本研究旨在探討企業實施體驗式教育訓練方案，對於組織集體效能之影響為何。

隨著體驗教育的發展，目前已有許多將體驗教育運用到學校教學現場的研究實證，體驗教育之效益有目共睹。在美國，企業運用體驗式教育訓練方式針對企業組織較重視的議題，如: 團隊建立、績效、問題解決、溝通等來安排訓練的課程主題已有很長的一段時間，且體驗教育的特性可適用在不同的情境設計，來達到訓練目標。

本研究是以一企業組織為研究對象，以問卷調查及半結構式訪談收集樣本資料。研究結果顯示，體驗式教育訓練方案的確有助於提升組織集體效能，且效果不因性別、年紀及工作年資有所差異，在集體效能的九個面向中，體驗式教育訓練方案對於「使命必達」、「具有影響力」有顯著的影響。實施體驗式教育訓練方案對組織集體效能的影響則包括「激發出團員克服困難的慾望與不服輸的精神」、「提升決策效率，加速達成目標」、「改善溝通方式，讓團隊更和諧」、「樂於分享，樂於協助他人」、「重新領悟已知的概念，運用於職場上」。

The purpose of the study was to search into the effect on enterprise collective efficacy through implementation of experiential education programs.
With the development of experiential education, there have been many studies about applying experiential education programs at school. So we can know the benefits of experiential education better. In the United States, enterprises like to utilize experiential education to execute important themes that companies take seriously, like team building, achievements, problem solving, and communication. Especially, experiential education can be used in different scenarios to reach the objectives of training.
The object of the study was an enterprise. I collected and analyzed the data of the samples via questionnaire survey and semi-structured interviewing. The results of the study reveal experiential education can facilitate collective efficacy indeed and show no differences between gender, age, or how long you’ve been serving the company. For the nine aspects of collective efficacy, experiential education has effects on “Job will certainly be done” and “To believe your own team is influential”. The concrete effects of collective efficacy through implementation of experiential education programs are “To arouse notions of overcoming difficulties and insistence”, “To facilitate efficiency of decision making to accelerate goal achievement”, “To improve the ways of communication to make team more harmonious”, “Happy to share and assist others”, and “To re-apprehend concepts which people used to know to use in career”.

中文部分
石雷山(2007)。集體效能研究述評。贛南師範學院學報，2，12-17。
江國泉(2004)。組織公平性、工作滿足與組織公民行為之關聯性研究-以國營企
業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立大同大學，台北市。
江琬瑜(1999)。訓練成效評估之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，桃園
市。
朱雪梅(2005)。員工自我效能、工作滿意度與組織承諾之關係研究-以東森電視
台為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣藝術大學，新北市。
朱黛芬(2011)。探索教育與組織玩性應用於企業中階主管領導行為發展之研
究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
李郁文(1998)。團體動力學-群體動力的理論與實務。台北 : 桂冠出版社。
宋鎮照(2000）。團體動力學。台北 : 五南出版社。
吳兆田(2006)。探索學習的第一本書: 企業培訓實務。台北 : 五南出版社。
吳幸宜譯(1994)。學習理論與教學應用。台北: 心理出版社。
吳清山(1997)。學習型組織理論及其對教育革新的啟示。國教月刊，43，1-7。
吳崇旗(2006)。建構戶外探索教育效益機轉知模式-以繩索挑戰課程為例(未出版博士論文)。國立台灣體育學院，桃園市。
吳崇旗、謝智謀(2006)。探討戶外冒險教育的效益。中華體育季刊，20，43-
53。
竺定宇(2005)。探索教育對企業團隊效能之影響-以台北市某五星級飯店為例(未
出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
卓國雄、盧俊宏(1999)。社會倦怠與運動成績表現。大專體育，46，94-100。
林芳菁(2007)。企業員工餐與探索教育對自我效能感與工作績效影響之研究-
以壽險公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
林萬億(1991)。團體工作。台北 : 三民書局。
林靜如、羅新興(2009)。團體性別組成隊團體衝突及集體效能的影響。中原企管
評論，5，23-40。
林麗芬(2009)。團隊集體效能、其前因以及團隊績效-一個實證研究(未出版之碩
士論文)。國立彰化師範大學，彰化。
姜飛月、郭本禹(2002)。從個體效能到集體效能-班杜拉自我效能理論的新發
展。心理科學，1，114-115。
孫本初(1999)。團隊建立的途徑與步驟。游於藝雙月刊，20(6)。
孫志麟(1991)。自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究雙月刊，
22，47-54。
夏林清(2002)。大團體動力-理念、結構與現象。台北：五南。
張子超(2000)。教育大辭書。新北市 : 國家教育研究院。
張予雲(2006)。行動力：完美執行來自徹底行動。台北 : 代表作國際文化出版
社。
張翊萱(2009)。探索教育活動對員工訓練成效及企業文化之影響-以某電子製造
大廠為例(未出版之碩士論文)。私立中原大學，桃園市。
莊文賢(2007)。領導型態、團隊凝聚力、集體效能、組織公正與智慧資本關係
之研究-以台灣國際造船公司為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學，高
雄市。
郭生玉(2002)。心理與教育研究法。台北市 : 朱衣出版社。
陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如編著(2002)。社會心理學。台北：國立空中大學。
許智翔(2003)。不同團隊訓練方式之成效評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大
學，桃園市。
彭建仁(2007)。體驗式學習運用於團隊建立之訓練遷移研究(未出版之碩士論文
)。國立台灣師範大學，台北市。
黃貞諭(2009)。冒險教育對企業團隊發展訓練成效之評估(未出版之碩士論文)。
國立台灣體育大學，桃園市。
黃國彥(2012)。教育大辭書。新北市 : 國家教育研究院，。
黃馨慧(2005)。團隊成員正面情感的組合對於團隊績效及個人人際滿意度之跨層
次分析-以集體效能、凝聚力為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。私立東吳大
學，台北市。
趙惠文(2001)。團隊建立訓練成效之評估(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學，
桃園市。
熊誦桂(1995)。組織溝通氣候與電視新聞記者工作滿意度之關聯性研究。私立輔
仁大學(未出版之碩士論文)，新北市。
蔡居澤、廖炳煌（2001）。探索教育與活動學校。台南：翰林。
蔡宛霖(2003)。激勵制度與工作滿足之相關性研究-以新竹科學園區為例。私立
大葉大學(未出版之碩士論文)，彰化縣。
鄭光展(2006)。團隊成員專業能力與親合特質組成隊集體效能及集體目標承諾支
影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國防大學，桃園市。
鄭晉昌、林俊宏、黃猷悌（2006）。人力資源e化管理：理論、策略與方法。台
北：前程文化事業有限公司。
盧佩秋(2003)。團隊領導對集體效能與團隊表現之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國
立政治大學，台北市。

英文部分
Anthony, D., & Horne, C. (2003). Gender and cooperation:
Explaining loan repayment in micro-credit groups.
Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(3), 293-302.
Alloy, L. B. amp; Abramson, L. Y. (1979). Judgment of
contingency in depressed and nondepressed students:
Sadder but wiser? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General, 108, 441-485.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human
agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought & action.
N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise
of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport
Psychology, 2,128-163.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control.
New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through
collective efficacy. Current
Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 75-78.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: A genetic
perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
Bollen, K. A. & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion.
Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504.
Danny, C., & John, H. (2003). Leadership when the heat’s
on. Darby, PA: Diane Pub Co.
Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Handbook of
qualitative research (3nd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Donna, M. Q. (2010). Experiential education: Making the
most of learning outside the classroom. Wiley: Jossey-
Bass.
Earley, P. C. (1999). Playing follow the leader: Status-
determining traits in relation to collective efficacy
across cultures. Organizational behavior and Human
Decision Processess, 80(3),192-212.
Erez, Amir, and Alice M. Isen (2002). The influence of
positive affect on the components of expectancy
motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87,
1055-1067.
Gross N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness.
American Journal of Sociology, 57, 546–54
Gully, S. M., Joshi, A., Incalcaterra, K. A. & Beaubien, J. M. (2002). A mate-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and
performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as
moderators of observed relationships. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 87(5), 891-832.
Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Compbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct.
British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
Hattie, J., Marsh, H. W., Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1997). Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of-class
experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of
Educational Research, 67(1), 43-87.
Hodges, L., & Carron, A. V. (1992). Collective efficacy and
group performance. International Journal of Sport
Psychology, 23, 48-59
Horowitz, M., Exline, R. I., Goldman, M., & Lee, F. (1953).
Motivational effects of alternative decision making
processes in groups. Urbana: University of Ilinois.
Jill, S. (1991). Adventure in business. Beverly: Project
Adventure Inc.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining together:
Group theory and group skills. Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Joplin, L. (1981). On defining experiential education.
Journal of Experiential Education, 4(1), 7-20.
Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational
leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment,
cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived
group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 313-336.
Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New
York: Basic Books.
Kimball, R. O. (1980). Wilderness/adventure programs for
juvenile offenders. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Knight, D., Durham C. C., & Locke, E. A. (2001). The
relationship of team goals, incentives, and efficacy to
strategic risk, tactical implement, and performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 326-338.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning：experience as
the source of learning and development. Englewood
Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Kozub, S. B., Mcdonnel, J. F. (2002). Exploring the
relationship between cohesion and collective efficacy
in rugby teams. Journal of Sport Behavior, 23, 120-320.
Kraft, R, J. & Sakofs, M. (1985). The theory of
experiential education. Boulder, CO: Association for
Experiential Education.
Latane’, B., Williams, K. D., & Harkins, S. G. (1979).
Many hands make light the work: The causes and
consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 37, 882-832.
Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995).
Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective.
Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 645-678.
Lester, S. W., Meglino, B. M., & Korsgaard, M. A. (2002).
The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A
longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups.
Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 352-368.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York:
Harper.
Michael, A. W. (1993). Effective teamwork. London, England:
John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Marquardt, Michael, Waddill, & Deborah D. (2003). The power
of learning in action learning: A conceptual analysis
of how the five schools of adult learning theories are
incorporated within the practice of action learning.
In Susan A. Lynham(chair), Human Resource Development.
Symposium conducted at the meeting of AHRD Conference,
Bowling Green, Ohio.
McGill, I. and Beaty, L. (1992). Action learning - a
practitioner’s guide. London, England: Kogan page.
Neill, J. T. (1999). The Melting pot of outdoor education
effects: Testing the flavours of program type, duration
and participant age. Queensland, Australia: Outdoor
Educator’s Association of Queensland.
O’Relly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational
commitment and psychological attachment : The effects
of compliance, identification, and internalization on
prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71
(3), 492-499.
Parker, G. M. (1990). Team player and teamwork. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Peter, F. D. (1977). People and performance: The best of
Peter Drucker on management. Boston, MA: Harvard
Business.
Priest, S. & Gass, M. A. (1997). Effective leadership in
adventure programming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Prussia, G. E. & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational
investigation of group effectiveness using Social-
Cognitive Theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81,
187-198.
Ringelmann, M. (1913). Research on animate sources of
power: The work of man. Annales de l'Institut National
Agronomique, 2(12), 1-40.
Roger Schwarz (2005). The skilled facilitator. Wiley:
Jossey-Boss.
Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003).
Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social
dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social
Psychology, 42, 161-186.
Sherif, M. & Sherif, C.W. (1956). An outline of social
psychology ( revised ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
Spink, K. S. (1990b). Group cohesion and collective
efficacy of volleyball teams. Journal of Sport &
Exercise Psychology, 12, 301-311.
Staw, B., Sutton, R., & Pelled, L.(1994). Employee positive
emotion and favorable outcomes at the workplace.
Organization Science, 5, 51-71.
Warren, K., Mitten D., & Loeffler, T.A. (2009). Theory and
practice of experiential education. Boulder, CO:
Association for Experiential Education.
Whitney, K. (1994). Improving group task performance: The
role of group goals and group efficacy. Human
Performance, 7, 55-78.
Yalom, I. D. (1995). The theory and practice of group
psychotherapy(4th ed.). New York: A Division of
HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
Zaccaro, S. J., Blair, V., Peterson, C., & Zazanis, M.
(1995). Collective efficacy. In J. E. Maddux(Chair),
Self-efficacy, adaptation and adjustment: Theory,
research, and application. Symposium conducted at the
meeting of Plenum Press, New York.

參考網站
2006台灣職業教育與訓練學術研討會，資料引自:
http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/64/64-43.htm
中華體驗學習發展協會，資料引自:
http://www.pataiwan.org/page/unable-move.php
中國生產力中心，資料引自:
http://cpc.tw/Train/Content.aspx?ProID=T48259
台灣外展教育基金會，資料引自:
http://www.obtaiwan.org/
周之明企業教育訓練網，資料引自:
http://gotraining.so-buy.com/front/bin/ptlist.phtml?Category=22999
佳威企管顧問有限公司，資料引自:
http://www.goodway-mcc.com.tw/classbusinessmanage19.htm
奈普敦學顧問，資料引自:
http://www.neptuner.com.tw/f02.html
創新企劃顧問公司，資料引自:
http://www.bplan.com.tw/chunfeng/ezcatfiles/bplan/img/img/1501/814560731.pdf