簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 簡立雯
Chien, Li-wen
論文名稱: 中文遞歸領屬「的」之第一語言習得
First Language Acquisition of the Recursive Possessive Marker de in Mandarin Chinese
指導教授: 陳純音
Chen, Chun-Yin doris
口試委員: 陳俊光
Chen, Jyun-gwang
范瑞玲
Fahn, Rueih-lirng
陳純音
Chen, Chun-yin Doris
口試日期: 2023/01/18
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 中文遞歸領屬符號「的」第一語言習得遞歸領屬
英文關鍵詞: Mandarin Chinese, de marker, First Language Acquisition, Recursive Possessive
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202300347
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:66下載:16
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討以中文為母語的兒童對中文遞歸領屬『的』之第一語言習得。主要包括四個面向:兒童對多層遞歸領屬的可行性,理解及產出多層『的』的表現程度,可能產出其它同質多層遞歸領屬的表達方式,以及年齡因素。本研究包含兩個測驗,一為真實價值判斷的理解測驗,另一為問答產出測驗。研究對象包含實驗組的四十八位幼稚園兒童,年齡層為三歲,四歲及五歲,並以此三個年齡分為三組,每組十六人,以及對照組的十六位成人。
    研究結果顯示,遞歸領屬的階層對母語為中文的三歲和四歲兒童無差異的重要性,但對五歲兒童而言,不同階層的遞歸領屬是有其意義的。在理解能力及產出測驗方面,所有參與者在理解測驗的表現均明顯優於產出測驗,但針對產出測驗卻僅有五歲兒童得以有所表現,而且就其現階段的語言能力也僅單層遞歸領屬通過測驗。另外,在測試中以其他方式表達同義於遞歸領屬的產出中我們發現,三歲兒童最多以手指著答案(肢體語言)作答,四歲兒童以不同類型短語回覆,五歲兒童最多則是遺漏一個階層的主語或目標符號『的』為最常使用。最後,年齡是兒童習得多層中文遞歸領屬『的』之重要關鍵因素,三歲及四歲兒童則僅在理解階段,但尚無法適切地表達即使是單層的遞歸領屬,反觀五歲兒童則不僅可表現出和成人一樣的理解程度,並可以產出單層的遞歸領屬語句回覆問題。

    The present study is aimed at investigating how Mandarin-speaking children acquire the recursive possessive marker de in four aspects: the feasibilities of RP levels, the degree of performance in cognition and competence, the age of availability and the variety of possible feedback. Two tasks – comprehension and production were conducted in a truth-value judgement for the former and a question-and-answer task for the latter. The participants were 48 preschoolers in a kindergarten in Taiwan at the age range from three to five. They were divided into three groups by their ages. Furthermore, 16 adults were recruited randomly in the campus of NTNU.
    The investigation results showed that RP levels were only significant to 5-year-old Mandarin-speaking children, but not the 3- and 4-year-olds. As for the task effects, the comprehension task was obviously easier than production for all the subjects, which showed that all the subjects were without difficulty in comprehension with no significance. However, it was exclusively significant for the five-year-old in the production task. With regard to the diverse responses to multiple levels of RPs, it was revealed that most kinesics for the youngest, variant insertions of phrases for the four-year-old and omission for the five-year-old ones. Finally, the task results demonstrated that age effects were a critical effect for younger children to adopt RPs, which suggested that 3- and 4-year-old Mandarin-speaking children were only available for multiple levels of RP in comprehension but not production, while the five-year-old presented adult-like comprehension and availability to produce Level 1 RP.

    Acknowledgement ……………………………….……….………..…………..……………. i Chinese Abstract …………………………………………………..………………………..iii English Abstract ……………………………...………………..………………….………...iv Table of Contents……….……………………………………...……………..………………v List of Tables……………….………………………………………………..……….………ix List of Figures……………………………………………………………...…...……............xi List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………......................xii Chapter One Introduction………………………………………………………1 1.1 Motivation………………………………………………………………………1 1.2 Research Questions……………………………………………………………4 1.3 Significance of the Study……………………………………………………...5 1.4 Organization of the Thesis…………………………………………………6 Chapter Two Literature Review…………………………………………………7 2.1 Internal Structures of Recursive Possessives……………………………7 2.1.1 Crain (1991)………………………………………………………………7 2.1.2 Roeper (2011)……………………………………………………………10 2.1.3 Interim Summary…………………………………………………………13 2.2 Theoretical Studies of Mandarin Possessives……………………………..14 2.2.1 Teng (1974)…………………………………………………………………14 2.2.2 Partee (2006)………………………………………………………………16 2.2.3 Niu (2015)……………………………………………………………………18 2.2.4 Interim Summary…………………………………………………………….22 2.3 Empirical Studies of First Language Acquisition of Recursive Possessives…22 2.3.1 Shi and Zhou (2018)………………………………….………………………22 2.3.2 Giblin et al. (2019)………………………………….………………………..25 2.3.3 Li et al. (2020)…………………………………….……………………….....28 2.3.4 Li et al. (2021)……………….……………………….………………………32 2.3.5 Interim Summary…………………………………………………………….35 2.4 Summary of Chapter Two……………………………………….……………….…...37 Chapter Three Research Design……………………………………………………………39 3.1 Participants…………………………………………………….……………………..39 3.2 Materials and Methods……………………………………………………………….43 3.2.1 Comprehension Task: Truth Value Judgment (TVJ) task…….………….…..43 3.2.2 Production Task: Question and Answer task………………….……………..44 3.3 Procedure……………………………………………………………………………..46 3.3.1 Pilot Study…………………………………………………………………...46 3.3.2 Formal Study………………………………………………………………...48 3.3.3 Scoring………………………………………………………...…….……….49 3.4 Summary of Chapter Three………………………………..……………………….....50 Chapter Four Results and Discussion……………………………………………………...51 4.1 Recursive Levels ……………………………………………………………………..51 4.1.1 Overall Findings ……………………………………………………………..52 4.1.2 General Discussion ………………………………………………………….54 4.2 Task Effect …………………………………………………………………………...56 4.2.1 Overall Findings ……………………………………………………………..57 4.2.2 General Discussion ………………………………………………………….62 4.3 Error Analysis ………………………………………….…………………………….65 4.3.1 Overall Findings ……………………………………………………………..65 4.3.2 General Discussion ………………………………………………………….71 4.4 Age Effect ……………………………………………………………………………72 4.4.1 Overall Findings ……………………………………………………………..72 4.4.2 General Discussion ………………………………………………………….74 4.5 Summary of Chapter Four………………………………………………………..77 Chapter Five Conclusion……………………………………………………………………78 5.1 Summary of the Major Findings …………………………..................…………….78 5.2 Limitations of the Present Study and Suggestions for Future Research ………………79 References………………………………………………...…………………………………81 Appendix A Test Items used in the TVJ Task………………..……………………….…...85 Appendix B Test Items used in the Q&A Task……………………………………….…..89 Appendix C Results for the Pilot Study……………………………………………………93 Appendix D 同意書…………….………………….............…………..……………..……...95

    Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2013. Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic perspective. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Possession and ownership: A cross-linguistic
    Borner, H. & Wexler, K. 1987. The maturation of syntax. In: Parameter setting, ed. T. Roeper & E. Williams. D. Reidel. [aSC]
    Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
    Chaudron, C. 1983c. Research on metalinguistic judgments: a review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning 33: 343-377
    Clark, Eve V., & Barbara F. Hecht. 1982. Learning to coin agent and instrument nouns. Cognition 12, 1-24.
    Clark, Eve V., & Joise Bernicot. 2008. Repetition as ratification: How parents and children place information in common ground. Journal of Child Language 35, 349-371
    Clark, Eve V. 2016. First Language Acquisition, Third Edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
    Chappell, H. 1996. Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse. In H. Chappell & W. McGregor (eds.). The Grammar of Inalienability. A Typological Perspective On Body Part Terms and the Part-whole Relation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Corder, S. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press
    Crain, S. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14: 597-612
    Crain, S., L. Koring & Rosalind Thornton. 2017. Language acquisition from a biolinguistic perspective [J]. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 81:120-149.
    Deal, Amy Rose. 2012. Nominal possessives: themes and puzzles. Handout of the syntactic seminar “Possession: Nominal and Clause” in UCSC.
    Demuth, Katherine. 1989. Maturation and the acquisition of the Sesotho passive. Language 65, 56-80.
    De Villiers, Jill, Thomas Roeper & Anne Vainikka. 1990. The acquisition of long-distance rules. In L. Frazier & J. de Villiers (Eds.), Language processing and language acquisition (pp.257-297). Dordrecht: Springer.
    Fraser, B., E. Rintell & J. Walters. 1980. An approach to conducting research on the acquisition of pragmatic competence in a second language. In Larsen-Freeman, D (ed.) Discourse analysis in second language research. Newbury House, Rowley, Mass.
    Flynn, Valerie, & E. F. Masur. 2007. Characteristics of maternal verbal style: Responsiveness and directiveness in two natural contexts. Journal of Child Language 34, 519-543.
    Fujimori, Chikako. 2010. Acquisition of recursive possessives in Japanese. Unpublished
    manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
    Gentile, Sarah. 2003. On the Acquisition of left-branching recursive possessives (MA thesis). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, USA
    Giblin, Iain, Peng Zhou, Cory Bill, Jiawei Shi, & Stephen Crain. 2019. The Spontaneous
    eMERGEnce of Recursion in Child Language. In Megan M. Brown & Brady Dailey
    (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Boston University Conference on Language
    Development (pp. 270-285). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
    Hamburger, H. & S. Crain. 1984. Acquisition of cognitive compiling. Cognition 17:85-136. [aSC]
    Hauser, Marc D., N. Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298 (5598), 1569-1579.
    Hendrilks, Petra & Charlotte Koster. 2010. Production/comprehension asymmetries in
    language acquisition. Introduction to special issue on asymmetries in language. acquisition. Lingua 120:8, 1887-1897.
    Hiraga, Misato. 2010. Acquisition of recursive verbal compound nouns. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Conference of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Sprachwissenschaft (DGfS), Humboldt University, Berlin (24 February 2010).
    Hornstein, N., & D. Lightfoot. 1981. Introduction. In: Explanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition, ed. N. Hornstein & D. Lightfoot. Longman. [aSC]
    Huang, C. T. James, Y. H. Audrey Li, And Yafei Li. 2009 The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1st edition.
    Huybregts, M. A. C. 2019. Infinite generation of language unreachable from a stepwise approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:425. Doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00425
    Larsen-Freeman, D., and M. Long. 1991. An introduction to second Language acquisition research. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York.
    Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Li, D., X. Yang, T. Roeper, M. Wilson, R. Yin, J. Kim, E. Merritt, D. Lopez, A. Tero. 2020. Acquisition of Recursion in Child Mandarin. In: Brow, M. M., Kohut, A. (Eds.) BUCLD 44: Proceedings of the 44th annual Boston university conference on language development. Cascadilla Press, Somerville.
    Li, Grohe, Schulz & C. Yang. 2021. Proceedings of the 45th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, ed.
    Limbach, Maxi, & Dany Adone. 2010. Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. In K. Franich, K. M. Iserman, & L. L. Keil (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 281-290). Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
    MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES project. Earlbaum.
    Mankiw, N. Gregory. 2015. Principles of Economics. Cengange Learning.
    Martins, M. D., & W. T. Fitch. 2014. Investigating recursion within a domain-specific framework. In: Lowenthal, F., Lefebvre, L. (Eds.), Language and Recursion. Springer, Berlin.
    Matthei, Edward H. 1982. The acquisition of prenominal modifier sequences. Cognition 11: 301-332.
    Niu, F. 2015 Nominal Possession in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral Dissertation, Queen Mary University of London
    Oshima-Takane, Y. 1993 Why do children make nominal reference? Poster presented at the bien-nial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. New Orleans, March.
    Partee, B. H. 2006. A note on Mandarin possessives, demonstratives, and definiteness. Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: 263-280. ed. by Birner B. J., Ward G. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Bejar & Diane Massam. 2012. Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition, 19(4), 301-311.
    Piaget, Jean. 1964. Part I: Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of research in science teaching 2(3): 176-186.
    Radford, A. 1990. Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Blackwell. [aSC]
    Reichardt, C., & T. Cook. 1979 Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In Cook, T and Reichardt, C (eds.) Qualitative and quantitative methods in education research. Saga Publication, Beverly Hills.
    Roeper, T. W. 1972. Approaches to a theory of language acquisition with examples from German children. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Harvard University. [aSC]
    Roeper, T. 2007. The Prism of Grammar: How Child Language Illuminates Humanism [M]. Cambridge, MA.:The MIT Press.
    Roeper, T. 2011. The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5 (1-2), 057-086.
    Shi, J., & Peng Zhou. 2018. How possessive Relations are Mapped onto Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 47, 1321-1341.
    Shi, J., P. Zhou, I. Giblin, & S. Crain. 2019. Recursive Possessive constructions in child language. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 51 (03), 323-333, 479.
    Tavakolian, Susan. 1981. The conjoined-clause analysis of relative clauses. In Susan Tavakolian (ed.), Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, 167-187. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Teng, Shou-hsin. 1974. Double nominative in Chinese. University of California dissertation 50:455-472
    Terunuman, Akiko, Miwa Isobe, Motoki Nakajima, Reiko Okabe, Inada, Shunichiro Inada, Sakumi Inokuma & Terue Nakato. 2017. Acquisition of recursive possessives and locatives within DPs in Japanese. In Maria LaMendola & Jennifer Scott (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 626-636). Somerville: Cascadilla Press
    Yang, Cai-mei. 2014. “Wei digui jiashuo” ji qi zhengju – yi xiang jiyu ertong nei digui nengli
    fazhan guilu de shiyan yanjiu. The Pedagogy and Research of Foreign Language
    (6):817-829.
    Xu, Li-yu. 2013. A Semantic, syntax, and discourse analysis of the Chinese structural particle
    de with pedagogical applications. MA thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE