研究生: |
莊懷淳 Huai-chun Chuang |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
颯弄蝶屬之分子親緣與系統研究 Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the genus Satarupa Moore, 1865 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) |
指導教授: |
徐堉峰
Hsu, Yu-Feng 千葉秀幸 Hideyuki Chiba |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
生命科學系 Department of Life Science |
論文出版年: | 2013 |
畢業學年度: | 101 |
語文別: | 英文 |
論文頁數: | 41 |
中文關鍵詞: | 分布 、分子親緣關係 、颯弄蝶屬 |
英文關鍵詞: | Satarupa, molecular phylogeny, Satarupa |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:179 下載:4 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
親緣關係為生物研究的基礎,弄蝶親緣關係已有高階親緣關係發表,在屬級的親緣關係尚有不足之處。颯弄蝶屬屬特徵為前翅2A至R3脈之間有透明的斑紋與後翅具有大片的白塊。因颯弄蝶種之間的形態太過於相似,許多發表尚有辨識錯誤的情形。Evans在1949整理為7種,Okano (1987) 和Chiba (1989) 則認為颯弄蝶屬為 valentini, zulla, gopala, nymphalis, splendens, monbeigi和 formosibia。以翅形與幼蟲型態S. formosibia與S. monbeigi應屬於同一類群,但是前者外生殖器卻並不典型。Shirôzu將S. majasra處理為gopala的亞種,但Tsukiyama處理為nymphalis的亞種。颯弄蝶屬近緣屬皆為熱帶分布,颯弄蝶卻分布自爪哇至溫帶的西伯利亞。建構颯弄蝶屬親緣關係可以確立formosibia及majasra的分類地位並且了解颯弄蝶屬的溫帶分布是由熱帶分布至溫帶或原本分布在溫帶。本研究使用COI, COII與Ef1α基因,以最大簡約法、最大概似法與貝式推斷進行親緣關係分析。結果顯示颯弄蝶屬為一個單系群,並且各個種為單系群,可以反映現在的分類是沒有問題。並且更能確定formosibia與monbeigi為同一群。從樹型可知majasra不屬於gopala或是nymphalis的亞種,建議提升為一個種,且颯弄蝶屬是由熱帶分布至溫帶並且適應溫帶的環境。
The phylogenetic relationship is the foundation of biological researches. The family level of relationship of Hesperiidae had been reported, but the phylogeny of genus levels still insufficient. The genus Satarupa is recognized by the transparent spots between veins 2A to R3 on the forewing and large white area in hind wing. Because of the difficulty in identification between the Satarupa species, there is many mis- identification in the publication about Satarupa. Evans recognized 7 species in 1949 and Okano (1987) and Chiba (1989) established genus Satarupa includes 7 species. The species currently identified in the genus is S. valentini, S. zulla, S. gopala, S. nymphalis, S. splendens, S. monbeigi, and S. formosibia. Even more, the gentilia of S. formosibia is unusual as the other species divided with the larvae characters and wing pattern; S. majasra treated as subspecies of gopala by Shirôzu in 1953, but Tsukiyama recognized the characters more similarity with nymphalis. Because the relatives genera of S. distribute in tropical regions, but the genus S. distributes from temperate region to tropical region. Construct the phylogenetic relationship of S. species to realize that what the ancestral region of Satarupa and clarify the states of S. formosibia and majasra. Samplings form the Asia countries, and use the PCR to amplify the target genes, two from mitochondrion: COI and II; one form nuclear, Ef1α. Use the sequence to maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analysis to construct the phylogenetic tree. The results show that the genus Satarupa is monophyletic group and also the each species. The tree topology suggests that S. formosibia belongs to the group with monbeigi, and S. majasra belongs neither gopala nor nymphalis, and it should rise as a species. The temperate distribution suggests that the adaption from the tropical region to the temperate regions.
Avise, J. C., 2000. Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Barraclough, T. G. and S. Nee. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends Eco.l Evol. 16: 391-399.
Braby M. F., R. Eastwood, and N. Murray, 2012. The subspecies concept in butterflies: has its application in taxonomy and conservation biology outlived its usefulness? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 106: 699-716.
Canfield, M.R., E. Greene, C. S. Moreau, N. Chen and N. E. Pierce. 2008. Exploring phenotypic plasticity and biogeography in emerald moths: A phylogeny of the genus Nemoria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49: 477-487.
Caterino, M.S. and F. A. H. Sperling. 1999. Papilio phylogeny based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 122-137.
Chiba, H. and H. Tsukiyama. 1989. Revisional notes on the Genus Satarupa Moore 1865 (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). I. New Synonyms of Satarupa monbeigi Oberthür. J. Res. Lepid. 27: 135-143.
Chou, I. 1998. Classification and Identification of Chinese Butterflies. Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House, Henan, China.
Chou, I. et al. 1994. Monograph of Chinese butterflies Second volume. Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House, Henan, China. 711-712.
Corl A,and H. Ellegren, 2013. Sampling strategies for species trees: The effects on phylogenetic inference of the number of genes, number of individuals, and whether loci are mitochondrial, sex-linked, or autosomal. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67: 358-366.
Edgar, R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nuc. Acids Res. 32: 1792-97.
Evans, W.H. 1949. A Catalogue of the Hesperiidae of Europe, Asia and Australia in the British Museum (Natural History). British Museum (Natural History), London.
Evans, W. H. 1956. Revisional notes on the Hesperiidae of Europe, Asia and Australia. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 9:749-752.
Goloboff , P., J. Farris and K. Nixon. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics. 24:774–786
Gu, M. B. and P. Z. Chen. 1997. Butterflies in Hainan island. China Forestry Press, Beijing, China.
Guindon, S., J. F. Dufayard, V. Lefort, M. Anisimova, W. Hordijk and O. Gascuel. 2010. New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Bio. 59:307-321.
Hao,J. S., Q. Q. Sun, H. B. Zhao, X. Y. Sun, Y. G. Gai, Q. Yang, 2012. The Complete Mitochondrial Genome of Ctenoptilum vasava (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) and Its Phylogenetic Implication. Comp. Funct. Genomics, 328049
Harada, M., Y. Ohshima, Y. Yoshida, and W. Min. 2012. Report of surveys on the early sdtage of butterflies in the Nanlin area (4). Lepid. Sci. 63: 154-174
Hebert, P. D. N., A. Cywinska, S. L. Ball, and J. R. deWaard. 2003. Biological identifications though DNA barcodes. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270: 313-322.
Hebert, P. D. N., E. H. Penton, J. M. Burns, D. H. Janzen, W. Hallwachs, 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Pro.c Natl. Acad. Sci. 101:14812-14817
Huang, B.K. et al. 2001. Fauna of insects in Fujian province of China Vol.4. Fujian Science and Technology Publishing House. Fujian, China.
Hundsdoerfer, A.K., D. Rubinoff , M. Attié, M. Wink and I. J. Kitching. 2009. A revised molecular phylogeny of the globally distributed hawkmoth genus Hyles (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52: 852-865.
Hsu, Y. F. 2002. Butterflies of Taiwan Vol.II. National Fonghuanggu Bird Park. Taiwan. 41-44.
Igarashi, S. and H. Fukuda. 2000. The life histories of Asian butterflies Vol. 2., Tokai University Press, Tokyo. 652-656
Io, C. 1990. Monograph of Chinese Butterflies Second volume, Henan Scientific and Technological Publish House, China. 711-712.
Kandul N. P., V.A. Lukhtanov, A.V. Dantchenko, J.W.S. Coleman, C.H. Sekercioglu, D. Haig and N.E. Pierce. 2004. Phylogeny of Agrodiaetus Hübner 1822 (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) inferred from mtDNA sequences of COI and COII and nuclear sequences of EF1-α: Karyotype diversification and species radiation. Syst. Biol. 53: 278-298.
Kojima, S., 1998. Paraphyletic status of Polychaeta suggested by phylogenetic analysis based on the amino acid sequences of elongation factor-1 alpha. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9: 255-261.
Danforth, B.N., and S. Ji, 2001. Australian Lasioglossum + Homalictus form a monophyletic group: resolving the "Australian enigma". Syst. Biol. 50: 268-283
Li, C. L. and P. C. Chu. 1992. Atlas of Chinese butterflies. Shanghai Yuandong Press.
Mayr E. 1942. Systematics and the origin of species. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Miura, T., Y. Roisin, and T. Matsumoto. 2000. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the nasute termite genus Nasutitermes (Isoptera: Termitidae) in the Pacific tropics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 17:1–10.
Moore, W. S. 1997. Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees, a reply to Hoelzer. Evolution 51:627–629.
Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirik, S. J. O'Brien, O. Madsen, M. Scally, C. J. Douady, E. Teeling, O. A. Ryder, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. de Jong,and M. S. Springer, Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 2001, 294: 2348-2351
Nichols, R. 2001. Gene trees and species trees are not the same. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:358–364.
Okano, M. 1982. New or Little Known Butterflies from China (II). Artes Liberales 31:91-94
Okano, M. and T. Okano. 1984. A New species of Satarupa from West China (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae). Tokurana (Acta Rhopalocero.) 6/7:124-126.
Okano, M. 1987. A revisional note on some butterflies from China and Korea. Tokurana (Acta Rhopalocero.) 12:1.
Omland K. E., C. L. Tarr, W. I. Boarma, J. M. Marzluff, and R. C. Fleischer, 2000. Cryptic genetic variation and paraphyly in ravens. Proc. Bio.l Sci. 267 :2475-2482
Penz C. M., P. J. Devries,and N. Wahlberg, 2012. Diversification of Morpho butterflies (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): a re-evaluation of morphological characters and new insight from DNA sequence data. Syst. Entomol. 37: 670-685.
Phillimore, A. B. and I. P. Owens, 2006. Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proc. Biol. Sci. 273: 1049-1053.
Posada, D., 2008. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol. Bio. Evol. 25: 1253–1256.
de Queiroz, K., and J. Gauthier, 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39: 307-322.
de Queiroz, K., 2007. Species concepts and species delimitation. Syst. Biol. 56: 879-886.
Reed, R. D., and F. A. H. Sperling, 1999. Interaction of process partitions in phylogenetic analysis: an example from the swallowtail butterfly genus Papilio. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16: 286–297
Ronquist, F., M. Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D. L. Ayres, A. Darling, S. Hohna, B. Larget, L. Liu, M. A. Suchard and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61:539-542.
Schmidt, T. R., D. E. Wildman, M. Uddin, J. C. Opazo, M. Goodman, and L. I. Grossman, 2005. Rapid electrostatic evolution at the binding site for cytochrome c on cytochrome c oxidase in anthropoid primates. Proc. Natl. acad. Sci. 102: 6379-6384.
Shirôzu, T. 1960. Butterflies of Formosa in color. Hoikusha., Osaka. 395-387.
Snyder, R. L., K. H. Frederick-Hudson, and J. Schul, 2009. Molecular phylogenetics of the genus Neoconocephalus (orthoptera, tettigoniidae) and the evolution of temperate life histories. PLoS One 4: e7203.
Soltis P. S. and D. E. Soltis, 2003. Applying the Bootstrap in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Stat. Sci. 18: 256-267
Tamura, K., D. Peterson, N. Peterson, G. Stecher, M. Nei, and S. Kumar. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Mol. Bio. Evol. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121.
Tsukiyama H. 1995. The comment of Monograph of Chinese butterflies (skipper). 807: 1-10
Uchida, H. 1995. Butterfly and nature of the Taiwan people - "A picture of Butterfly Island Uruwashiki permanent " 183-184
Wang, Z. G. et al. 1998. Insect fauna of Henan, Lepidoptera: Butterflies. Henan Scientific and Technological Publishing House.
Warren, A. D., J. R. Ogawa and A. V. Z. Brower. 2008. Phylogenetic relationships of subfamilies and circumscription of tribes in the family Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) Cladistics. 24:1–35
Wilson, E. O. 2000. A global biodiversity map. Science 289: 2279
Wu, L. W. 2010. Elucidating origins of the Cycad Blue (Chilades pandava): a threat to cycad plants worldwide, with a discussion on the evolution of Cycas-feeding behavior. Ph. D Dissertation, NTNU, Taipei.
Xue, G. X.,Y. L. Zhang and F. Yuan. 2009. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Hesperiidae (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea) from China. Ph. D Dissertation, NWAFU, China