本研究旨在探討以夥伴關係為基礎之輔導系統對健康促進學校推動成效。本研究採次級資料分析，以劉潔心（2010）所承接之教育部「99學年度健康促進學校輔導與網站維護計畫」之「成效評價問卷」加以分析與統計。此調查以99學年度全國國中及國小健康促進學校承辦人員為母群體，樣本選取採分層系統抽樣設計，各層內採用抽取率與單位大小成比例等距抽樣法，共回收621份問卷。資料整理後以SPSS 22.0軟體進行統計分析。
　　本研究結果如下：
一、夥伴關係及夥伴運作層次表現佳，且近八成的學校都有與健康促進學校計畫之中央輔導團隊進行互動。
二、健康促進學校計畫執行情形及推動效能佳。學校對於執行情形及其六大範疇介於約半做到與大部分做到之間，而學校對於推動效能及其六大範疇介於有一半把握與很有把握之間。
三、「主要負責人職務」在夥伴關係、夥伴運作層次、推動效能上有顯著差異。
四、「經費補助」在夥伴關係、夥伴運作層次上有顯著差異。
五、夥伴關係與執行情形及推動效能達顯著正相關。
六、夥伴運作層次在執行情形及推動效能上有顯著差異。
七、夥伴關係之「任務界定」、「承諾與投入」能有效預測執行情形。
八、夥伴關係之「任務界定」、「相互關係」能有效預測推動效能。
九、夥伴運作層次能有效預測執行情形及推動效能。
　　根據研究結果，建議學校推動健康促進學校計畫時，應以校長為主要承辦人，學校需與健康促進學校計畫中央輔導團建立與維持長久的夥伴關係，以增進健康促進學校計畫執行情形及推動效能。

The purposes of this study were to explore the effects of partnership-based supporting system on Health-Promoting School (HPS) implementation and efficacy. This study used the secondary data analysis. Stratified systematic sampling design was employed for sampling, and interval sampling method with probability proportional to size (PPS) was used at each stratum. The schools were chosed from the nationwide junior high schools and elementary schools in 99 academic year. 621 samples provided data with the ”effectiveness evaluation questionnaire” of ”99 Academic Year Health Promoting School Consulting and Network Maintenance Program” executed by Ministry of Education. SPSS 22.0 software was used for statistical analysis.
The main results of this study were as follows：
1.Partnership relationship and levels of partnership were good. Nearly eighty percent of the schools have interaction with the central consulting committee members in Health-Promoting School program.
2.Health-Promoting School implementation and efficacy were good. The implementation and six categories in HPS ranged between about half done and most do. The efficacy and six categories in HPS ranged between half and very confident grasp。
3.The main undertaker was significantly different among partnership relationship, levels of partnership, and Health-Promoting School efficacy.
4.Funding was significantly different among partnership relationship and levels of partnership.
5.Partnership relationship was significantly positively related to Health-Promoting School implementation and efficacy.
6.Health-Promoting School implementation and efficacy were significantly different among levels of partnership.
7.Specific tasks and commitment & involvement of partnership relationship could effectively predict Health-Promoting School implementation.
8.Specific tasks and mutual exchange of partnership relationship could effectively predict Health-Promoting School efficacy.
9.Levels of partnership could effectively predict Health-Promoting School implementation and efficacy.
According to the results, suggested that schools execute the Health-Promoting School program, the principal should be the main undertaker, schools should establish and maintain a long-term partnerships with the central consulting committee members in Health-Promoting School program to improve Health-Promoting School implementation and efficacy.

一、中文部分
方崇雄（1998）。科技教育師資培訓的夥伴關係。中學工藝教育，31(5)，8-12。
江東亮、余玉眉（1994）。健康促進：國民健康的新方向。中華公共衛生雜誌，13(5)，381-387。
行政院衛生署（2004）。教育部及行政院衛生署簽署共同推動「健康促進學校」。取自http://www.doh.gov.tw/CHT2006/DM/DM2_p01.aspx?class_no=25&now_fod_list _no=5978&level_no=2&doc_no=32976
吳勇龍（2008）。桃園縣國民小學「健康促進學校」教育政策執行之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。開南大學公共事務管理學系，桃園縣。
吳雯菁（2009）。彰化縣國民中小學衛生組長對健康促進學校的認知、態度及執行程度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
呂育誠（2004）。永續發展對地方基層組織與人員影響之研究。中國行政評論，13(2)，33-64。
李紹鴻、李大拔（2002）。何謂「健康促進學校」，李大拔編著，健康促進學校香港經驗分享，1-10，香港：香港中文大學。
邱皓政（2010）。量化研究與統計分析：SPSS（PASW）資料分析範例解析。五版：五南。
紀雪雲、闕瑞紋（2007）。社區醫療群與健康促進學校的夥伴關係經營。臺灣醫學，11(3)，312-314。
張麗春、黃松元、巫菲翎（2005）。從健康促進學校的觀點談學校與社區夥伴關係之建立。護理雜誌，52(3)，76-81。
教育部（2005）。學校衛生工作指引－健康促進學校〈理論篇、實務篇〉。台北：教育部。
教育部（2012）。健康促進學校輔導與網站維護計畫－輔導手冊。台北：教育部。
曹以好（2008）。臺北縣國民中小學健康促進學校實施現況之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所，新北市。
郭銘洲（2007）。中部五縣市國民小學教師推行健康促進學校之自我效能感研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立新竹教育大學人資處教育行政碩士專班，新竹市。
郭鍾隆（2005）。推動學校本位的健康促進學校。台灣教育，634，14-19。
陳志哲（2006）。塑立健康願景　共創健康未來　談本校如何建構健康促進學校願景－“健康ATM活力百分百”。學校衛生(49)，125-140。
陳美嬿（2010）。健康促進學校與社區夥伴關係之現況及其相關因素研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
曾如敏（2005）。台灣地地國民小學護理人員對健康促進學校的看法與其相關因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
黃松元（2009）。健康促進學校計畫的實施及其應努力的方向。學校衛生(55)，107-122。
黃松元、陳政友、賴香如（2004）。學校衛生工作新模式-健康促進學校。學校衛生(45)，59-71。
黃靖華（2005）。台北縣國小班級導師對學校衛生工作認知態度及執行程度之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
劉潔心（2013）。臺灣推動健康促進學校之現況與展望。中等教育，64(1)，6-25。
劉潔心、晏涵文（2005）。台灣健康促進學校整體行動方案芻議－專業支持輔導機制之建構。臺灣教育(634)，2-13。
劉潔心、晏涵文（2005）。推動學校本位的健康促進學校。台灣教育，634，2-13。
魏珮嘉（2008）。台北縣市國中衛生組長健康促進學校執行情形及相關因素研究(（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
譚燕婉（2007）。彰化縣國民中小學校長對健康促進學校工作之認知及執行研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學健康促進與衛生教育學系，臺北市。
蘇昭文（2009）。國民小學護理人員對推動健康促進學校看法之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學教育行政與政策發展研究所，嘉義市。

二、英文部分
Audit Commission (2005). Governing Partnerships – Bridging the Accountability Gap. Audit Commission: Lodon.
Baron-epel O, Drach-Zahavy A, Peleg H, (2003) Health promotion partnerships in israel: motives, enhancing and inhibiting factors, and modes of structure, Health Promotion Inetrnational, 18(1), 15-23
Brinkerhoff, J.M. (2002). Assessing and improving partnership relationship and outcomes: a proposed framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 215-231.
Competency Based Framework for Health Education. (2006). Whitehall, PA:NCHEC.
European Network of Health Promoting Schools. (1992). Promoting Health in Second Level Schools in Europe: A Practical Guide.
Glndinning, C., Powell, M. & Rummery K. (2002). Partnerships, New Labour and the Governance of Welfare. Bristol: Policy Press.
Himmelman A. (2001). On Coalitions and the Transformation of Power Relations: Collaborative Betterment and Empowerment’, American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 277-284.
Hogue, T. (1993). Community Based Collaboration: Community Wellness Multiplied. Oregon State University, Oregon Center for Community Leadership.
Kagan, S. L. (1991). United We Stand: Collaboration for Child Care and Early Education Services. New York: Coumbia University Teachers College Press.
Lee, A., Cheng, F. F., Fung, Y., & St Leger, L. (2006). Can Health Promoting Schools contribute to the better health and wellbeing of young people? The Hong Kong experience. J Epidemiol Community Health, 60(6), 530-536.
Lee, A., Wong, M. C., Keung, V. M., Yuen, H. S., Cheng, F., & Mok, J. S. (2008). Can the concept of Health Promoting Schools help to improve students' health knowledge and practices to combat the challenge of communicable diseases: Case study in Hong Kong? BMC Public Health, 8, 42.
National Network for Collaboration. Collaboration Framewor－ Addressing community capacity. Fargo, ND.: National Network for Collaboration, 1996.
Pender, N. J. (2006) . Health Promotion in Nursing Practice. 5th . Standford, Connecticut : Appleton & Lange.
Schofield, M. J., Lynagh, M., & Mishra, G. (2003). Evaluation of a Health Promoting Schools program to reduce smoking in Australian secondary schools. Health Educ Res, 18(6), 678-692.
Simnett, I. (1995). Managing Health Promotion. New York:John Wiley & Sons .
The National Commission for Health Education Credentialing, Inc., Society for Public Health Education, and American Association for Health Education. (2006). A
U.S.CDC. (2007). School Health Policies and Programs Study, SHPPS, 2006. Journal of School Health, 77 (8), 385-587.
United Nations (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations.
WHO (1978). Declaration of Alma-Ata. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (1986). Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (1994). New Horizons in Health. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (1996). The World Health Organization’s Global School Health Initiative: Promoting Health Through Schools. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (1998) WHO’S Global School Health Initiative: Health Promoting Schools. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (2005). Bangkok Charter for Health Promotion in a Globalized World. Geneva: WHO.
WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific (1996). Regional Guidelines 〈for the〉Development of Health-promoting Schools-A Framework for Action. Manila：The Office.
Xin-Wei, Z., Li-Qun, L., Xue-Hai, Z., Jun-Xiang, G., Xue-Dong, P., Aldinger, C., et al. (2008). Health-promoting school development in Zhejiang Province, China. Health Promot Int, 23(3), 220-230