閱讀理解能力自2000年起就被列為PISA重要的評量項目，語文閱讀理解能力更是108課綱中重要的素養能力之一。如何提升閱讀素養能力也成為學校教學的重點之一。本研究欲探討在同儕互評支持評分規準下進行科學閱讀筆記寫作對閱讀理解能力的影響。藉以評分規準為鷹架，同儕互評為引導，促使學生在進行科學筆記寫作的過程中提升科學閱讀理解能力。

本研究以新北市某完全高中11年級三類組97名學生為研究對象，但在實施過程中未硬性要求學生完成科學閱讀筆記寫作，故最終以31名學生為研究對象進行數據結果分析。31名學生依便利分組分為無互評組12人，互評組19人。研究過程中學生須閱讀科學文章並參照評分規準撰寫科學筆記寫作，互評組學生交換科學筆記寫作進行同儕互評；完成科學筆記寫作後交由教師統一評閱回饋後發還給學生。本研究共進行13次科學閱讀筆記寫作，過程中收集學生之科學筆記成果、評分規準、閱讀理解能力測驗與生物科學習成就表現。

研究結果顯示，閱讀理解能力隨著科學筆記寫作次數增加有所提升，且同儕互評組的閱讀理解能力增加幅度大於無互評組；然而，閱讀理解能力仍受到學生的先備知識、生物科學習成就表現等因素的影響。同儕互評支持科學筆記寫作能顯著提升學生的筆記寫作品質，但是生物科學習成就未見顯著影響。根據研究結果，研究者對於提升閱讀理解能力有以下結論:（一）、以同儕互評支持評分規準進行科學筆記寫作能有效提升科學筆記寫作表現；（二）、閱讀理解能力可藉由多次科學閱讀筆記寫作提升但不受到同儕互評影響；（三）、評分規準能作為良好的評分依據，亦可以做為良好教學鷹架，能有效引導學生達到預期的學習表現；（四）、科學閱讀理解能力與生物科學習成就高度相關，學生閱讀理解能力的提升能提高生物科學習成就表現。

Since 2000, reading comprehension has been listed as an important assessment item in PISA, and scientific reading comprehension is one of the important literacy skills in the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education. This study aims to investigate the impact of scientific reading note-taking on reading comprehension skills under the support of the peer assessment scoring rubrics. By using scoring rubrics as a scaffold and peer assessment as guidance, students are encouraged to enhance their scientific reading comprehension skills through the process of scientific note-taking.

This study focuses on 97 students in the 11th grade of a senior high school in New Taipei City, but during the implementation process, students were not strictly required to complete scientific reading note-taking. As a result, 31 students were selected for data analysis in the study. These 31 students were divided into two groups: 12 students in the non-peer assessment group and 19 students in the peer assessment group. Throughout the study, students were required to read scientific articles and complete scientific note-taking based on scoring rubrics. Students in the peer assessment group exchanged scientific notes for peer assessment; after completing the scientific note-taking, they were reviewed and given feedback from the teacher. groups. The whole experimentation consists of 13 scientific note-taking sessions, during which students' scientific note outcomes, scoring rubrics, reading comprehension test results, and biology achievements were collected.

The results of the study show that reading comprehension skills improve with an increase in the number of scientific notes-taking sessions, and the increase in reading comprehension skills in the peer assessment group is greater than that in the non-peer assessment group. However, reading comprehension skills are still influenced by personal factors such as students' prior knowledge, and biology academic performance. Peer assessment can support scientific note-taking and significantly improve the quality of students' note-taking, but it did not show a significant impact on biology achievements. Based on the research results, the researcher draws the following conclusions: (1) conducting scientific note writing with peer assessment support of scoring criteria can effectively improve scientific note writing performance; (2) reading comprehension skills can be enhanced through multiple scientific reading note writing sessions but are not influenced by peer assessment; (3) scoring rubrics can serve as a good basis for assessment and can also serve as a good teaching scaffold to effectively guide students to achieve the expected learning performance; (4) scientific reading comprehension skills are highly correlated with biology achievements, and improving students' reading comprehension skills can enhance their biology achievements.

王金泉。（2004）。九年級學生科學寫作與學習成就之探討－以「溫度與熱」為例 （Publication Number 2004年） 國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
王眉涵。（2018）。運用評分規準於直笛學習評量之行動研究—以桃園市某國中為例。 臺灣師範大學音樂學系學位論文，臺北市。
李博宏 與 張美珍。（2019）。評分規準在科技教育的應用初探。工業科技教育學刊（12），82-99。
林美琪。（2009）。整合科學寫作與合作學習在國中自然課程之行動研究 （Publication Number 2009年）中原大學，桃園市。
洪月女 與 靳知勤。（2008）。科學寫作理論與教學之探討。 課程與教學， 11（2），173-191。
洪佳儀 與 宋涵鈺。 （2020）。 透過課內翻轉進行 國小STEM精緻化教學。 Journal of Education Research （1680-6360）（320）， 61-76。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020120320004
國家教育研究院。 （2018）。 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校-自然科學領域。
郭乃瑄。 （2022）。 評量規準對不同學習成就學生學習動機與學習表現之影響 （Publication Number 2022年） 國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
郭岱涵。 （2006）。 國小數學寫作評分規準之開發-以闡述性寫作及編織字網為例。 臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所學位論文，臺北市。
程玉茹。 （2010）。 標題式數學寫作評分規準的發展及探討其對 國小一年級學生加減文字問題解題之成效。 中原大學教育研究所學位論文，桃園市。
靳知勤。 （2015）。 大學生在科學寫作課程中之能力與任務重要性覺知與自我效能的改變。 載於世新大學（主編），科學傳播論文集7（頁291-313）。世新大學。https://doi.org/10.6930/9789868844841.201511.0020
蔡本慧。 （2008）。 科學寫作融入四年級自然與生活科技領域教學之行動研究－以月亮單元為例 （Publication Number 2008年） 中原大學，桃園市。
蔡惠如 與 鄭夢慈。 （2020）。 評分規準對科學筆記寫作及科學閱讀理解能力的影響 [The Impact of Rubrics on Scientific Note-Taking and Science Reading Comprehension]。 科學教育學刊， 28（3）， 255-280。 https://doi。org/10。6173/cjse。202009_28（3）。0003
韓德彥。 （2020）。 以三國演義簡報設計教學及訓練提升學生簡報技能效益 [The Effects of Teaching and Training Designs in the Course of ＂Romance of the Three Kingdoms＂ on Improving Students' Oral Presentation Skills]。 通識學刊：理念與實務， 8（2）， 107-133+135-137。https://doi。org/10。6427/jgecp。202010_8（2）。0004
羅豪章 & 蘇明俊。 （2008）。 如何評鑑學生的實驗報告: 大學普通物理學實驗報告評分規準的建立。 Chinese Physics， 9（1）， 1-16。
Abdelaal, N. M., & Sase, A. S. （2014）. Relationship between Prior Knowledge and Reading Comprehension. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5（6）, 125-131.
Al-Musalli, A. M. （2015）. Taxonomy of Lecture Note-Taking Skills and Subskills. International Journal of Listening, 29（3）, 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2015.1011643
Andrade, H., & Boulay, B. （2003）. Role of Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment in Learning to Write. Journal of Educational Research - J EDUC RES, 97, 21-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670309596625
Andrade, H. G. （2000）. Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57（5）, 13-19.
Andrade, H. G. （2001）. The effects of instructional rubrics on learning to write.
Andrade, H. G. （2005）. Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. College Teaching, 53（1）, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.27-31
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. （1977）. Social learning theory （Vol. 1）. Englewood cliffs Prentice Hall.
Birjandi, P., & Siyyari, M. （2010）. Self-assessment and peer-assessment: A comparative study of their effect on writing performance and rating accuracy.
Boch, F., & Piolat, A. （2005）. Note Taking and Learning: A Summary of Research. The WAC Journal, 16（1）, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.37514/wac-j.2005.16.1.08
Boyle, J. R., & Forchelli, G. A. （2014）. Differences in the note-taking skills of students with high achievement, average achievement, and learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 9-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.06.002
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. （2020）. Multiple Document Comprehension. In: Oxford University Press.
Brookhart, S. M. （1999）. The Art and Science of Classroom Assessment. The Missing Part of Pedagogy. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 27, Number 1. ERIC.
Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., Strømsø, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. （2011）. The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model. Educational Psychologist, 46（1）, 48-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538647
Bui, D. C., & Myerson, J. （2014）. The role of working memory abilities in lecture note-taking. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 12-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.05.002
Bulut, A. （2017）. Improving 4th Grade Primary School Students' Reading Comprehension Skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5（1）, 23-30.
Chen, L., Paterson, K. B., Li, X., Li, L., & Yang, Y. （2019）. Pragmatic influences on sentence integration: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72（12）, 2742-2751. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819859829
Cheng, K.-H., Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. （2015）. Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students' writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001
Chiu, C.-H., Wu, C.-Y., & Cheng, H.-W. （2013）. Integrating reviewing strategies into shared electronic note-taking: Questioning, summarizing and note reading. Computers & Education, 67, 229-238. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.015
Evans, B. P., & Shively, C. T. （2019）. Using the Cornell Note-Taking System Can Help Eighth Grade Students Alleviate the Impact of Interruptions While Reading at Home. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10（1）, 1-35.
Fisher, J. L., & Harris, M. B. （1973）. Effect of note taking and review on recall. Journal of educational psychology, 65（3）, 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035640
Goldman, S. R., Braasch, J. L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A. C., & Brodowinska, K. （2012）. Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47（4）, 356-381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.027
Hagen, Å. M., Braasch, J. L. G., & Bråten, I. （2014）. Relationships between spontaneous note-taking, self-reported strategies and comprehension when reading multiple texts in different task conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 37（S1）, S141-S157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01536.x
Hanf, M. B. （1971）. Mapping: A Technique for Translating Reading into Thinking. Journal of Reading, 14（4）, 225-270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40009605
Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. （2001）. Assessing Self- and Peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20（1）, 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360123776
Hubbard, K. E., & Dunbar, S. D. （2017）. The role of reading strategies in scientific text comprehension and academic achievement of university students. PloS one, 12（12）, e0189753.
Iraji, H. R., Enayat, M. J., & Momeni, M. （2016）. The effects of self-and peer-assessment on Iranian EFL learners' argumentative writing performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6（4）, 716.
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. （2019）. Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills? Learning and Instruction, 60, 85-94. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007
Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E. （1978）. Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85（3）, 555-586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.85.3.555
Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y.-S. （2011）. Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36（4）, 313-322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.04.001
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. （2011）. Students’ perceptions about peer assessment for writing: their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39（3）, 387-406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
Khodabandehlou, M., Jahandar, S., Seyedi, G., & Abadi, R. M. D. （2012）. The impact of self-directed learning strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 3（7）, 1-9.
Kiewra, K. A. （1988）. Cognitive Aspects of Autonomous Note Taking: Control Processes, Learning Strategies, and Prior Knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 23（1）, 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2301_3
Kiewra, K. A. （1989）. A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1（2）, 147-172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326640
Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. F., Christian, D., McShane, A., Meyerhoffer, M., & Roskelley, D. （1991）. Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of educational psychology, 83（2）, 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.2.240
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. （2003）. Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of educational psychology, 95（1）, 3.
Leung, K. H., Pluye, P., Grad, R., & Weston, C. （2010）. A reflective learning framework to evaluate CME effects on practice reflection. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 30（2）, 78-88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.20063
Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. （2010）. Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13（4）, 242-247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.004
Linderholm, T., Kwon, H., & Therriault, D. J. （2014）. Instructions that Enhance Multiple-Text Comprehension for College Readers. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 45（1）, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2014.906269
McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. （2007）. Relevance and Goal-Focusing in Text Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19（2）, 113-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9010-7
Mendieta, J., Múnera, L., Olmos, T., Onatra, C., Pérez, P., & Rojas, E. （2015）. Fostering reading comprehension and self-directed learning in a collaborative strategic reading （CSR） setting. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 20（1）, 15-42.
Mertler, C. A. （2000）. Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7（1）, 25.
Moskal, B. M. （2000）. Scoring rubrics: What, when and how? Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7（1）, 3.
Moskal, B. M., & Leydens, J. A. （2000）. Scoring rubric development: Validity and reliability. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7（1）, 10.
Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. （2019）. PIRLS 2021 Assessment Frameworks. ERIC.
Mullis, I. V. S., von Davier, M., Foy, P., Fishbein B, Reynolds, K. A., & Wry, E. （2023）. PIRLS 2021 International Results in Reading.
Nurmila, N. （2020）. Improving the Students' Reading Skill Trough Note-Taking Technique: a Pre-Experimental Research. Journal La Edusci, 1（1）, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.37899/journallaedusci.v1i1.29
OECD. （2023）. PISA 2022 Results （Volume I）. https://doi.org/doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Orsmond , P., Merry, S., & Callaghan, A. （2004）. Implementation of a formative assessment model incorporating peer and self‐assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 41（3）, 273-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290410001733294
Palmatier, R. A. （1971）. Comparison of Four Note-Taking Procedures. Journal of Reading, 14（4）, 235-258. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40009607
Paris, S. G., & Oka, E. R. （1986）. Children's reading strategies, metacognition, and motivation. Developmental Review, 6（1）, 25-56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297（86）90002-X
Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. （1986）. Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of educational psychology, 78（1）, 34-38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.34
Perfetti, C. A. （1999）. Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. The neurocognition of language, 167, 208.
Peverly, S. T., & Wolf, A. D. （2019）. Note-taking. In The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education. （pp. 320-355）. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108235631.014
Popham, W. J. （1997）. What's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55（2）, 72-75.
Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. （2011）. Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In Text relevance and learning from text. （pp. 19-52）. IAP Information Age Publishing.
Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., & Durik, A. M. （2017）. RESOLV: Readers' Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks. Educational Psychologist, 52（3）, 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1329015
Rouet, J.-F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. （1996）. Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of educational psychology, 88（3）, 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.3.478
Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. （1998）. The Construction of the Hidden Curriculum: messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 23（4）, 391-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293980230406
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. （2012）. Dimensions of Reading Motivation and Their Relation to Reading Behavior and Competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47（4）, 427-463. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030
Schleicher, A. （2019）. PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations. oecd Publishing.
Schoen, I. （2012）. Effects of method and context of note-taking on memory: handwriting versus typing in lecture and textbook-reading contexts.
Shader, M. （2014）. Notetaking Styles and Effectiveness for a Middle School Population Northwest University]. Evanston. archives.northwestu.edu/handle/nu/25755
Stanovich, K. E. （2000）. Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. Guilford Press.
Sternglass, M. （1980）. Sentence-combining and the reading of sentences. College Composition and Communication, 31（3）, 325-328.
Sundeen, T. H. （2014）. Instructional rubrics: Effects of presentation options on writing quality. Assessing Writing, 21, 74-88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.003
Taboada, A., & Guthrie, J. T. （2006）. Contributions of Student Questioning and Prior Knowledge to Construction of Knowledge from Reading Information Text. Journal of Literacy Research, 38（1）, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_1
Tarchi, C. （2010）. Reading comprehension of informative texts in secondary school: A focus on direct and indirect effects of reader's prior knowledge. Learning and Individual Differences, 20（5）, 415-420. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.04.002
Thomas, J. W., Strage, A., & Curley, R. （1988）. Improving students' self-directed learning: Issues and guidelines. The Elementary School Journal, 88（3）, 313-326.
Topping, K. J. （2009）. Peer Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48（1）, 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I., & Elliot, A. （2000）. Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25（2）, 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/713611428
Trilipi, D., Subali, B., Anwar, Y., & Santoso, L. M. （2019）. Note-taking roundhouse diagram strategy: improving student retention on body defense system concepts. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 12（2）, 157-169.
van Hout-Wolters, B., Simons, R.-J., & Volet, S. （2000）. Active learning: Self-directed learning and independent work. In New learning （pp. 21-36）. Springer.
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. （2010）. Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20（4）, 270-279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004
Venables, A., & Summit, R. （2003）. Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40（3）, 281-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000103816
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. （2008）. Advances in text comprehension: model, process and development. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22（3）, 293-301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1417
Wigfield, A. （1997）. Reading motivation: A domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32（2）, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3202_1
Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. （2009）. Supporting self-regulated learning with cognitive tools. In Handbook of metacognition in education （pp. 271-289）. Routledge.