簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃玉君
Huang, Yu-Chun
論文名稱: 高職資料處理科學生訊息處理能力與創造性問題解決能力之相關性研究
A Study of The Relationship between Information Processing Ability and Creative Problem Solving Ability of Students in Data Processing Department of Vocational High school.
指導教授: 莊謙本
Chuang, Chien-Pen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工業教育學系
Department of Industrial Education
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 147
中文關鍵詞: 訊息處理後設認知創造性問題解決能力
英文關鍵詞: Information process, Metacognition, Creative Problem Solving ability
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:114下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 創造力是社會與個人進步的驅動力,面對知識經濟與技術生命週期大幅縮短的環境,更須培育學生具備創造性問題解決的能力。本研究旨在探討個體訊息處理能力與創造性問題解決能力的內涵,並分析二者之間的關聯性,藉以提供教師規劃教學課程與活動設計時之參考,並期許達成培育學生具備創造性問題解決能力之目標。
    本研究主要採用相關文獻分析、專家審查、問卷調查等方法進行研究,研究對象為台北市私立高職資料處理科一年級學生,有效樣本數共計60名。以情境式問題引導使學生進行相關活動,藉以收集和分析資料。經由平均數、標準差以及單一樣本t檢定進行現況分析,探討高職資料處理科學生在程式設計思考歷程中,其注意力程度、工作記憶容量、後設認知能力與創造性問題解決能力展現之現況;並以皮爾森積差相關之統計方法探討研究對象的訊息處理能力與創造性問題解決能力間之相關性。
    本研究結果發現注意力程度、工作記憶容量、後設認知能力與創造性問題解決能力均呈現顯著的相關性。進一步做細項分析後發現個體的「工作記憶量」與「問題解決能力態度」只呈現低度相關,「創造表現力」分別與「後設認知能力」、「問題解決能力態度」亦呈現低度相關。本研究建議教師在規畫教學活動與課程時,應增加專題式與問題導向的教學活動,以增進培養學生具備創造性問題解決能力。

    Creativity is the motivation to drive people and society in progress. Facing the knowledge economic and the environment of the technology life cycle is getting shorter remarkably. Therefore, ability of creative problem solving becomes necessary in cultivating students. The study is to explode the connotation of individual information processing ability and the creative problem solving ability and analyze the correlation between them. Hopefully, it can be a reference to design curriculum and activity for teachers, and also is expected to achieve the goal which students have creative ability to solve problems.
    Documentary analysis, questionnaires, and expert examination are used in the research. The subjects are the freshman year students who study data processing as major in vocational high school in Taipei. There are 60 effected samples. Situation questions were used in activities and collected and analyzed data simultaneously. The methods of data analysis are mean, standard deviation and one-sample t test which are to discover abilities of attention, working memory capacity, metacognition and creative problem solving of subjects in thinking process of digital design, also explode correlation between abilities of information process and creative problem solving by Pearson correlation.
    The result presents significant correlation between attention ability, working memory capacity, metacognition and creative problem solving abilities. When data is analyzed further in details, it illustrate that working memory capacity and problem solving attitude are low correlation, also between problem solving attitude, metacogniton and creativity proformance.
    To sum up, the evidence suggests teachers should add project based learning and problem based learning in order to improve students’ creative ability to solve problems.

    中文摘要 Ⅰ 英文摘要 Ⅱ 謝誌 IV 目錄 V 表目錄 VIII 圖目錄 X 第一章 緒論  第一節 研究背景與動機 1  第二節 研究目的與待答問題 5 第三節 研究方法與步驟 7 第四節 研究範圍與限制 10 第五節 名詞解釋 12 第二章 文獻探討  第一節 訊息處理理論 14 第二節 後設認知 25 第三節 創造性問題解決能力 30 第三章 研究設計與實施  第一節 研究對象 37  第二節 研究架構 38 第三節 研究方法 41  第四節 研究流程 43 第五節 研究工具 45 第四章 資料統計與分析  第一節 高職資料處理科學生訊息處理能力之現況分析 64  第二節 訊息處理能力各構面之相關性分析 72 第三節 創造性問題解決能力之現況與相關性分析 75  第四節 訊息處理能力與創造性問題解決能力之相關性分析 85 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 90 第二節 建議 92 參考文獻 94 附錄一 原訊息處理歷程之注意力評估量表 103 附錄二 原訊息處理歷程之後設認知評估量表 104 附錄三 原問題解決能力態度評估量表 106 附錄四 原總結性創造表現力教師評量表 108 附錄五 後設認知量表原文 110 附錄六 問題解決能力態度量表原文 112 附錄七 訊息處理歷程之注意力評估量表—專家審查意見 114 附錄八 訊息處理歷程之後設認知評估量表—專家審查意見 116 附錄九 問題解決能力態度評估量表—專家審查意見 121 附錄十 總結性創造表現力教師評量表—專家審查意見 125 附錄十一 訊息處理歷程之注意力評估量表—正式問卷 129 附錄十二 訊息處理歷程之後設認知評估量表—正式問卷 130 附錄十三 問題解決能力態度評估量表—正式問卷 132 附錄十四 總結性創造表現力教師評量表—正式評量表 134 附錄十五 情境式問題導引活動 136 附錄十六 日常生活工具性語文工作記憶量表 146 附錄十七 日常生活工具性語文工作記憶量表同意書 147

    一、中文部分
    于富雲、陳玉欣(2007)。不同知識表徵建構的學習策略對自然科學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊,15(1),99-118。
    毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安和林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理。
    何偉雲、謝居盛、施焜燿(2004)。從後設認知探討國小學童創意問題提出能力。屏東師院學報,21,37-68。
    吳明雄(2004)。工業職業教育的創造思考教學。技術及職業教育雙月刊, 24, 14-27。
    吳明雄、許碧珊、饒達欽、簡明忠、陳建宏、張中一和黃秀玉(2008)。高職學生技術創造力指標建構之研究。師大學報,53(3),67-93。
    吳金聰(2006)。認知負荷理論及其在資源班教學上的應用:以國語和數學為例。教育研究,14,179-190。
    李丹(1989)。兒童發展。台北:五南。
    李仁豪、葉素玲(2004)。選擇注意力:選空間或選物體?應用心理研究, 21,165-194。
    李亞蕙(2003)。國小三年級數學學習困難與普通學生工作記憶之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育系碩士論文。
    李偉俊(2008)。後設認知取向之創思領導才能課程設計理論初探。網路社會學通訊期刊。
    李淑媛(1995)。高一學生問題解決態度、生涯不確定源與生涯決定狀態之相關研究。國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
    杜家興(2003)。精緻性複誦技巧訓練對慢性精神分裂症住院病人之語文工作記憶的效果。中原大學心理學系碩士論文。
    阮啟弘、呂岱樺、劉佳蓉、陳巧雲(2005)。視覺注意力的研究議題與神經生理機制(1)。應用心理研究, 28, 25-50。
    周裕欽(2000)。工作記憶對國小五年級不同理解能力學童的區辨效果研究。台東師院學報,11,157-194。
    岳修平譯(1998)。教學心理學—學習的認知基礎,台北:遠流。(原著為Gagné, E.D., Yekovich, C.W. & Yekovich, F.R.,1993 年版)
    林后泰(2005)。高職廣告設計科學生設計創造傾向與問題解決態度之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。
    林幸台(1980)。衡鑑創造力的新指標。資優教育季刊, 4, 6-12。
    邱皓政(2005)。創造力的測量與共識衡鑑。教育資料集刊,30,267-298。
    邵瑞珍、皮連生(1989)。教育心理學。台北:五南。
    洪文東(2006)。以創造性問題解決教學活動設計提升學生解決問題能力。科學教育研究與發展,43,26-42。
    洪榮昭、蕭錫錡、吳明雄(1997)。日本創造力培育。教育研究資訊,5(4), 144-152。
    洪蘭(1999)。活用智慧。譯自Robert, J. Sternberg(1986):原著 "Intelligence applied"。台北市:遠流。
    涂金堂(1999)。簡介「國民中小學學生推理能力測驗」及其應用。學生輔導,63,24-33。
    張世彗(2007)。創造力理論、技法與教學。台北:五南。
    張玉成(1998)。思考技巧與教學。台北:心理出版社。
    張昇鵬(2003)。資賦優異學生及普通學生後設認知能力與創造思考能力之比較研究。特殊教育學報,17,95-119。
    張春興(1996)。教育心理學。台北,東華書局。
    張春興、林清山 (1989)。教育心理學。台北:東華。
    張景媛、陳荻卿(2003)。促進推理思考的認知策略。課程與教學季刊,2(6),107。
    張銘忠(2006)。網路化高層次思考訓練之研究—以六頂思考帽的教學為例。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
    教育部(2002)。創造力教育白皮書。台北:教育部。
    教育部(2006)。教育部輔導高級中等學校發展創意教學環境補助要點。台北:教育部。
    莊謙本、黃玉君、胡凱堯、黃議正、陳鴻基(2009)合作式電腦心智繪圖寫作教學對國小四年級學生寫作與態度之影響。GCCCE2009第十三屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會。
    莊謙本、黃議正、黃玉君、陳鴻基、張銘忠(2009)以六項思考帽之網路化高層次思考訓練提升問題解決能力之研究。GCCCE2009第十三屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會。
    莊謙本和黃雅萍(2002)。知識經濟時代技職教育的因應之道。技職雙月刊,67,2-7。
    莊謙本和戴嘉伸(2004)。圍棋教學對提升學生創新能力之研究。台灣棋院月刊,8, 42-49。
    郭生玉(2000)。心理與教育測驗。台北:精華書局
    郭有遹(2006)。創造性的問題解決法,1-3。台北:心理。
    陳妍竹(2010)。高職廣告設計科學生心流經驗之相關因素研究。臺灣師範大學工業教育系碩士論文。
    陳李綢(1992)。國小男女生後設認知能力與數學作業表現的相關研究。教育心理學報,25, 97-109。
    陳怡安(2002)‧Flow沈浸理論整理。網路社會學通訊期刊,20‧(ISSN:1609-2503)‧ 2010年4月10日摘自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~ society /e-j/20/index.htm#168
    陳昭儀(1991)。二十位傑出發明家的生涯路。台北:心理。
    陳昭儀(2000)。傑出理化科學家之人格特質及創造歷程之研究。師大學報(科學教育類),45(1),27-45。
    陳昭儀(2006)。傑出表演藝術家創作歷程之探析。師大學報(教育類),51, 29-50。
    陳密桃(2003)。認知負荷理論及其對教學的啟示。教育學刊,21, 29-51。
    陳學志(譯)(2004)。Mark H. Ashcraft著。認知心理學。台北:學富。
    陳龍安(2002)。創造力訓練課程設計與實施。創造力課程開發國際學術研討會。
    曾志朗(2005)。原創力之探源,猶如摸象?科學人,45(11),12-13。
    程炳林(2001)。中學生自我調整學習之研究(2/2)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。NSC89-2413-H-006-021。
    黃柏勳(2004)。課程與教學的研究新取向:認知負荷理論。中等教育,55(6),129-138。
    黃茂在、陳文典 (2006)。「問題解決」的能力。九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域--科學素養的內涵與解析,教育部暨國立台灣師範大學編印。
    黃湫瑛(2003)。創造性思考學習活動對高中生網頁設計創造力表現 及問題解決學習成效之影響。國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育研究所碩士論文
    葉玉珠(2005)。影響國小學童科技創意發展的因素之量表發展。師大學報:科學教育類,50(2),29-54。
    葉玉珠(2007)。創造力教學過去、現在與未來。台北:心理‧
    廖永昶(1995)。淺論Torrance創造思考測驗。資優教育季刊, 57,8-11,30。
    潘裕豐(1999)。記憶理論與特殊兒童的記憶學習策略。國小特殊教育,26,32-39。
    潘裕豐(2005)。創意思考的過程論與創造思考得技巧。創造思考教育,15,30-40。
    鄭昭明(1993)。認知心理學–理論與實踐。台北:桂冠。
    蕭錫錡、張仁家、黃金益(2000)。合作學習對大學生專題製作創造力影響之研究。科學教育學刊,8(4),395-410。

    二、英文部分:
    Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General,
    Allport, D. A. (1993). Attention and control: Have we asked the wrong question? A critical review of 25 years. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer- Verlag.
    Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
    Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. CO: estview Press. American psychologist, 56(4), 332.
    Angell, R. B. (1964). Reasoning and logic. New York: Meredith Publishing Company.
    Asubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267-272.
    Atkinson, R. C., Shiffrin R. M. (1968). The psychology of learning and motivation., 89-195, NY: Academic Press.
    Baddeldy AD, (1974). The psychology of learning and motivation. Hitch G., 47-89.
    Baddeldy AD, (2002). Is working memory still working? European Psychologist, 7, 2, 85-97.
    Baddeley , A. D.(1992).Working memory. Science , 255, 556-565.
    Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.
    Barbara, K. & Camea, G. (2003). Measuring creativity in research and practice. In Lopez, S.J. & Snyder, C.R. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Beyer, B. K. (1988). Developing a thinking skills program. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, Inc.
    Bowd, A., McDougall, D., & Yewchuk, C. (1994). Educational psychology for Canadian teachers. Harcourt, Brace and Company: Toronto.
    Broadbent, D. E. (1958), Perception and Communication. NY: Pergamon.
    Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self- regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding, 65-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Colin, C. E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Acoust Soc Am, 25, 975-979
    Colom, R., & Shih, P. (2004). Is working memory fractionated onto different components of intelligence? Intelligence, 32, 431–444.
    Colom, R., Abad, F., Rebollo, I. & Shih, P. C. (2005). Memory span and general intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Intelligence, 33, 623–642.
    Colom, R., Flores-Mendoza, C. & Rebollo, I. (2003). Working memory and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 34,. 33–39.
    Cropley, A.J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
    Crowder, R.G. (1976). Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.
    Deutsch, J.A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention, some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80-90.
    Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: Heath.
    Duncan, J. (1999). Converging levels of analysis in the cognitive neuroscience of visual attention. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan & A. Treisman (Eds.), Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Ennis, R. H. (1985). Goals for a critical thinking curriculum. In A. Costa (Ed.), Developong minds: A resource book for teaching thinking., 54- 57,Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development..
    Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245.
    Eysenck, M., Keane, M. (1995). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook. Psychology Press, UK.
    Flavell, J. H. (1976). First discussant’s comment: What is memory develop- ment of Human Development, 14, 272-278.
    Fleith, D. S. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153.
    Follman, John. C., & Anderson, James A. (1967). An Investigation of the Reluablility of Five Procedures for Grading English Themes. Research in the Teaching of English.
    Gage', B. A. (1986). An analysis of problem solving processes used in college chemistry quantitative equilibrium problems. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: The University of Maryland.
    Gagne' E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston:Lettle, Brown and Company.
    Gallagher, J.J. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. NY: Basic Books.
    Ghani, J. A., & Deshpande, S. P. (1994). Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The Journal of Psychology, 128(4), 381-391.
    Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53, 267-293.
    Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw -Hill.
    Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creativive talents: Their nature, uses and development. NY: Bearly limited.
    Hatch, L. (1988). Problem-solving approach In Kemp, W. H. & Schwaller, A. E.(Eds.), Instructional Strategies for technology education., 88-89, 37th Yearbook of Council on Technology Education,
    Heppner P. P., & Petersen C. H. (1982). The Development and Implications of a Personal Problem-Solving Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 29(1), 66-75.
    Howe, R. (1997). Handbook of seminar on instruction for creative thinking. Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
    Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differencein working memory. Psychological Review, 99 (1), 122-149.
    Kahney, H. (1986). Problem solving- A cognitive approach. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
    Katz, J. G., & Ivey, A. E. (1977). Developing the counselors as a teacher:A systematic Program. Canadian Counselor, 11, 176-181
    Krulik, S. & Rudnick, J. A. (1993). Reasoning and problem solving: handbook for elementary school teachers. Boston: Allyn and Bason.
    Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.
    Lindsay, P.H., & Norman, D. A. (1977). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Inc.
    Mehrabian, A. (1976). Questionnaire measures of affiliative tendency and sensitivity to rejection. Psychological Reports, 38, 199-209.
    Michel, M., & Dudek, S. Z. (1991). Mother-child relationship and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 4(3), 281-286.
    Miller, J. (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limit on our capacity to process information. Psychological Review, 63, 81~87.
    Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 909-919.
    Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century- Crofts.
    Nelson, M. R. (2001). We have the information you want, but getting it will cost you: Being held hostage by information overload. 2009年12月23日摘自:http://www.acm.org/crossroads/xrds1-1 /mnelson.html.
    Newell, A. & Simon, H. (1972). Human Problem Solving . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    O’Neil, H. F. Jr., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and Validity of a State Metacognitive Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
    Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. New York, NY: Charles Scribiner’s Sons.
    Pashler, H. (1998). The Psychology of Attention. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    Pohlman, L. (1996). Creativity, gender and the family: A study of creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(1), 1-24.
    Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol, 32(1), 3-25.
    Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Conscious and nonconscious processing and cognitive functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Siegel, H. (1980). Critical thinking as an educational ideal. The Educational Forum, 45(1), 7-23.
    Simon, H. A. (1974). How big is a chunk? Science, 183, 482-488.
    Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientifc creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475 -494.
    Snowden, P. L., & Christian, L. G. (1999). Parenting the young gifted child: Supportive behaviors. Roeper Review, 21(3), 215-221.
    Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.
    Spitz, H. H. (1979). Beyond field theory in the study of mental deficiency, l21-141. In N. R. Ellis. (Ed.), Handbook of Mpnta1 deficiency. 2nded. Hillsdale, N. J.
    Sternberg, & Lubart (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Critical thinking: Its nature, measurement and improvement. Eric Document Reprodutction Servise No. ED 272 882.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Intelligence applied: Understanding and increasing your intellectual skills. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A theory of human intelligence. New York: Viking.
    Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Giftedness according to the triarchic theory of human intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (eds.), Handbook of gifted education. A Division of Simon & Schuster, Inc.
    Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive psychology (3E). 李玉琇、蔣文祁合譯(2006)。認知心理學,台北:雙葉。
    Sweller, R. J. (1998). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.
    Sweller, R. J., van Merriënboer, J.G., & Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review ,10 (3), 251-297.
    Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual, research edition. New Jersey, Princeton: Personnel Press.
    Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance test of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. research edition personnel press, Inc., Princeton, N. J.
    Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 313-322.
    Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lectures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40(2), 201-237.
    Wallas, G. (1926). The arts of thought. New York: Harcour Brace and Worl.
    Waltz, C.F, Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (1991). Measurement in nursing research (2nd ed., p.173). Philadelphia : F. A. Davis.
    Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 411-426.
    Welford, A. T. (1952). The "psychological refractory period" and the timing of high-speed performance- A review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2-19.
    Zimmerman, E. (2006). It takes effort and time to achieve new ways of thinking: Creativity and art education. The International Journal of Arts Education, 3(2), 74-87.

    下載圖示
    QR CODE