研究生: |
陳彥瑋 Chen, Yen-Wei |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
執行功能對國小資優生創造力之預測分析 The study of executive functions predicting creativity in gifted elementary students |
指導教授: |
郭靜姿
Kuo, Ching-Chih |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
特殊教育學系 Department of Special Education |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 198 |
中文關鍵詞: | 資優生 、執行功能 、創造力 、認知抑制 、工作記憶 |
英文關鍵詞: | gifted student, executive functions, creativity, cognitive inhibition, working memory |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/DIS.NTNU.DSE.022.2018.F02 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:333 下載:25 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文摘要
本研究旨在探討執行功能對創造力之預測,並了解執行功能中抑制能力、記憶廣度、更新能力和轉移能力與不同創造思維歷程的關係。本研究以臺北市164位國小五、六年級資優生與普通生為研究對象,以史楚普色字作業、線索回憶作業、中文閱讀廣度測驗、數字記憶作業、顏色形狀作業為執行功能評量工具,並以新編創造思考測驗和兒童版中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗為創造力評量工具。所得資料以獨立樣本及相依樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、二因子混合變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元逐步迴歸進行統計考驗。茲將本研究之主要結果說明如下:
1.資優生在執行功能與創造力的表現較普通生佳
資優生在抑制優勢反應能力、抑制前向干擾能力、記憶廣度、更新能力與轉移能力優於普通生,顯示資優生執行功能發展較普通生成熟。
2.資優生抑制優勢反應能力越好,封閉式解答創造力問題表現越好
在資優生群體中,抑制優勢反應能力越好,在遠距聯想測驗的表現越好。此外,資優生在封閉式解答創造力問題得分高於普通生,顯示資優生能產生較多的想法並進行聚斂,以得出正確的解答。
3.執行功能對擴散性思考能力的預測能力
預測語文創造思考能力方面,在資優生群體中,最能預測變通力之執行功能為記憶廣度;最能預測整體語文創造思考能力為轉移能力。在普通生群體中,以轉移能力最能預測流暢力、變通力與整體語文創造思考能力。
預測圖形創造思考能力方面,在資優生群體中,最能預測流暢力之執行功能為抑制前向干擾能力;最能預測獨創力為抑制優勢反應能力與抑制前向干擾能力。在普通生群體中,以抑制前向干擾能力最能預測流暢力、獨創力與整體圖形創造思考能力。
Abstract
The main purpose of the research was to analyze how executive functions (EFs) patterns predict creativity. Under the category of EFs, various relations among inhibition, memory span, information updating and monitoring (updating), mental set shifting (shifting), and different creative thinking processes were investigated accordingly. The research subjects included 164 fifth and sixth graders from Taipei city; among of them, 100 gifted and 64 non-gifted students were involved. The psychometric tests of EFs were Stroop Task, Cued Recall Task, Chinese Reading Span Task, Digit Memory Task, and Color-Shape Task. The instruments of creativity were “The Chinese Version of Creative Thinking Test” and “The Chinese Word Remote Associates Test-Children (CWRAT-C)”. The study results were analyzed by “Student’s t-test”, “One-way ANOVA”, “Two-way mixed ANOVA”, “Pearson correlation”, and “multiple stepwise regression analysis”. The main results of this study were as follows:
1.Gifted students outperformed non-gifted students on creativity and EFs tasks
Gifted students had better performances on prepotent response inhibition, resistance to proactive interference, memory span, updating, and shifting than nongifted ones did. The result indicated the EFs development path of gifted students were faster than their regular peers.
2.The better prepotent response inhibition gifted students had, the higher scores on CWRAT-C they obtained
In the gifted student group, the better prepotent response inhibition they had, the higher scores on the closed-ended creative problems they received. In addition, gifted students scored higher on the closed-ended creative problems than non-gifted students, showing that gifted students can generate more ideas and had better convergent thinking.
3.The prediction of EFs on creativity
On predicting the verbal creative thinking, among the gifted students, the “memory span” was the most predictive of EFs on flexibility and that “shifting” was the most predictive of EFs on verbal creative thinking. Among the non-gifted students, “shifting” was the most predictive of EFs on fluency, flexibility, and verbal creative thinking.
On predicting the figural creative thinking, among the gifted students, the resistance to proactive interference was the most predictive of EFs on fluency and that “prepotent response inhibition” and “resistance to proactive interference” were the most predictive of EFs on originality and figural creative thinking. Among the non-gifted students, the “resistance to proactive interference” could predict fluency, originality, and figural creative thinking the best.
一、中文文獻
王韻茹(2015):注意力不足過動症兒童青少年的情緒刺激、動機與注意力控制之研究(未出版)。慈濟大學人類發展學系碩士論文,花蓮縣。
任純慧、陳學志、練竑初、卓淑玲(2004):創造力測量的輔助工具:中文遠距聯想量表的發展。應用心理研究,21,195-217。
吳玉欣(2001):日常生活執行功能行為與執行功能測驗關係研究-以腦中風患者為例(未出版)。高雄醫學大學行為科學研究所碩士論文,高雄市。
吳靜吉、陳甫彥、郭俊賢、林偉文、劉士豪、陳玉樺(1998):新編創造思考測驗研究。臺北市:教育部。
何偉雲、葉錦燈(2003):RAT-like測驗中的發散性思考分析。科學教育學刊,11(2),195-210。
李漢岳(2013):身體活動介入對執行功能影響之後設分析(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北市。
周育如、樂可天(2013):應用工作記憶理論促進學習成效之研究初探。慈濟大學教育研究學刊,9,33-68。
林慧芳(2002):國小六年級低閱讀能力學生工作記憶與推論能力之研究(未出版)。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,彰化縣。
林緯倫(2006):不同創造力運作與認知抑制、工作記憶廣度間關係之探討(未出版)。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所博士論文,臺北市。
邱發忠(2005):創造力認知運作機制之探究(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系博士論文,臺北市。
洪巧菱、蔡侑蓉、黃崇儒、洪聰敏(2016):以神經電生理取向探討身體活動在ADHD兒童症狀與認知功能效益:文獻回顧與展望。應用心理研究,64, 39-93。
胡中凡、陳彥丞、卓淑玲、陳學志、張雨霖、宋曜廷(2017):1200個中文雙字詞的聯想常模與其被聯想反應參照表。教育心理學報,49(1),137-161。
翁巧涵、陳修元、周泰立(2014):語意關聯與類別語意關係對兒童中文語意發展影響的縱貫式研究。中華心理學刊,56(1),65-81。
張雨霖、吳哲源、陳學志、吳清麟 (2016):「中文部件組字遠距聯想測驗」之發展與其信效度研究。測驗學刊,63(1),59-81。
陳學志(主譯)(2004):認知心理學(M. H. Ashcraft著:Cognition3rd )。臺北市:學富文化。(原著出版於2001)。
陳學志、彭淑玲、曾千芝、邱皓政(2008):藉由眼動追蹤儀器探討平均掃視幅度大小與創造力之關係。教育心理學報,39,127-149。
單延愷、陳映雪、蘇東平(2004):兒童與青少年注意力、記憶、與執行功能之發展性常模。臨床心理學刊,1(1),21-29。
黃博聖、陳學志、劉政宏(2012):「中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及其信、效度報告。測驗學刊,59(4),581-607。
黃博聖、陳學志、黃鴻程、劉政宏(2009):“詞彙聯想策略擴散性思考測驗”之編製。測驗學刊,56(2),153-177。
蔡雅淳(2009):「小就是大」-學前幼兒在執行功能作業中的抑制控制表現(未出版)。國立屏東教育大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文,屏東縣。
蕭文欽(2015):教練模式應用於提升同儕教練執行功能之研究—以自閉症學童社會技巧訓練設計為任務導向(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,臺北市。
羅珮文、游勝翔、黃博聖、陳學志、施依伶、林緯倫(2017):兒童封閉式創造力潛能測量:「兒童版中文詞彙遠距聯想測驗」之編製及信、效度研究。測驗學刊,64(3),237-258。
蘇秀慧(2006):中文遠距聯想作業之構成要素難度分析暨其與擴散性及頓悟性思考之關聯(未出版)。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系在職進修碩士班,臺北市。
蘇曜祥(2009):中央執行功能與類別學習的個別差異現象(未出版)。國立成功大學認知科學研究所碩士論文,臺南市。
二、英文文獻
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Arffa, S. (2007). The relationship of intelligence to executive function and non-executive function measures in a sample of average, above average, and gifted youth. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(8), 969-978.
Arffa, S., Lovell, M., Podell, K., & Goldberg, E. (1998). Wisconson Card Sorting Test performance in above average and superior school children: Relationship to intelligence and age. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13, 713–720.
Armbruster, B. B. (1989). Metacognition in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 177-182). New York: NY: Plenum Press.
Ash, I. K., & Wiley, J. (2006). The nature of restructuring in insight: An individual-differences approach. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13(1), 66-73.
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1996). Exploring the central executive. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49(1), 5-28.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829-839.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1-29.
Balchin, T. (2009). Creativity in a culture of conformity: Recognising and rewarding creative endeavour in design and technology. Dudweiler Landstr, Saarbrücken, Deutschland: VDM.
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65-94.
Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 8(3), 287-292.
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P., Nusbaum, E., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory and Cognition, 42(7), 1186-1197.
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 309-319.
Beech, A., Powell, T., McWilliam, J., & Claridge, G. (1989). Evidence of reduce “cognitive inhibition” in Schizophrenia. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 109-116.
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 480-485.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. Neuroimage, 88, 125-133.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73-83.
Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick's model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies. evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 273-289.
Benedek, M., Neubauer, A. C., & Könen, T. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 6(3), 273-281.
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29(3), 180-200.
Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Naglieri, J. A. (2011). Relations between executive function and academic achievement from ages 5 to 17 in a large, representative national sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 327-336.
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 10(3), 730-737.
Brown, R. T. (1989). Creativity: What are we to measure? In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-32). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Brydges, C. R., Reid, C. L., Fox, A. M., & Anderson, M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts Intelligence in children. Intelligence, 40(5), 458-469.
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273-293.
Burch, G. S. J., Hemsley, D. R., Pavelis, C., & Corr, P. J. (2006). Personality, creativity and latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20(2), 107-122.
Callahan, C. M. (1991). The assessment of creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 219-235). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Caroff, X., & Besançon, M. (2008). Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 367-371.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499-506.
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50.
Christensen, P. R., Guilford, J. P., & Wilson, R. C. (1957). Relations of creative responses to working time and instructions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53(2), 82-88.
Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41-54.
Claxton, A. F., Pannells, T. C., & Rhoads, P. A. (2005). Developmental trends in the creativity of school-age children. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 327-335.
Cooper, E. (1991). A critique of six measures for assessing creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 25(3), 194-204.
Crabtree, J., & Green, M. J. (2016). Creative cognition and psychosis vulnerability: What’s the difference? Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 24-32.
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404.
Darvishi, Z., & Pakdaman, S. (2012). "Fourth grade slump in creativity": Development of creativity in primary school children. GSTF International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 1(2), 40-48.
Davidson, M. C., Amso, D., Anderson, L. C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037-2078.
Davis, G. A. (2004). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 656-669.
Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135-168
Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1382-1390.
Duan, X., Wei, S., Wang, G., & Shi, J. (2010). The relationship between executive functions and intelligence on 11- to 12-year-old children. Psychological Test and Assessment Modelling(52), 419-431.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Edl, S., Benedek, M., Papousek, I., Weiss, E. M., & Fink, A. (2014). Creativity and the Stroop interference effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 38-42.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993a). Creativity and Personality: An attempt to bridge divergent traditions. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 238.
Eysenck, H. J. (1993b). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 147.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Creativity as a product of intelligence and personality. In D. H. Saklofske & M. Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 231-247). Boston, MA: Springer.
Finke, R. A., Ward, B. W., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory ,research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Friedman, N. P., Haberstick, B. C., Willcutt, E. G., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2007). Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence. Psychological Science, 18(10), 893-900.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 101-135.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Altamirano, L. J., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Rhea, S. A., & Hewitt, J. K. (2016). Stability and change in executive function abilities from late adolescence to early adulthood: A longitudinal twin study. Developmental Psychology, 52(2), 326-340.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Defries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Robinson, J. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Developmental trajectories in toddlers' self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), 1410-1430.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201-225.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Fioratou, E. (2009). Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach. Thinking and Reasoning, 15(4), 355-376.
Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611-625.
Gilhooly, K. J., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 11(3), 279-302.
Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. K., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Test review behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychology, 6(3), 235-238.
Golden, C. J. (1975). The measurement of creativity by the Stroop Color and Word Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39(5), 502-506.
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398-1405.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480-506.
Groborz, M., ecedil, & cka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3), 183.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and Inhibition in Cognition (pp. 175-204). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy andcritique of measurements used in the study ofcreativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum Press.
Hofstee, W. K., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146-163.
Homack, S., & Riccio, C. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Stroop Color and Word Test with children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(6), 725-743.
Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69-90
Huntsinger, J. R., & Ray, C. (2016). A flexible influence of affective feelings on creative and analytic performance. Emotion, 16(6), 826-837.
Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J. H., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 487-493.
Johns, G. A., Morse, L. W., & Morse, D. T. (2001). An analysis of early vs. Later responses on a divergent production task across three time press conditions. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35(1), 65-72.
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Agars, M. D., & Loomis, D. (2010). Creativity stereotypes and the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 200-205.
Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. New York, NY: Wiley.
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2), 57-66.
Kozbelt, A., & Durmysheva, Y. (2007). Understanding creativity judgments of invented alien creatures: The roles of invariants and other predictors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(4), 223-248.
Kwiatkowski, J., Vartanian, O., & Martindale, C. (1999). Creativity and speed of mental processing. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 17(2), 187-196.
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41(5), 306-320.
Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-80.
Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Trandel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Lin, W.-L., Hsu, K.-Y., Chen, H.-C., & Wang, J.-W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: A dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 112-123.
Lin, W.-L., & Lien, Y.-W. (2013a). The different role of working memory in open-ended versus closed-ended creative problem solving: A dual-process theory account. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 85-96.
Lin, W.-L., & Lien, Y.-W. (2013b). Exploration of the relationships between retrieval-induced forgetting effects with open-ended versus closed-ended creative problem solving. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 40-49.
Lin, W.-L., & Shih, Y.-L. (2016). The developmental trends of different creative potentials in relation to children’s reasoning abilities: From a cognitive theoretical perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 36-47.
Long, H. (2014). More than appropriateness and novelty: Judges’ criteria of assessing creative products in science tasks. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 183-194.
Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3-4), 295-308.
Lv, K. (2015). The involvement of working memory and inhibition functions in the different phases of insight problem solving. Memory and Cognition, 43(5), 709-722.
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach (Vol. 11, pp. 249-268). Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.
Martinussen, R., Hayden, J., Hogg-Johnson, S., & Tannock, R. (2005). A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with Attention-Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44(4), 377.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89(1), 60-94.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509-516.
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220-232.
Milgram, R. M., & Rabkin, L. (1980). Developmental test of Mednick's associative hierarchies of original thinking. Developmental Psychology, 16(2), 157-158.
Miller, A. L. (2014). A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 203-218.
Miyake, A., Emerson, M. J., Padilla, F., & Ahn, J.-C. (2004). Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: The effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 115(2-3), 123-142
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8-14.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex `frontal lobe' tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621-640.
Morrison, R. G., McCarthy, S. W., & Molony, J. M. (2017). The experience of insight follows incubation in the Compound Remote Associates Task. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(2), 180-187.
Mumford, M. D. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: II. information encoding. Creativity Research Journal, 9(1), 77.
Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Maher, M. A., Costanza, D. P., & Supinski, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 59.
Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30-47
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C. E., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91-122.
Nigg, J. T. (2000). On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 220-246.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39(1), 36-45.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 37(1), 51-87.
Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and Openness to Experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(2), 323-332.
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1137-1147.
Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48-73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 55-63.
Radel, R., Davranche, K., Fournier, M., & Dietrich, A. (2015). The role of (dis)inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation. Cognition, 134, 110-120.
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (1991). The assessment of creative products in programs for gifted and talented Students. Gifted child Quarterly, 35(3), 128-134.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305-310.
Romine, C. B., Lee, D., Wolfe, M. E., Homack, S., George, C., & Riccio, C. A. (2004). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test with children: A meta-analytic study of sensitivity and specificity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(8), 1027-1041.
Royall, D. R., Lauterbach, E. C., Cummings, J. L., Reeve, A., Rummans, T. A., Kaufer, D. I., LaFrance, W. Jr., & Coffey, C. E. (2002). Executive control function: A review of its promise and challenges for clinical research-A report from the committee on research of the American neuropsychiatric association. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 14(4), 377-405.
Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59(3), 711-717.
Runco, M. A. (1986). Flexibility and originality in children's divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology, 120(4), 345-352.
Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted child Quarterly, 3(31), 121-125.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93-96.
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric Integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3/4), 393-400.
Sastre-Riba, S., & Viana-Saenz, L. (2016). Executive functions and high intellectual capacity. Revista De Neurologia, 62 Suppl 1, S65-S71.
Schaefer, C. E., & Bridges, C. I. (1970). Development of a creativity attitude survey for children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 31(3), 861-862.
Schooler, J. W., Ohlsson, S., & Brooks, K. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122(2), 166-183.
Schwaighofer, M., Bühner, M., & Fischer, F. (2016). Executive functions as moderators of the worked example effect: When shifting is more important than working memory capacity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(7), 982-1000.
Scibinetti, P., Tocci, N., & Pesce, C. (2011). Motor creativity and creative thinking in children: The diverging role of inhibition. Creativity Research Journal(23), 262-272.
Sharma, S., & Babu, N. (2017). Interplay between creativity, executive function and working memory in middle-aged and older adults. Creativity Research Journal, 29(1), 71-77.
Siegel, J., & Bugg, J. M. (2016). Dissociating divergent thinking and creative achievement by examining attentional flexibility and Hypomania. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 10(4), 416-424.
Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages: Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 111-120.
Steel, C., Hemsley, D. R., & Jones, S. (1996). Cognitive inhibition and schizotypy as measured by the Oxford-Liverpool inventory of feelings and experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 20(6), 769-773.
Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2005). Creativity. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 37(4), 571-590.
Tolan, G. A., & Tehan, G. (1999). Determinants of short-term forgetting: Decay, retroactive interference, or proactive interference? International Journal of Psychology, 34(5-6), 285-292.
Tsai, K. C. (2015). Assessing a Chinese version of the Runco Ideational Behavior Scale. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 43(7), 1111-1122.
Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2011). Variation in verbal fluency: A latent variable analysis of clustering, switching, and overall performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(3), 447-466.
Urban, K. K. (2005). Assessing creativity: The test for Creative Thinking-Drawing Production (TCT-DP). International Education Journal, 6(2), 272-280.
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6), 1470-1480.
Wakefield, J. F. (1989). Creativity and cognition some implications for arts education. Creativity Research Journal, 2(1-2), 51-63.
Wakefield, J. F. (1992). Creative thinking: Problem-solving skills and the art orientation. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Wang, C.-C., Ho, H.-C., Cheng, C.-L., & Cheng, Y.-Y. (2014). Application of the Rasch model to the measurement of creativity: The creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 62-71.
Ward, W. C. (1969). Rate and uniqueness in children’s creative responding. Child Development, 40(3), 869.
Weisberg, R. W. (1995). Prolegomena to theories of insightin problemsolving: A taxonomy of problems. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 157-196). London: The MIT Press.
Welsh, M. C., & Pennington, B. F. (1988). Assessing frontal lobe functioning in children: Views from developmental psychology. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4(3), 199-230.
Willcutt, E. G., Doyle, A. E., Nigg, J. T., Faraone, S. V., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Validity of the executive function theory of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A meta-analytic review. Biological Psychiatry, 57(11), 1336-1346.
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 136-143.
Zabelina, D. L., Robinson, M. D., Council, J. R., & Bresin, K. (2012). Patterning and nonpatterning in creative cognition: Insights from performance in a random number generation task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(2), 137-145.
Zabelina, D. L., Saporta, A., & Beeman, M. (2016). Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking. Memory and Cognition, 44(3), 488-498.
Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354-360.