本研究呼應當今學校教育應培養學生「核心素養」的教育風潮，嘗試應用「建造主義」於高中地理課程設計，希望藉由建造主義提出的教學理念，搭配十二年國教倡導的核心素養，結合時下高中生擅長的手機拍片與公開分享，設計一份能提升學生核心素養的地理實察教案。本研究設計「地理眼看世界」影片製作專題課程，於108學年的高一開設多元選修課進行教學實驗，研究採用多元的評量工具，如核心素養量表、影片評分規準與課後回饋問卷等量化工具，並結合研究者的參與觀察及同學的訪談回饋等質性分析，共同評估學生核心素養的學習成效。

研究結果發現，結合建造主義與手機拍影片的地理實察課程可以提升學生的核心素養，訓練解決問題所需要的各項能力，更可獲得成就感與特殊體驗，有效達成將知識轉化為生活中的實踐和引發持續學習熱情的教育目標。

According to recent education innovation, school education now focuses on promoting students’ core competencies. Therefore, the aim of this study is to apply “Constructionism” to design a field study course of geography in the senior high school. The students’ core competencies could therefore be promoted through making video by smart phones in the field. A geography course for grade 10 named “Geo eye through the world” was designed for the teaching experiment. The research uses multiple assessment tools to evaluate the students’ learning achievements of core competencies, such as the questionnaire of core competencies, video grading rubric, and after-class feedback questionnaire. Qualitative analysis was also conducted through the researcher’s participative observations and students’ interview feedback.

The result shows that this “Geo eye through the world” geography course not only promotes students’ core competencies, but also lets them practice the skills of problem solving. Moreover, they gain a sense of accomplishment and special life experience. The goals of applying the knowledge into life and maintaining the enthusiasm of learning were achieved.

一、英文文獻
Ackermann, E. (2001). Piaget’s constructivism, Papert’s constructionism: What’s the difference. Future of learning group publication, 5(3), 438.
Brennan, K. (2015). Beyond technocentrism: Supporting constructionism in the classroom. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 289-296.
Buckingham, D. (2007). Media education goes digital: An introduction learning. Media and Technology, 32(2), 111-119.
Davis, K. S., & Falba, C. J. (2002). Integrating technology in elementary preservice teacher education: Orchestrating scientific inquiry in meaningful ways. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(4), 303-329.
Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations. 7(3), 11-14.
Engel, G., & Green, T. (2011). Cell phones in the classroom: Are we dialing up disaster?. TechTrends, 55(2), 39-45.
Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students' perspectives with project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 6.
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50).
Hakkarainen, P. (2011). Promoting meaningful learning through video production-supported PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 5(1), 4.
Han, S., & Bhattacharya, K. (2001). Constructionism, learning by design, and project based learning. Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved April, 29, 2007.
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Software design as a learning environment. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 41-84). NJ: Ablex.
Irina, A. (2012). A cell phone in the classroom: A friend or a foe?. European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning (EUROCALL).
Jonassen, D. H., Myers, J. M., & McKillop, A. M. (1996). From constructivism to constructionism: Learning with hypermedia/multimedia rather than from it. Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design, 93-106.
Kafai, Y. (1996). Learning design by making games: Children's development of design strategies in the creation of a complex computational artifact. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (71-96). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kafai, Y. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36-40.
Kafai, Y., & Harel, I. (1991a). Learning through design and teaching: Exploring social and collaborative aspects of constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 85-106). NJ: Ablex.
Kafai, Y., & Harel, I. (1991b). Children learning through consulting: When mathematical ideas, knowledge of programming and design, and playful discourse are intertwined. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 111-140). NJ: Ablex.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. NY: McGraw-Hill College.
Lamb, A., & Johnson, L. (2012). Jiminy Cricket revisited: A dozen ways video can activate learning. Teacher Librarian, 39(6), 55-59.
Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. CA: Constructing Modem Knowledge.
Mergendoller, J.R. (2006). Project based learning handbook, 2nd edition. CA: Buck Institute for Education.
Mitra, A. (2002). Trust, authenticity, and discursive power in cyberspace. Communications of the ACM, 45(3), 27-29.
Miura, A. and Yamashita, K. (2007). Psychological and social influences on blog writing: An online survey of blog authors in Japan. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1452-1471.
Moursund, D. (1998). Project-based learning in an Information-technology environment. Learning and Leading with Technology, 25, 4-5.
Moursund, D.(2016). Project based learning using information technology. First edition 1999. OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. NY: Basic Books, Inc.
Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. in constructionism. NJ: Ablex Publishing.
Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. NY: Basic books, Inc.
Papert, S. (1999). The eight big ideas of the constructionist learning laboratory. Unpublished internal document. South Portland, Maine.
Rychen , D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a wellfunctioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber
Smith, S. (2017). Student-created reflective video as meaningful formative and summative assessment during hands-on learning experiences. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1191-1198). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Spires, H. A., Hervey, L. G., Morris, G., & Stelpflug, C. (2012). Energizing project‐based inquiry: Middle‐grade students read, write, and create videos. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(6), 483-493.
Stager, G. (2005). Papertian constructionism and the design of productive contexts for learning. Proceedings of EuroLogo 2005.
Stefanou, C., Stolk, J. D., Prince, M., Chen, J. C., & Lord, S. M. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem-and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 109-122.
Toff1er, A. (1974). Learning for tomorrow: The role of the future in education. NY: Random House.
Toff1er, A. (1997). Rethinking the future. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Education next, 12(1), 82-83.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers
Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45–65). MA: Hogrefe & Huber.

二、中文文獻
王文裕（2003）。新竹縣國民小學教師進行資訊科技融入教學的現況、意願及相關因素研究。國立新竹教育大學輔導教學碩士班碩士論文，新竹市。
王裕賢（2017）。連結主義應用於高中地理教學-以學生共同編輯維基百科西亞詞條為例。國立臺灣師範大學地理學系碩士論文，臺北市。
王學武（2018）。專題式學習與數位遊戲設計應用於課程設計與教學成效之研究。教學實踐與創新，1(1)，13-69。
李佳蓉（2016）。推動資訊科技融入教學的進階改變—從師資培育課程談。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(1)，150-153。
杜欣育（2019）。自律學習、學習價值與專題式學習表現之研究。淡江大學教育科技學系碩士班學位論文，臺北市。
周新富（2007）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
林永豐（2018）。延續或斷裂? 從能力到素養的課程改革意涵。課程研究，13(2), 1-20。
林生傳（1998）。建構主義的教學評析。課程與教學，1(3)，1-13。
林姿秀（2016）。高中校園人權教育的實踐與困境─從「公民與社會」科教師的觀點出發。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文，臺北市。
林彥佑（2015）。創客風潮動手玩語文。師友月刊，580，80-83。
林崇河（2009）。運用專案式學習促進國小電腦課程教學之行動研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文，高雄市。
邱政皓（2019）。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
邱瀞瑩（2011）。PBL模式應用於綜合高中「英文閱讀與寫作」科目教學之研究。國立雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士班碩士論文，雲林縣。
邱韻如（2018）。108 課綱之素養的英文與科學史的脈絡。物理教育學刊，19(2)， 41-46。
柯秀佳、劉泯彤、詹忠諺（2014）。從使用與滿足理論探索影響臉書使用者持續使用地標打卡之意圖的因素。資訊科技國際期刊，8(2)，59-69。
國家教育研究院（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程發展指引，2019年12月7日，取自：https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-5622,c952-1.php?Lang=zh-tw
教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。
教育部（2017）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校—社會領域。
莊玫欣（2002）。臺北市立大直高中學生專題研究之歷程研究。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文，臺北市。
許惠美（2011）。美國初等教育中建造主義實踐之初探。網路社會學通訊，97，38-50。
陳柏璋（2010）。臺灣國民核心素養與中小學課程發展之關係。課程研究，5(2)，1-25。
陳伯璋、張新仁、蔡清田、潘慧玲（2007）。全方位的國民核心素養之教育研究。國科會研究計畫報告（NSC95-2511-S-003-001）。致遠管理學院，臺南市。
陳毓凱與洪振方（2007）。兩種探究取向教學模式之分析與比較。科學教育月刊，305，4-19。
陳麗蓉、王念念、劉蘋蘋（1999）。影帶教學。英語教學，23(4)，43-55。
楊千儀（2017）。專題式學習應用於高中地理實察課程之行動研究。國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系碩士論文，新竹市。
楊俊鴻（2016）。導讀:《 課程發展與設計的關鍵 DNA: 核心素養》。教育脈動， 5，1-5。
劉源俊（2020）。正本清源說素養。臺灣教育評論月刊，9(1)，13-19。
蔡清田（2015）。課程發展與設計的關鍵 DNA：核心素養。臺北市：五南。
蔡清田（2019）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要的核心素養課程改革。評鑑雙月刊，80，25-29。
蕭伊茹（2013）。基於建造主義導入數位說故事於英語學習之研究。國立中央大學網路學習科技研究所碩士班論文，桃園市。
顏伯芳（2012）。輔以YouTube影片及小組海報的英文單字教學法：增進國中三年級學生之英文單字習得與存留之影響。國立成功大學外國語文學系在職專班碩士論文，臺南市。