本研究旨在進行探究式教學於理化課的實踐與改善，並探討實施探究式教學對學生在科學學習動機與科學探究能力之影響。本研究採行動研究法，以32位八年級學生為研究對象，進行探究式教學。藉由學生的科學學習動機量表、探究能力測驗、教學滿意度調查、學習單；教師的課堂觀察與教學日誌等多元素材進行質性與量化分析，研究成果歸結如下：
一、 從教學滿意度調查與教師的課堂觀察等質性研究上發現，在支持性學習環境下，實施探究式教學可提高學生的自我效能並對科學探究產生興趣。學生認為最具挑戰的步驟為實驗規劃與設計；在實驗形式上，學生喜愛實體實驗勝於模擬實驗。搭配翻轉教室的情境下，每次段考期間實施一次探究式教學於教學進度上是可行的。
二、 從科學學習動機量表的分析結果，發現實施探究式課程可提高學生的科學學習動機，且在自我效能的向度上達顯著差異（p<0.05）。
三、 由探究能力測驗中得知，實施探究式課程可提高學生探究能力，其中以資料蒐集與記錄最為顯著，其次為形成結論、實驗設計與規劃，最後為數據分析。
最後，本研究依此結果分別對於教學設計與未來研究方向提出以下建議：
一、 教師須事先透過各式獎懲制度與學習活動建立師生間的信任與支持性的學習環境。在進行探究課程前，說明探究課程的目的與數據分析的觀念與方法。當學生學習理化的基礎能力達到一定程度，再引入探究式教學。視學生探究能力的增長逐漸提高探究活動問題的開放程度，避免適得其反。
二、 本研究採異質性分組，未來建議可採同質性分組，並給予不同深度的探究議題與指標，進行分析與比較。

The purpose of this study is to implement the inquiry-based teaching in science courses and to explore the impact of inquiry-based teaching on students’ motivation toward science learning and scientific inquiry ability. This study applied Action Research approach to explore inquiry-based teaching and learning among 32 8th-grade students. Based on data analysis of multiple materials such as SMTSL questionnaire, inquiry ability test, teaching satisfaction survey, worksheets, video recordings of classroom teaching and teaching log, the research findings are as follows:
I. From qualitative research such as teaching satisfaction survey and classroom observation, it is found that in a supportive learning environment, the implementation of inquiry-based teaching can improve students' self-efficacy and interests of scientific inquiry process. The most challenging step to students is experimental design and they prefer real experiments to simulated experiments. Under the context of flipped classroom, it is feasible to do inquiry-based teaching once during midterm exam.
II. From the analysis results of the SMTSL questionnaire, it is found that the implementation of inquiry-based teaching can improve the students’ motivation towards science learning, and there is a significant difference in the dimension of self-efficacy(p<0.05).
III. From the inquiry ability test, it shows that the implementation of inquiry-based teaching can improve students' inquiry ability. Data collection and recording are the most significant improved aspects, followed by the formation of conclusions, experimental design and planning, then lastly the data analysis.
Finally, there are several suggestions for teaching design and future research :
I. Teachers must build a trust and supportive learning environment between teachers and students through learning activities. Before conducting the inquiry-based courses, teachers need to explain the purpose of the inquiry-based courses and review methods of data analysis for students. When the basic ability and concept of science reaches a certain level, inquiry-based teaching can be introduced then. Depending on the growth of students' inquiry ability, the degree of openness of inquiry activities can be gradually increased in order to avoid the feeling of frustration and failure.
II. Heterogeneous grouping was adopted in this study, and it is suggested to conduct further study on the effects of homogeneous grouping, and give different depths of exploration topics and indicators for analysis and comparison.

中文部分
王玉麟（2004）。研究倫理的相關議題。教師之友，45（3），85-93。http://dx.doi.org/　　10.7053/TF.200406.0085
朱敬先（2000）。教育心理學。五南。
吳百興、張耀云、吳心楷（2010）。科學探究活動中的科學推理。科學教育研究
　　與發展季刊，56，53-74。http://utaipeir.lib.utaipei.edu.tw/dspace/retrieve/1270/st5603.pdf
佘曉清、林煥祥（2019）。PISA 2015 臺灣學生的表現。國立陽明交通大學出版社。
林步剛（2014）。探討功能性鷹架之科學探究數位學習內容對學生科學解釋與舉證能力之影響（碩士論文，國立交通大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0030-2203201110561320
林姝君、段曉林、余忠潔（2011，12月15-17日）。探究式教學融入攜手計畫提升弱勢低成就學生科學探究能力與學習動機之行動研究。中華民國第二十七
屆科學教育學術研討會。
林浩然（2018）。不同形式之物理虛擬實驗對偏遠地區國中生學習成效與科學態度之影響 （碩士論文，淡江大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0002-2705201823394300
段曉林、靳知勤（2000）。提昇國中理化學習動機之行動研究。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫成果報告（NSC 89-2511-S-018-030）。彰化師大科學教育所。
段曉林、靳知勤（2005）。探究式實驗教學對國二學生理化學習動機之影響。科學教育學刊，13（3），289-315。http://dx.doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2005.1303.03
洪振方（2003）。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15（3），641-662。
洪萱芳、林英杰、顏瓊芬（2019）。偏鄉學生面臨科學探究式專題導向教學法之學習挑戰。科學教育學刊，27（2），121-145。http://dx.doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.201906_27（2）.0003
邱美虹、林世洲、湯偉君、周金城、張榮耀、王靜璇（2005）。科學創意實驗書。洪葉文化。
陳育霖（2016）。教育現場為什麼需要探究與實作課程？科學研習月刊，55（2），19-27。https://www.ntsec.gov.tw/FileAtt.ashx?id=2904
陳柏宇（2012）。「探究式教學」對「學習環境偏好」及「學習」之影響─以溫度與熱單元為例（碩士論文，國立台灣師範大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://　 www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0021-1610201315282434
莊淑娟（2016）。以「虛擬實驗室」數位教材發展國中「牛頓第二運動定律」課程之設計與研究 （碩士論文，淡江大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0002-2406201618303200
張元馨（2019）。科學社團探究式教學對學生探究能力與學習動機之影響 （未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
張春興（2000）。教育心理學：三化取向的理論與實踐。臺灣東華書局。
黃欣玲（2008）。5E探究式教學對國中學生電學學習情境及學習成就之研究（碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學）。http://ykuo.ncue.edu.tw/theses/Huang%20Hsin-Lin%20MS%20thesis-2008-07-14.pdf
湯宇成（2018）。引導式探究教學對國中理化「反應速率」學習成效與探究能力之影響（碩士論文，淡江大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0002-0207201809475600
楊秀停、王國華（2007）。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15（4），439–459。http://dx.doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2007.1504.05
楊芳怡（2007）。運用探究實驗教學提升問題解決能力之行動研究－以八年級數理資優班為例（碩士論文，淡江大學）。華藝線上圖書館。https://www. airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh1?DocID=U0002-2906201710333900
楊芳瑩、洪榮昭、蔡其瑞、蔡居澤、吳崇旗、李晟瑋、陳育霖、楊智元、高松景、廖弘民、蔡雅薰（2020）。探究式教學法理論與實踐。高等教育出版。
楊琇珊（2020）。探討探究教學對國中八年級學生探究能力之影響（碩士論文，國立通大學）。華藝線上圖書館https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/ alDetailed Mesh1?DocID=U0030-1504202111253867
甄曉蘭（2003）。課程與行動研究─實例與方法分析。師大書苑。
蔡執仲、段曉林、靳知勤（2005）。巢狀探究教學模式對國二學生理化學習動機影響之探討。科學教育學刊，15（2），119-144。http://dx.doi.org/10.6173/
CJSE.2007.1502.01
劉湘瑤（2016）。科學探究的教學與評量。科學研習，55（2），5-11。https://www.
ntsec.gov. tw/FileAtt.ashx?id=2902
賴志忠、段曉林（2020）。以ARCS動機模式融入引導式探究教學提升九年級生學習動機之行動研究。科學教育學刊，28（1），25-48。http://dx.doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.202003_28（1）.0002
顧炳宏、陳瓊森、溫媺純（2011）。從學生的表現與觀點探討引導發現式教學作為發展探究教學之折衷方案角色的成效─以密度概念為例。科學教育學刊，19（3），257-282。http://dx.doi.org/ 10.6173/CJSE.2011.1903.04
西文部分
Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R. A., Hofstein, A., Lederman, N. G.,Mamlok, R., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. 　　https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/2671439/mod_resource/content/1/2.1.Inquiry_in_Science_Education_International_perspec.pdf
Banchi, H. & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry.Science and Children, 　　46(2), 26-29. https://www.michiganseagrant.org/lessons/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/The-Many-Levels-of-Inquiry-NSTA-article.pdf
Colburn, A. & Bianchini, J. A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry
　　to prospective elementary teacher: A tale of researchers. Journal of esearch in Science teaching, 37(2), 177-209. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227755124_Teaching_the_Nature_of_Science_through_Inquiry_to_Prospective_Elementary_Teachers_A_Tale_of_Two_Researchers
Costenson, K., & Lawson, A. E. (1986). Why isn’t inquiry used in more classrooms? The American Biology Teacher, 48(3), 150-158. https://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article/48/3/150/13707/Why-Isn-t-Inquiry-Used-in-More-Classrooms
Chiang, T. H. C., Yang, S. J. & Huang, G. J. (2014). An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 352-365.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287529242_An_Augmented_Reality-based_Mobile_Learning_System_to_Improve_Students'_Learning_Achievements_and_Motivations_in_Natural_Science_Inquiry_Activities
Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stageenvironment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139-186). Academic Press.
Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., Chang, H. Y., Chang, W. H., Wu, H. K. & Chen, C. M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: a case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12): 1945-1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688
Hwang, G. J. & Chen, C. H. (2017). Influences of an Inquiry-based Ubiquitous 　　Gaming Design on Students' Learning Achievements, Motivation, Behavioral Patterns, and Tendency towards Critical Thinking and Problem Solving. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 950-971. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12464
Hong, J. C., Tsai, C. R., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Chu, K. C., Gu, J. & Sitthiworachart, J. (2019). The effect of the Prediction-observation-quiz-explanation” inquiry-based e-learning model on flow experience in green energy learning. Computers & Education, 133,127-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.009
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of scientific enquiry. School Review, 79, 171–212.
https://doi.org/10.1086/442968
Horwood, R. H. (1988). Explanation and description in science teaching. Science Education, 72(1),41–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720104
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (2003). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: a project-based approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, 2002.
Lee, O., & Anderson, C. W. (1993). Task engagement and conceptual change in middle school science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 585-610. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312030003585
Lee, O., & Brophy, J. (1996). Motivational patterns observed in six-grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 303-318. https://　doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199603)33:3<303::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-X
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The science teacher, 69(2), 34. https://www.studentachievement.org/wp-content/uploads/Defining_Inquiry_in_Science.pdf
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. 　　Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science EducationStandards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. The NationalAcademies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9596.
Polman, J. L. (1999). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through 　　guided inquiry. Teachers Collage Press.
Schumacher, D. (1998). “The Transition to Middle School” (Report No.　　DO-PS-98-6). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED422119.pdf
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hacking, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in 　　Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in ScienceEducation, 28(2), 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02462906
Straits, W. J., & Wilke, R. R. (2002). Practical consideration for assessing 　　inquiry-based instruction: Some guidelines for improving student assessment. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(7), 432-435.
Tuan, H.L., & Chin, C.C. (2000). Promoting junior high school students’ motivation toward physical science learning (III). Report for Taiwan National Research Council (NSC 89-2511- S018-030).
Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
Trowbridge, L. W., & Bybee, R. W. (1990). Models for Effective Science Teaching.
Becoming a Secondary School Science Teacher (5th ed.). Merrill Publishing Company press.
Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., & Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Fan-Chiang, S. H., Yang, C. W., Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students’guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103830
Wu, H. -K., & Hsieh, C. E. (2006). Developing sixth graders’ inquiry skills to construct scientific explanations in inquiry-based learning environments. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1289-1313. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09500690600621035
White, R., & Gunstone, R. F. (1992). Prediction-observation-explanation. In R. White & R. F. Gunstone, Probing Understanding ( pp. 44-64). The Falmer Press.