教育部自2008年起，為落實「在地學習」之理念，結合各縣（市）各級學校、政府機關（構）、民間團體等，於全國各鄉（鎮、市、區）設置「樂齡學習中心」用以推動高齡學習。而本研究旨在探究不同背景變項之高齡學習者，其學習參與和社會資本之關聯。主要目的為了解：
一、高齡學習者學習參與之現況。
二、高齡學習者社會資本之現況。
三、探討不同背景高齡學習者，在學習參與及其社會資本上之差異情形、相關性。
四、探討高齡學習者在學習參與對其社會資本之預測情形等。
本研究採用問卷調查法，以「高齡學習者社會資本量表」、「高齡學習者學習參與量表」為研究工具，從教育部於2022年核可之370所樂齡中心，以立意抽樣出34所樂齡學習中心，進行問卷調查（發出1,175份問卷），計回收875份有效樣本。前項量表經過專家學者審查、項目分析、信度分析、探索性因素分析和驗證性因素分析來確定其信、效度。而所得之資料進行敘述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、逐步多元迴歸分析等方式來進行分析，以驗證本研究之各項假設。根據分析所得，提出研究之結論如下：
一、高齡學習者之學習參與屬高等程度，其中以「情感參與」程度最高，「主動參與」　程度最低。
二、高齡學習者之社會資本屬中高等程度，其中以「生命價值」程度最高，「社會參與」程度最低。
三、高齡學習者為經濟狀況大致夠用者、健康狀況非常健康、良好及不好者、獨居或其他者、職業曾為軍公教、家庭主婦、服務業者，對於部分學習參與構面知覺程度較高。
四、高齡學習者為年齡超過75歲以上者、低於國小學歷及國小學歷者、經濟狀況大致夠用者、健康狀況非常健康及不好者，對於部分社會資本構面知覺程度較高。
五、高齡學習者之學習參與和社會資本各構面之間，均達統計良好的顯著水準（p < .01），代表具有良好的顯著相關情形。
六、高齡學習者之學習參與對社會資本各構面和整體層面具有預測力，且達統計極佳的顯著水準（p < .001）。
依據研究結論提出建議，僅供高齡學習業管單位、高齡學習者及未來研究之參據。

Since 2008, in order to implement the concept of " local learning", the Ministry of Education has set up "Active Aging Learning Center", in various townships (towns, cities, districts) across the country in combination with schools at all levels in counties (cities), government agencies (institutions), and non-governmental organizations. Active Aging Learning Center is dedicated to providing high-quality educational programs to older learners. The researcher aimed to explore the relationship between learning engagement and social capital among older learners with different background variables. The main purpose of the study is to understand:
1. The current status of learning engagement of older learners.
2. The current status of social capital of older learners.
3. To explore correlation and the differences in learning engagement and social capital among older learners of different backgrounds.
4. To discuss the prediction of social capital of older learners during their learning engagement.
This research adopted the questionnaire survey method, with the use of " Social Capital Scale of Older Learners " and " Learning Engagement Scale of Older Learners" as research tools. Among all the 370 Learning Center of Senior Citizens approved by the Ministry of Education in 2022, 34 senior learning centers were chosen to conduct the questionnaire survey (1,175 questionnaires were issued), and 875 valid samples were recovered. The former scales has been reviewed by experts and scholars meetings, item analysis, reliability analysis, exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factors analysis to determine its reliability and validity. The obtained data were subjected to descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-difference correlation, stepwise multiple regression analysis and other methods were used for analysis to verify the hypotheses of this study. The conclusions of the study are as follows:
1. The learning engagement of older learners is at a high level, with the highest level of "emotional engagement " and the lowest level of "active engagement ".
2. The social capital of older learners is at a medium to high level, with the highest level of "life value" and the lowest level of "social participation".
3. Older learners are those with adequate economic status, very healthy, good or bad, living alone or others, the former occupation of government employees, military, teachers, housewives, and service workers. Perceived levels of some aspects of learning engagement are higher.
4. Older learners are those who are over 75 years old, those with lower than elementary school education and elementary school education, those whose economic status are generally adequate, and those whose health status are very healthy or poor, and have a higher degree of perception of some aspects of social capital.
5. The learning engagement and social capital of older learners all reached a high degree of statistical significance (p < .01), which represented a high-quality and significant correlation.
6. The learning engagement of older learners has predictive power on all aspects of social capital and the overall level, and it reached a statistically excellent level of significance (p < .001).
Suggestions based on the research conclusions are only for the reference ofelderly learning management units, older learners and future research.

壹、中文文獻
江鴻津（2012）。社會資本與樂齡學習之研究－以桃園縣為例（未出版碩士論文）。元智大學。
江明修、陳欽春（2004）。充實社會資本之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究報告—新世紀第二期國家建設計劃研擬專題研究系列之三。行政院經建會。
吳佳芸（2010）。社經地位、社會資本對老人健康及生活滿意度的影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
吳舒靜（2014）。臺灣大專校院學生學習投入對學習發展影響之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立暨南國際大學。
李玉婷（2013）。高齡者參與學習活動與家庭互動關係之研究－以新竹縣為例（未出版碩士論文）。玄奘大學。
李嵩義（2006）。高齡學習者學習偏好、社會支持與幸福感關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。
李瑞金（1996）。高齡者社會參與需求─以台北市為例。社會建設，95，7-19。
李瑞金（2010）。活力老化—銀髮族的社會參與。社會發展季刊，132，123-132。
李寶鳳（2011）。新北市社大學員社會資本與社區參與及其相關性之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
周新富（2006）。家庭教育學—社會學取向。五南書局。
林玉燈（2007）。社區居民參與社區營造與其社會資本關係之研究－以宜蘭蘇澳鎮白米社區為例（未出版碩士論文）。逢甲大學。
林宜嘉（2017）。從心理資本與社會資本探究大學生學習成效之關聯性：以學習投入為中介變項（未出版碩士論文）。臺北市立大學。
林岳玫（2012）。高齡者參與志願服務經驗之研究：社會資本觀點（未出版碩士論文）。國防大學。
林欣緣（2021）。臺中市國中學生知覺師生關係、學習投入與幸福感之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。東海大學。
林信廷（2009）。社會資本與社區參與相關性之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學。
林南（2001）。林會資本：爭鳴的範式和資證的檢驗，香港社會學學報，2，1-38。
林南（2007）。社會資本理論與研究簡介。社會科學論叢，1（1），1-32。
林淑惠、黃韞臻 （2012）。中部大學生學習投入與學習倦怠之分析。輔導與諮商學報，34（1），51-67 。
林淑惠、黃韞臻（2012）。「大學生學習投入量表」之發展。測驗學刊，59（3），373-396。
林麗惠（2002）。高齡者參與學習活動與生活滿意度關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學。
吳明隆（2009）。結構方程模式方法與實務應用。麗文文化。
吳明隆（2011）。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。易習圖書。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2012）。SPSS與統計應用分析（第2版）。五南書局。
邱宜慧（2020）。公務人員學習動機、學習投入與學習成效之研究-以公務人力發展學院政策能力訓練為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
邱建璋（2019）。高齡學習者社會資本、自我效能與幸福感關係之研究—以南部地區樂齡學習中心學員為例（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學。
洪嘉駿、施昆易、王淑卿、董曜瑜、王國華（2018）。一個混成式案例教學模式應用於非正式科學師資培育之成效：由學習參與和學習感受觀點。科學教育學刊，26（2），171-196。
孫珮禎（2009）。臺灣老年人口疾病壓縮現象之研究（未出版碩士論文）。長榮大學。
孫珮禎、黃偉堯（2010）。年齡與疾病的關係－疾病擴張、壓縮與動態均衡概論。臺灣老年學論壇，5。
馬健萍（2016）。我國中高齡者社會資本與身心健康之關係（未出版碩士論文）。玄奘大學。
張玉璽（2017）。社會資本與公民參與之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
張國治（2006）。雲林縣高齡學習參與者、非參與者生命意義感之比較研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
張鈿富（2012）。大學生學習投入理論與評量實務之探討。高教評鑑中文特刊，41-62。
張德永（2013）。社區、成人學習與社會資本。師大書苑。
教育部（2006）。邁向高齡社會老人教育政策白皮書。教育部。
許芷瑋（2017）。高職餐旅群學生學校氣氛、家庭社會資本、學習策略與學習投入關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立高雄餐旅大學。
郭秀珍（2013）。樂齡學習社會資本與幸福感之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
陳孝庭（2004）。社會資本與公民參與關係之研究－以臺北市為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北大學。
陳偉倫（2016）。臺北市高齡學習者學習參與、社會支持及其幸福感之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
陳雪雲（2008）。全球化情況下世界公民養成—終身學習新觀點。載於中華民國社區教育主編，社區學習方法（1-26）。師大書苑。
陳寬裕、王正華（2018）。結構方程模型：運用AMOS分析。五南。
陳詠榆（2013）。高齡者的健康狀況與社會資本的相關性（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學。
陳龍潔（2020）。自我效能、成就動機、學習投入與專業能力成長關係之研究-以資訊課程為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
彭駕騂、彭懷真（2012）。老年學概論。威仕曼文化事業。
曾琳雲（2007）。非營利組織退休志工社會資本之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。
黃芳銘（2009）。結構方程模式理論與應用（五版）。五南。
黃富順（2004）。高齡學習。五南。
黃富順（2007）。各國高齡教育。五南。
黃富順（2015）。以高齡學習達到活躍老化。載於中國民國成人及終身教育學會主編，高齡社會與終身教育（3-16）。師大書苑。
黃富順（2015）。臺灣樂齡學習中心及相關高齡學習機制的發展經驗。載於中華民國成人及終身學習學會主編，高齡社會與終身學習（47-60）。師大書苑。
黃富順（2017）。我國新近高齡學習得推展。載於中華民國成人及終身學習學會主編，終身學習與高齡自主學習（81-96）。師大書苑。
黃富順、楊國德（2016）。高齡學。五南。
楊依璇（2010）。Maslow需求層次改變歷程之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
楊致慧（2013）。科技大學英文教師教學風格、師生互動、學生學習投入與學習自我效能關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立高雄師範大學。
楊凱蓁（2017）。高齡者學習參與、自我價值與生活滿意度關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
劉以慧（2011）。社區大學社會資本構成要素之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
劉汶琪（2016）。高齡者學習參與、社會連結與靈性健康關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學。
蔡文輝（2002）。老人社會學。臺北市，五南。
蔡必焜（2004）。社會資本、休閒參與與健康關係之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣大學。
蔡明展（2010）。高齡者社會資本及社會參與之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
Coleman, J. S.（1992）。社會理論的基礎（鄧方，譯）。五南。
鄭志豪（2008）。成人文化資本、社會資本及後設認知能力與其自我導向學習傾向關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
鄭惠美（2018）。國小學生社會資本、學業情緒與學習投入之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。大葉大學。
盧宥廷（2017）。大學生覺知教師班級經營類型、大學生學習投入與其學業應得權益感關係之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學。
謝慶華（2017）。國中生自然與生活科技學習動機、學習參與和學習成就之相關研究（未出版博士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。
簡素枝（2004）。嘉義縣市高齡學習參與者與非參與者在人際關係、生活滿意度之比較研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中正大學。
簡瑋成（2012）。學習自我效能、學習投入與學習成就之後設分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學。
David Halpern（2008）。社會資本（黃克先、黃惠茹譯）。國立編譯館與巨流圖書股份有限公司合作翻譯發行。
Nan Lin（2005）。社會資本（林祐聖、葉欣怡譯）。弘智。
貳、英文文獻
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, K. S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Alfred, M. V. (2010). Transnational migration, social capital and lifelong in the USA. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(2), 219-235.
Anderson, S. A.,Russell, C. S.,＆Schumm.W. R. (1983). Perceived marital quality and family life-cycle categorises:A further,analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family,45, 127- 139.
Angell, L. R. (2009). Construct validity of the community college survey of studentengagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research andPractice, 33, 564-570.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427-445.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
Balatti, J., & Falk, I. (2002).Socioeconomic contribution of adult learning to community: A social capital perspective. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(4), 281-298.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson,J. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theoryand research for the sociology of education. Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. In John B. Thompson (Ed.). Policy.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsey, H. Launder, P. Brown, & A. Stuart Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy and society (pp.46-58). Oxford University Press.
Bullen, P., & Onyx. J. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23-42.
Burgess, K. R. (2009). Social networking technologies as vehicles of support for women in learning communities. New directions for adult and continuing education, 122, 63-71. Published online in wiley InterScience.
Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent values of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(8), 1-7.
Cicirelli,V. G. (1995). Relationship of psychosocial and background variables to old adults end-of-life decisions. Psychology and Aging,12,72-83.
Clarke, E. J., Preston, M., Raksin, J., & Bengston,V. L. (1999). Types of conficts and tensions between older parents and adult children.Gerontologist, 39, 261-270.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). The creation and destruction of social capital:Implications for law. In Notre Dame J (Ed). Law, Ethics, Public Policy, 3, 375-404.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 23). University of Chicago Press.
Dale, L. (2001). Learning in the third age. In D. Aspin, J. Chapman, M. Hatton, ＆ Y. Sawano (Eds.), International handbook of lifelong learning part two (pp.777-798). London and Kluwer Academic publishers.
Dean, A., & Lin, N. (1977). The stress-buffering role of social support. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 165(6), 403-417.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Collier Books.
Dowd, J. J. (1975). Aging as exchange: A preface to theory. Journal of Gerontology, 30(5), 584-594.
Dowd, J. J. (1985). Exchange rates and old people. Journal of Gerontology, 35, 595-602.
Duvall, E. M. (1977). Marriage and family development. (5th ed.). Harper & Row.
Eccles, J. & Wang, M. T. (2012). Part I commentary: so what is student engagement anyway? In Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp.133-144). Springer.
Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In W. Damon＆N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, 1018-1095. Wiley.
Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. Norton.
Falk, I.,＆Kilpatrick, S. (2000).What is social capital? A study of rural communities.Sociologial Ruralis,40(1), 87-110.
Ferraro, K. F. (2001). Aging and Role transitions. In R. H. Binstocls & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (pp. 313-330). Academic Press.
Ferraro, K. F. (2007). Afterword:The gerontological imagination. In J. M. Wilmoth＆K. F. Ferraro(Eds.)，Gerontology: Perspectives and Issues (pp.325-342). Springer Publishing Company.
Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. Routledge.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Finn, J. D., & Voelk, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. Journal of Negro Education, 62(3), 249-268.
Fredricks, J. A., Phyllis, B., & Parks, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. N Engl J Med, 303(3), 130-135.
Fries, J. F. (1988). Aging, illness, and health policy: implications of the compression of morbidity. Perspect Biol Med, 31(3), 407-428.
Fries, J.F. (1983). The compression of morbidity. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc, 61(3), 397-419.
Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. (2nd ed.). Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1997). Social capital and the modern capitalist economy: Creating a high trust warkplace. Stern Business Magazine, 4(1), 1-16.
Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital: Civil Society and Development. Third World Quqrterly, 22 (1), 7-20.
Fukuyama, F.(1995).Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press.
Furlong, J. J., Whipple, A. D., St. Jean, G., Simental, J., Soliz, A., & Punthuna, S. (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. California School Psychologist, 8, 99-114.
Furrer, C. J., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing:Building social capital as a development strategy. Sage.
Gold, D. T. (1989). Sibling relationships in old age: A typology.International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 37-51.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973).The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
Grolnick, W. S., Farkas, M. S., Sohmer, R., Michaels, S., & Valsiner, J. (2007). Facilitating motivation in young adolescents: Effects of an after-school program. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 332-344.
Gruenberg, E. M.(1977). The failures of success. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc, 55(1), 3-24.
Halpern, A. (2005). Social capital: The new golden goose. Cambridge: Policy Press.
Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.
Hanifan, L. J. (1920). The community center. Silver Burdett.
Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. David McKay.
Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning and learning society (Vol. 2). London:Routledge.
Kearns, A. (2003). Social capital, regeneration and urban policy. In M. Raco, & R. Imrie (Eds.), Urban renaissance? New labour, community and urban policy (pp.37-60). Policy Press.
Kivinick, H. Q.,＆Sinclair, H. M. (1996). Grandparenthood. In J.E. Birren (Ed.), Encyclopedia of gerontology: Age, aging, and the aged (pp. 611-623). Academic Press.
Klem, A. M., & Connel, J. P. (2004). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907-945.
Kline, R. B. (2011). Princeples and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Knowles, M. S. (1990). The adult learner: A neglected species. Gulf Publishing Company.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. USA, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.
Lamdin L.＆Fugate, M. (1997). Elderlearinig: New frontier in an aging society. Oryx Press.
Laslett, P. (1989). A fresh map of life: The emergance of the third age. Weidenfield and Nicholson.
Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classroom. American Education Research Journal, 30(3), 585-610.
Lin, Nan. (2001).Social captial: A theory of social captial structure and action.: Cambridge University Press.
Londoner, C. A. (1990). Instrumental and expressive education: From needs to goals assessment for educational planning.In R.H.Sherron & D. B. Lumsden(Eds),Introduction to educational gerontology ,8 5-107. Hemisphere Publishing.
Manton, K. G. (1982). Changing concepts of morbidity and mortality in the elderly population. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc, 60(2), 183-244.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.
Mattingly, S. J. (1989). A study of the characteristics of college students over age 65. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Austin.
McClusky, H. Y. (1971). Education: background issues. White House Conference on aging. Washington, D.C.
McCrae, R. R.(1989).Age differences and changes in the use of coping mech- anisms. Jourmals of Gerontology , 44, 161-164.
McKinnon, M., & Vos, J. (2015). Engagement as a threshold concept for science education and science communication. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 5(4), 297-318.
Meyer, D. K. & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 107-114.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass Inc.
Mezirow, J., Taylor, E. W., and Associates (2009). Transformative learning in practice: Insights from conmunity, workplace, and higher education. Jossey-Bass.
Mostain, B. R., & Smart, J. C. (1974). Reasons for participation in adult education courses: A multivariate analysis of group differences. Adult education, 24 (2), 83-98.
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significant and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary school (pp. 11-39). Teachers College Press.
Newton, K. (1999). Social capital and european democracy in modern Europe. In Jan W. Van Deth, Marco Marafi, Ken Newton and Paul F. Whiteley (eds.). Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3-24). Jan W. van Deth, Marco Marafi, Ken Newton, and Paul F Whiteley. Routledge.
Oberschall, A. (1993). Social movements: Ideologies, interests and identities. Transaction.
Osler, W. O. (1935). The Principles and Practice of Medicine (12th ed.). D. Appleton-Century Company.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. Jossey-Bass.
Paul B. Baltes & Margaret M. Baltes (eds)( 1990), Successful Aging (pp. 397), Cambridge University Press.
Peck, R. C. (1955). Psychological development in the second half of life. In J. E. Anderson(Ed.), Psychological aspects of aging (pp. 44-49). American Psychological Association.
Peterson, D. A. (1983). Facilitating education for older learners. Jossey-Bass.
Peterson, D. A. (1985). A History of Education for Older Learners, in D. B. Lumsden(Ed.), The Older Adult As Learner: Aspect of Educational Gerontology (pp. 1-23). Hemisphere.
Pintrich, P. R.,＆De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivation and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.Practice, 33, 564-570.
Putnam, R. D. & Kristin, A. Goss (2002). "Introduction", In Robert D. Putnam (Ed.), Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford University Oress.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: American's declining social capital.Journal of Democracy, 6, 65-78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American community (pp. 288-290). Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2002).The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. SIENA Conference.
Rae, Gouglas (2002). "Foreword", In McLean, Scott L., David A Schultz, and Manfred B. Steger (Ed.), Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and "Bowling Alone." . New York University Press.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L. & Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149-172). Springer.
Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595.
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational psychology, 36(4), 257–267.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169.
Rohe, W. M. (2004). Building social capital through community development. Journal of the American Planning Association,70(2), 158-164.
Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. The Gerontologist, 37(4), 433-440.
Ryan, A. M., & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and change in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Education Research Journal, 38(2), 437-460.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social capital: a review and critique. Social capital: Critical perspectives, 50, 1-38.
Sirin, S., & Jackson, L. R. (2001). Examining school engagement of Africa American adolescents. ERIC database (ED454 318).
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571-581.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 223-245 ). Routledge.
Szreter, S. (1998). Urbanization,mortality, and the standard of living debate: New estimates of the expcctation of life at birth in 19th-century British cities, Ecomomic History Reios, 51, 86-112.
Talento, B. N. (1984). The impact of lifelong learning on the life satisfaction of the older adult. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Claremont Graduate School.
Thomas, J. L. (1992). Adulthood and aging. Allyn and Bacon.
Veiga, F. H. (2016). Assessing student engagement in school: development and validation of a four-dimensional scale. Procedia: social & behavioral sciences, 217, 813-819.
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 1-12.
Wellborn, J. P. (1991). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain.[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Rochester.
Whitbourne, S. K. (2007). Adult development＆aging.(3th ed). John Wiley＆Sons,Inc.
WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Aging. (1984). The uses of epidemiology in the study of the elderly: report of a WHO Scientific Group on the Epidemiology of Aging. Geneva: World Health Organization.
WHO (2000). Ageing and intellectual disabilities -improving longevity and promoting healthy ageing: Summative report. Geneva, Switzerland.
WHO (2002). Active Ageing. A policy framework. WHO: Geneva.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy,Indiana University.
參、線上文獻
內政部（2020）。國人平均壽命表。https://ws.moi.gov.tw/001/Upload/OldFile/news_file/109%E5%B9%B4%E7%AC%AC32%E9%80%B1%E5%85%A7%E6%94%BF%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E9%80%9A%E5%A0%B1_%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E8%A1%A8.pdf
國家教育研究院（2000a）。活動理論—The Activity Theory。教育大辭書。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1307560/
國家教育研究院（2000b）。撤退論—Disengagement Theory。教育大辭書。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1313130/?index=1
國家教育研究院（2000c）。邊際理論。教育大辭書。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1315420/?index=6
國家教育研究院（2021）。學習理論。教育大辭書。https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314264/
國家發展委員會（2021）。高齡化時程表。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=695E69E28C6AC7F3
教育部（2006）。邁向高齡社會老人教育政策白皮書。https://ws.moe.edu.tw/001/Upload/3/RelFile/6315/6929/95.11%E9%82%81%E5%90%91%E9%AB%98%E9%BD%A1%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E8%80%81%E4%BA%BA%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8.pdf
教育部（2016）。「高齡社會：創新學習策略國際論壇」實施計畫。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/EduMoreNewsDataRead?educationMessageFileViewModel.enFormId=NnzI8F3kprAkn5qf1KvtgA_c_c
教育部（2020a）。第2期高齡教育中程發展計畫。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/UploadFiles/20211124111149057.pdf
教育部（2020b）。樂齡課程規劃圖。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/CE5E46778E4A503F?A=C
教育部（2021c）。106年高齡中程教育發展計畫及第2期高齡教育中程發展計畫。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/About
教育部（2021d）。110年度各縣市樂齡學習中心連絡電話及地址一覽表。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/Senior?side_nav=ContentSeniorCenter
教育部（2021e）。全國樂齡學習示範中心列表。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/Senior?side_nav=ContentSeniorCenter_4
教育部（2021f）。110年度各縣（市）樂齡學習中心之統計數據。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/SeniorCenter#tab110
教育部（2021g）。何謂樂齡學習。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/Senior?side_nav=ContentAbout_1
教育部（2021h）。教育部補助各直轄市及縣（市）政府申辦樂齡學習中心實施計畫。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/About-1
教育部樂齡學習網（2021a）。教育部補助辦理樂齡學習活動及獎勵直轄市縣（市）政府辦理樂齡學習業務實施要點。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000962
教育部樂齡學習網（2021b）。樂齡學習中心、樂齡示範中心、樂齡優質中心統計數據。https://moe.senioredu.moe.gov.tw/Home/DemonstrationCenter
勞動部（2016）。勞動基準法強制退休年齡延後至65歲。https://www.mol.gov.tw/announcement/27179/13433/
衛生福利部統計處（2016）。106年老人狀況調查報告。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dos/lp-5095-113-xCat-y106.html
衛生福利部（2015）。高齡社會白皮書規劃報告。https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/AFC4ECD60B18593F?A=C
Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southeast/pdf/REL_2011098.pdf
Bullen, P., & Onyx, J. (1998). Measuring social capital in five communities in NSW. http://www.mapl.com.au/A2.htm
OECD (2009). Society at a Glance, OECD, Paris.https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314264/
The World Bank (1999). What’s social capital? Poverty Net. http://www.worldbank.org/poverty/scapital/whatsc.htm
Yazzie-Mintz (2007). Voices of Students on Engagement: A Report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED495758