簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 劉欣宜
Hsin-Yi Liu
論文名稱: 高中教師對全球觀融入第二外語教學知覺之調查
The survey of infusing global perspectives into the second foreign language teaching at the Senior High Schools in Taiwan
指導教授: 李咏吟
Li, Yong-Yin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育學系
Department of Education
論文出版年: 2004
畢業學年度: 92
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 170
中文關鍵詞: 全球觀全球教育高中第二外語
英文關鍵詞: global perspectives, global education, the second foreign language in senior high school
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:283下載:47
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

本研究的主要目的在透過全球觀與全球教育之相關研究,建構全球觀融入第二外語教學之六大結構成分,分別為:「了解學生全球知識與態度」、「教導全球關聯知識」、「多種教學資源的使用」、「多樣化教學策略」、「跨學科合作」,以及「多元評量學生學習」。採用量化研究的方式探討第二外語教師對全球觀融入教學之六大結構成分的知覺重要程度與實施滿意程度,以了解高中第二外語教師在不同背景變項的投入下,分析出調查資料之所得,進而研析其間差異之情形。
本研究以自編「全球觀融入第二外語教學之調查問卷」為研究工具,對全國高中第二外語教師進行調查研究,研究樣本共200位,其回收率為65. 5%,有效樣本為131位,可用率為98.5%。調查所蒐集之資料,主要以平均數、T考驗、單因子變異數分析,及Scheffe’事後比較法等統計方法進行資料分析。
根據統計分析結果,本研究主要發現如下:
一、在全球觀融入教學的各項重要成分中,第二外語教師普遍認為以「了解學生全球知識與態度」和「多種教學資源的使用」兩向度最為重要。
二、全球觀融入第二外語教學之落實不足,教師實施滿意度普遍偏低。
三、 教師對跨學科合作的重視度不高,未與全球統整課程設計之主流配合。
四、多元教學策略、教學評量之使用的觀念有待加強。
根據研究結果提出以下建議:
一、 對教育行政機關方面:
(一) 全球教育相關研究的充實,以提供有心教師參考方向與實施依據。
(二) 提供教師與學生跨文化學習機會,大大利於全球觀的發展。
(三) 將第二外語教師納入正式教師的編制,有助於跨學科合作與教學內容的充實。
二、 對學校教育人員的建議
(一) 善用辯論、角色扮演等教學策略,活潑外語教學。
(二) 進行跨校跨區的跨學科課程發展。

The aim of the study was to explore definition of global perspectives and global education, and tried to construct the main six components of infusing global perspectives into the teaching of the second foreign language. The main six components included: the understanding of students’ world knowledge and attitude, the teaching of world knowledge, the using of various teaching resources, the using of various teaching strategies, the cooperation of cross-subjects, and the using of multiple assessment. In addition, the author examined the perspective differences on the aboved six components of the second-language foreign teachers from the senior high schools with the diverse backgrounds by means of questionnaire survey.
According to the structure of the study, the author developed questionnaire of infusing global perspectives into the second foreign language teaching as research tool to conduct the investigation. The subjects were teachers of the second foreign languages from senior high schools in Taiwan. There were 200 teachers responding the surveys, and the return rate of the questionnaire was 65.5% and the usable rate is 98.5%. The main statistical methods used mean, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and Scheffe Post Hoc Multiple Comparisons.
According to the findings of the survey, conclusions were made as follows:
1. Upon the implementation of infusing the global perspectives into the second foreign language, the teachers’ satisfaction levered to low satisfaction, thus there is still a lot of room for improvement.
2. Upon the implementation of cooperation of cross-subjects teacher acts, the teachers expressed low degree of implementing interdisciplined-curriculum upon their teaching.
3. The use of multiple teaching strategies and assessment for the second-language foreign teachers needed to be strengthened.
Some suggestions were provided for educational administration institutions and the second foreign language teachers based on the findings of the study.

第一章 緒 論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究動機與目的…………………………………………………1 第二節 待答問題與名詞釋義……………………………………………6 第三節 研究方法與步驟…………………………………………………8 第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………… 10 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………11 第一節 全球觀與全球教育………………………………………………11 第二節 全球教育與第二外語教學……………………………………25 第三節 融入全球觀之第二外語的教與學……………………………36 第三章 研究設計與實施………………………………………………49 第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………49 第二節 研究工具………………………………………………………50 第三節 研究樣本與調查實施…………………………………………56 第四節 資料處理與統計………………………………………………62 第四章 調查結果之分析與討論………………………………………63 第一節 第二外語教師對全球觀融入教學之各成份的知覺重要程度 概況………………………………………………………………………… 63 第二節 第二外語教師對全球觀融入教學之各成份的實施滿意程度 概況………………………………………………………………………… 87 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………114 第一節 主要研究發現摘要……………………………………………115 第二節 結論……………………………………………………………121 第三節 建議……………………………………………………………123

一、中文部分
台灣巴別塔第二外語教育網站(2001)。論第二外語教學。2003年6月28日,取自http://ccms.ntu.edu.tw/~luisa/article/babel_rocmelia.htm
吳明烈(2002)。WTO體系中的教育變革與發展全民終身學習的觀點。成人教育,66,23-30。
沈坤宏(1996)。國小六年級學童世界觀之研究。國立台東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東。
何欣穎(2001)。管理教育國際觀化之實證研究—以台灣地區技職體系學校為例。國立東華大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮。
林彩岫(1989)。小學的全球教育。國教輔導,29(2),7-11。
林瑞榮(1988)。小學社會課程的發展趨勢及其啟示。國立台灣師範大學碩士論文,未出版,台北。
洪美齡(1997a)。嘉義市國小社會科教師的全球觀教學現況研究。國民教育研究學報,3,45-73。
洪美齡(1997b)。教師的全球觀教學研究:以嘉義市國小社會科教師為例。(國科會專案報告,計畫編號:NSC85-2413-H-023-003)
高薰芳、蔡大立(2002)。全球教育在師資培育實施之研究:職前教師全球視野之培育。載於中華民國師範教育學會,師資培育的政策與檢討(頁74-121)。台北:中華民國師範教育學會。
教育部中教司(2000a)。高級中學選修科目第二外國語課程標準。2003年6月28日,取自http://www.edu.tw/high-school/i1301/course/update/index.htm
教育部中教司(2000b)。推動高級中學第二外語教育五年計劃。2003年6月28日,取自http://www.edu.tw/high-school/rules/one/3/14.htm
許雅惠(1998)。高中第二外語之現況與未來發展評估。人文及社會科學教學通訊,9(4),147-166。
許雅惠(2000)。迎接高級中學第二外語教育新紀元。中等教育,51(2),57-61。
郭金水等人(1994)。國立台北師範學院全球教育實施現況分析。台北師院學報,7,379-426。
郭俊賢、陳淑惠(譯)(1999)。L. Campbell, & B. Campbell, & D. Dickinson著。多元智慧的教與學。台北:遠流。
郭為藩(1995)。教育改革的省思。台北:天下文化。
黃景裕(1994)。我國小學全球教育課程實施。臺海兩岸,冬季號,46-59。
楊國賜(1995)。現代化與教育革新。台北市:師大書苑。
蔡佩芳(1999)。全球觀融入國小社會科教學之合作行動研究 : 以四年級為例。國立嘉義大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
蔡清華(1987)。社會科教學新途徑─「全球教育課程之分析」。教育文粹,16,12-19。
鄭佳美(譯)(2000)。D. Crystal著。英語帝國。台北:貓頭鷹。
鄭燕祥(1990)。新世紀教育改革:多元智能與全球化、本土化及個別化。載於中國教育學會主編,新世紀的教育願景(頁1-41)。台北:台灣書店。
顏佩如(2003)。課程圖像重建:學校全球教育課程發展之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。
簡妙娟(1992)。全球教育所需之師資。師友,300,20-21。
簡妙娟(1997)。全球教育的教學策略。教師之友。38(4),40-45。
蘇復興(1995)。評國、高中開設第二外語課程。國立編譯館通訊,8(1),43-45。
二、英文部分
Alger, C. F., & Harf, J. E. (1984). Global education: Why? For whom? About what? Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University.
Anderson, L. F. (1977). Global education in elementary schools: An overview. Social Education, 41(1), 34-37.
Ayyar, R. V. (1996). Educational policy planning & globalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(4), 347-354.
Bennett, C. (1992). Strenthening multicultural and global perspectives in the curriculum. In Bragaw, D., & Thomson, W. S. (Eds), Multicutiral education: A global approach (pp.28-32). New York: The American Forum for Global Education.
Brogan, M. L. (1990). Trends in international education: New imperatives. College and Research Libraries, 51(3), 28-35.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (1996). Education, globalization & economic development. Journal of Education Policy, 11(1), 1-25.
Cakmak, S. B. (1993). Educational and sociocultural roots of prejudices and approximations to globalism: American high school students perceptions of universal cultural diversity and concerns for humanity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation of Philosophy, the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Case, R. (1993). Key elements of a global perspective. Social Education, 57(6), 318-325.
Cothran, D. (1986). Foreign language use in international trade and commerce: Trends in the southeastern United States─Part II: The universitys’response. In N. S. Nicholson, (Eds.), Languages in the international perspectives (pp. 241-252). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
Crossette, B. (2000, Sep). Globalization: Tops 3 U.N. agenda for world leaders. A paper presented at the Summit conferences of New York Times, NY.
CyberGuard. (2004). New global education program from CyberGuard. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 79(5), 13-14.
David, H. (2003). Thirty years of global education: A reminder of key principles and precedents. Educational Review, 55(3), 265-275.
Dekock, A. & Paul, C. (1989). One district's commitment to global education. Education leadership, 7(1), 46-49.
Fowler, F. C. (1994). International arena:The global village. Journal of Education Policy, 9(5-6), 89-102.
Garavalia, B. J. (1997). International education: How it is defined by U. S. students and foreign students. Clearing House, 70(4), 215-221.
Gay, G. (1983). Multiethnic education: Historical developments & future prospects. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 560-563.
Gillian, M. C., & Remy, R. C. (1978). Needed: A new approach to global education. Social education, 39(3), 136-148.
Green, A. (1999). Education & globalization in Europe & East Asia: Convergent & divergent trends. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), 55-71.
Gualdoni, T. (1980). Global education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, Michigan.
Hanvey, R. G. (1976). An attainable global perspective. Denver, Colombia: Center for Teaching International Relations.
Hanvey, R. G. (1982). An attainable global perspective. Theory into practice, 21(3), 162-167.
Henrny, M., Lingard, B., Rizvi, F., & Taylor, S. (1999). Working with/ against globalization in education. Journal of Education Policy, 14 (1), 85-97.
Hudock, T. (1990). Global perspectives in education. Global Pages, 8 (1), 7.
Johnson, D. (1993). Academic and intellectual foundations of teacher education in global age. Social Education, 56(2), 211-223.
King, E. W. (1992). Education for world awareness: Teaching strateies for worldmindness. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the schools (pp. 229-240). London: The Falmer Press.
King, E. W. (2000). Nigel grant’s contribution to comparative education. Comparative Education, 36(2), 129-133.
Kniep, W. M.(1986). Defining a global education by its content. Social Education, 50, 437-446.
Massialas, B. (1991). Education for international under-standing. In Shaver, J., Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
Mead, M. (1970). Culture and commitment. New York: Doubleday.
Merryfield, M. M. (1991). Preparing American secondary social studies teachers to teach with a global perspective: A status report. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 11-20.
Merryfield, M. M. (1992). From teacher education to the classroom: Reflections of practitioners on their teacher education experiences in global perspectives. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
Merryfield, M. M. & White, C. (1996). Teacher decision making and global perspectives in education: A conversation about teachers’ goals and world views in the context of classroom instruction. Paper presented to the Conference of the American forum, Indianaplois.
Metcalf, M. F. (1998). The role of foreign languages in the internationalization of the curriculum. In J. A. Mestenhauser, & B. J. Ellingboe (Eds.), Reforming the higher education curriculum (pp. 83-91). Phoenix, Arizona: Oryx Press.
Michigan State Department of Education. (1978). Global education guidelines. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED159106)
Myers(2001). The impact of international experience on teaching with a global perspective: Reflections of returned Peace Corps volunteer teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio state university, Ohio.
NCSS(1982). Position statement on global education. Social Education. 46(1), 36-38.
O’Neil, J. (1989). Global education: Controversy remains, but support growing. ASCD Curriculum Update, 29, 1-8.
Paige, R. M. & Mestenhauser, J. A. (1999). Internationalizing educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(4), 18-33.
Pike, G., & Selby, D. (1988). Global teacher, global learner. University of New York: Center for global education.
Pike, G., & Selby, D.(1999). In the global classroom. Toronto: Pippin.
Po, T. (2001, February). Globalization, localization & individualization for the future. Paper presented at the International Conference on Education Reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region, Hong Kong.
Ramler, S. (1991). Teaching and learning in a global society. Independent School, 61(3), 100-107.
Rothenberg, P. (1988). Integrating the study of race, gender, & class: Some preliminary observations. Feminist Teacher, 3, 37-42.
Tye, K. A. & Kniep, W. M. (1991). Global education around the world. Educational Leadership, 48(7), 47-49.
Tye, B. B. & Tye, K. A. (1992). Global Education: A study of school change. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Tye, K. A. (2003). Global education as a worldwide movement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(2), 165-168.

QR CODE