目的：本研究旨在探討不同練習情境對桌球初學者正手發不旋轉長球之影響。方法：實驗參加者為64名國中生(男32、女32名)，未曾接受過正式桌球訓練為研究對象，平均年齡為12.6 ± 0.56歲，進行前測(即桌球正手發不旋轉長球技能測驗)後，將實驗參與者採S形排列平均分為四組：無限制組、落點限制組、高度限制組、雙限制組。實驗流程為實驗參加者在球桌左方之指定位置發球，以正手發不旋轉長球方式發斜線至對桌得分區，練習時依各組別之練習情境不同，每次練習200顆，兩次/週，共練習四週，練習期間以攝影機記錄得分區狀況，計算個人進球得分，四週後進行立即保留測驗及遷移測驗，隔週進行延遲保留測驗。實驗資料以混合設計二因子變異數分析檢證在不同組別與測驗之間、不同組別與練習之間是否有顯著差異，再以獨立樣本單因子變異數分析比較四組的遷移測驗。結果：一、不同練習情境之立即保留、延遲保留測驗有顯著差異，且高度限制組之學習成績顯著優於其他組別。二、不同練習情境除了雙限制組外，其餘三組之練習表現隨著練習次數增加皆有顯著提升。三、不同練習情境對於遷移測驗無顯著影響。結論：在練習時，有提供高度限制之練習情境能有助於桌球正手發不旋轉長球之學習表現。

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different practicing conditions to the forehand flat serve of table tennis beginner. Method: The participants included 64 junior high students (male 32, female 32) that had no experience of forehand flat serve and the average age is 12.6 ± 0.56 years old. After pre-test, all of these participants were divided into four groups (No constraint group, first placement constraint group, height constraint group, double constraints group). The experimental procedure was that participants faced the table and stood on the left side which was the specific position. Participants practiced table tennis forehand flat serves twice a week for four weeks and 200 serves in every practice. The data of score were recorded by video camera. After four weeks, all participants performed immediate retention test and transfer test. A week later, they accepted the delayed retention test. The data of eight practices, the scores of immediate retention and delayed retention test, were analyzed by two-way (group 4 × test 3) mixed design ANOVA, and transfer test scores were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Result: (1) There was significant difference among practicing conditions in immediate retention tests, and the learning effect of height constraint group was better than other groups. (2) There was significant raise during the practicing for four weeks, and height constraint group was better than other groups. (3) There was no significant difference among practicing conditions in transfer retention tests. Conclusion: Practicing condition with height constraint could positively affect the forehand flat serve of table tennis beginner.

一、中文文獻
王晨峰、詹貴惠 (2010) 。桌球運動初學者旋轉發球之學習課程。大專體育(109), 23-30。
世界體育大事典編輯委員會 (1993)：世界體育大事典。北京：中國致公出版社。
刘永立（2011）。优秀乒乓球选手马琳发球抢攻战术的落点区研究。运动（9），19-21。
江麗玉 （2017）。彈跳之間-桌球。載於林正常(主編)，國中健康與體育第二冊 (頁94-98)。新北市：康軒文教事業股份有限公司。
李永智（譯）（2013）。進擊の桌球 基本打法&戰術200招。新北市：楓葉社文化。（宮崎義仁，2013）。
李村棋、卓俊伶（1998）。工作限制對國小學童投擲動作型式的影響。體育學報（26），225-232。
卓俊伶（1998）。身心障礙學生的動作學習與技能發展。適應體育導論 (頁 415-434). 台北市: 教育部。
周芳毅(2014) 。性別差異下工作限制對國小六年級學童樂樂棒球擊球準確性之影響(未出版碩士論文)。屏東大學，屏東縣。
林品緯（2012）。扯鈴拋接單雙鈴動作型態初探。(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
林彥男、朱文慶、林耀豐 (2012)。自由度限制對運動技能表現影響之探討。屏東教大體育(15), 194-202.
林曉鐘（譯）（2000）。桌球技巧。臺北市：益群書店。（伊藤繁雄，2000）。
林耀豐 (2004)。工作限制下介入訓練對網球正手拍技能表現的影響。中華民國大專院校93年度體育學術研討會專刊，337-351。
胡名霞（2013）。動作控制與動作學習(第四版)。新北市：金名圖書。
張鳳盛（2004）。手掌寬度與球體種類對國小五年級男生定點投籃動作型式的影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
張瓊恩（2011）。工作限制對學習前翻之影響(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
教育部（2007）。學校體育教材教法與評量-桌球。臺北市：國立教育資料館。
梁嘉音、卓俊伶、簡曜輝（1998）。距離對籃球投籃動作形式的影響：個案研究。體育學報，25，199-208。
陳金梅、侯淑玲 (2002)。世界女子桌球運動員前四板技術分析。中華民國大專院校九十一年度體育學術研討會專刊，188-194。台北市：中華民國大專院校體育總會。
彭國威、卓俊伶、楊梓楣（2003）。兒童踢球動作型式之轉移: 工作限制與年齡效應。臺灣運動心理學報（2），93-110。
森武（1995）。圖解桌球教室。臺北市：武陵。
黃震雄 (2017)。羽球反手短發球動作的限制觀點驗證-以工作限制為標的(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
楊梓楣、梁嘉音、黃嘉君、陳秀惠、彭國威、陳重佑、劉淑燕、卓俊伶、賴世炯、張智惠、林靜兒 (譯) (2017)。動作學習與表現-從原則到應用。臺北市：禾楓。(Richard, A. S., ＆ Timothy D. L., 2014)
楊梓楣與卓俊伶(1998)。接球動作形式的環境變項探討。體育學報（25），269-278。
劉有德、謝宗諭、陳秀惠、嚴雅婷、戴遠成、江函芸、王衍超、李易潔、陳尹華、鄭光志 (譯) (2010)。技能學習的動力：限制導向的觀點。臺北市：禾楓。(Keith D., Chris B., Simon B.,2008)
謝玟娟（2010）。視覺對學習拋環動作的影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。

二、英文文獻
Bernstein, N. (1967). The coordination and regulation of movement. London: Pergamon.
Capel, S. (2000). Approaches to teaching games. In S. Capel, & S. Piotrowski (Eds), Issues in physical education. (pp. 81-98). Cornwall, UK: TJ International.
Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., Kelso, J. A. S., ＆ Elliott, D. (1995). Intentional switching between patterns of interlimb coordination. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 27, 201-218.
Clark, J., & Phillips, S. (1985). A developmental sequence of the standing long jump. In J. Clark, & J. Hmphhrey (Eds.), Motor development: Current selected research (pp.73-85). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Book Co.
Corbetta, D., & Vereijken, B. (1999). Understanding development and learning of motor coordination in sport: The contribution of dynamic systems theory. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 30(4), 507-530.
Davis, W. E., ＆ Burton, A. W. (1991). Ecological task analysis: Translating movement behavior theory into practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 8, 154-177.
Ericsson, K. (2001) The path to expert golf performance: Insights from the masters on how to improve by deliberate practice. In P. Thmas (Ed.), Optimizing performance in golf (pp. 1-58). Brisbance, Australia: Australian A cademic Press.
Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. California, CA: Belmont.
Gibson, J. J. (1959). Perception as a function of stimulation. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (pp.456-501). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Haken, H., Kslso, J. A. S., ＆ Bunz, H. A. (1985). Theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movement. Biological Cybernetics, 51, 356-374.
Halverson, L. E., Roberton, M.A., ＆ Haper, C. (1973). Current research in motor development. Journal of Reseach and Development in Education, 6, 56-70
Haywood, K. M., ＆ Getchell, N. (2005). Life span motor development (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Kelso, J. A. S., & Schoner, G. (1998). Self-organization of coordinative movement patterns. Human Movement Science, 7, 27-46.
Kerr, R. (1982). Psychomotor learning. New York, NY : Saunders College Publishing.
Kugler, P. N., ＆ Turvey, M. T. (1987). Information, natural law, and the self-assembly of rhythmic movement. Hillsdale, NJ：Erlbaum.
Lee, T. D., Chamberlin, C. J., & Hodges, N. J. (2001). Practice. In B. Singer, H. Hausenblas, ＆ C. Jannelle (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (2nd ed.). (pp. 115-143). New York, NY: Wiley.
Liu, Y.-T., Mayer-Kress, G., ＆ Newell, K. M. (2006). Qualitative and quantitative change in the dynamics of motor learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology： Human Perception and Performance, 32, 380-393.
Magill, R. A. (2006). Motor learning. Concepts and applications (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Newell, K. M. (1985). Coordination, control and skill. In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, ＆ I. M. Franks (eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control. (pp. 295 318). Amsterdam, NL: North-Holland.
Newell, K. M. (1986). Constraints on the development of coordination. In M.G. Wade＆H. T. A. Whting (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control (pp.341-360). Dordrecht, NL: Martinus Nijhoff.
Newell, K. M. (1991). Motor skill acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 213-317.
Newell, K. M. (1996). Change in movement and skill: Learning, retention and transfer. In M.L. Latash, ＆ M. T. Turver (Eds.), Dexterity and its development (pp. 393-430). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Newell, K. M., Liu, Y.-T., ＆ Mayer-Kress, G. (2001). Time scales in motor learning and development. Psychological Review, 108(1), 57-82.
Oslin, J. L., ＆ Mitchell, S. A.(1998). Form follows function. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 69(6),46-49.
Rink , J. E. (2001). Teaching physical education for learing (4th ed.). Boston, MA : WCB McGraw-Hill.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D.(1999). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schmidt, R. A., ＆ Lee, T. D. (2006). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (2003). Development as a dynamic system. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8),343-348.
Stoffregen, T. A. (2000). Affordance and events. Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 1-28.
Ulrich, B. D., & Reeve, G. T. (2005). Studies in motor behavior: 75 years of research in motor development, learning, and control. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(2), S62-S70.
Warren, W. H. (1984). Perceiving affordance：visual guidance of stair climbing. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Human Perception and Performance, 10, 683-703.