資訊科技的發展，使得多媒體輔助學習的應用越來越多元，其中擴增實境因具有高互動與虛實整合的特性，也開始廣泛的被應用在教育上。然而在過去的相關研究中，往往僅關注在多媒體的正面的影響與學習成效上，卻忽略了不同學習者在透過多媒體來學習時，可能產生的不同感受。因此，本研究欲了解在擴增實境的學習環境下，學習者的認知型態、學習動機與電腦態度，對於學習者在進行學習時的認知負荷之影響。

為了解變項與變項之間的關係，本研究以國中七年級之學生為對象，採用前實驗研究法進行擴增實境學習系統的教學後，再以問卷調查法蒐集實徵資料進行分析與假設驗證。結果發現學習者的認知型態、學習動機與電腦態度，的確會對學習者在透過擴增實境進行學習時所產生的認知負荷產生影響。在三個自變項當中，學習動機對於認知負荷的影響最高，而電腦態度對於認知負荷的影響最低。在認知型態的部分，相較於語文導向的學生，視覺導向的學生產生的認知負荷較低，不過整體而言，兩類型的學生在透過擴增實境學習時所產生的認知負荷都偏低。

The development of information technologies is making a various application of multimedia-assisted learning, and augmented reality also is used on education for its high interactivity. The correlational studies in the past, however, were mainly focused on the effect of media without taking the individual differences into consideration. Thus, this study examed the relationship between cognitive styles, learning motivation, attitudes toward computers and cognitive load under an augmented reality learning system.
To figure out the relationships between the variables, this research took junior high school’s students as the participants, and adopted questionnaires as the manner of collecting empirical data. All the data were analyzed to test hypotheses. The result shows that cognitive styles, learning motivation and attitudes toward computers of users will influence their cognitive load under the augmented reality learning system while learning. In the three independent variables, learning motivation has the greatest impact on cognitive load while attitudes toward computers have the minimum impact on cognitive load. In cognitive styles, visualized students have lower cognitive load than verbalized students, but cognitive load of the both two styles is all low under the augmented reality learning system.

一、中文部分
沈碩彬(2008)。從認知負荷理論談英語教學之實施。研習資訊，25(2)，51-58。
林生傳(1999)。教育心理學。台北：五南。
林清山(譯)(1997)。教育心理學：認知取向(原作者：R. E. Mayer)。臺北市：遠流。(原著出版年：1987)
邱皓政(2005)。量化研究法(一)：研究設計與資料處理。台北：雙葉。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS/PASW資料分析範例解析(第五版)。台北市：五南。
徐媛(2007)。增強現實技術的教學應用研究。中國遠端教育，10，68-70。
張春興(1994)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
教育部國民教育司(2012)。資訊科技概論課程綱要[台國(二)字第 0970082874B號]。取自http://www.edu.tw/EJE/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326
郭世文(2008)。擴增實境應用於博物館展示的初探。科技博物，12(4)，25-37。
陳玉玲(2003)。國小學生內、外在學習動機在數學學業表現中的角色。教育學刊，21，173-193。
陳彙芳、范懿文(2000)。認知負荷對多媒體電腦輔助學習成效之影響研究。資訊管理研究，2(2)，45-60。
黃世杰(2002)。國中學生電腦態度量表發展研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
謝富榮(2007)。台中縣國小學童電腦態度調查：兼論網路調查法在教育研究之可行性。屏東教育大學學報，28，1-38。
韓乾(2008)。研究方法原理：論文寫作的邏輯思維。臺北市：五南。
羅清俊(2007)。社會科學研究方法-如何做好研究。臺北市：威仕曼。

二、英文部分
Agnesia, R. H. (2010). Features affecting task-motivation in English for academic purposes online learning. Second Language Studies, 29(1), 1-34.
Ainsworth, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.
Amelink, C., Scales, G., & Tront, J. G. (2012). Student use of the tablet PC: Impact on student learning behaviors. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(1), 1-17.
Artino, A. R. (2005). Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (Research Report). http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED499083.pdf
Ayersman, D. J., & von Minden, A. (1995). Individual differences, computers and instruction. Computer in Human Behavior, 11(3-4), 371-390.
Azuma, R. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Teleoperators and virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Belal, A. R. (2011). Students' perceptions of computer assisted learning: An empirical study. Management in Education, 5(1), 63-78.
Bong, M. (2004). Academic motivation in self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal orientations, and attributional beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(6), 287-297.
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.
Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Lin, S. F. (2006). Computer-assisted learning for mathematical problem solving. Computers & Education, 46(2), 140-151. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.002
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2004). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15. doi: 10.1002/asi.10023
Chen, S. Y., Ghinea, Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). A cognitive approach to user perception of multimedia quality: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(12), 1200-1213. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.08.010
Childers, T. L., Houston, M. J., & Heckler, S. E. (1985). Visual versus verbal information processing. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 125-134.
Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3-18. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.002
Cierniak, G., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2009). Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 315-324. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.020
Connolly, T. M., Stansfield, M., & Hainey, T. (2011). An alternate reality game for language learning: ARGuing for multilingual motivation. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1389-1415. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.009
Curry, L. (1983, April). An Organization of Learning Styles Theory and Constructs. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Damala D., Marchal I., & Houlier P. (2009, October). Merging augmented reality based features in mobile multimedia museum guides. Paper presented at XXI International CIPA Symposium, Athens, Greece.
Di Serio, A., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2012). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' notivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.002
Dias, A. (2009). Technology enhanced learning and augmented reality: An application on multimedia interactive mooks. International Business & Economics Review, 1(1), 69-79.
Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. doi: 10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
Ferrari, M., & Mahalingham, R. (1998). Personal cognitive development and its implications for teaching and learning. Educational Psychology, 33(1), 35-44.
Ghinea, G., & Chen, S. Y. (2003). The impact of cognitive styles on perceptual distributed multimedia quality. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 393-406.
Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151-179.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Höffler, T., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2010). The influence of visual cognitive style when learning from instructional animations and static pictures. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 479-483. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.001
Holzinger, A., Kickmeier-Rust, M. D., & Albert, D. (2008). Dynamic media in computer science education; Content complexity and learning performance: Is less more? Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 279-290.
Hsu, H. Y., & Wang, S. W. (2011). The impact of using blogs on college students’ reading comprehension and learning motivation. Literacy Research & Instruction, 50(1), 68-88. doi: 10.1080/19388070903509177
Hsu, M. K., Wang, S. W., & Chiu, K. K. (2009). Computer attitude, statistics anxiety and self-efficacy on statistical software adoption behavior: An empirical study of online MBA learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 412-420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.10.003
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014
Irawati, S., Hong, S., Kim, J., & Ko, H. (2008, December). 3D edutainment environment: Learning physics through VR/AR experiences. Paper presented at Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Yokohama, Japan.
Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual difference, learning, and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jong, T. D. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 509-539. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kay, R. H. (1993). An exploration of theoretical and practical foundations for assessing attitudes toward computers: The computer attitude measure (CAM). Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 371-386.
Klein, G. S., & Schlesinger, H. J. (1951). Perceptual attitudes toward instability: I. Prediction of apparent movement experiences from Rorschach responses. Journal of Personality, 19, 289-302.
Lamber, J. (2008). Technology, transfer, and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers’ computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385-410.
Lee, I. C. (2010). The effect of learning motivation, total quality teaching and peer-assisted learning on study achievement: Empirical analysis from vocational universities or colleges’ students in Taiwan. Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(2), 56-73.
Lepper, M. R., Iyengar, S. S., & Corpus, J. H. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184
Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 284-289. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.010
Liu, M., Horton, L., Olmanson, J., & Toprac, P. (2011). A study of learning and motivation in a new media enriched environment for middle school science. Education Tech Research, 59(2), 249-265. doi: 10.1007/s11423-011-9192-7
Liu, T. Y., Tan, T. H., & Chu, Y. L. (2007, July). 2D Barcode and Augmented Reality Supported English Learning System. Paper presented at International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Montreal, Canada.
Liu, Z. F., Lin. C. H., Jian, P. H., & Liou, P. Y. (2012). The dynamics of motivation and learning strategy in a vreatibity-supporting learning environment in higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 172-180.
Lynch, T. G., Steele, D. J., Palensky, J. E. J., Lacy, N. L., & Duffy, S. W. (2001). Learning preferences, computer attitudes, and test performance with computer-aided instruction. The American Journal of Surgery, 181, 8-371.
Massa, L. J., & Mayer, R. E. (2006). Testing the ATI hypothesis: Should multimedia instruction accommodate verbalizer-visualizer cognitive style? Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 321-335.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions. Educational Psychologist, 32, 1-19.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a click away: Does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia message? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390-397.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Mayer, R. E., Fennell, S., Farmer, L., & Campbell, J. (2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 389-395. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.389
Mayer, R. E., Heiser, J., & Lonn, S. (2001). Cognitive constraints on multimedialearning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 187-198. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.187
Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 171-185. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.94.1.171
McWilliams, V. M. (2001). Exploring the relationship between computer-based training, learning styles, and cognitive styles (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No.3003433)
Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1994). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282-292.
Mitra, A. (1998). Categories of Computer Use and Their Relationships with Attitudes Toward Computers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 30(3), 281-295.
Morris, S. A., Gullekson, N. L., Morse, B. J., & Popovich, P. M. (2009). Updating the attitudes toward computer usage scale using American undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 535-543. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.11.008
Nickel, P., & Nachreiner, F. (2003). Sensitivity and diagnosticity of the 0.1 Hz component of heart rate variability as an indicator of mental workload. Human Factors, 45(4), 575–590.
Nickell, G. S., & Pinto, J. N. (1986). The computer attitude scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2(4), 301–306.
Nix, I., & Wyllie, A. (2011). Exploring design features to enhance computer-based assessment: Learners' views on using a confidence indicator tool and computer-based feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(1), 101-112. doi:1O.11 11/j.1467-8535.2009.00992.x
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.
Paas, F. G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351-371.
Pektas, S. T. (2010). Effects of cognitive styles on 2D drafting and design performance in digital media. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(1), 63-76. doi: 10.1007/s10798-008-9060-x
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Paper present at National Center for Research to Improve Teaching and Learning, School of Education, The university Michigan.
Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61-86.
Rao, N., & Sachs, J. (1999).Confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(6), 1016-1029. doi: 10.1177/00131649921970206
Richard M. R., & Edward L. D. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Richardson, A. (1977). Verbalizer–visualizer: A cognitive style dimension. Journal of Mental Imagery, 1(1), 109-126.
Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193–215.
Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 469-508. doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2005). Enabling, facilitating, and inhibiting effects of animations in multimedia learning: Why reduction of cognitive load can have negative results on learning. Educational Technology, 53(3), 47-58.
Seiler, J. R., Popescu, O., & Peterson, J. A. (2002). A woody plant identification tutorial improves field identification skills. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 31, 12-15.
Shelton, B. E., & Hedley, N. R.(2002, September). Using augmented reality for teaching earth-sun relationships to undergraduate geography students. Paper presented at the First IEEE International Augmented Reality Toolkit Workshop, Darmstadt, Germany.
Specht, M., Ternier, S., & Greller, W. (2011). Dimensions of Mobile Augmented reality for Learning: A First Inventory. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 117-127.
Strehler, A. (2008). The relationship between cognitive load, cognitive style and multimedia learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
Stull, A. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: Three experimental comparisons of learner-generated versus author-provided graphic organizers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 808-820. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.808
Sun, Y. C., & Chen, C. M. (2010, May). Assessing learning emotion for both the cognitive styles of visualizer and verbalizer distributed to different types of multimedia learning materials. Paper presented at International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation, Tainan, Taiwan.
Sweller, J. (2006). Discussion of emerging topics in cognitive load research: Using learner and information characteristics in the design of powerful learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 353-357. doi: 10.1002/acp.1251
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, 12(3), 185-233.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York: Springer.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-297.
Tan, C. T., & Soh, D. (2010, December). Augmented reality games: A review. Paper presented at Gameon-Arabia, Eurosis.
Tan, K. T. W., Lewis, E. M., Avis, N. J., & Withers, P. J. (2008, December). Using augmented reality topromote an understanding of materials science to school children. Paper presented at SIGGRAPH Asia, Singapore.
Teo, T. (2008). Assessing the computer attitudes of students: An Asian perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1634-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.004
Thompson, B. R., & Thornton, H. J. (2002). The transition from extrinsic to intrinsic motivation in the college classroom: A first-year experience. Education, 122(4), 785-792.
van Merriënboer , J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147-177. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner's mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.
Wilson, K., Boyd, C., Chen, L., & Jamal, S. (2011). Improving student performance in a first-year geography course: Examining the importance of computer-assisted formative assessment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1493-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.011
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64.
Zhou, F., Duh, H. B., & Billinghurst, M. (2008, September). Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: A review of ten years of ISMAR. Paper presented at IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, Cambridge, United Kindom.