簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 謝芳婷
論文名稱: 音樂介入天文學課程對11年級學生學習成效之影響
指導教授: 張俊彥
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 科學教育研究所
Graduate Institute of Science Education
論文出版年: 2013
畢業學年度: 101
論文頁數: 47
中文關鍵詞: 莫札特效應音樂與認知音樂喜好
英文關鍵詞: Mozart effect, music and cognition, music preference
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:151下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 從許多研究中可發現音樂可促進智能表現,自從Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky (1993)他們的研究之後,「音樂能夠讓人變聰明!」變成眾所皆知的標語了。因此,我想知道音樂介入天文學課程中是否也能夠促進學生的學習表現。我的樣本為380位十一年級的高中生(288位男生,92位女生),他們大約16至17歲,全部都來自於同一所高中。
    藉由天文學態度問卷(AAQ)、天文學測驗(AKT)、音樂喜好問卷(MPS)、學生背景調查問卷(SBS),來探討是否音樂能夠給學生帶來正面的影響。如果可以的話,什麼種類的音樂會比較好?因此,根據MPS,我把學生分成三組(古典音樂組、流行音樂組、控制組),藉此來探討是否有音樂介入,學生的表現會比較好,且是否學生最喜歡的音樂組(流行音樂組),會表現最好。結果是流行音樂組的表現,並沒有顯著與控制組有差別,而古典音樂組似乎對學生的表現造成負向影響。

    Many researches had found that music can promote intellectual performance. Since the research of Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky (1993), “Music makes you smarter!” became a well-known slogan. So what I would like to know is whether incorporating music into astronomy course can improve students’ performance as well. My samples are 380 high school students (288 male, 92 female), 11th grade, 16-17 years old, all from the same high school.
    By using (a) Attitude towards Astronomy Questionnaire (AAQ), (b) Astronomy Knowledge Test (AKT), (c) Music Preference Survey (MPS), (d) Students’ Background Survey (SBS) to find out if music play a positive role in students’ learning outcome. And if it can, what music is better. So by using MPS, I divided the students into 3 groups (classical, pop, no music), to see whether music groups have better performance, and whether pop music (students prefer) can give the best consequence. The result was that the pop music group did not show a significant difference compared to the control group, and the classical music group, music listening seems to give a counter effect.

    Acknowledgements………………………………………………iv Abstract……………………………………………………………v Table of Contents……………………………………………vii Introduction………………………………………………………1 Background and Context Mozart Effect…………………………………………3 Other Effects…………………………………………4 Music Preference……………………………………6 Cognition and Music………………………………7 Cognitive Transfer of Music…………………9 Impact of Music……………………………………10 Research questions………………………………12 Research Design Site and sample……………………………………14 Measures and Data Analyses…………………14 (a) Attitude towards Astronomy Questionnaire (AAQ) (b) Astronomy Knowledge Test (AKT) (c) Music Preference Survey (MPS) (d) Students’ Background Survey (SBS) Procedures……………………………………………15 Findings Simple Statistics…………………………………20 Fitted Regression Model………………………24 Final Model…………………………………………25 Discussion Conclusion……………………………………………28 Limitations…………………………………………30 References………………………………………………………31 Appendices………………………………………………………33

    Barnett, S.M., & Ceci, S.J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637.
    Ceci, S.J., & Williams, W.M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence and income. American Psychologist, 52, 1051–1058.
    Craik, F., & Bialystok, E. (2005). Intelligence and executive control: Evidence from aging and bilingualism. Cortex, 41, 222–224.
    Ekman, P. (1999). Basic Emotions. Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (Daigleish, T. & Power, M., ed.), pp. 45-60, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Gaser, C. & Schlaug G. (2003). Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(27), 9240 –9245.
    Hallam, S. 2000. The effects of listening to music on children’s spatial task performance. Br. Psychol. Soc. Edu. Rev. 25: 22–26.
    Hetland, L. (2000a). Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 179–238.
    Hetland, L. (2000b). Listening to music enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: Evidence for the ‘‘Mozart effect.’’ Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3–4), 105–148.
    Husain, G., Thompson, W.F., & Schellenberg, E.G. (2002). Effects of musical tempo and mode on arousal, mood, and spatial abilities. Music Perception, 20, 151–171.
    Huttenlocher, P.R. (2002). Neural plasticity: The effects of environment on the development of the cerebral cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Loui, P., Wu, E.H., Wessel, D.L., & Knight, R.T., (2009). A Generalized Mechanism for Perception of Pitch Patterns. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(2), 454–459.
    Moreno, S., Friesen, D., & Bialystok, E. (2011). Effect of music training on promoting preliteracy skills: Preliminary causal evidence. Music Perception, 29, 167–174.
    Nantais, K.M., & Schellenberg, E.G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. Psychological Science, 10, 370–373.
    Rauscher, F.H., Shaw, G.L., & Ky, K.N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.
    Schellenberg, E.G. (2003). Does exposure to music have beneficial side effects? In I. Peretz & R.J. Zatorre (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of music (pp. 430–448). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    Schellenberg, E.G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological Science, 15, 511–514.
    Schellenberg, E.G. (2005). Long-term positive associations between music lessons and IQ. Manuscript submitted for publication.
    Schellenberg, E.G., & Hallam, S. (2005). Music listening and cognitive abilities in 10 and 11 year olds: The Blur effect. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
    Schellenberg, E.G. (2005). Music and cognitive abilities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci.
    Schellenberg, E.G. (2006) Exposure to music: the truth about the consequences. In The Child as Musician: A Handbook of Musical Development (McPherson, G.E., ed.), pp. 111–134, Oxford University Press
    Schellenberg, E. G. (2006). Long-term positive associations between music lessons and IQ. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 457–468.
    Schellenberg, E. G. (2011). Examining the association between music lessons and intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 283–302.
    Schellenberg, E. G. (2011). Music lessons, emotional intelligence, and IQ. Music Perception, 29, 187–196.
    Smith, B.D., Osborne, A., Mann, M., Jones, H., & White, T. (2004). Arousal and behavior: Bio psychological effects of caffeine. In A. Nehlig (Ed.), Coffee, tea, chocolate, and the brain: Nutrition, brain, and behavior (pp. 35–52). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    Thompson, W.F., Schellenberg, E.G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12, 248–251.
    Thompson, W.F., Schellenberg, E.G., & Husain, G. (2004). Perceiving prosody in speech: Do music lessons help? Emotion, 4, 46–64.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE