簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 柯思勤
Ke, Sih-Cin
論文名稱: 以語料庫為本的研究—探討 Coursera 大規模開放式線上課程的字彙涵蓋量
A Corpus-based Study on the Lexical Coverage of Coursera MOOCs
指導教授: 陳浩然
Chen, Hao-Jan
口試委員: 林至誠
Lin, Chih-Cheng
高照明
Gao, Zhao-Ming
陳浩然
Chen, Hao-Jan
口試日期: 2022/05/25
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 110
中文關鍵詞: 詞彙覆蓋率大規模開放式線上課程學術口語單字學術英語
英文關鍵詞: lexical coverage, MOOCs, academic spoken vocabulary, English for academic purposes (EAP)
研究方法: 實驗設計法
DOI URL: http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200502
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:176下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 文獻指出以英語做為外語學習者在接觸學術英文聽力(如大規模開放式線上課程)時,常面臨的一項挑戰是單字量不足,除此之外,對於專業單字不熟悉也是影響學術聽力理解的原因之一。因此,本研究旨在透過(a)計算 Coursera大規模開放式線上課程的詞彙覆蓋率與(b)計算學術口語詞彙表對於 Coursera 大規模開放式線上課程的詞彙覆蓋率,探討理解 Coursera 大規模開放式線上課程所需的單字量,以及其學術口語單字檔案。
    研究結果顯示要達到 95%的詞彙覆蓋率,需要 3,000 個字彙量加上專有名詞、邊際詞彙、複合字以及首字母縮略字;而要達到 98%的詞彙覆蓋率,則需6,000 個字彙加上專有名詞、邊際詞彙、複合字以及首字母縮略字,然而,不同領域所需的單字量有所不同。至於學術口語詞彙的整體覆蓋率,學術口語詞彙表(Dang, Coxhead, & Webb, 2017)覆蓋了 90.77% 的 Coursera MOOCs 語料庫,然而,ASWL 在各領域的覆蓋率並不相同。上述發現表明,以英語做為外語學習者需要掌握 3,000 到 6,000 個詞彙以及專有名詞、邊際詞彙、複合字和首字母縮略字,才能充分理解 Coursera 大規模開放式線上課程。研究結果還表明,學習學術口語詞彙表有助於學術聽力理解,因為學習者在聽 Coursera 大規模開放式線上課程時很可能會遇到學習學術口語詞彙表中的詞彙。根據以上的發現,本研究亦提出英語教學上之意義探討。

    Studies have found that the common challenge that EFL (English as Foreign Language) learners face when listening to authentic academic English materials, such as MOOCs, is a lack of vocabulary. Moreover, unfamiliar technical or specialized vocabulary can be a factor affecting their listening comprehension as well. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate the vocabulary size needed for adequate listening comprehension and to determine the academic vocabulary profiles of Coursera MOOCs by (a) measuring the lexical coverage of the Coursera MOOCs, and (b) determining the coverage of academic spoken vocabulary in Coursera MOOCs.
    The results show that, in general, it requires 3,000 vocabulary knowledge plus proper nouns (PN), marginal words(MW), transparent compounds(TC), and acronyms(AC) to reach 95% coverage of the Coursera MOOCs corpus; to reach 98% coverage, it requires 6,000 vocabulary knowledge plus PN, MW, TC, and AC. However, the vocabulary size needed for each discipline differs between fields. As for the coverage of academic spoken vocabulary overall, the Academic Spoken Word List (Dang, Coxhead, & Webb,2017) covered 90.77% of the Coursera MOOCs corpus. However, the ASWL coverage is not evenly distributed across fields. The above findings indicate that EFL learners need to acquire 3,000 to 6,000 vocabulary plus PN, MW, TC, and AC to have adequate comprehension of the Coursera MOOCs. The findings also suggest that studying Academic spoken Word List is beneficial for academic listening comprehension because it is highly likely that learners encounter the ASWL vocabulary when listening to Coursera MOOCs. Pedagogical implications have been discussed based on the findings.

    摘要 I Abstract III Acknowledgements V CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background of the Study 1 1.2 Purposes and Significance of the Study 6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 9 2.1 Challenges of Comprehending Authentic English Input 9 2.1.1 Challenges of Comprehending Reading Materials 10 2.1.2 Challenges of Comprehending Listening Materials 12 2.2 Vocabulary Size Necessary for Adequate Comprehension 15 2.2.1 Language Threshold For Adequate Comprehension 16 2.2.2 Lexical Coverage and Reading Comprehension 18 2.2.3 Lexical Coverage and Listening Comprehension 21 2.3 Summary of Chapter Two 31 2.4 Research Question 32 CHAPTER THREE METHOD 34 3.1 Materials 34 3.1.1 The Coursera Corpus 34 3.1.2 Word lists 39 3.2 Instrument 43 3.3 Procedure 44 3.3.1 Corpus Creation 44 3.3.2 Data Analysis 46 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 48 4.1 Vocabulary Size Necessary for Adequate Comprehension 48 4.1.1 BNC/COCA List Representation in the Overall Coursera MOOCs Corpus 48 4.1.2 BNC/COCA List Representation in Each Field and Sub-field of the Coursera MOOCs Corpus 51 4.2 The Academic Spoken Vocabulary Profiles 59 4.2.1 ASWL Representation in the Overall Coursera MOOCs Corpus 59 4.2.2 ASWL Representation in Each Field and Sub-field of the Coursera MOOCs Corpus 60 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 68 5.1 Summary of Findings 68 5.2 Discussion on Research Findings 70 5.2.1 The Vocabulary Size Necessary for the Overall Coursera MOOCs Corpus 70 5.2.2 The Vocabulary Size Necessary for Each Field and Sub-field of the Coursera MOOCs Corpus 73 5.2.3 The Academic Spoken Vocabulary Profiles of the Overall Coursera MOOCs Corpus 81 5.2.4 The Academic Spoken Vocabulary Profiles of Each Field and Sub-field of the Coursera MOOCs Corpus 84 5.3 Limitations of the Study 85 5.4 Pedagogical Implications 87 REFERENCE 90 Appendix A 96

    Adolphs, S., & Schmitt, N. (2003). Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied linguistics, 24(4), 425-438.
    Adolphs, S. (2004). Vocabulary coverage according to spoken. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing, 10, 39.
    Ai-hua, C. (2013). EFL listeners' strategy development and listening problems: A process-based study. Journal of Asia TEFL, 10(3).
    Al-Jarrah, H., & Ismail, N. S. B. (2018). Reading comprehension difficulties among EFL learners in higher learning institutions. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(7), 32-41.
    Al-Mansour, N. S. (2011). The effect of teacher’s storytelling aloud on the reading comprehension of Saudi elementary stage students. Journal of King Saud University-Languages and Translation, 23(2), 69-76.
    Al Nooh, A. (2013). The Effectiveness of Reading Techniques Used in a Saudi Arabian Secondary School Classroom as Perceived by Students and Teachers: A Study of Methods Used in Teaching English and their Effectiveness. Arab World English Journal, 4(3).
    Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher education studies, 10(3), 16-25.
    Anthony, L. (2021). AntWordProfiler (Version 1.5.1) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
    Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
    Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers (Vol. 23). John Benjamins Publishing.
    Bowler, B., & Parminter, S. (2002). Mixed-level teaching: Tiered tasks and bias tasks. Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, 59-64.
    Carter Jr, R. A., Rice, M., Yang, S., & Jackson, H. A. (2020). Self-regulated learning in online learning environments: strategies for remote learning. Information and Learning Sciences.
    Chawwang, N. (2008). An investigation of English reading problems of Thai 12th Grade Students in Nakhonratchasima Educational Regions 1, 2, 3 and 7. Unpublished master’s thesis, Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
    Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2003). Technical vocabulary in specialised texts.
    Cobb, T. (2004). The online corpus builder. In.
    Cobb, T., & Horst, M. (2004). Is there room for an academic word list in French. Vocabulary in a second language, 23, 15-38.
    Cojocariu, V.-M., Lazar, I., Nedeff, V., & Lazar, G. (2014). SWOT anlysis of e-learning educational services from the perspective of their beneficiaries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1999-2003.
    Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
    Csomay, E. (2006). Academic talk in American university classrooms: crossing the boundaries of oral‐literate discourse? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 117-135.
    Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The academic spoken word list. Language Learning, 67(4), 959-997.
    Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66-76.
    Dennis, D. V. (2008). Are assessment data really driving middle school reading instruction? What we can learn from one student's experience. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(7), 578-587.
    Engle, D., Mankoff, C., & Carbrey, J. (2015). Coursera’s introductory human physiology course: Factors that characterize successful completion of a MOOC. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2), 46-68.
    Evans, S., & Morrison, B. (2011). The first term at university: Implications for EAP. ELT journal, 65(4), 387-397.
    Ferris, D., & Tagg, T. (1996). Academic listening/speaking tasks for ESL students: Problems, suggestions, and implications. TESOL quarterly, 30(2), 297-320.
    Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 305-327.
    Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
    Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165-182.
    Gunning, T. G. (1998). Assessing and correcting reading and writing difficulties. ERIC.
    Harris, T. (2003). Listening with your eyes: The importance of speech‐related gestures in the language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 36(2), 180-187.
    Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners' perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153.
    Heatley, A., Nation, P., & Coxhead, A. (1994). Range. Victoria University of Wellington, NZ.[Computer program, available at http://www. vuw. ac. nz/lals/.].
    Hendry, C., & Ruivivar, J. (2019). MOOCs as environments for learning spoken academic vocabulary. CALL and complexity, 180.
    Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review, 12, 45-58.
    Hsueh-Chao, M. H., & Nation, P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension.
    Hudson, T. (2009). Teaching second language reading. In: Oxford University Press.
    Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2003). The new science of learning: Active learning, metacognition, and transfer of knowledge in e-learning applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 325-334.
    Hyland, K., & Shaw, P. (2016). The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes. Routledge.
    Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL quarterly, 41(2), 235-253.
    Johnson, G. M. (2006). Synchronous and asynchronous text-based CMC in educational contexts: A review of recent research. TechTrends, 50(4), 46-53.
    Johnson, M. D., Acevedo, A., & Mercado, L. (2016). Vocabulary knowledge and vocabulary use in second language writing. TESOL Journal, 7(3), 700-715.
    Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 2003(100), 31-43.
    Kelly, P. (1991). Lexical ignorance: The main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29(2), 135-149.
    Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.
    Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Addison-Wesley Longman Limited.
    Kuyath, S. J. (2008). The social presence of instant messaging: Effects on student satisfaction, perceived learning, and performance in distance education The University of North Carolina at Charlotte].
    Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension.
    Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2016). A new medical academic word list: A corpus-based study with enhanced methodology. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 42-53.
    Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in higher education, 6(3), 333-349.
    Liu, C.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2019). Academic spoken vocabulary in TED talks: Implications for academic listening. English Teaching & Learning, 43(4), 353-368.
    Martinez, J. (2020). Take this pandemic moment to improve education. EduSource. In.
    McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).
    Meara, P. (1996). The dimensions of lexical competence. Performance and competence in second language acquisition, 35, 33-55.
    Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11(2), 323-348.
    Meier, A. (2015). L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through extensive listening to podcasts.
    Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65.
    Mohammed, Q., & Ab Rashid, R. (2019). The sources of reading comprehension difficulties among Saudi EFL learners. Trends in Social Sciences, 1(1), 7-16.
    Morse, K. (2003). Does one size fit all? Exploring asynchronous learning in a multicultural environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 37-55.
    Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian modern language review, 63(1), 59-82.
    Nation, I. (2017). The BNC/COCA Level 6 word family lists (Version 1.0. 0)[Data file]. In.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2016). Making and using word lists for language learning and testing. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Nguyen, C.-D. (2020). Lexical Features of Reading Passages in English-language Textbooks for Vietnamese High-school Students: Do they Foster both Content and Vocabulary Gain? RELC Journal, 0033688219895045.
    Nguyen, H. T. (2007). Educating Vietnamese American Students. Multicultural Education, 15(1), 23-26.
    Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge university press.
    Nurmukhamedov, U. (2017). Lexical coverage of TED Talks: Implications for vocabulary instruction. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 768-790.
    Nurmukhamedov, U., & Sharakhimov, S. (2021). Corpus-Based Vocabulary Analysis of English Podcasts. RELC Journal, 0033688220979315.
    Onah, D. F., Sinclair, J., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Dropout rates of massive open online courses: behavioural patterns. EDULEARN14 proceedings, 1, 5825-5834.
    Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536.
    Rahimirad, M., & Moini, M. R. (2015). The challenges of listening to academic lectures for EAP learners and the impact of metacognition on academic lecture listening comprehension. Sage Open, 5(2), 2158244015590609.
    Reilly, E. D., Williams, K. M., Stafford, R. E., Corliss, S. B., Walkow, J. C., & Kidwell, D. K. (2016). Global Times Call for Global Measures: Investigating Automated Essay Scoring in Linguistically-Diverse MOOCs. Online Learning, 20(2), 217-229.
    Sanchez-Gordon, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2014). MOOCs gone wild. Proceedings of the 8th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED 2014),
    Schwier, R., & Balbar, S. (2002). The interplay of content and community in synchronous and asynchronous communication: Virtual communication in a graduate seminar. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 28(2).
    Shah, D. (2018). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2015. Class central, 18.
    Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How many ways can we define online learning? A systematic literature review of definitions of online learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education, 33(4), 289-306.
    Stæhr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in second language acquisition, 31(4), 577-607.
    Tegge, F. (2017). The lexical coverage of popular songs in English language teaching. System, 67, 87-98.
    Vacca, R. T. (2002). Making a difference in adolescents’ school lives: Visible and invisible aspects of content area reading. What research has to say about reading instruction, 3, 184-204.
    Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied linguistics, 34(4), 457-479.
    Veletsianos, G., Collier, A., & Schneider, E. (2015). Digging deeper into learners' experiences in MOOC s: Participation in social networks outside of MOOC s, notetaking and contexts surrounding content consumption. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 570-587.
    Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. (2009a). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied linguistics, 30(3), 407-427.
    Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. (2009b). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335-366.
    West, M. (1965). A general service list of English words. Longmans Green and Co. Ltd.
    Wingrove, P. (2017). How suitable are TED talks for academic listening? Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 79-95.
    Yang, H.-C., & Sun, Y.-C. (2013). It is more than knowledge seeking: Examining the effects of OpenCourseWare lectures on vocabulary acquisition in English as a foreign language (EFL) context. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 1-20.
    Yang, L., & Coxhead, A. (2020). A corpus-based study of vocabulary in the new concept English textbook series. RELC Journal, 0033688220964162.

    無法下載圖示 電子全文延後公開
    2027/06/01
    QR CODE