本研究旨在探討「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up」中引導學生能對數學產生興趣，透過活動之參與，達到積極練習，遊戲中透過使用平板中的「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up App」作為實驗之規劃之一。
本研究非隨機立意取樣方式，以臺北市某國民小學五年級學生。在遊戲中，需要一邊透過抽取的數字牌來進行四則運算，取得自己滿意的步數，一邊搭配平板的「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up App」來輸入四則運算式並計算出答案，遊戲時間為兩節課。在遊戲結束後，皆以問卷填答，用以探討學生於利他行為、認知乏、遊戲焦慮、心流、學習價值、持續玩的意圖之差異，回收問卷整理後，有效樣本為159人。研究結果表明：（1）利他行為對心流呈現正向影響；（2）利他行為對遊戲焦慮沒有明顯影響；（3）心流對學習價值呈現正向影響；（4）遊戲焦慮對學習價值呈現負向影響；（5）學習價值對持續玩的意圖呈現正向影響。
根據研究發現，「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up」對學生可以培養學生互助合作利他利己之精神，並且能提升學生之學習意願，「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up」具有學習價值，學生對於「運算思維遊戲Comput-Up」之持續玩的意圖提高，更可以利用此遊戲來訓練學生之運算思維能力。

To enhance students’ computational thinking is an essential issue in elementary educational setting. How to develop this type of thinking ability with meth strategies, has not been particular studied, thus, the present study used a game, named Comput-Up, which developed by the Digital game-based learning lab of National Taiwan Normal University for studentst to play. To explore how to explore students’ cognitive and affective factor change in playing that game, this study adapted a non-random sampling method, to invite fifth-grade students from an elementary school in Taipei City. In the game, participants need to perform four arithmetic operations through the drawn digital cards to get number of steps for moving their own flags with math strategies. The time for playing was 30 minutes and four students were formed in a cooperative-competitive scheme to play 2 vs.2. After the game was over, questionnaires were delivered to investigate the differences among students in altruistic behavior, cognitive loading, gameplay anxiety, flow experience, perceived learning value, and continueous intention to playing. After collecting the questionnaires, the effective returns were 159. The research results show that: (1) Altruism is positively related to flow experience; (2) Altruism is not significantly related to gameplay anxiety; (3) flow experience is positively related to perceived to perceived learning value; (4) gameplay anxiety is negatively related realted to perceived learning value; (5) perceived learning value is positively related to continueous intention to play. According to research findings, "Comput-Up" can develop students' value perception by flow experience as using this game can be used to train students' computational thinking ability.

中文部分
王三幸(1993)。影響國小高年級學生數學學業成就的相關因素研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
王裕宏、張美珍、劉佳儒（2016）。大學生團隊參與創意實作競賽之參賽動機及競賽成效評估分析。工業科技教育學刊，8，1-11。
王秀蓮（2019）。主題結合童軍利他行為的旅遊規劃之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。南華大學，嘉義縣。
王雅郁（2020）。靈性領導、組織正義、任務績效、歸屬感及員工幸福感之關係（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
王筱妮、梁淑坤（2018）。桌遊融入國小三年級數與計算課程之設計與反思。臺灣數學教師，39（2），23-49。
李記萱（2015）。桌上遊戲應用於國中數學補救教學之研究－以「因數與倍數」單元為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
李新民、李宜蓁、鄭博真（2017）。桌上遊戲代間方案對老人正向老化與代間溝通的影響。華醫學報，46，165-187。
李佩真、朱蕙君（2019）。探討臺灣高中、高職學生對於行動學習的社會影響、知識分享與科技接受度之影響模式分析。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，15（1），57-80。
吳武典(1971)。影響學生學習的因素。教育文摘，16（15），5-32。
吳元良（1996）。不同數學課程、性別、社經地位的國小學生在數學態度及成就上比較之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
吳梅蘭、曾哲仁（ 1994）。 國小學童數學態度及其相關因素之研究。臺南師院學生學刊，15，19-38。
吳明隆、蘇耕役（1995）。國民小學學生控制信念、重要他人態度知覺與數學焦慮、數學態度及數學成就關係之研究。初等教育學刊，4，181-210。
吳承翰（2011）。桌上遊戲參與型態對人際溝通改善之研究－以臺北地區桌上遊戲專賣店顧客為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
吳珈瑤（2014）。寓教於樂—悅趣化數位學習。取自 https://scitechvista.nat. gov.tw/c/5332.htm
吳亭瑩（2014）。大學生擔任數位學伴課輔老師對其自我期望及利他行為之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，臺東市。
吳聖璇（2015）。桌上遊戲教學在國小智能障礙學生互惠式溝通行為之應用。桃竹區特 殊教育，26，7-14。
吳佩玲（2017）。公益旅遊者的參與動機、利他行為與主觀幸福感關係之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄餐旅大學，高雄市。
林欣怡（2015）。學習興趣、自我效能與學習價值對八年級學生科學學習成就之影響─以 TIMSS2011 臺灣為例（未出版碩士論文）。明道大學，彰化縣。
林育慈、吳正己（2016）。運算思維與中小學資訊科技課程。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊，6，5-20。
沈六（1993）。犯罪青少年的道德判斷。公民訓育學報，3，47-104。
侯采伶（2016）。用桌遊來翻轉學習—以國中數學質數為例。台灣教育評論月刊，5（5），132-137。
胡芯瑋（2016）。桌遊媒材融入認知行為取向團體諮商對害羞兒童社交技巧之效果研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
教育部（2003）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。取自https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/Tw/Common/SinglePage?filter=22ABAF7F-245B-4966-AC87-9388AA1504BC
若水鑑價（2020）。桌遊產業介紹與分析。取自http://www.ewac-valuation.com/professionalism/detail/36
國家教育研究院（2018）。十二年國教課程綱要。取自https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/WebContent/index.aspx?sid=11&mid=1821
侯惠澤（2017）。線上知識分享討論活動與其行為模式探究：以教師/學生社群為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
侯正裕、尚榮安（2018）。專注未必有用－從媒介特性及認知專注探索行動通訊App的持續意圖。行銷評論，15（1），167-191。
梁淑坤、張嘉玲、王全興（2009）。遊戲融入國小三年級乘除法教學之研究。載於楊思偉（主編）。課程實驗與教學改革（67-102頁）。臺北市：五南圖書公司。
張春興（1994）。現代心理學。臺北市：東華。
張春興（2007）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐（重修二版）。臺北市：東華。
張新仁（2003）。學習與教學新趨勢。臺北市：心理出版社。
張以群（2013）。桌上遊戲參與者玩興特質、心流體驗與創造力關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。大葉大學，彰化縣。
張基成、林冠佑（2016）。從傳統數位學習到遊戲式數位學習－學習成效、心流體驗與認知負荷。科學教育學刊，24（3），221-248。
張聖淵、詹勳從（2019）。高中生持續參與遊戲意圖之研究：以3D摩托車數位遊戲為例。教育科學研究期刊，64（3），31-53。
張瓊懿（譯）（2019）。心流 : 高手都在研究的最優體驗心理學（M. Csikszentmihalyi）。新北市：行路出版。（原著出版年：2008）
邱子容（2015）。桌上遊戲 VS 英語教學。師友月刊，579，69-72。
程炳林（1991）。國民中小學生激勵的學習策略之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
辜詩婷、洪榮照（2017）。桌上遊戲融入社會技巧課程在提升高職選擇性緘默症學生溝通能力之成效研究。障礙者理解半年刊，15（2），41-64。
黃永和（2012）。激發學習活力--遊戲在教學上的應用。教師天地 ，179，23-28。
黃心玫（2013）。桌上遊戲在國小資源班的教學應用。桃竹區特殊教育，22，28-41。
黃千慈（2019）。桌遊融入英語教學提升國小三年級學生學習動機與成效之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
黃明月、洪榮昭、 譚華德、葉建宏、葉貞妮、郝永崴（2021）。數位遊戲式之泰語學習：語言焦慮、自我效能對於情意表現因素及學習價值之相關分析。數位學習科技期刊，13（2），87-117。
曾淑容（1991）。普通班和資優班學生性別、年級、數學歸因和數學態度的相關研究,。特殊教育學報， 6，373-430。
曾琬淑（1995）。三種不同補救教學方式對國小數學科低成就學生實施成效之比較研究。台南師範學院國民教育研究所集刊，1，345-383。
楊濠傑（2015）。以學生出題策略為核心之桌遊設計與發展（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
溫卓謀、章勝傑（2018）。大學滑雪課程學生學習歷程之心流體驗。臺東大學體育學報，29，79-108。
維基百科（2021）。桌上遊戲。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/桌上遊戲
劉秀嫚（1998）。合作學習的教學策略。公民訓育學報，7，285-294。
劉育忠（2015）。淺談桌遊學習的療癒功能—找回世界的童心。慧炬雜誌，595，20-23。
黎瓊麗、莊筱玉、傅敏芳（2006）。國小學童英語學習動機量表之編製。高應科大人文社會科學學報，3，141-167。
潘正安（1984）。國中學生科學態度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立師範大學，臺北市。
賴怡伶（2015）。桌上遊戲應用於提升特殊需求幼兒社會互動技巧之行動研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東大學，屏東市。
賴嘉偉（2015）。桌遊深度玩家之動機、人際互動與人格特質之分析（未出版之碩士論文）。世新大學，臺北市。
陳介宇（2010）。從現代桌上遊戲的特點探討其運用於兒童學習的可行性。國教新知，57（4），40-45。
陳彙芳、范懿文（2000）。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理研究，2（2），45-60。
陳容瑋、許育光（2016）。桌遊媒材在家族遊戲治療中的應用初探。輔導季刊，52（3），36-46。
陳玟樺、許志農（2017）。從Jakobson傳達模式反思課室層級的數學教與學。台灣教育評論月刊，6（7），110-116。
楊振玄（2020）。桌上遊戲融入高中生英語字會學習的學習成效與新劉經驗之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
鍾詠昕（2020）。國軍官兵手機遊戲涉入及使用動機與工作效能之關係—檢驗心流體驗的效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國防大學政治作戰學院，台北市。
魏妤珊（2014）。桌上遊戲融入視覺藝術課程專論。師友月刊，567，100-103。
鄭佩文（2020）。科技輔具融合數位遊戲式教學對於提升國中學障生的學習興趣及成效探討。國民小學及國民中學學生學習扶助資源平台PRIORI，9（9），154-161。
蕭嘉惠、曹校章（2019）。利他？利己？探究團隊績效管理的互惠。大專體育學刊，21（2），1-4。
羅家駿與郭宛如（2020）。玩家人格特質與答題時間壓力對遊戲體驗、態度與表現之影響。教育傳播與科技研究，124，53-68。

 
英文部分
Ahmad, S., Zulkurnain, N. N. A., & Khairushalimi, F. I. (2016). Assessing the fitness of a measurement model using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 17(1), 159-168.
Aronson, Wilson, & Akert (1995). Social psychology construed and esteemed. PsycCRITIQUES, 40(7), 662-663.
Alicke, M. D., & Govorun, O. (2005). The better-than-average effect. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, J. I. Krueger, M. D. Alicke, D. A.Dunning, & J. I. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgment (pp.85-106). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Ausubel, D. A. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cavanagh, S. (2008). Playing games in class helps students grasp math. Education Week, 27, 43-46.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.
Comte (1852). Catéchisme positiviste (The Catechism of positive religion.) Retrieved from http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/Comte_auguste/catechisme_positiviste/catechisme_positiviste.pdf
Conard, M. A., & Marsh, R. F. (2014). Interest level improves learning but does not moderate the effects of interruptions: An experiment using simultaneous multitasking. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 112-117.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J.M. (2010). Demystifying computational thinking for non-computer scientists. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why
Elofsson, J., Gustafson, S., Samuelsson, J., & Träff, U. (2016). Playing number board games supports 5-year-old children’s early mathematical development. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 43, 134-147.
Fornell, C., & Lacker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Ghazali, E., Mutum D. S., Woon, M.-Y. (2019). Exploring player behavior and motivations to continue playing Pokémon Go. Information Technology & People, 32(3), 646-667.
Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. (2004). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate aata analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (Eds.). (2013). Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed.). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Harris, C. (2009). Meet the new school board: Board game are back-and they’re exactly what your curriculum needs. School Library Journal, 55(5), 24-46.
Harker-Schuch, I. E., Mills, F. P., Lade, S. J., & Colvin, R. M., (2020). CO2peration-Structuring a 3D interactive digital game to improve climate literacy in the 12-13-year-old age group. Computers & Education, 144, 103705.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
Heshmati, S., Kersting, N., & Sutton, T. (2018). Opportunities and challenges of implementing instructional games in mathematics classrooms: Examining the quality of teacher-student interactions during the cover-up and un-cover games. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 777-796.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Szeto, E., Tsai, C. R., Kuo, Y. C., & Hsu, W. Y. (2016). Internet cognitive failure relevant to self-efficacy, learning interest, and satisfaction with social media learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 214-222.
Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Hwang, M.Y., & Kuo, Y.C. (2016). Internet cognitive failure affects learning progress as mediated by cognitive anxiety and flow while playing a Chinese antonym synonym game with interacting verbal-analytical and motor-control. Computers & Education, 100, 32-44.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. T., Lin, P. H., & Chen, Y. L. (2016). The role of pre-game learning attitude in the prediction to competitive anxiety, perceived utility of pre-game learning of game and gameplay interest. Interactive Learning Environment, 24(1), 239-251.
Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H. & Ye, J. H. (2019). Playing a Chinese Remote Associated Game: The correlation among flow, self-efficacy, collective self-esteem, and competitive anxiety. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2720-2735.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Tai, K. H. (2020) . Effects of gamifying questions on English grammar learning mediated by epistemic curiosity and language anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publiscation. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2020.1803361
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., Lin. P. H., & Lin, P. C. (2020). Learning progress in a Chinese order of stroke game: The effects of intrinsic cognitive load and gameplay interest mediated by flow experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(4), 842-862.
Ibrahim, B., & Abu Hmaid, Y. (2017). The effect of teaching mathematics using interactive video games on the fifth grade students' achievement. An-Najah University Journal for Research (Humanities), 31(3), 471-492.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Holubec, E. J. (1994). The new circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom and school. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y., & Kim, S. M. (2012). A model for predicting learning flow and achievement in corporate e-learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 313–325.
Józsa, K. & Székely. G. (2004). Kísérlet a kooperatív tanulás alkalmazására a matematika tanítása során. Magyar Pedagógia, 104(3), 339–362.
Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociological Methods & Research, 44(3), 486-507.
Kimble, G. A. (1967). Foundations of conditioning and learning. New York, NY: Appleton.
Kiili, K., & Ketamo, H. (2017). Evaluating cognitive and affectiveoOutcomes of a digital game-based math test. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11(2), 255-263.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Lee, Eun Mi, Seong-Yeon Park, Molly I. Rapert, Christopher L. Newman (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate Social responsibility issues?. Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558-1564
Luntley, M. (2005). The character of learning. Educational Philosophy & Theory, 37(5), 689–704.
Luo, F., Antonenko, P. D., & Davis, E. C. (2020). Exploring the evolution of two girls’ conceptions and practices in computational thinking in science. Computers & Education, 146, 103759.
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.
Mayer, R. E. (1982). Learning In H. E. Mitzel (Ed.). Encyclopedia of educational research (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
McNeil, D. W. (2001). Terminology and evolution of constructs in social anxiety and social phobia. In S. G. Hofmann & P. M. DiBartolo (Eds.), From social anxiety to social phobia: Multiple perspectives (pp. 8–19). Allyn & Bacon.
Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2003). The construction of meaning through vital engagement. In C.L.M. Keyes & J. Haidt (Eds.). Flourishing positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 83-104). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Panitz, T. (1999). The motivational benefits of cooperative learning. New Directions for teaching and learning, 78, 59-67.
Park, S. Y., Song K. S., & Kim, S. H., (2015). Cognitive load changes in pre-service teachers with computational thinking education. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(10), 169-178.
Peel, A., Sadler, T. D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2019). Learning natural selection through computational thinking: Unplugged design of algorithmic explanations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(7), 983-1007.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Schlossberg, Morris, & Lieberman (2001). The effects of a counselor-led guidance intervention on students' behaviors and attitudes. Professional School Counseling, 4, 156-164.
Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: The developing definition. University of Southampton (E-prints) 6p. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299450690
Shen, C.-Y., & Chu, H.-P. (2014), The relations between interface design of digital game-based learning systems and flow experience and cognitive load of learners with different levels of prior knowledge. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8528, 574-584.
Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158.
Shaban, A. & Pearson, E. (2019). A learning design framework to support children with learning disabilities incorporating gamification techniques. Paper presented at the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-6. doi: 10.1145/3290607.3312806
Sung, E. (2019). Fostering computational thinking in technology and engineering education: an unplugged hands-on engineering design approach. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 78(5), 8-13.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
Torshizi, M. D., & Bahraman, M. (2019). I explain, therefore I learn: Improving students’ assessment literacy and deep learning by teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 66-73.
Trischler, J., Kristensson, P., & Scott, D. (2018). Team diversity and its management in a co-design team. Journal of Service Management, 29(1), 120-145.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, Z., & Hung, L. M. (2010). Kindergarten children’s number sense development through board games. The International Journal of Learning, 17(8), 19-31.
Wang, S. Y., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Chen, P. Y. (2018). A microworld-based role-playing game development approach to engaging students in interactive, enjoyable, and effective mathematics learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 411-423.
Wang, Z., Li, Y., Yu, H., Xu, Y., Xue, H., Li, X., Wang, H., & Wang, L. (2018). Ambient electrochemical synthesis of ammonia from nitrogen and water catalyzed by flower-Like gold microstructures. ChemSusChem, 11, 3480-3485.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33-35.
Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions on the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717-3725.
Wiersum, E. G. (2012) Teaching and learning mathematics through games and activities. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica, 12(3), 23–26.
Yoon, B., Rodriguez, L., Faselis, C.J., & Liappis, A. P. (2014). Using a board game to reinforce learning. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(3), 110-1.
Zappalà, D. A., Pluchino, A., & Rapisarda, A. (2014). Selective altruism in collective games. Physica A, 410, 496-512.