簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高慧鈴
Huey-Ling Kao
論文名稱: 組織吸引力對應徵者主觀適配知覺的影響
The Effect of Organization Attraction on Subjective P-O Fit:The Moderating Effect of Objective P-O Fit and Preference for Consistency
指導教授: 顏志龍
Yen, Chih-Long
李隆盛
Lee, Lung-Sheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 國際人力資源發展研究所
Graduate Institute of International Human Resource Developmemt
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 65
中文關鍵詞: 組織吸引力主觀適配客觀一致性知覺
英文關鍵詞: organization attraction, subjective P-O fit, objective P-O fit, preference for consistency
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:191下載:14
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過去的文獻普遍支持以下推論:應徵者對組織的客觀適配知覺會影響其對組織的主觀適配知覺,進而影響其被該組織吸引的程度.此外,應徵者的保持一致性的需求為造成此推論的潛在可能原因.然而,過去的研究多半使用相關法進行研究,因此,以上推論所隱涵的因果關係並未被證明.根據文獻,本研究提出另一種可能的推論關係:應徵者乃先被組織吸引,方才形成對其對組織的主觀適配知覺,而客觀適配知覺則調節以上變項間的關係.最後,本研究亦檢驗一致性知覺的調節效果.本研究採用實驗法,設計一間虛擬組織,操弄其組織吸引力,以檢驗不同組織吸引力對應徵者主觀適配知覺的影響.研究結果發現,應徵者面對高組織吸引力的組織時,其主觀適配知覺程度為高,且不受客觀適配程度的影響.此外,一致性知覺亦不具有調節效果.此外,本研究亦蒐集跨時點資料,支持以上研究結果的穩定性,同時,亦探討變項間互為因果的可能性.相關的研究發現與應用,請參考本研究.

    In the organization attraction literature, it is widely supported that objective person-organization fit (P-O fit) influences the subjective P-O fit, which, in turn, influences the organization attraction. However, the past research is not conducted in the experimental setting. Thus, the casual relation is precarious. In the present study, it is expected that organization attraction influences the subjective P-O fit, not the opposite. Besides, an experimental design is used to affirm the causal effect of the organization attraction on subjective P-O fit, which is ignored in the literature. In addition, the present study examined the mediating effects of subjective P-O fit on the relationship between organization attraction and intention to apply to a job. At last, the moderating effect of objective P-O fit and preference for consistency on the relationship between organization attraction and subjective P-O fit was examined. 83 soon-to-graduate students were invited to participate in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to read information of hypothetical company which was either low or high in organization attraction, and then completed the questionnaires. After two weeks, 60 of the 83 subjects completed another questionnaire of subjective fit and organization attraction, without reading any information. The results indicate that the organization attraction influences the participants’ subjective P-O fit (both Time1 and Time2). However, the moderating effects of both objective P-O fit and preference for consistency (PFC) are not significant. Finally, subjective P-O fit partially mediated the relationship between organization attraction and application intention (both Time1 and Time2). The implications of research findings are discussed.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION……………………………………………..1 CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW Organizational Attraction Literature……………………………………………....5 Organizational Attraction and P-O Fit……………………………………….........8 The Moderating Effect of Objective P-O Fit….......................................................12 The Moderating Effect of Preference for Consistency……....................................14 CHAPTER III METHODOLOGY Pilot Study……………………………………………………………………….17 Formal Experiment………………………………………………………………20 Instruments………………………………………………………………………23 CHAPTER IV RESULTS……………………………………………………..30 CHAPTER V DISCUSSION Discussion…………………………………………..………………………….....36 Strength……………………………………..……………..………………….......39 Limitations….............................................…………………….............................40 Implication and Future Research…….................... ……………….......................43 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………….45 APPENDICES Appendix A………………………………….……………………….………….49 Appendix B……………………………..…...…………………………………..57 Appendix C……………………………………………………………………..62 Appendix D……………………………………………………………………..64 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1 Forty Value Items of OCP ………………………………………………….23 Table 3.2 Measurement Items of Subjective P-O fit…………………………………..24 Table 3.3 Measurement Items of Application Intention……………………………….25 Table 3.4 Measurement Items of PFC Scale…………………………………………...26 Table 3.5 Measurement Items of Organization Attraction …………………………….27 Table 3.6 Measurement Items of Subjective P-O Fit…………………………………..28 Table 3.7 Measurement Items of Organization Attraction……………………………..29 Table 3.8 Measurement Items of Application Intention………………………………..29 Table 4.1 Descriptive Statistics and Intercorrelations among Study Variables………...30 Table 4.2 Independent Samples T-test………………………………………………....31 Table 4.3 Mediators Regressed on Independent Variables…………………………….32 Table 4.4 Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis……………………………….33 Table 4.5 Hierarchical Moderated Regression Analysis……………………………….34 Table 4.6 Mediators Regressed on Independent Variables…………………………….35 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Study Structure……………………………………………………………..16

    Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Are you attracted? Do you intend to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 219-236.
    Allen, V. L. (1968). Role theory and consistency theory. In R. P. Alberson, E. Aroson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Ronsenberg, M. J. Ronsenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.). Cognitive consistency theories:A sourcebook (pp. 201-109). Chicago:Rand McNally and Company.
    Baron, R. H., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
    Block, J. (1978). The Q-sort method of personality assessment and psychiatric research. Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., LePine, M. A., & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). Individual job-Choice decisions and the impact of job attributes and recruitment practices:A longitudinal field study. Human Resource Management, 42, 27-37.
    Breaugh, J. A., & Starke, M. (2000). Research on employee recruitment:So many studies, so many remaining questions. Journal of Management, 26, 405-434.
    Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. NY:Academic Press.
    Cable, D. M. & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preference and job search decisions:A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317-348.
    Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organization entry. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 294-311.
    Caildini, R. B., Trost, M. R., & Newsom, J. T. (1995). Preference for consistency:The development of a valid measure and the discovery of surprising behavioral implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 318-328.
    Carless, S. A. (2005). Person-job fit versus person-organization fit as predictors of organizational attraction and job acceptance intentions:A longitudinal study. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 411-429.
    Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choices:A meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 928-944.
    Chatman, J. (1989). Improving international organizational research:A model of person-organizational fit. Academy of Management Review, 14, 333-349.
    Dineen, B. R. (2003). The effects of customizing recruitment information to individual job seekers in a web-based recruitment context:A multi-level experimental investigation (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, 2003). Dissertation Abstracts International, 65, 599.
    Dineen, B. R., Ash, S. R., & Noe, R. A. (2002). A web of applicant attraction:Person-organization fit in the context of web-based recruitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 723-734.
    Ehrhart, K. H., & Ziegert, J. C. (2005). Why are individuals attracted to organizations? Journal of Management, 31, 901-919.
    Fishbein, J. D., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior:An introduction to theory and research. MA:Addison-Wesley.
    Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414-427.
    Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 986–1001.
    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
    Judge, T. A., & Bretz, R. D. (1992). Effects of work value on job choice decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 261-271.
    Judge, T. A., & Cable, D. M. (1997). Applicant personality, organizational culture, and organizational attraction. Personnel Psychology, 50, 359-394.
    Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit:An interactive review of its conceptualizations, measurement and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49.
    Kristof-Brown, A. I., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual’s fit at work:A meta-analysis of person-job, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-342.
    Lievens, F., & Highhouse, S. (2003). The relation of instrumental and symbolic attributes to a company’s attractiveness as an employer. Personnel Psychology, 56, 75-101.
    McGuire, W. J. (1966). The current status of cognitive consistency theories. In S. Feldman (Ed.). Cognitive consistency:Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents (pp. 1-46). NY:Academic Press.
    Nail, P. R., Correll, J. S., Drake, C. E., Glenn, S. B., Scott, G. M., & Stuckey, C. (2001). A validation study of the preference for consistency scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1193-1202.
    O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture:A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487-516.
    Ravlin, E. C., & Ritchie, C. M. (2006). Perceived and actual fit:Multiple influences on attitudes. Journal of Managerial Issues,ⅩⅤⅢ, 175-192.
    Roberson, Q. M., Collins, C. J., & Oreg, S. (2005). The effects of recruitment message specificity on application to organizations. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19, 319-339.
    Ryan, A. M., Horvath, M., & Kriska, S. D. (2005). The role of recruiting source informativeness and organizational perceptions in decisions to apply. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 235-248.
    Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choices, and post-hire consequences:A call for new research direction. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 399-444). Palo Alto, CA:Consulting Psychologists Press.
    Rynes, S. L., & Barber, A. E. (1990). Applicant attraction strategies:An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 15, 286-310.
    Scheu, C. R. (2000). Achieving recruiting goals:Applying what we know about person-organization fit across a range of organizational image. (Master dissertation, Michigan State University, 2000). Master Abstracts International, 39, 603
    Schnieder, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 150-163.
    Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
    Turban, D. B., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 733-751.
    Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness:An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184-193.

    QR CODE