研究生: |
廖炳煌 |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
探索教育課程目標與內容之研究 Study of Curriculum Objectives and Content in Adventure Education |
指導教授: | 蔡居澤 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
論文出版年: | 2008 |
畢業學年度: | 96 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 130 |
中文關鍵詞: | 探索教育/冒險教育 、課程目標 、課程內容 |
英文關鍵詞: | Adventure Education, Curriculum Objectives, Curriculum Content |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:260 下載:120 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
探索教育(Adventure Education, AE)活動,是一套盛行於歐、美等國的體驗教育活動。此套課程主要用來培養青少年刻苦自勵精神、促進創造力、增進人際關係與團隊信任、培養自信心與自我成長。探索教育所秉持的理念及方法,例如:以學習者為中心、培養帶著走的能力…等理念,非常適合現今教育改革的推動方向,同時又是操作性極高的一套活動方式,如果課程的操作可以從課程目標的釐清與設定開始,並且挑選適當的內容,然後著重在過程的引導及反思,最後再以評估程序做為課程效益的評價和課程修正時的依據,不只是著重在活動帶領的樂趣及評估課程反應及滿意度而已,是以,整理出一套完整的課程目標及內容,應是當前刻不容緩的課題,也是本研究的目的。
現今國內研究探索教育之方向,多是直接測量參加者反應的研究居多,少有人針對課程發展中的課程目標及內容著手研究。因此,以本國學者專家之意見,共同整理出適合現今教師所需要的課程內容,有急切的需要,如果沒有一系列正確的課程目標及相關課程內容,無法確保課程品質及產出。
本研究透過相關文獻探討整理出探索教育在國內外課程發展之經驗,找出探索教育課程之目標和內容。採用德懷術(Delphi Technique)問卷調查法,邀請學者專家組成德懷術小組,針對探索教育的課程目標與內容,進行問卷調查,獲得德懷術小組成員一致的意見。本文主要研究結果如下:
一、國內「探索教育課程目標」包含:表達與溝通、傾聽、自我察覺、品格發展、破除人際藩籬、同理心、情緒掌握、衝突管理、解決問題的技巧、建構解決問題的共同模式、個人決策、團隊決策、領導、互助與合作、信任建立、群我意識建構、潛能開發、建立個人的願景及使命、尊重大自然。
二、國內「探索教育課程內容」包含:溝通活動、目標設立活動、熱身活動、自我察覺活動、信任活動、問題面對與解決活動、延伸活動、繩索場地的低空挑戰活動、高空繩索挑戰活動、戶外冒險活動。
Adventure education is a set of experiential education activities which are popular in Europe, the United States and other countries. The curriculum for adventure education courses is designed to nurture youth spirit of self motivation, to promote creativity, to enhance social skill and team trust, to build self confidence and encourage personal growth. The concept and the method in which learner oriented adventure education is acting on, for example, to nurture self ability and so on, is very suitable for the direction of the current education revolution and is a set of activity patterns with high operability. Course operation starts from the clarification and setting of the course objectives, and choosing appropriate content. After the content is delivered the course focuses on the debriefing and reflection of the process. Finally, the course staff evaluates the program to assess its benefits in order to establish a foundation for the next course. Adventure education therefore not only emphasizes the inherent fun of leading a course, and the evaluation and satisfaction of the participants, it also emphasizes the urgency of course objectives and content which is the focus of this study.
Currently in Taiwan research in adventure education is mostly focusing on participants’ responses to their course experience and not on the objectives and content in the curriculum development process. Therefore, compiling a complete set of objectives and content for adventure education should be our main subject. Futhermore, based on the comments of domestic scholars and experts, jointly compiling suitable curriculum to satisfy teachers’ needs deserves higher priority. If there is no adequate series of targets for curriculum objectives and the related curriculum content, there is no way to ensure curriculum quality and output.
The purpose of this study was to review the domestic and international adventure education resources in order to discover the objectives and content within the curriculum development process. It also included a questionnaire distributed to a Delphi Technique group made up of scholars and experts in the adventure education field in order to come up with a single group opinion about objectives and content.
The results are summarized as the following:
1. The domestic Adventure Education curriculum objectives are expressing and communicating, listening, self awareness, character development, breaking people barrier, empathy, emotion control, conflict management, problem solving technique, building common mode of problem solving, personal decision making, teamdecisionmaking,leadership, cooperation, trust building, and group-individual concept, potential exploitation, building up the self vision and mission, and respecting nature.
2. The Adventure Education curriculum content includes communication activitits, goal setting activitits, warm-up activitits, self awareness activitits, trust activitits, initiative problems activitits, variations activitits, low elements challenging activitits, high elements challenging activitits, and outdoor adventure activitits.
中文部分
王秀玲(民95)。課程理論的先驅:R. W. Tyler《課程與教學的基本原理》。中等教育月刊,57:1,130-143
李義男(民92)。探索教育與諮商治療。臺北市:水牛圖書。
林秀珍(民96)。經驗與教育探微-杜威(J.Dewey)教育哲學之詮釋。臺北市:師大書苑。
竺定宇(民93)。探索教育對企業團隊效能之影響。國立臺灣師範大學運動與休閒管理研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
周鳳琪(民90)。國中適應不良學生參與探索諮商團體之效益研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文,臺北市。
姜文閔譯(民81) 杜威(Dewey)原著。經驗與教育(Experience and Education)。台北:五南出版。(原作1938年出版)
黃光雄、蔡清田(民87)。課程設計—理論與實際。台北巿:五南出版社。
黃政傑(民76)。課程評鑑。臺北市:師大書苑。『沒有使用之文獻』
黃政傑(民80)。課程設計。臺北市:東華書局。
黃政傑(民94)。課程思想。臺北縣:冠學文化。
黃炳煌(民91)。課程理論之基礎(6版)。臺北市:文景書局。
游家政 (民91)。課程革新。臺北市:師大書苑。
廖炳煌、魏大統(民95)。從探索教育課程設計實務發展國民中學班級經營模式。中等教育月刊,57:1,36-63。
廖炳煌 (民96)。TA團隊探索課程講義。團隊發展公司未出版。
歐用生(民83)。課程發展的模式探討。高雄市:高雄復文圖書。
歐用生(民92)。課程發展的基本原理。高雄市:高雄復文圖書。
陳麗敏(民94)。組織型露營課程領導人員證照制度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文,臺北市。
蔡居澤(民93)。國民中學綜合活動學習領域活動課程設計:以探索教育活動為例。公民訓育學報,16,37-55。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(民90)。探索教育與活動學校。臺南市:翰林出版。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(民96a)。探索教育引導技巧培訓手冊。桃園縣:中華探索。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌(民96b)。探索教育與活動學校(3版)。桃園縣:中華探索。
鍾啟暘(民93)。探索教育活動對高中學生自我概念與失敗容忍力影響研究。
國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,彰化市。
英文部份
Adventure Programming Workshop (1996). Adventure Programming Workshop. Project Adventure Publishing. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
Bisson, C. (1999). Sequencing the adventure Experience. In J. C. Miles, & S. Priest, (Eds.), Adventure Programming (pp.205-214). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Bunker, L., & Rotella, R. (1977). Getting them up, not uptight. In J. R. Thomas (Ed.), Youth sport guide for coaches and parents (pp.75-87). Washington, DC: NASPE.
Burrington, B. (1995). Youth Leadership in Action: A Guide to Cooperative Games and Group Activities. Dubuque IA: Kendall Hunt.
Blenkin, G.M., & Kelly, A.V. (1981). The Primary Curriculum. London : Harper and Row.
Boy Scouts of America (2001). Project Cope. Ashmore, IL: Boy Scouts of America.
Fortier, S.(Ed.)(1995). Youth Leadership in Action – A Guide to Cooperative Games and Group Activities. Dubuque IA: Kendall Hunt.
Campbell, M., Liebowitz, M., Mednick, A., & Rugen, L. (Eds.). (1998). Guide for Planning a Learning Expedition–Expeditionary Learning Outward Bound. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Dick, P., Jane, P., & Rufus, C. (Eds.). (2007). Adventure Education:Theory and applications. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Flavin, M.(1996). Kurt Hahn’s School & Legacy – To Discover You Can be More and Do More Than You Believed. Wilmington, DE: The Middle Atlantic Press.
Gass, M. A. (1993). The Evolution of Processing Adventure Therapy Experiences . In M. A. Gass (Ed.) Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic applications of adventure programming (pp.219-229). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Grout, J., & Hall, N. (2007). The High5 Guide. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Gilbertson, K., Bate, T., Mclaughlin, T., & Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor Education-Methods and Strategies. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Gills, H.L.(1995). Adventure Based Counseling - Workshop Manual Second Edition. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
Hirst, S.M. (1969). Populations in a Transvaal Lowveld Nature Reserve. Zoologica Africana. 4(2):199–230.
Kelly, A.V. (1977). The Curriculum-Theory and Practice, London : Harper and Row.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kraft, R. & Sakofs, M.(1985). The Theory of Experiential Education. Boulder, CO: Association of Experiential Education.
Lawton, M.P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85-89.
Outward Bound International(2007). PROFESSIONAL. Retrieved Aug. 14, 2007, from http://www.outwardbound.net/
Panicucci, J., Hunt, L.F., Kohut, A., Rheingold, A., & Stratton, N. (2002). Adventure Curriculum for Physical Education-Middle School. Beverly, MA: Project Adventure.
Priest, S., & Gass M.A. (2005). Effective Leadership in Adventure Programming. (2nd ed. )Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Priest, S., & Gass, M.A. (1999). The Learning in Adventure Programming. In J. C. Miles & S. Priest(Eds.) Adventure Programming (pp.179-180). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Prouty, D.(1991). Project Adventure-A Brief History. In Project Adventure(Ed.) Adventure Programming Workshop Manual (pp.5-23). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Rohnke, K.(1977). Cowstails & Cobras-A guide to Ropes Courses, Initiative Games, and other Adventure Activities. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
Rohnke, K. (1984). Silver Bullets-A Guide to Initiative Problems, Adventure Games amd Trust Activities. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Rohnke, K. (1989). Cowstails and cobras II. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
Rohnke, K., & Butler S. (1995).Quick Silver. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt..
Rohnke, K. (2004).Funn’N Games. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Roland, C., Summers, S., Freidman, M., Barton, G., & McCarthy, K. (1987). Creation of an experiential challenge program. Therapeutic Recreation Journal. 21(2), 54-63.
Schoel, J., Prouty, D., & Radcliffe, P. (Eds.)(1988).Islands of Healing – A Guide to Adventure Based Counseling. Hamilton, MA: Project Adventure.
Tsai, J. T. (2006). The identification of the components for an outdoor education cuuriculum in Taiwan. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, USA.
Wheeler, A. (1967). Grammatical structure in Siona discourse. Lingua, 19: 60-77.