本研究旨在探討使用即時回饋系統輔助學習下之學習投入與學習滿意度之相關因素。本研究針對使用即時回饋系統輔助學習的大專通識課學生進行問卷調查，共回收296份問卷，剔除無效問卷後共222份有效問卷。
經過路徑分析結果顯示學習自我效能對認知負荷有顯著負相關；學習自我效能對實用性價值有顯著正相關；認知負荷對實用性價值有顯著負相關；實用性價值對學習投入及學習滿意度有正相關；認知負荷對學習滿意度有正相關。
經過差異分析結果顯示不同性別在學習滿意度上有顯著差異，其餘變項的部分則沒有統計上的顯著差異；不同年級別及不同學院別在各構面皆未達到統計上的顯著差異水準。

This study aims to explore the factors related to learning input and learning satisfaction using the IRS system to assist learning. This study conducted a questionnaire survey on college students who used the IRS system to assist in the study. A total of 296 questionnaires were collected, and 222 valid questionnaires were excluded after the invalid questionnaires were excluded.
Path analysis results show that learning self-efficacy has a significant negative correlation with cognitive load; learning self-efficacy has a significant positive correlation with unility value; cognitive load has a significant negative correlation with unility value; unility value has student engagement and learning satisfaction positive correlation; cognitive load has a positive correlation with learning satisfaction. The results of the difference analysis showed that there were significant differences in learning satisfaction between different genders, and there were no statistically significant differences in the remaining variables. Different grades and different colleges did not reach statistically significant differences in each facet.

王日宏（2008）。台東縣高中生網路素養、網路自我效能與學習網路方式之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺東大學，臺東縣。
王怡萱（2016）。 探究 Kahoot 雲端即時反饋系統輔助高中國文學習之效益。教育傳播與科技研究，115，37-57。
王家健（2011）。淡江大學學生學習投入與學習信心之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
王聖葶（2013）。網路學習者之學習自我效能、自主學習能力與學習投入之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。
阮姿綾（2014）。臺北市國小高年級學生自我效能、智力內隱信念、課室目標結構與學習投入之關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，台北市。
江娟如（2018）。互動式APP-Plickers融入國小二年級數學科教學之研究 －以三位數的加減為例（未出版之碩士論文）。清華大學，新竹市。
財團法人臺灣網路使用中心（2017）。「2017年台灣無線網路使用」報告書。取自：https://www.twnic.net.tw/doc/twrp/201711e.pdf。
吳國清（2005）。我國警察人員電腦犯罪偵防之自我效能傾向研究。警學叢刊，35（5），149-180。
李旻樺（2013）。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習任務價值與課業學習動機調整策略之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
李育逢（2010）。大學身心障礙學生個人背景變項、校園經驗、學習表現及心理社會發展之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
汪慶珍（2017）。即時回饋系統教學對教學互動、學習投入、自我效能與學習滿意度之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
林梅琴（2003）。大學進修部學生投入校園各項經驗與其教育收穫間的關係－以某大學為例。科技整合與社會實踐通識教育研討會論文集，23-45。
林明正（2006）。認知負荷理論與教學。台灣教育，641，41-43。
林美芳（2009）。遊戲自我效能和創意自我效能對玩家之創意表現的影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。
林麗春（2016）。互動式 APP-Plickers 融入低年級學童健康飲食之認知成效探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台中教育大學，台中市。
周曉旻、葉建宏、施勇綸、李進成、林素美（2018）。運用 Socrative 即時反饋評量工具輔助臨床血液學白血球形態教學之成效。台灣醫檢雜誌， 33（2），22-30。
孟祥仁、陳世盟、汪祖胤（2011）。屏東縣偏遠地區國中技藝教育學程學生學習滿意度與生涯發展後設認知相關研究。技術及職業教育學報，4（2），23-44。
柯嘉甄（2003）。國小學生家長對多元評量的覺知與學生的目標導向、學習自我效能之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
洪志泓（2015）。IRS即時反饋系統結合同儕教學對高中物理學習態度與解題能力改善之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，臺北市。
洪邦傑（2016）。IRS即時反饋系統融入四年級數學領域教學之研究-以數與量為例（未出版之碩士論文）。明道大學，彰化縣。
范懿文、陳彙芳（2000）。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理研究，2，45-60。
徐易稜（2001）。多媒體呈現方式對學習者認知負荷與學習成效之影響研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園市。
徐新逸、吳珮瑾（2002）。資訊融入教學的現代意義與具體作為。教學科技與媒體，59，63-73。
郭裕庭（2010）。大學生學習動機、任教意願與學習滿意度之關係研究─以師院改制後之大學教育系為對象（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
陳寶山（2008）。預習導讀、同儕評量與IRS結合運用－以“學校行政”課堂教學為例。學校行政，58，150-180。
陳佳玲（2014）。應用IRS在高中課程研究－以國文課程為例（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，臺北市。
陳彥儒 (2015)。行動裝置搭載擴增實境 App 的呈現方式對國小學童空間旋轉的學習成效、認知負荷與情境興趣影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立交通大學，新竹市。
陳婉如（2015）。數位科技改善國中生數學學習滿意度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。中華大學，新竹市。
翁筱涵（2018）。交互教學法結合即時反饋系統ZUVIO運用於國中學習障礙學生閱讀成效之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。淡江大學，臺北市。
梁茂森（1998）。國中生學習自我效能量表之編制。教育學刊，14，155-192。
張卜仁、吳承燕及高惠珠（2003）。資訊科技融入國小圖像記憶教學行動研究。二○○三年台灣網際網路研討會專題報告。取自：http://www.chu.edu.tw/~jerry/paper/tanet2003/pdf/c2/9780.pdf
張春興（2006）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北：東華。
張春興、林清山（1989）。教育心理學。臺北：東華。
張薰方（2009）。不同行動學習模式融入古蹟探訪活動隊學習成就與認知負荷之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。
張偉豪（2011）。SEM論文寫作不求人。高雄市：三星。
莊淑惠（2011）。第一代與非第一代大學生個人因素、校園經驗與學習成果模式研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式理論與應用（五版）。臺北：五南書局。
康自立（1990）。技職教育課程設計之重要趨勢，中國工業職業教育學會年刊，89 -104。
曾意翔（2012）。商業概論數位教材融入高職商經科學習成效及認知負荷之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
楊致慧（2013）。科技大學英文教師教學風格、師生互動、學生學習投入與學習自我效能關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
廖淑秦（2014）。科技大學餐旅群學生學習動機、學習滿意度與生涯發展關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄餐旅大學，高雄市。
劉信雄（1911）。國小生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能與學業成就關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
稽慶生（2004）。文教行政人員參與回流教育碩士在職進修專班學習滿意度之調查研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
劉子鍵、王瑀（2004）。IRS促進之「螺旋討論模式」:模式之設計與實施。全球華人計算機教育應用學報(GCJCE)。
蔡文榮（2012）。檢視即時反饋系統在大學教學推廣上的現況與展望。海峽科學，63，152-155。
蔡文榮（2015）。探討及時反饋系統運用在大學「管理數學」之教學現況。教育科學期刊，13（2），75-96。
賴瑩瑄（2016）。即時反饋App應用於國中九年級英語文法教學之研究─以Plickers為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
蕭芳樺（2016）。桃竹苗地區高中職餐飲管理科學生人格特質與學習滿意度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
鍾采蓉（2012）。多媒體教材之教學模式對學習者認知負荷與學習態度之影響-以國小高年級「自然與生活科技」為例（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中科技大學，臺中市。
簡瑋成（2012）。學習自我效能、學習投入與學習成就之後設分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南大學，南投縣。
顏予萱、蔡銘修（2018）。即時回饋系統活化補習班教學。臺灣教育評論月刊，7（5），249-253。
Abrahamson, L. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education, 1–25. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of college student personnel, 25(4), 297-308.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4, 359-373.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
Bandura, A. (1997). Personal efficacy in psychobiologic functioning. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), Bandura: A leader in psychology, 43-66. Milan, Italy: Franco Angeli.
Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K. H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate behavioral research, 34(2), 181-197.
Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., & Mellinger, A. E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college‐level courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60-71.
Boomsma, A. (1982). The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction, 149-173.
Breivik, E., & Olsson, U. H. (2001). Adding variables to improve fit: The effect of model size on fit assessment in LISREL. Structural equation modeling: Present and future, 169-194.
Miller, R. B., & Brickman, S. J. (2004). A model of future-oriented motivation and self-regulation. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 9-33.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1-32.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(8), 1-7.
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best-practice tips. Life Sciences Education, 6(1),9-20.
Chen, P. D., Lambert, A.D. and Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners: The impact of Web-bassed learning technology on college student engagement. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
Corkett, J., Hatt, B., & Benevides, T. (2011). Student and teacher self-efficacy and the connection to reading and writing. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(1), 65-98.
Domer, D. E., Carswell, J. W., & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1983). Understanding educational satisfaction. The University of Kansas School of Architecture and Urban Design.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 232 600).
Eccles, J.S., Adler, T., Futterman, R., Goff, S., Kaczala, C., Meece, J., ＆ Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. Spence(Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives, 75-146. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
Eceles, J., Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents` achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletiu, 21, 215-225.
Eccles, J. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation, 105-121. NY: The Guilford Press.
Fredricks,J., Eccles, J. (2002). Children's competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519-533.
Fredricks, J. A., Blunenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A.H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Flammger, D.M. (1991). Nontraditional students and postsecondary school satisfaction. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362077
F Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Gist, M. E.(1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12(3),472-485.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7).
Hu, S., Kuh, G. D., & Li, S. (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 71-81.
Jones, C., Connolly, M., Gear, A., & Read, M. (2001). Group interactive learning with group process support technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 571-586.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Scientific Software International.
Kaplan-Leiserson, E. (2002). E-learning glossary. Retrieved march, 2, 2006. from http://www.learningcircuits.org/glossary.htm
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Knowles, Malcolm S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. New York: Association.
Krywka, C., Paulus, M., Sternemann, C., Volmer, M., Remhof, A., Nowak, G., Nefedov, A., Pöter, B., Spiegel M. & Tolan, M. (2006). The new diffractometer for surface X-ray diffraction at beamline BL9 of DELTA. Journal of synchrotron radiation, 13(1), 8-13.
Kuh, G.D. (2001) Assessing What Really Matters to Student Learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change. 33(3), 10–17.
Kuh, G.D. (2005) Putting Student Engagement Results to Use: Lessons from the Field. Assessment Update. 17(1), 12–13.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J., Bridges, B, Hayek, J. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Washington DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20.
Liu, C. T., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 371-382.
Martin, R. (1988). Minority influence and social categorization: A replication. European journal of social psychology, 18(4), 369-373.
Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological bulletin, 105(3), 430.
Nunnally, J. (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pike, G. R., & Kuh, G. D. (2005). A typology of student engagement for American colleges and universities. Research in higher education, 46(2), 185-209.
Pike, G. R., Smart, J. C., Kuh, G. D., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter?. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847-872.
Polychroni, F., Koukoura, K., & Anagnostou, I. (2006). Academic self‐concept, reading attitudes and approaches to learning of children with dyslexia: Do they differ from their peers?. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 415-430.
Porter, S. R. (2006). Institutional structures and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 47(5), 521-558.
Quaye, S. J., Harper, S. R., & Pendakur, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). " Should I ask for help?" The role of motivation and attitudes in adolescents' help seeking in math class. Journal of educational psychology, 89(2), 329.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 550-558.
Rodgers, T. (2008). Student engagement in e-learning process and the impact on their grades. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 1(2), 143-156.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.
Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific studies of reading, 3(3), 257-279.
Siau, K., Sheng, H., & Nah, F. H. (2006). Use of a classroom response system to enhance classroom interactivity. IEEE Transactions on Education, 49(3), 398-403.
Small, R. V., & Venkatesh, M. (2000). A cognitive-motivational model of decision satisfaction. Instructional science, 28(1), 1-22.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204.
Sun, J. C. Y., & Chen, A. Y. Z. (2016). Effects of integrating dynamic concept maps with Interactive Response System on elementary school students' motivation and learning outcome: The case of anti-phishing education. Computers & Education, 102, 117-127.
Stajkovic, A. D., & Sommer, S. (2000). Self efficacy and causal attributions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 707-737.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
Tough, A.(1978). The major learning efforts: recent research and future directions. Adult Education, 28(4), 250-265.
Tough, A. (1979). The Adult's Learning Projects: A Fresh Approach to Theory and Practice in Adult Learning, 2nd edn. University Associates (Learning Concepts), San Diego, and Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario
Uekawa, K., Borman, K., & Lee, R. (2007). Student engagement in US urban high school mathematics and science classrooms: Findings on social organization, race, and ethnicity. The Urban Review, 39(1), 1-43.
Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents’ self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556-1574.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, develpoement, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30, 1-35.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Leading for Engagement. Principal Leadership, 10(7), 54-58.
Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender differences in self-regulated online learning environment. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 12-22.
Zhao, C. M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in higher education, 45(2), 115-138
Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of educational Psychology, 82(1), 51.