研究生: |
雷達莉 Lestari Mahastuti |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
華語學習者詞彙廣度與深度知識測試的設計 Test Design of Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge for Chinese Learners |
指導教授: |
蕭惠貞
Hsiao, Hui-Chen |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
華語文教學系 Department of Chinese as a Second Language |
論文出版年: | 2016 |
畢業學年度: | 105 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 171 |
中文關鍵詞: | 詞彙知識 、詞彙廣度 、詞彙深度 、語言測試設計 |
英文關鍵詞: | Vocabulary Knowledge, Breadth of Vocabulary, Depth of Vocabulary, Language Test Design |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202203210 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:208 下載:11 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在詞彙知識研究的領域中,無論在詞彙知識本身的研究還是在詞彙知識與語言綜合能力相關性的研究,至今仍以針對英語學習者的詞彙知識居多,而且相關研究通常會採取由專家設計的標準化詞彙知識測試工具(Qian, 2000,2002;白麗梅、陳艷玲,2005;李曉,2007;王申,2010;王子穎,2014)。由於缺乏標準化的詞彙知識測試工具,華語詞彙知識研究的發展也因此落後於英語相關研究。有鑑於此,本研究以英語詞彙知識測試工具為參考基準,試圖設計華語詞彙知識的測試工具,以填補華語詞彙知識研究中的一個空缺。
本研究以屬於《現代漢語語料庫詞頻統計》4000詞頻帶的詞彙為選詞範圍,參考英語Vocabulary Level Test (VLT)以及Word Associates Test (WAT)的測試形式,設計華語詞彙廣度、深度知識的測試工具。除了具有高信度與效度之外,測試工具的特點還包括:能準確(95%信賴水準)地估計學習者的詞彙量、區分四個不同程度學習者的詞彙知識、減低學習者成功隨機猜測的機率、描述詞彙廣度與深度知識的關聯性與測量各地學習者的詞彙知識。
整體而言,本研究得出以下發現:(一)華語詞彙廣度、深度知識間具有高正相關(r = 0.952),而且廣度對深度知識也具有高預測力(90.6%);(二)詞彙知識對閱讀能力具有相當高的正相關(廣度、深度知識與閱讀能力的相關係數分別為0.591與0.614)以及一定程度的預測力(雖然廣度知識僅使得預測力增強0.3%,但深度知識的預測力已達到37.7%)。因此,可以透過提升華語學習者的詞彙深度知識達到加強他們閱讀能力的目標,而提升詞彙深度知識必須從習得大量新詞彙做起,也顯示詞彙為語言核心成分的重要性。
So far, most previous studies of vocabulary knowledge have primarily focused on English learners’ vocabulary knowledge, with standardized English vocabulary knowledge test instruments employed as main research tools (Qian, 2000, 2002; Bai & Chen, 2005; Li, 2007; Wang, 2010; Wang, 2014). Meanwhile, the lack of standardized vocabulary knowledge test remains as one problem that lead to the falling behind of Chinese vocabulary knowledge research. In view of this, present study aims to fill the gap by designing test of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge for Chinese learners.
The test design is based on English Vocabulary Level Test (VLT) and Word Associates Test (WAT), with target words selected from 4000 word band of “Xiandai hanyu yuliao ku ci pin tongji [Word Frequency Statistics of Modern Chinese Corpus]”. Besides of its high reliability and validity, the instrument also able to accurately (95% confidence level) estimate vocabulary size, distinguish four different proficiency levels, reduce the probability of successful random guessing, describe the correlation between breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge, and measure vocabulary knowledge of Chinese learners from various regions.
Overall, results of this study are: (1) Chinese breadth of vocabulary knowledge showed a high positive correlation (r = 0.952) with depth of vocabulary knowledge, while also significantly contributed to the prediction (90.6%) of depth knowledge; (2) Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge showed a moderate positive correlation (with coefficient of 0.591 and 0.614 respectively) with reading comprehension, while also fairly contributed to the prediction of reading comprehension. Though breadth knowledge’s contribution of 0.3% additional explained variance was insignificant, depth knowledge already accounted for 37.7% variance in reading comprehension. Therefore, to achieve the goal of strengthening Chinese learners’ reading comprehension, an effort should be put forth to improve their depth of vocabulary knowledge, something that should begin with expanding their vocabulary size, hence indicates the importance of vocabulary as a core component of language.
王子穎 (2014)。詞彙量測試對語言水平的預測性的實證研究。外語教學理論與實踐,2,71-96。
王文科、王智弘 (2014)。教育研究法。台北:五南。
王申 (2010)。詞彙廣度與深度對英語專業學生閱讀的影響。雲南農業大學學報,4 (2),59-62。
白麗梅、陳艷玲 (2005)。英語詞彙知識的廣度和深度在閱讀理解中的作用。河西學院學報,21 (4),53-56。
李俊 (2003)。論詞彙的深度和廣度與閱讀理解的關係。外語教學,24 (2),21-24。
李曉 (2007)。詞彙量、詞彙深度知識與語言綜合能力關係研究。外語教學與研究,39 (5),352-359。
何志紅 (2013)。基於數學模型分析的漢語詞彙深度研究。湖南大學中國語言文學學院碩士論文,為出版,長沙。
呂長竑 (2004)。詞彙量與語言綜合能力、詞彙深度知識之關係。外語教學與研究,36 (2),116-124。
邵華 (2002)。普通高師院校學生大學英語四級階段詞彙水平實證研究。外語教學與研究,34 (6),421-425。
周大軍、文渤燕、陳莉、李春榮 (1999)。大學英語學生4階段詞彙量狀況調查。外語與外語教學,12,34-36。
周大軍、文渤燕 (2000)。理工科學生英語詞彙量狀況全程調查。外語教學與研究,32 (5),356-400。
桂詩春 (1985)。我國英語專業學生詞彙量的調查與分析。現代外語,1,1-6。
張和生 (2006)。外國學生漢語詞彙學習狀況計量研究。世界漢語教學,1,70-77。
張郁雯 (2003)。詞彙分級研究。載於柯華葳 (主編),華語文能力測試編製:研究與實務 (頁83-102)。台北:遠流出版社。
張莉萍 (2007,7月)。華語文能力測試 (TOP-Huayu) 發展現狀。論文發表於國立政治大學舉辦之「外語能力測試之動向與展望」國際學術研討會,台北。
張莉萍 (2012)。對應於歐洲共同架構的華語詞彙量。華語文教學研究,9 (2),77-96。
崔艷嫣、王同順 (2006)。接受性詞彙量、產出性詞彙量與詞彙深度知識的發展路徑及其相關性研究。現代外語,29 (4),392-438。
辜玉旻、陳咏馨、林千惠、張菀真 (2012)。重新思考詞彙知識在國小低年級學童閱讀理解中的角色。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告 (NSC100-2420-H-008-001-)。桃園市:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
黃強 (2002)。高年級英語學生詞彙搭配習得的實證性研究。解放軍外國語學院學報,25 (4),73-77。
葉德明 (1997)。華語文常用詞彙頻率等級統整研究。華文世界,85,14-21。
楊希貴 (2009)。中級階段如何擴大留學生的詞彙量。華中師範大學研究生學報,16 (3),83-87。
鄭昭明 (1997)。華語水平考試的定位、編製及「字彙」與「詞彙」使用的問題。華文世界,85,42-47。
鄧昭春 (2001)。英語詞彙量調查問題探討。外語教學與研究,33 (1),57-62。
劉紹龍 (2001)。論二語詞彙深度習得及發展特徵。外語教學與研究,33 (6),436-480。
錢旭菁 (2002)。詞彙量測試研究初探。世界漢語教學,4,54-62。
蘇向麗、李如龍 (2011)。詞價研究與漢語詞彙知識的深度習得。語言文學應用,2,63-70。
Bachman, L.F., & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice: Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardakçi, M. (2016). Breadth and Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and Their Effects on L2 Vocabulary Profiles. English Language Teaching, 9 (4),239-250.
Barrow, J., Nakanishi, Y., & Ishino, H. (1999). Assessing Japanese college students’ vocabulary knowledge with a self-checking familiarity survey. System, 27 (2), 223-247.
Beglar, D. (2010). A Rasch-based validation of the Vocabulary Size Test. Language Testing, 27 (1), 101-118.
Bruton, A. (2009). The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale: A Critical Analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6, 288-297.
Cronbach, L. J. (1942). An Analysis of Techniques for Diagnostic Vocabulary Testing. Journal of Educational Research, 36, 206-217.
Dolch, E. W., & Leeds D. (1953). Vocabulary Tests and Depth of Meaning. Journal of Educational Research, 47, 181-189.
Farr, R., & Carey, R.F. (1986). Reading: What can be measured. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Henrikson, B. (1999). Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 303-317.
Koda, K. (1989). The Effects of Transferred Vocabulary Knowledge on the Development of L2 Reading Proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22 (6), 527-612.
Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing Vocabulary Knowledge: Size, Strength, and Computer Adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399-436.
Li, M., & Kirby, J. R. (2015). The Effects of Vocabulary Breadth and Depth on English Reading. Applied Linguistics, 36 (5), 611-634.
Meara, P. (1992). EFL Vocabulary Tests. University College Swansea: Centre for Applied Language Studies.
Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. In G. Brown, K. Malmkjaer, & J. Williams (Eds.), Performance and competence in second language acquisition (pp. 35-53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milton, J. (2006). X-Lex: The Swansea Vocabulary Levels Test. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, & D. Lloyd (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th and 8th Current Trends in English Language Testing (CTELT) Conference, Vol. 4 (pp. 29-39). UAE: TESOL Arabia.
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31 (7), 9-13.
Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nurweni, A., & Read J. (1999). The English Vocabulary Knowledge of Indonesian University Students. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 161-175.
Wesche, M.B., & Paribakht, T.S. (1996). Assessing Second Language Vocabulary Knowledge: Depth Versus Breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (1), 13-40.
Paribakht, T.S., & Wesche, M.B. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. In Coady & Huckin (Eds.), Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 174-200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pignot-Shahov, V. (2012). Measuring L2 Receptive and Productive Vocabulary Knowledge. Language Studies Working Papers, 4, 37-45.
Qian, D.D. (2000). Assessing the Roles of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in Reading Comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56 (2),282-308.
Qian, D.D. (2002). Investigating the Relationship Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Academic Reading Performance: An Assessment Perspective. Language Learning, 52 (3), 513-536.
Qian, D.D., & Schedl M. (2004). Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for assessing reading performance. Language Testing, 21 (1), 28-52.
Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10, 355-371.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, B.J., Malvern, D.D., & Graham, S. (2008). Word frequency and trends in the development of French vocabulary in lower-intermediate students during Year 12 in English schools. Language Learning Journal, 36 (2), 199-214.
Richards, J.C. (1976). The Role of Vocabulary Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 77-89.
Ruan, X.J. (2013). A study on correlation between the non-native Chinese learners’ vocabulary knowledge and their reading comprehension ability. Unpublished master thesis, Hunan University, Changsha.
Schmitt, N., & Meara, P. (1997). Researching Vocabulary Through a Word Knowledge Framework: Word Associations and Verbal Suffixes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 17-36.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behavior of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18 (1), 55-88.
Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C. J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24 (1), 99-128.
Wolter, B. (2001). Comparing The L1 and L2 Mental Lexicon a Depth of Individual Word Knowledge Model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 41-69.