研究生: |
周泓妤 Chou, Hung-Yu |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
戶外解說牌版面設計滿意度之研究 Study on the Satisfaction of Outdoor Interpretation Panel Layout Design |
指導教授: |
周世玉
Chou, Shih-Yu |
口試委員: |
施人英
Chou, Shih-Yu 蔡明志 Tsai, Ming-Chih 周世玉 Chou, Shih-Yu |
口試日期: | 2024/02/26 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
高階經理人企業管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration |
論文出版年: | 2024 |
畢業學年度: | 112 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 61 |
中文關鍵詞: | 戶外解說牌版面設計 、享樂體驗 、認知體驗 、滿意度 、結構方程模型分析 |
英文關鍵詞: | Outdoor Interpretation Panel Layout Design, Enjoyment Experience, Cognitive Experience, Satisfaction, SEM Analysis |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202400564 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:93 下載:5 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究聚焦於戶外解說牌版面設計,探討其對環境教育、解說服務、導覽和管理機構與遊客間關係的重要性。研究認為高品質的解說牌設計是旅遊景點提供優質服務的關鍵,並能在戶外環境中解決天氣和人力資源限制的問題,促進遊客的自主學習。本研究將深入分析解說牌的風格、色彩、文字內容、排版和字體等方面,評估這些設計元素對於提升遊客體驗和滿意度的效果,以判斷其是否真正符合公眾需求和獲得積極反饋。
將聚焦於戶外解說牌的設計,強調其對遊客體驗的重要性。研究指出許多解說牌設計欠缺一致性,如字型、比例、間距等,影響遊客體驗。研究目標包括三方面:一是探討解說牌版面設計如何影響遊客的享樂體驗和認知體驗;二是分析遊客體驗如何共同作用於遊客滿意度上;三是瞭解遊客對於設計元素的偏好。
對此,本研究運用結構方程模型(SEM)及PLS脫靴法,深入剖析解說牌的設計元素(如整體的平衡感、色彩搭配、字體)如何影響遊客認知、享樂體驗和滿意度。結果發現,解說牌的平衡感能夠顯著提高遊客的認知體驗;使人愉悅的色彩搭配直接增進享樂體驗;恰當的字體選擇則對這兩者均有正面效果,並間接地提高遊客的滿意度。享樂體驗和認知感受對滿意度直接正面的影響也得到實證。本研究強調解說牌在視覺設計上的細節對於增強遊客體驗和滿意度的關鍵作用,並表明精心的設計不僅能有效傳遞資訊,還能提升遊客對品牌或展覽的整體感受和滿意度。
綜上,本研究強調解說牌的整體平衡感、色彩搭配和字體類型是提升遊客體驗和滿意度的關鍵設計元素。這些元素不僅影響遊客的美學感受,還影響其對資訊的理解。因此,戶外解說牌的設計應考慮不同遊客群體的需求和偏好,著重於提供豐富、多元且互動的體驗。這些發現對於戶外解說牌的設計者和經營單位業者具有實際意義,有助於提升旅遊目的地的整體吸引力和遊客滿意度。
This study focuses on the design of outdoor explanatory panels and explores their importance for environmental education, interpretive services, guiding, and the relationship between management agencies and visitors. It posits that high-quality design of explanatory panels is key to providing excellent services at tourist attractions and can address the limitations posed by weather and human resources in outdoor settings, thereby promoting autonomous learning among visitors. This research will delve into aspects such as style, color, text content, layout, and font of explanatory panels, evaluating the effect of these design elements on enhancing visitor experience and satisfaction, and determining whether they truly meet public needs and receive positive feedback.
The study emphasizes the design of outdoor explanatory panels and their significance for the visitor experience. It notes that many explanatory panel designs lack consistency in aspects such as font type, proportions, and spacing, affecting visitor experience. The research objectives include exploring how the quality of explanatory panels influences visitors' hedonic and cognitive experiences; analyzing how these experiences jointly impact visitor satisfaction; and understanding visitor preferences for different design elements.
Through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) bootstrapping analysis, this study thoroughly investigates the impact of explanatory panel design features (overall balance, color coordination, font) on users' cognitive experience, hedonic experience, and satisfaction. The findings reveal that the overall balance of explanatory panels significantly enhances cognitive experience; color coordination has a direct positive effect on hedonic experience; and font choice significantly benefits both experiences, indirectly affecting satisfaction. Moreover, the direct positive impacts of hedonic and cognitive experiences on satisfaction were also confirmed. These findings highlight the importance of considering visual design elements when designing explanatory panels to enhance user experience and satisfaction, indicating that careful design can not only convey information but also enhance the overall experience, thereby increasing positive perceptions and satisfaction with the brand or exhibition.
In summary, the study underscores that the overall balance, color coordination, and font type of explanatory panels are key design elements for improving visitor experience and satisfaction. These elements affect not only the aesthetic perception of visitors but also their understanding of information. Therefore, the design of outdoor explanatory panels should consider the needs and preferences of different visitor groups, focusing on providing rich, diverse, and interactive experiences. These findings have practical implications for designers of outdoor explanatory panels and tourism operators, helping to enhance the overall appeal of tourist destinations and visitor satisfaction.
曲家傑(2022)。基隆八斗子娛樂漁業漁船滿意度與重遊意願之研究-以基隆嶼主題旅遊為例[臺北海洋科技大學海洋休閒觀光系碩士論文]。臺北海洋科技大學。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/v75942
江進富(2004)。遊客對關渡自然公園親蟹觀察區戶外解說牌成效之評估[未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所,臺北市。
吳忠宏(2006)。遊客之旅遊動機與其對解說服務需求之實證研究:以鹿港古蹟景點為例。《環境教育研究》,3(2),77-121。
吳淑華(2000)。與環境之溝通者--博物館標識計畫探析[Communicating with Our Environment: The Use of Signage in the National Science & Technology Museum]。《科技博物期刊》,3(3),81-94。
李佳容(2010)。溪頭自然教育園區解說牌服務成效評估之研究[未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣大學森林環境暨資源學研究所,臺北市。
林昂儀(2002)。太魯閣國家公園砂卡礑步道解說效果之探討[未出版碩士論文]。南華大學旅遊事業管理研究所,嘉義縣。
林逢祺、洪仁進(2008)。《教師哲學:哲學中的教師圖像》。臺北市:五南出版社。
邱彥傑(2008)。遊客使用解說牌之參與動機與使用效益之研究[未出版碩士論文]。亞洲大學休閒與遊憩管理學系,台中縣。
邱韻璿(2007)。玉山國家公園步道解說牌主旨之分析研究[未出版碩士論文]。高雄師範大學環境教育研究所。
侯錦雄(1990)。遊憩區遊憩動機與遊憩認知間關係之研究[Doctoral dissertation, National Taiwan University]。National Taiwan University Repository。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/wsby4j
張明洵、林玥秀(2005)。《解說概論》。臺北市:揚智。
郭育任(2005)。解說設施軟、硬體之設計與施工。在「森林遊憩設施規劃設計與施工研習會暨94年度林務局育樂工程計畫內容說明」會議中的發表,4-1-4-24。
陳明宏(1997)。商業環境視覺設計計畫系列報導-從文化觀點談解說牌設計。《設計期刊》,75,56。
陳碧祥(2000)。國家教育研究院辭書。取自https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=體驗
傅琬晴(2006)。戶外解說牌之適切性研究: 以臺北植物園為例[未出版碩士論文]。臺北市立教育大學環境教育研究所,臺北市。
曾於寧(2004)。教育展示空間設計因數之研究: 以科博館植物公園為例[未出版碩士論文]。朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所。
葉育瑜(2010)。中文戶外解說牌內容適當字數探討[未出版碩士論文]。國立臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所,臺北市。
鄭燿忠(2005)。解說牌誌規劃設計之理論與應用─以嘉義縣奮瑞古道為例[未出版碩士論文]。文化大學景觀學系。
賴瓊琦(1987)。色彩意象調查及分析。《臺北工專學報》,20,221-245。
Abbott, L. (1955). Quality and competition: An essay in economic theory. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/abbo92492
Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, & profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53-66.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 644-656.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
Baker, D. A., & Crompton, J. L. (2000). Quality satisfaction and behavioral intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 27(3), 785-804.
Batra, R., & Ahtola, O. T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00436035
Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 244-249.
Carter, J., & Terrace, C. (1998). The Darwin technical manual for botanic gardens. In Botanic Gardens Conservation International (BGCI) (pp. 100-108). London, UK.
Churchill, G. A., & Suprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491-504.
Dorfman, M. H. (1976). Water required to develop geothermal energy. Journal of the American Water Works Association. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1976.tb02435.x
Festinger, L. (2015). Cognitive dissonance theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosc058.pub2
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: The Swedish experience. Journal of Marketing, 55, 1-21.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Hall.
Ham, S. H. (1992). Environmental interpretation: A practical guide for people with big ideas and small budgets. Colorado: North America Press.
Holbrook, M. B. (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. London, UK: Routledge.
Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 132-140.
Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hunt, K. H. (Ed.). (1977). Conceptualization and measurement of consumer satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
Johnson, M. D., & Fornell, C. (1991). A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories. Journal of Economic Psychology, 12(3), 267-286.
Kelly, J. R. (1987). Freedom to be: A new sociology of leisure. New York, NY: Routledge.
Lawler, E. E. (1973). Measurement and meaning of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(2), 95-105.
Locke, J. (1980). Second treatise of government (C. B. Macpherson, Ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: Evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 451-465.
Mathwick, C., Malhotra, N., & Rigdon, E. (2001). Experiential value: Conceptualization, measurement and application in the catalog and Internet shopping environment. Journal of Retailing, 77(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00045-2
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw.
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(December), 460-469.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1994). Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for further research. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 111-124.
Petrick, J. F. (2004). The roles of quality, value, and satisfaction in predicting cruise passengers' behavioral intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 42, 397-407.
Piaget, J. (1976). Cognitive development in children: Piaget development and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 176-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020306
Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
Schreyer, R., & Roggenbuck, J. W. (1978). The influence of experience expectation on crowding perceptions and social psychological carrying capacities. Leisure Sciences, 14, 373-394.
Sharpe, G. W. (1982). Selecting the interpretive media. In G. W. Sharpe (Ed.), Interpreting the environment (2nd ed., pp. 100-122). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Spreng, R. A. (1992). A comprehensive model of the customer satisfaction formation process. Indiana University.
Spreng, R. A., & Mackoy, R. D. (1996). An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72, 201-214.
Trapp, S., Gross, M., & Zimmerman, R. (1994). Signs, Trails, & Wayside Exhibits: Connecting People and Places. Stevens Point, WI: University of Wisconsin Stevens Point Foundation Press.
Westbrook, R. A. (1980). Intrapersonal affective influences on consumer satisfaction with products. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 49-54.