本研究的目的在於了解智慧型手機對愛侶間的情感關係是否產生影響，且形成何等關係。以期了解智慧型手機在愛情關係中之地位與意義。
本研究採孫頌賢（民95）之成人依附特質量表篩選出五名研究參與者（四女，一男），其中三名為焦慮/矛盾依附風格，另兩名為安全依附風格。在未知研究參與者之愛情依附風格的狀態下，研究者訪談他/她們使用智慧型手機之愛情故事，並試圖以詮釋現象學來了解其「愛情關係」和「智慧型手機」間之關係，以「置身所在」來了解每位研究參與者在其「位置」中之愛情經驗。
本研究發現，智慧型手機在愛情關係中之地位與意義如下：
一、智慧型手機是促進彼此聯繫，亦徒增監控彼此之效果；
二、智慧型手機可提供伴侶多種溝通管道；
三、智慧型手機可增添愛情關係之話題與情趣；以及
四、在兩人約會時，使用智慧型手機會造成未使用者之不舒服的感受。
本研究針對上述研究結果作進一步之詮釋，認為智慧型手機或將促進伴侶連結，抑或將增加監控之效果。其主要影響因素為兩人之「信任」以及「渴望確知3W之頻率」。當信任較穩固且渴望確知3W訊息之頻率較低時，智慧型手機在愛情關係中之意義，則為促進伴侶連結。當信任較不穩固且渴望確知3W訊息之頻率較高時，智慧型手機在愛情關係中之意義，則為增加監控之效果。
根據上述發現，本研究最後針對心理治療之實務應用進行討論。不同依附風格者在建立「信任」關係之能力和過程不同，此部分可藉由回溯研究參與者過去與其主要照顧者之間的關係來試圖修復。另一方面，「渴望確知3W之頻率」在心理治療的立即操作上，可就外在行為來控制，降低因「關心」伴侶而演變為「監控」伴侶之行為。

The author intends to understand the impact of using smartphones on the relationship between the lovers by a hermeneutic phenomenology study. It is expected to expand the research of smartphones and romantic relationship.
In this study, with the use of the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (Sun, 2006), the author invited five participants (female 4, male 1), three with anxiety-ambivalent attachment types and two with secure attachment types. Without knowing their romantic attachment types, the author interviewed all participants about
the use of smartphones for their romantic relationship.
The result of this study is presented as follows:
1. The smartphone might promote the intimacy between the lovers each other or result in the monitoring situation between them ;
2. The way to use smartphone provides the lovers with multi-ways to communicate each other ;
3. The smartphone is helpful to share with the other person and also make more fun in their relationship ;
4. When the lovers met each other, one of them using smartphone will result in the other’s bad feeling.
It is assumed that the smartphones might be helpful to the linking with each other or result in more monitoring situation, regarding to their trust to each other and the frequency of the eagerness for 3W issues. When they trust each other more and the frequency of the eagerness for 3W message is less, the smartphone will be helpful for
the lovers to get close each other.
Based on the findings above, the study also discussed possible applications in psychotherapy. Clients with different romantic attachment styles may have different interaction when it comes to the establishment of "trust". Therefore, therapists can backtrack clients’ past experiences of the relationships with their primary caregivers to repair this kind of issue. On the other hand, the frequency of eagerness for 3W might be intervened by external behaviors to decrease the need for "caring" about the lover and evolve into "monitoring" the behavior.

中文部分
王慶福（民89）。當男孩愛上女孩：人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適
　應之研究。中華輔導學報，8，117-201。
吳文嘉（民95）。不同依附風格老人之憂鬱與社會支持之關係。私立東吳大學心
　理學研究所碩士論文。
吳國豪（民88）。網際網路虛擬社群之象徵互動之探索—以irc.hinit.net為
例。私立淡江大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。
吳嘉瑜（民94）。配對研究的行與思－以一個受訪家庭為例。輔導與諮商學報，
　27，71-92。
李煉祥（民100）。智慧型手機軟體商店之商業模式分析。國立中央大學資訊管理
　研究所在職專班碩士論文。
李維倫（民93）。以置身所在做為心理學研究的目標現象及其相關之方法論。應
　用心理研究，22，157-200。
李維倫、賴憶嫺（民98）。現象學方法論：存在行動的投入。中華輔導與諮商學
　報，25，275-321。
李靜如（民96）。大學生的成人依附、社交能力、社會支持、寂寞與憂鬱之關
係。國立政治大學教育學系教育心理與輔導組博士論文
汪文聖（民90）。現象學方法與理論之反思：一個質性方法之介紹。應用心理研
　究，12，49-76。
周子堯（民101）。商務市場選購智慧型手機的行為研究 –以台北都會區的商務
　人士為研究對象。私立淡江大學管理科學研究所企業經營在職專班碩士論
　文。
林佳玲（民89）。夫妻依附風格、衝突因應策略與婚姻滿意度之相關研究。國立
台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。
林羿妏、陳昭秀（民101）。大專院校生的批判思考意向與Facebook特性對其
　資訊驗證行為的影響。國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報，8，17-36。
林捷安、陳盈芊、邱璿蓉、洪承昀、張維純、彭國芳（民101）。免費App軟體下
　載意圖之研究。取自勤益科技大學典藏機構網站http://ir.lib.ncut.edu.
　tw/handle/987654321/3862，民101年10月9日。
LINE官方網站（民101年9月22日）。傳送有趣的獨家貼圖，與LINE體驗歡
　樂的溝通時刻【官方網站】。取自：http://campaign.naver.com/
　linesticker/zh-hant
邱秋雲（民91）。網路戀情者個人特質與其網戀經驗之初探。國立交通大學：傳
　播研究所碩士論文。
侯吉諒（民101）。手機螢幕-寫給「低頭族」。取自聯合報網站：http://
　udn.com/NEWS/READING/X5/7196539.shtml，民101年7月9日。
孫頌賢（民101）。【愛情關係中成人依戀風格分類公式之建立與探討研究】。
　未出版之原始資料。
孫頌賢（民95）。大學生伴侶間人際行為對愛情依附的影響。國立政治大學：心
　理學研究所博士論文。
梁德馨、劉惠婷、陳薪卉、劉峻廷、謝昀東、蘇浚欽、陳儀蔓、吳懿軒、瞿佑安、陳世鴻、姜柔萍（民101）。台灣寬頻網路使用調查。取自財團法台灣網路資訊
　中心：http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/200307
　index.shtml，民101年7月9日。
高淑清（民97）。質性研究的18堂課首航初探之旅。高雄：麗文。
許伶楓（民99）。大學生追逃型配對伴侶的人際行為知覺之研究：焦慮/矛盾型
　與逃避型依戀風格配對研究。國立台北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士班
　碩士論文。
許芷浩（民100年）。智慧型手機使用成長快，Google公佈使用者行為調查。取
　自電子商務時報網站：http://www.ectimes.org.tw/Shownews.aspx
　?id=110826221233，民101年7月22日。
陳芝菁（民100）。智慧型手機選單介面資訊呈現型式之設計研究。國立臺灣科
　技大學設計研究所碩士論文。
陳冠名（民96）。台灣智慧型行動電話裝置廠商發展動態與布局分析。取自資策
　會MIC市場情報中心網站：http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence
　/reports/pop_Doc_promote.asp?docid=CDOC20080111002，民101年
　9月6日。
程淑華（民99）。兩性在嫉妒情緒及引發情境之差異性研究。復興崗學報，99，
　125-150。
黃思齊（民100）。永恆聯繫，輕連結，強控制：手機愛情故事。臺灣大學社會
　學研究所碩士論文。
葉玫君（民93）。年輕族群行動文字簡訊使用研究初探。資訊社會研究，6，　
　235-282。
維基百科Wikidedia（民101）。Facebook。民101年7 月26 日，取自
　http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Facebook
歐貞延（民94）。GO TO CYBERLOVE—從網路看親密關係的轉變。南華大學
　教育社會學研究所碩士論文。
鄧嘉文（民101）。社群行事曆的育成平台及其商業模式。臺灣大學商學研究所碩
　士論文。
蕭源都、修偐驊、王儒弘、汪孟動、林凱逸（民101）。智慧型手機服務品質之研
　究。華人經濟研究，10，131-164。
修慧蘭（譯）（民95）。諮商與心理治療理論與實務（原作者：G. Corey）。台
　北市：雙葉書廊。（原著出版年：2001）

英文部分
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S.
(1978). Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange
　situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles
　among young adults:A test of a four-category model.
　Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
　61, 226-244.
Bechhofer, F., & Paterson, L. (2000). Principles of Research
　Design in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
Benjamin, L. S. (1979). Structural analysis of
　differentiation failure. Psychiatry:Journal for the Study
　of Interpersonal Processes, 42, 1-23.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1: Attachment.
　New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2 Separation:
　Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Clinical applications of
　attachment theory. London: Routledge.
Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R.(1998). Self-
　report measurement of adult attachment: An intergrative
　overview. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes (Eds.),
　Attachment theory and close relationship (pp.46-76). New
　York: Guilford Press.
Campbell, L., & Marshall, T. (2011). Anxious attachment and
　relationship processes : An interactionist perspective.
　Journal of Personality, 79, 1219-1249.
Carlyne, L. K. (2011). Facebook and mySpace: complement or
　substitute for face-to-face interaction, Cyberpsychology,
　behavior,and Social Networking, 14, 75-78.
Cassidy, J., & Berlin, L. J. (1994). The insecure/ambivalent
　pattern of attachment: Theory and research. Child
　Development, 65, 971–981.
Cassidy, J., Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., & Lavy, S.
　(2009). Experimentally induced security influences
　responses to psychological pain. Journal of Social and
　Clinical Psychology, 28, 463–478.
Cohen, M. Z. (Ed.). (2000). Hermeneutic phenomenological
　research: A practical guide for nurse researchers.
　Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment:
　Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior.
　Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832.
Collins, N. L., & Read, S, J. (1990). Adult attachment,
　working models , and relationship quality in dating 　couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58,
　644-663.
Darvell, M. J., B.Behav.Sc., Shari P. Walsh, P. D., &
　Katherine M. White, P. D. (2011). Facebook tells me so:
　applying the theory of planned behavior to understand
　partner-monitoring behavior on Facebook. Cyberpsychology,
　behavior, and social networking, 14(12), 717-722. doi:
　DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2011.0035
Downey, G., Freitas, A. L., Michaelis, B., & Khouri, H.
　(1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close
　relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by 　
　romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social
　Psychology, 75, 545–560.
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The
　benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capital and college
　students’ use of OnLINE social network Sites. Journal of
　Computer Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168.
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New
　York: Norton.
George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1985). Adult Attachment
　Interview. Unpublished manuscript, University of
　California, Berkeley.
Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological 　phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology
　and psychological research (pp. 8-22). Pittsburgh, PA:
　Duquesne University Press.
Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010).
　Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics
　in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3-19.
Gormley, B. (2005). An adult attachment theoretical
　perspective of gender symmetry in intimate partner
　violence. Sex Roles, 52, 785-795.
Grinter, R. E., & Eldridge M. A. (2001). 'y do tngrs luv 2
　txt msg?' In Prinz W., M.Jarke, Y.Rogers, K.Schmidt &
　V.Wulf (eds.): Proceedings of the Seventh European
　Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work ECSCW
　'01, Bonn, Germany. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer 　Academic Publishers, pp. 219-238.
Haddon, L. (1998). The Experience of the Mobile Phone. World
　Congress of Sociology,Social Knowledge, 1-13.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized
　as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and
　Social Psychology, 52, 511-524.
Holmes, J. (1994). The clinical implications of attachment
　theory. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 11, 62-76.
Junghyun, K., and Jong-Eun R. L. (2011). The Facebook paths
　to happiness: effects of the number of Facebook friends
　and self-presentation on subjective well-Being,
　Cyberpsychology, behavior,and Social Networking, 14, 359-
　364.
Kennedy MC. (2009). Facebook and panopticism: healthy
　curiosity or stalking? Unpublished master’s thesis, Scrips
　College of Communication, Ohio.
Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style,
　gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal
　analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
　66, 502–512.
Lampe C., Ellison N., Steinfield C. (2006). A Face(book) in
　the crowd: social searching vs. social browsing.
　Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer
　Supported Cooperative Work, 167–170.
Lopez, F. G. ( 2003). The assessment of adult attachment
　security. In Shane J. Lopez & C. R. Snvder (Ed.), Positive
　psychological assessment: An handbook of models and
　Measures (pp. 285-299). Washington, DC: American
　Psychological Association.
Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Castro, G. D., & Lee, R. A.
　(2012). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-
　related jealousy and surveillance in romantic
　relationships. Personal Relationships, 1-22. doi:
　10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1998). The relationship
　between adult attachment styles and emotional and
　cognitive reactions to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson
　& W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close
　relationships (pp.143–165). New York: Guilford Press.
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). Attachment theory
　and emotions in close relationships: exploring the
　attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to
　relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149–168.
Mikulincer, M., Birnbaum, G., Woddis, D., & Nachmias, O.
　(2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related
　thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual
　components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality
　and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523.
Mikulincer, M., Gillath, O., & Shaver, P. R. (2002).
　Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: threat-
　related primes increase the accessibility of mental
　representations of attachment figures. Journal of
　Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881–895.
Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S. (2009). More
　information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out
　the green-eyed monster of jealousy? CyberPsychology and
　Behavior, 12, 441–444.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation
　methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial
　in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality
　and Social Psychology, 160, 307-317.
Plant, S.(2002), On the Mobile：The Effects of Mobile
　Telephoneson Social and Individual Life，Motorola Media
　Center Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative
　Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and
　Researchers: Sage Pubns.
Shaver, P. R., Mikulincer, M., & Feeney, B. C. (2009).
　What’s love got to do with it? insecurity and anger in
　attachment relationships. Virginia Journal of Social
　Policy and the Law, 16, 491-513.
Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., & Phillips, D. (1996).
　Conflict in close relationships: an attachment
　perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
　71, 899-914.
Soraya, M. (2010). Self-presentation 2.0:narcissism and
　self-esteem on Facebook, Cyberpsychology, behavior,and
　Social Networking, 13, 357-364.
Soukup, P. A., Juckley, B. F., & Robinson, D. C. (2001).
　“The Influence of the ‘Social’ in Computer-Mediated
　Communication,” pp.30-65 in Lea M. (Ed.), Contexts of
　Computer-Mediated Communication. New York: Harvester
　Wheatsheaf.
Spiegelberg, H. (1975). Doing phenomenology. Hague: Martinus
　Nijhoff.
Stern, L. A., & Taylor, K. (2007). Social networking on
　Facebook. Journal of the Communication, Speech and Theatre
　Association of North Dakota, 20, 9-20.
Tanaka, K.(2002), Small Talk with Friends and Family: Does
　text messaging on the mobile phone help users enhance
　relationships? Published doctoral dissertation,
　U WASHINGTON, the Washington state
Taylor, A. S., & Harper, R. (2002). Age-old Practicies in
　the 'New World': A Study of Gift-Giving between Teenage
　Mobile Phone Users. Retrieved from Digital World Research
　Centre, University of Surrey website: http://research.
　microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/ast/files/chi_2002.pdf
Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1982). The dyad as the unit of
　analysis: conceptual and methodological issue. Journal of
　Marriage and Family, 44, 889-900.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social
　surveillance site? understanding the use of interpersonal
　electronic surveillance in romantic relationships.
　Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 705–713.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together. New York: Basic Book.
Valkenburg, J., Peter, & Schouten, A.P. (2006). Friend
　networking sites and their relationship to adolescents'
　well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology
　& Behavior, 584–590.
Wallace, H. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2002). The performance
　of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity
　for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
　82, 819-834.
Wertz, F. J. (1985). Method and findings in a　phenomenological psychological study of a complex life-
　event: Being criminally victimized. In A. Giorgi (Ed.),
　Phenomenology and psychological research (pp. 155-216).
　Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Ylva Hård af Segerstad (2002), Use and Adaptation of Written
　Language to the Conditions of Computer-Mediated
　Communication Department of Linguistics, Doctroal
　Dissertation, Göteborg University, Sweden
Young, S., Dutta, D., & Dommety, G. ( 2009). Extrapolating
　psychological insights from Facebook profiles: a study of
　religion and relationship status. CyberPsychology &
　Behavior, 12, 347-350.