本研究目的在於發展教室即時評量行動載具軟體，輔助老師在課堂即時形成性評量活動的進行，並評估學生的學習成效。
經由研究一、研究二在大同高中一位英文老師與授課兩班高一英文課程的實驗研究觀察，透過實驗觀察分析、實驗問題分析、實驗數據分析和實驗軟體改進分析，結果顯示，本研究達到了以下三個目標：
1. 本研究所開發的軟體能協助教師輕易地進行課堂上的即時形成性評量活動，並提供可穩定支援40人進行評量活動的無線網路傳輸機制與無虞的軟硬體設定模式。
2. 即時性評量軟體搭配平版電腦PDA長時間融入課堂中使用後，實驗組與控制組在英文學習成就上的差異逐漸縮小。另外，實驗組的學習成就比控制組呈現出更穩定的成長。
3. 本研究說明了行動載具設備和無線網路環境在實際教學中使用優點和限制。

The purposes of this study were to develop a wireless formative assessment software to help teacher conduct formative assessment in the classroom, and to evaluate the learning effects of students.
One junior high school English teacher and two classes participate the evaluation experiment. Through the observations and analyses of experiment process, experiment problems ,experiment data and software analysis, has arrived three objectives:
1. The formative assessment software in this study assist teacher to conduct formative assessment in the classroom, and could offer a wireless environment to support 40 students using wireless network smoothly. A stable software/hardware wireless structure supporting classroom formative assessment has been established.
2. After a long-term evaluation using the formative assessment software with Tablet PC and PDA, the difference of English learning performance between the experimental and control groups were reduced. Furthermore, the increase of achievement of experimental group was more stable then the control group.
3. We explored and documented the benefits and costs of using mobile and wireless devices in teaching activities in a classroom.

郭生玉(民85)。當前學校教學評量工作的檢討與改進。載於黃政傑主編：教學評量(pp157-164)。台北：師大書苑。
蔡振昆(民89)。傳統教學與網路教學之比較研究-從教學媒體、班級經營及教學評量來探討。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所研究所碩士論文。
趙育玄(2001)：PDA在科技教育上的應用。生活科技教育期刊，34（10），頁33-39。
黃智偉(2001)。使用EduClick當作遠端遙控互動評量系統。國立中央大學資訊工程研究所碩士論文。
Abrahamson, L. A., Hantline, F., Fabert, M., Robson, M., & Knapp, R. (1989). Electronic classroom system enabling interactive self-paced learning [patent #5002491]. Patent and Trademark Office, United States of America, Washington, DC.
Anderson, R. S. (1998). Why talk about different ways to grades? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 74, pp.5-14.
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education, 5, pp. 7-75.
Curtis, M., Luchini, K., Bobrowsky, W., Quintana, C. and Soloway, E. (2002). Handheld use in K-12: A descriptive account. In proceedings of the IEEE workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C.(pp.23-30).
Davis, S. (2003). Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 3, 298-307.
Dempsey, J. V., Driscoll, M. P., & Swindell, L. K. (1993). Text-based feedback. In J. V. Dempsey, & G. C. Sales(Eds), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 21-54). NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Ding, L. (1998). Revisiting assessment and learning: implications of students’ perspectives on assessment feedback.Paper presented in Scottish Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee, 25–26 September.
Dufresne, R .J., Gerace, W .J., Leonard, W .J., Mestre, J .P. & Wenk, L. (1996). Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3–47.
Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A hndbook for educators, NY:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Higgins, R.A., Hartley, P., & Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer:Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning . Studies in Higher Education 27(1).90-100
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment, in P. Hyland & A. Booth (Eds.), The practice of university history teaching .Manchester, Manchester University Press.
Jean, S. & Amy, P. (2002), A report card on handheld computing. Technology & Learning, 22(7), 24-36.
Kate, C., & Carolyn, S. (1999). A computer in the palm of their hands. [Online] Available: http://www.concord.org/newsletter/1999fall/palm-computer.html
Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1996). Educational Testing and management (5th ed.). NY: HarperCollins.
Luchini, K., & Quintana, C., & Soloway, E. (2003). Designing applications for handheld devices: Pocket PiCoMap: A case study in designing and assessing a handheld concept mapping tool for learners. Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems, (pp.321-328).
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. NJ:Prentice Hall.
Owens, D., Demana, F., & Abrahamson, L. (2002). Developing pedagogy for wireless calculator networks and researching teacher professional development. Columbus, OH:State University Research Foundation.
Roschelle J. (2003) .Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, 260-272
Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2001). Log on education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.
Liu, T. C., Wang, H.Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003).Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3),371-382. (SSCI)
Vahey, H. & Crawford, C. (2002). PalmTM education pioneers program: Final evaluation report. [Online] Available: http://www.palmgrants.sri.com/news.html