簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳德彥
De-Yan Wu
論文名稱: 字彙與聽力學習後設認知策略覺察與行動語言學習準備度關係之研究-以台灣國中英語學習者為例
The Relationship between Metacognitive Vocabulary and Listening Learning Strategy Awareness and Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Readiness: A Study of Taiwanese Junior High School Learners of English
指導教授: 林至誠
Lin, Chih-cheng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 英語學系
Department of English
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 115
中文關鍵詞: 後設認知字彙學習策略覺察後設認知聽力學習策略覺察行動語言學習準備度
英文關鍵詞: metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy awareness, metacognitive listening learning strategy awareness, mobile language learning readiness
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:280下載:15
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討,在台灣以英語為外語學習(EFL)的國中學生,其字彙及聽力學習的後設認知策略覺察,與使用手機學習字彙及聽力準備度之間的關係。本研究採用問卷調查法,使用的問卷包含五個部份:受試者個人基本背景資料、字彙行動學習準備度問卷、聽力行動學習準備度問卷、後設認知字彙學習策略覺察問卷、以及後設認知聽力策略覺察問卷(MALQ)。
    在預試中,總共回收251份有效問卷。將回收問卷後所得的資料進行主成分分析(principal components analysis),經過刪題並且分類命名後,得到以下正式問卷:字彙及聽力行動學習準備度問卷將受試者的準備度分為三個層面(aspects),分別是熟悉度(Familiarity)、態度(Attitude)、及經驗(Experience)。後設認知字彙學習策略覺察問卷是用以探究受試者在選擇性注意(Selective Attention)、自我驅動(Self-Initiation)、及強化鞏固(Consolidation)三個要素(components)的覺察情形。而後設認知聽力策略覺察問卷,則將受試者的後設認知聽力策略覺察狀況分為五個要素來評估:問題解決(Problem Solving)、計畫評估(Planning/Evaluation)、專注學習(Directed Attention)、心智翻譯(Mental Translation)、及個人知識(Person Knowledge)。
    接著以正式問卷施測,共回收877份有效問卷,將問卷調查所得資料進行描述統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析(one-way ANOVA)和多元迴歸分析(multiple regression analysis)等統計方法後,獲得下列結論:
    一、受試者的性別,對其字彙及聽力後設認知學習策略覺察,以及其行動學習準備度無顯著影響。
    二、受試者的就讀年級、英語程度(全民英檢通過狀況)以及手機持有與使用的時間,對其字彙及聽力策略後設認知策略覺察,以及其行動學習準備度有顯著影響。
    三、受試者的後設認知字彙學習策略覺察,與其行動學習準備度有顯著相關;並且此後設認知策略覺察可用以預測其字彙行動學習之準備度。
    四、受試者的後設認知聽力策略覺察,與其行動學習準備度有顯著相關;並且此後設認知策略覺察可用以預測其聽力學習之準備度(個人知識除外)。
    本研究認為,若能提升學習者的整體英語能力,並且若能長時間的持有與使用手機學習,可以提升學習者的字彙及聽力後設認知學習策略覺察,以及其字彙及聽力行動學習的準備度。此外,若能提升學習者字彙及聽力的後設認知學習策略覺察,亦能提升其字彙及聽力行動學習的準備度。

    Educators are looking into the opportunities and concerns brought by the integration of mobile technologies and language learning. Although m-learning has been thought to be effective and beneficial, few studies have investigated learners’ perception and their readiness towards using these technologies in language learning. The present study intends to explore the relationship between the metacognitive vocabulary and listening learning strategy awareness and the readiness towards mobile-assisted English learning among Taiwanese junior high school EFL students.
    In the pilot study, a total of 251 participants completed the four questionnaires as the research instruments: a metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy awareness questionnaire, a Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ), a mobile vocabulary learning readiness questionnaire, and a mobile listening learning readiness questionnaire. Their readiness towards mobile learning was assessed in terms of familiarity, attitude, and experience was assessed. The metacognitive vocabulary learning strategy questionnaire was used to investigate the learners’ awareness of metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies with respect to Selective Attention, Self-Initiation, and Consolidation. The MALQ evaluated their awareness and perceived use of listening strategies in five components, including problem solving, planning-evaluation, directed attention, mental translation, and person knowledge.
    After the principal components analysis (PCA), the questionnaires were revised and administered in the main study. A total of 877 copies of questionnaires were collected and analyzed. The results of the analysis revealed that the learners’ current grade levels, proficiency levels and ownership duration had significant influence not only on their readiness towards mobile vocabulary and listening learning, but also on their metacognitive vocabulary and listening strategy awareness. In addition, with the multiple regression analysis, the learners’ awareness of metacognitive vocabulary strategy in general was found to be significantly related to their mobile vocabulary learning readiness. The three aspects of readiness could be good predictors of the learners’ mobile vocabulary learning readiness. Furthermore, it was also found that the learners’ metacognitive listening strategy awareness in general was related to their mobile listening learning readiness. The five components of the awareness except person knowledge were also good predictors of their readiness.

    中文摘要..................................................i ABSTRACT.................................................ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS........................................iii TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................iv LIST OF TABLES..........................................vii LIST OF FIGURES..........................................ix CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION.................................1 1.1 Background............................................1 1.2 Purpose of the Study..................................3 1.3 Research Questions of the Study.......................4 1.4 Significance of the Study.............................6 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW............................8 2.1 Metacognitive Learning Strategies.....................8 2.1.1 Definition of Metacognition.........................8 2.1.2 Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategies.......11 2.1.3 Metacognitive Listening Strategies.................19 2.2 Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL).............24 2.2.1 What is MALL.......................................25 2.2.2 Differences between E-learning and M-learning......25 2.2.3 CALL and MALL......................................26 2.3 MALL and Vocabulary Learning.........................26 2.4 MALL and Listening Comprehension.....................32 2.5 MALL and Learner Readiness...........................38 CHAPTER THREE METHODS...................................43 3.1 Participants.........................................43 3.2 Instruments..........................................43 3.2.1 Demographic Information Questionnaire..............44 3.2.2 Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness Questionnaire............................................44 3.2.3 Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)...................................................45 3.2.4 Mobile Vocabulary and Listening Learning Readiness Questionnaires...........................................46 3.3 Procedures...........................................47 3.3.1 The pilot study....................................47 3.3.1.1 Results of the Demographic Information Questionnaire............................................48 3.3.1.2 Results of the Analysis of Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness Questionnaire................48 3.3.1.3 Results of the Analysis of Mobile Vocabulary Learning Readiness Questionnaire.........................51 3.3.1.4 Results of the Analysis of Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)...........................55 3.3.1.5 Results of the Analysis of Mobile Listening Learning Readiness Questionnaire.........................58 3.3.2. The Main Study....................................62 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS....................................64 4.1 Sample Description...................................64 4.2 Demographic Information of the Participants..........64 4.3 Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness Questionnaire............................................65 4.3.1 Descriptive Statistics.............................65 4.3.2 The Relationships among Demographic Variables and Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness.....65 4.4 Mobile Vocabulary Learning Readiness Questionnaire...69 4.4.1 Descriptive Statistics.............................69 4.4.2 The Relationships among Demographic Variables and Mobile Vocabulary Learning Readiness.....................69 4.5 Predictors of Readiness towards Mobile Vocabulary Learning.................................................72 4.5.1 Inter-Correlation among Variables..................72 4.5.2 The Results of Multiple Regression Analysis........73 4.6 Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ)...................................................75 4.6.1 Descriptive Statistics.............................75 4.6.2 The Relationships among Demographic Variables and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Awareness...............75 4.7 Mobile Listening Learning Readiness Questionnaire....80 4.7.1 Descriptive Statistics.............................80 4.7.2 The Relationships among Demographic Variables and Mobile Listening Learning Readiness......................81 4.8 Predictors of Readiness towards Mobile Listening Learning.................................................84 4.8.1 Inter-Correlation among Variables..................84 4.8.2 The Results of Multiple Regression Analysis........85 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION..................87 5.1 The Influences of Different Backgrounds on Vocabulary Learning.................................................87 5.1.1 Backgrounds and Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness.......................................87 5.1.2 Backgrounds and Mobile Vocabulary Learning Readiness................................................88 5.2 Metacognitive Vocabulary Learning Strategy Awareness, Mobile Vocabulary Learning Readiness and the Predictors .........................................................89 5.3 The Influences of Different Backgrounds on Listening Learning.................................................91 5.3.1 Backgrounds and Metacognitive Listening Learning Strategy Awareness.......................................91 5.3.2 Backgrounds and Mobile Listening Learning Readiness................................................93 5.4 Metacognitive Listening Learning Strategy Awareness, Mobile Listening Learning Readiness and the Predictors...94 5.5 Conclusion...........................................96 5.6 Pedagogical Implications.............................97 5.7 Limitations of the Present Study.....................99 5.8 Suggestions for Future Research.....................100 REFERENCES..............................................101

    Abas, Z. W., Peng, C. L., & Mansor, N. (2009). A study on learner readiness for mobile learning at Open University Malaysia. IADIS International Conference Mobile Learning, 151–157.
    Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In P. Meara (Ed.), Beyond words (pp. 3-14). London: British Association for Applied Linguistics, in association with Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research.
    Ally, M. (2009). Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training. Au Press.
    Anderson, J. R. (2009). Cognitive psychology and its implications seventh edition. NY: Worth Publishers.
    Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Lozotsev, Y. (2008). Undergraduates’ metacognitive knowledge about the psychological effects of different kinds of computer-supported instructional tools. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 2172–2198.
    Asgari, A., & Mustapha, G. B. (2011). The Type of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by ESL Students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2).
    Ausubel, D. (1961). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 266-274.
    Baird, J. R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. In E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.), The student laboratory and the science curriculum (pp. 183-200). London: Routledge.
    Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38.
    Balog˘lu, M., & Çevik, V. (2008). Multivariate effects of gender, ownership, and the frequency of use on computer anxiety among high school students. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2639–2648.
    Bannert, M., Hildebrand, M., & Mengelkamp, C. (2009). Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 829–835.
    Bax, S. (2003). CALL--past, present and future. System 31(1), 13-28.
    Beckers, J., & Schmidt, H. (2003). Computer experience and computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 785-797.
    Berne, J. E. (1995). How does varying pre-listening activities affect second language listening comprehension? Hispania, 78, 316–319.
    Bonk, W. J. (2000). Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 14, 14-31.
    Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77–165). New York: Halsted Press.
    Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
    Brown, C., & Payne, M. E. (1994). Five Essential Steps or Processes in Vocabulary Learning. Paper presented at the TESOL 1994, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
    Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Brown, H.D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (Second Edition). New York: Pearson Education.
    Buck, G. (1991). The test of listening comprehension: An introspective study. Language Testing, 8, 67–91.
    Buck, G. (1995). How to become a good listening teacher. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin. (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 113-131). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press
    Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Buda, J. (1984). Improving Your Reading Ability, retrieved May 5, 2008 from http://www.f.waseda.jp/buda/texts/reading.html.
    Catalán, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54-77.
    Cavus, N. & Ibrahim, D. (2009). m-Learning: an experiment in using SMS to support learning new English language words. British Journal of Educational Technology. 40(1), 78-91.
    Cavus, N., & Uzunboylu, H. (2009). Improving critical thinking skills in mobile learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 434-438.
    Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner strategies in language learning (pp. 71-83). New York: Prentice Hall.
    Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic journal of foreign language teaching, 1(1), 14-26.
    Chang, A. C.-S., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 375-397.
    Chang, A. C-S., & Read, J. (2007). Support for foreign language listeners: Its effectiveness and limitations. RELC Journal, 38, 375-394.
    Chang, A. C.-S., & Read, J. (2008). Reducing listening test anxiety through various forms of listening support. TESL-EJ, 12. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume12/ej45/ej45al/
    Chang, C. C., Chen, I. J., & Chen, W. C. (2010). More than just audio guide—Listening comprehension training of foreign language supported by mobile devices. UbiLearn 2010.
    Chang, C. C., Tseng, K. H., & Tseng, J. S. (2011). Is single or dual channel with different English proficiencies better for English listening comprehension, cognitive load and attitude in ubiquitous learning environment? Computers & Education, 57(4), 2313-2321.
    Chang, C.-C., Lei, H. & Tseng, J.-S. (2011). Media presentation mode, English listening comprehension and cognitive load in ubiquitous learning environments: Modality effect or redundancy effect? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(4), 633-654.
    Chang, C.Y. (2003). The effects of language learning motivation on the use of language learning strategies among EFL learners at technological universities and colleges in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Spalding University, Kentucky, USA.
    Chaudron, C & Richards, J. C. 1986. The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Comprehension of Lectures. Applied Linguistics, 7 (2): 113-127.
    Chen, C.-M. & Li, Y.-L. (2010). Personalized context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective English vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(4), 341-364.
    Chen, C.-M., & Chung, C.-J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51, 624-645.
    Chen, C.-M., & Hsu, S.-H. (2008). Personalized intelligent mobile learning system for supporting effective English learning. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 153-180.
    Chen, I. J. & Chang, C. C. (2011). Content presentation modes in mobile language listening tasks: English proficiency as a moderator. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(5), 451-470.
    Chen, I. J., Chang, C. C. & Yen, J. C. (2012). Effects of presentation mode on mobile language learning: A performance efficiency perspective. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(1), 122-137.
    Chen, I.J., Chang, C.C. & Lee, Y.C. (2011). Effects of the Presentation Mode on the Performance Efficiency of English Listening Comprehension Task Supported by PDA. In T. Bastiaens & M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 2903-2912). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
    Chen, L. (2002). Taiwanese junior high school English teachers’ perceptions of the washback effect of the Basic Competence Test in English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
    Chen, N.-S., Hsieh, S.-W., & Kinshuk. (2008). Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 99-113.
    Chinnery, G. M. (2006). Emerging technologies going to the MALL: Mobile assisted language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 9-16.
    Clough, G., Jones, A. C., McAndrew, P. & Scanlon, E. (2008). Informal learning with PDAs and smartphones. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 359–371.
    Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley & J. Levin (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Educational applications (pp. 87-126). New York: Springer Verlag.
    Cross, D. R. & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children’s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
    Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues In Educational Research, 18(1), 1-11.
    Daud, N. M., & Husin, Z. (2013). Mobile Learning: A Quasi-Experiment on Using SMS to Support Reading Comprehension Programme. Mobile Learning: Malaysian Initiatives & Research Findings.
    Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perception and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 475–487.
    Diao, Y., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2007). The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language. The American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 237-261. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20445397
    Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/ foreign language: Toward an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 431-457.
    Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14.
    Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 206-220.
    Evans, C. (2008). The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education. Computers & education, 50(2), 491-498.
    Eyraud, K., Giles, G., Koening, G., & Stoller, F. L. (2000). The world wall approach: Promoting L2 vocabulary learning. English Teaching Forum, 38(3). Retrieved, June 27, 2005, from http://exchanges.state.gov/forum/vols/vol38/no3/p2.htm.
    Fan, M.-Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of second language vocabulary strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 222-240.
    Farrell, T. S. C. (2001). Teaching reading strategies: ‘It takes time!’. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13, 631-646.
    Fischer, R. & Farris, M. (1995). The instructional basis of Libra. The IALL Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 28, 15-46.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
    Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Eds.), Children's oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.
    Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Frommer, J. (1989). Listening, looking, and learning with MacLang. CALICO Journal, 6(4), 51-71.
    Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application, Macmillan, New York.
    Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies. Novitas-Royal, 1(2), 84-91.
    Geddes, S. J. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: Benefits for learners. Knowledge Tree. Retrieved from http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition06/download/Geddes.pdf
    Goodwin-Jones, R. (2007). Digital video update: YouTube, Flash, High-Definition. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 16–21.
    Godwin-Jones, R. (2010). Emerging technologies from memory palaces to spacing algorithms: approaches to second language vocabulary learning. Language, Learning & Technology, 14(2).
    Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Emerging technologies: Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2-11.
    Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners' listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
    Greene R.L. (1989). Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 371–377.
    Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46, 643-679.
    Hacker, D. (1997). Metacognitive: Definitions and Empirical Foundations, In Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J., Graesser A. (Eds.), Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, in press.
    Hasan, A. (2000). Learners’ perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13, 137-153. doi: 10.1080/07908310008666595
    Hatch, E. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
    Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.
    Hsu, L.-Y. (2005). EFL learners’ vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary knowledge. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching (pp. 203~213). Taipei: Crane Publishing Co., Ltd. Kojic-Sabo, & Lightbown, M. (1999). Students' approaches to vocabulary learning and their relationship to success. Modern Language Journal, 83, 176-192.
    Hu, H.-Y. (2007). An investigation into Taiwanese vocational high school students' use of vocabulary learning strategies (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Huang, Y.-M., Huang, Y.-M., Huang, S.-H., Lin, Y.-T. (2012). A ubiquitous English vocabulary learning system: Evidence of active/passive attitudes vs. usefulness/ease-of-use. Computers and Education, 58, 273-282.
    Huckin, T., & Coady, J. (1999). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 181-193.
    Hulstijin, J. H. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 413-425.
    Hussin, S., Manap, M. R., Amir, Z., & Krish, P. (2012). Mobile learning readiness among Malaysian students at higher learning institutes. Asian Social Science, 8(12), p276.
    International Telecommunication Union. (2013). The World in 2013: ICT Facts and Figures. ITU. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
    Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22 (3 & 4), 255-278.
    Jones, L. C. & Plass, J. L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. The Modern Language Journal, 86,546-561.
    Keene, E. O., & Zimmermann, S. (1997). Mosaic of Thought: Teaching Comprehension in a Reader's Workshop. Heinemann, 361 Hanover Street, Portsmouth, NH 03801-3912.
    Kemp, J. (2010). The listening log: Motivating autonomous learning. ELT Journal, 64, 385-395. doi: 10.1093/elt/ccp099
    Kennedy, C., & Levy, M. (2008). L'italiano al telefonino: Using SMS to support beginners' language learning. ReCALL, 20(3), 315-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000530
    Kerr, M. S., Rynearson, K., & Kerr, M. C. (2006). Student characteristics for online learning success. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(2), 91–105.
    Khezrlou, S. (2012). The relationship between cognitive, metacognitive strategies, age and level of education. The Reading Matrix, Vol. 12 (1), 50-61.
    Kim, H.-S. (2012). Using short message service for vocabulary learning by Students’ English proficiency. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(2), 75-96.
    Kramarski, B. (1999). The study of graphs by computers: is easier better? Educational Media International. 2, 203–209.
    Kramarski, B. & Feldman, Y. (2000) Internet in the Classroom: Effects on Reading Comprehension, Motivation and Metacognitive Awareness, Educational Media International, 37:3, 149-155, DOI: 10.1080/09523980050184709.
    Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 77-82.
    Krashen, S. D. (1985), The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.
    Kudo, Y. (1999). L2 vocabulary learning strategies (NFLRC NetWork #14) [HTML document]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center. Retrieved [February 15, 2006] from the World Wide Web: http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW14/
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2007). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: Can mobile devices collaborative practice in speaking and listening? Retrieved on June 28, 2008.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and Interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. London: Routledge.
    Kukulska-Hulme, A., Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sa´ nchez, I. and Vavoula, G. (2009). Innovation in Mobile Learning: A European Perspective. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 1(1): 13–35.
    Kung, W.-J. (2004). An exploratory study on vocabulary learning strategies by Taiwanese EFL elementary school students (Unpublished master thesis). National Taipei Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Kurita, T. (2012). Issues in second language listening comprehension and the pedagogical implications. Accents Asia, 5(1), 30-44.
    Levy, M., & Kennedy, C. (2005). Learning Italian via mobile SMS. In A. Kukulska-Hulme, & J. Traxler (Eds.), Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers (pp. 76-83). London: Taylor and Francis.
    Liao, Y. F. (2004). A survey study of Taiwanese EFL freshmen’s vocabulary learning strategies. Journal of Pingtung Teachers College, 21, 271-288.
    Lin, L. (2001). Taiwanese children’s EFL vocabulary learning strategies (Unpublished master thesis). National Chinhwa University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
    Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: an overview. Retrieved August, 11, 2006.
    Lu, M. (2008). Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 515-525.
    Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2002). Listening. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 193-210). London: Arnold.
    Malan, D. J. (2007). Podcasting computer science E-1. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 389-393.
    Markham P. (1989), The effects of captioned television videotapes on the listening comprehension of beginning, intermediate, and advanced ESL students, Educational Technology, 29(10), 38-41.
    Matthews, D., & Shrum, L. (2003). High-speed Internet use and academic gratifications in the college residence. Internet and Higher education, 6(2), 125-144.
    Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and Instruction. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
    Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Mayer, R. E. & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
    Meara, P., & Jones, G. (1987). Tests of vocabulary size in English as a foreign language. Polyglot, 8(1), 1-40.
    Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In D. J. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132–150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
    Meskill, C. (1996). Listening skills development through multimedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 179-201.
    Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. International Journal of Distributed & Parallel Systems, 3(1).
    Mokhtar, A. A., Rawian, R. M., Hussain, M. N. M., & Mohamed, A. R. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Malaysian Adult ESL Learners in Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 174-180.
    Mueller, G., A. (1980). Visual contextual cues and listening comprehension: an experiment. Modern Language Journal, 64 (3), 335–40.
    Nagy, W. (2003). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
    Nah, K.-C., White, P., & Sussex, R. (2008). The potential of using mobile phone to access the Internet for learning EFL listening skills within a Korean context. ReCALL, 20 (3), 331-347.
    Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
    Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63, 59-82. doi: 10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59
    Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching and learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
    Nunnally, J. O. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
    O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. (1985a). Listening strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21-46.
    O’Malley, J., Chamot, A., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. (1985b). Learning strategy application with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (3), 557-584.
    O’Malley, C., Vavoula, G.., Glew, J. P., Taylor, J. ,Sharples, M. & Lefrere, P. (2005). Guidelines for Learning, Teaching, Tutoring in a Mobile Environment. MOBllearn.
    Osada, N. (2004). Listening Comprehension Research: A Brief Review of the Past Thirty Years. Dialogue, 3, 53-66.
    Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
    Oxford, R. (2002). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 166–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Paolucci, R. (1998). Hypermedia and learning
    Paas, F. G. W. C., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
    Padeliadu, S., Botsas, G., & Sideridis, G. (2000). Metacognitive awareness and reading strategies: differences between average and reading disabled students. In Proceeding of the 14 th International Conference on Applied Linguistics, Thessaloniki, Greece (pp. 1-9).
    Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index (TRI): A multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2, 307-320.
    Patten, B., Arnedillo Sánchez, I., & Tangney, B. (2006). Designing collaborative, constructionist and contextual applications for handheld devices. Computers & Education, 46(3), 294-308.
    Pawley, D., Ayres, P., Cooper, M. & Sweller, J. (2005). Translating words into equations: A cognitive load theory approach. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 75-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341042000294903
    Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1994). Self-regulated learning in college students: Knowledge, strategies, and motivation. In P. R. Pintrich, D. R. Brown & C. E. Weinstein (Eds), Student motivation, cognition, and learning (pp.113-133). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp.43-97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
    Poynton, T. A. (2005). Computer literacy across the lifespan: A review with implications for educators. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 861-872.
    Psycharis, S. (2005). Presumptions and action affecting an e-learning adoption by the educational system. Implementation using virtual private networks. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 2, 2005.
    Quinn, C. (2000). M-Learning: mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LineZine. Fall 2000. Found at: http://www.linezine.com/2.1/features/cqmmwiyp.htm
    Rahamat, R., Shah, P. M., Din, R. B., & Aziz, J. B. A. (2011). Students’ Readiness and Perceptions Towards using Mobile Technologies for Learning the English language Literature Component. Journal. Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
    Rahamat, R., Shah, P., Puteh, S. N., Din, R., Aziz, J. A., Nordin, N. M. N. M., Embi, M. A. (2012). Students Perceptions Towards Receiving Short Message Services for Learning: A Mobile Learning Experience. First International Conference on Mobile Learning, Applications, and Services (mobilcase2012), 12-16.
    Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). The role of metacognitive listening strategies awareness and podcast-use readiness in using podcasting for learning English as a foreign language. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1153-1161.
    Research and Markets. (2013). Taiwan - Mobile Market - Overview, Statistics and Forecasts. Retrieved from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/lv8vbm/taiwan_mobile
    Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking. Cambridge University Press.
    Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. New York: Longman.
    Rost, M. (2001). Teaching and researching listening. London: Longman.
    Sánchez-Alonso, S., & Vovides, Y. (2007). Integration of metacognitive skills in the design of learning objects. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2585–2595.
    Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy (pp. 199-227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26,113-125.
    Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp.3-16.). Boston: Kluwer.
    Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
    Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review 7 (4), 351-371.
    Schraw, G.., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.
    Schreurs, J., Sammour, G., & Ehlers, U. (2008). ERA-E-Learning Readiness Analysis: A eHealth Case Study of E-Learning Readiness. In The Open Knowledge Society. A Computer Science and Information Systems Manifesto, 267-275. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
    Seo, K. (2002). The effect of visuals on listening comprehension: A study of Japanese learners’ listening strategies. International Journal of Listening, 15, 57–81.
    Shaughnessy, J., Zechmeister, E., & Jeanne, Z. (2011). Research methods in psychology (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill. pp. 161–175.
    Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449.
    Smartphone Adoption Tips Past 50% in Major Markets Worldwide. (2013, May 29). eMarketer Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.emarketer.com/Article/Smartphone-Adoption-Tips-Past-50-Major-Markets-Worldwide/1009923
    Solé, R. C., Calic, J., & Neijmann, D. (2010). A social and self-reflective approach to MALL. ReCALL, 22(1), 39-52.
    Song, Y. & Fox, R. (2008). Using PDA for undergraduate student incidental vocabulary testing. ReCALL, 20(3), 290-314.
    Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2008). Effects of the metacognitive computer-tool metaware on the web search of laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 716-737.
    Stahr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 577-607. doi: 10.1017/S0272263109990039
    Stockwell, G. (2007). Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4), 365-383.
    Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95-110.
    Stoffer, I. (1995). University foreign language students’ choice of vocabulary learning strategies as related to individual difference variables (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Alabama.
    Strevens, J. (1996). Applied multivariate statistics for social sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Sun, K. C. (2002). Investigation of English Listening Difficulties of Taiwan Students. Selected Papers from the Eleventh International Symposium on English Teaching/Fourth Pan-Asia Conference, 518-525. Taipei, Taiwan: Crane.
    Sweller, J. (2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp.19-29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
    Taylor, H. M. (1981). Learning to listen to English. TESOL quarterly, 15(1), 41-50.
    Teng, H. C. (1998). The effects of text types and task types on English listening comprehension. English Teaching Journal, 23, 5-18.
    Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634–1642.
    Thornton, P. & Houser, C. (2001). Learning on the Move: Vocabulary Study via Email and Mobile Phone SMS. In C. Montgomerie & J. Viteli (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2001 (pp. 1896-1897). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved August 7, 2013 from http://www.editlib.org/p/9065.
    Thornton, P., & Houser, C. (2005). Using mobile phones in English education in Japan. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 217-228.
    Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479–494.
    Tsai, M.-J., & Tsai, C. C. (2003). Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(1), 43–50.
    Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: the role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14, 305–319.
    Tsung, S.-T. (2012). The relationship among socio-economic status, learning motivation, Use of metacognitive vocabulary learning strategies, and English vocabulary acquisition (Unpublished master thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Underwood, M. (1998). Teaching listening .London: Longman.
    Vandergrift, L . (2004). Learning to listen or listening to learn. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25.
    Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210. doi: 10.1017/S0261444807004338
    Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462.
    Verdugo, D., & Belmonte, I. A. (2007). Using digital stories to improve listening comprehension with Spanish young learners of English. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 87–101.
    Wagner, E. D., 2005. Enabling Mobile Learning. Educause Review, 41-52.
    Walls, S. M., Kucsera, J. V., Walker, J. D., Acee, T. W., McVaugh, N. K., & Robinson, D. H. (2010). Podcasting in education: Are students as ready and eager as we think they are?. Computers & Education, 54(2), 371-378.
    Wang, Y.-H. (2004). An investigation into vocabulary learning strategies used by senior high school students in Taiwan (Unpublished master thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
    Wilberschied, L. & P. M. Berman (2004). Effect of using photos from authentic video as advance organizers on listening comprehension in an FLES Chinese class. Foreign Language Annals, 37(4), 534–543.
    Winne, P., & Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 227-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2010). Vocabulary learning by mobile-assisted authentic content creation and social meaning-making: Two case studies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 421-433.
    Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers and Education, 57, 2364-2381.
    Woolfolk, A.E., Winne, P.H., Perry, N.E., & Shapka, J. (2010). Educational Psychology (4th ed). Toronto: Pearson Canada. ISBN 978-0-205-75926-2
    Yang, J. (2013). Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Review of the Recent Applications of Emerging Mobile Technologies. English Language Teaching, 6(7), p19.
    Yang, J., & Park, J. (2012). Software Review: SuperMemo UX-Extreme English Advanced and Proficient. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 718-726. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.29.4.718-726
    Yushau, B. (2006). Computer attitude, use, experience, software familiarity and perceived pedagogical usefulness: The case of mathematics professors. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(3), 1–17.
    Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116.
    Zhang, H., Song, W., & Burston, J. (2011). Reexamining the effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phones. TOJET, 10(3).
    林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:臺灣東華。
    [Lin, C.-S. (1992). Psychological and educational statistics. Taipei, Taiwan: Dong Haw.]

    QR CODE