本研究主要係為了解英國教育視導制度的緣起與演進，探討英國教育視導的意義與功能，分析英國教育視導的組織與實施，進而探究英國教育視導制度的特點並予以評析，最後歸納研究發現，提出英國教育視導制度對我國的啟示。
為達成上述研究目的，本研究採用文獻分析法。分別探討英國自西元一八三九年設置皇家督學以來教育視導制度的緣起與演進、瞭解英國政府機關與學者專家對於教育視導意義與功能之觀點、探討西元一九九二年英國教育標準署成立後教育視導組織與實施的現況，以及歸結英國教育視導制度的特點與評析。
綜合文獻探討所得之研究結果，本研究得到以下結論：一、視導制度的變革與政府政經意識型態息息相關。二、重視視導的功能。三、視導的典章制度較為完備。四、中央與地方有所分工，視導實施的重點不同。五、視導方式科學化且重視溝通與回饋。六、強調與相關單位的合作與支援。七、視導學校內容兼顧教學與行政視導，並以教學視導為重心。八、視導資訊公開化。九、強調視導後的追蹤輔導。
根據上述研究結論，本研究提出如下建議：一、制定教育視導法。
二、訂定學校視導架構與手冊。三、建立視導人員的證照制度。四、定期及不定期視導併用，並以適性分化方式實施。五、視導的實施應重視溝通與回饋，並邀請家長參與。六、公開視導報告內容。七、妥善運用視導所得資訊，提供政策建議。八、與鄰近大學、師資培育機構或其他縣市共同合作。九、建立額外督學制度，擴充視導人力。
十、輔導學校建立自我評鑑機制。

ABSTRACT
This study is to gain an understanding on the origin and evolution of the education inspection system in the United Kingdom. It studies the meaning and functions of the educational inspection system in the United Kingdom, analyse the educational inspection organizations, its performance in the United Kingdom, and look into study the characteristics of the educational inspection system in the United Kingdom and provide evaluation and analysis. It also aims to classify research findings and propose recommendations on how educational inspection system in the United Kingdom can inspire us.
To achieve above-mentioned research objectives, the document analysis method was adopted for this study. A study on the origin and evolution of the educational inspection system in the United Kingdom since the establishment of Her Majestry’s Inspector in 1839 was conducted to gain an understanding on the perspective of the UK government agencies as well as those of scholars and experts on the meaning and function of educational inspection. A study on the overview of the educational inspection organizations and its performance since the establishment of the Office for Standard in Education in 1992 was also conducted. The characteristics and evaluation of the UK educational inspection system was also consolidated.
Summarizing research results obtained from document review, this study obtained the following conclusions: 1. Reforms in inspection system have close relationship with government, political and economic awareness; 2. Importance was placed on functions of inspections; 3. Decrees and regulations on inspection are comprehensive; 4. There is a division of labor between central and local authorities, and focus of inspection performance are different; 5. A scientific method was adopted for inspections and orientation is focused on communication and rebate; 6. Cooperation and support with relevant units are emphasized; 7. Contents for inspection of schools include school and administrative inspections with focus on educational inspection; 8. Inspection information is open to public; 9. Stress follow up and technical assistance after inspection.
Based on the above-mentioned research results, this study proposed the following recommendations: 1. Formulate laws for educational inspection; 2. Establish structure and manual for school inspection; 3. Establish accreditation system for inspectors; 4. Merge egular and irregular inspection and implement through appropriate polarization method; 5. Implementation of inspection should focus on communication and rebate; parents should be invited to participate; 6. Contents of inspection report should be open to public; 7. Appropriately disseminate information obtained from inspection and provide recommendations for policy; 8. Enter into cooperation with neighboring universities, teacher qualification cultivation agency or other municipalities and cities; 9. Establish extra inpector system, expand inspectors resources; 10 provide technical assistance to school to establish self-assessment system.

一、中文部份：
王璐（民81）。英國教育督學與評價。太原：山西教育出版社。
李祖壽（民68）。教育視導與教育輔導。台北：黎明文化。
李奉儒（民85）。英國教育改革機構、法案與報告書。載於黃政傑（主
編），各國教育改革動向（頁77-106）。台北：師大書苑。
行政院教育改革審議委員會（民85）。第三期教育改革諮議報告書。台北：行政院教育改革審議委員會。
沈珊珊（民83）。英國進入二十一世紀的教育改革-一九八八年以來之變革與紛擾。比較教育通訊，34期，32-40。
吳培源（民88）。英國教育視導制度。高雄：復文圖書出版社。
吳福源（民80）。台灣省各縣市督學徵選制度之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
吳韻儀（民87）。教改大浪 席捲全球。載於天下雜誌1998教育特刊-海闊天空 跨世紀希望工程師（頁20-25）。台北：天下雜誌。
呂木琳（民87）。教學視導-理論與實務。台北：五南。
呂愛珍（民63）。我國地方教育視導人員任務研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林武（民79a）。英國皇家督學視導制度。國教天地，83期，74-80。
林武（民79b）。各國教育視導制度比較。高雄：復文出版社。
林明美、簡茂發（民85）。改革教育視導制度。教改通訊，17/18期，5-7。
林清江（民80）。英國教育。載於林清江（主編），比較教育（頁179-206）.台北：五南。
邱錦昌（民82）。英國皇家督學視導措施之簡介（上）。研習資訊，第10卷第6期，16-20。
邱錦昌（民83）。美國教育視導趨向之研究。教育與心理研究，十七期，99-128。
邱錦昌（民84）。教育視導之理論與實際（二版）。台北：五南。
邱錦昌（民88）。我國教育視導制度改進之研究。台北：教育部。
馬永成、陳其邁合譯（民88）。Tony Blair原著：顛覆左右-新世紀的第三條路。台北：時報文化。
孫邦正（民73）。教育視導大綱。台北：商務書局。
秦夢群（民86）。教育行政─實務部份。台北：五南。
郭昭佑（民84）。教學視導-行政視導無法兼顧的層面。教育資料文摘，213期，100-108。
張明輝（民84）。教育視導。載於謝文全等編著，教育行政學（頁305-328）。台北：空中大學。
張明輝（民88）。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北：師大書苑。
張清濱（民83）。臺灣省教育視導績效皮估之研究。國立政大教育研究所博士論文。
張德銳（民84）。教育行政研究（二版）。台北：五南。
黃昆輝（民61）。視導工作的新趨勢。師友月刊，第65期，8-12。
黃昆輝（民71）。教育行政與教育問題。台北：五南。
黃昆輝（民77）。教育行政學。台北：東華書局。
楊百世（民78）。國民小學校長教學視導之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
楊振昇（民88）。我國教學視導制度之困境與因應。課程與教學，二卷二期，15-30。
楊瑩（民85）。一九八八年後英國的教育改革。載於黃政傑（主編）， 各國教育改革動向（頁107-134）。台北：師大書苑。
雷國鼎（民60）。教育行政。台北：正中書局。
魯先華（民83）。國民中學校長教學領導之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
劉真（民39）。教育行政。台北：正中書局。
謝文全（民80）。教育行政─理論與實務（七版）。台北：文景書局。
謝文全（民84）。比較教育行政。台北：五南。
謝文全（民88）。教學視導的意義與原則-並以英國教學視導制度為例。課程與教學，二卷二期，1-14。
鄭武國譯（民88）。Anthony Giddens原著：社會民主的更新-第三條路。台北：聯經出版社。
羅淑芬（民87）。中英教育視導制度之比較研究。國立暨南國際大學比較教育研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部份
Audit Commission. （1998）. Changing partners-a discussion paper on the role of the local education authority. London： Audit Commission.
Audit Commission. （1999）. Held in trust-the LEA of the future.
London： Audit Commission.
Barnsley District Council. （1999）. The advisory and inspection Service.〔WWW page〕
http：www.ofsted.gov.uk/pubs/lea/barnsley/barnsley.html
（visited on 28 September 1999）
Bolton, Eric （1998）.HMI-the Thatcher years. Oxford Review of Education, 24（1）, 45-55.
Brighouse, Tim （1995）. The history of inspection, In Brighouse, Tim ＆ Moon, Bob（Eds）, School inspection （pp. 1-14）. London： Pitman.
Bromley Borough Council. （2000）. Standards ＆ effectiveness service. 〔WWW page〕 http://www.bromley.gov.uk/sovdet.asp？sovcode＝
o00636（visited on 26 April 2000）
Carman, B.D. （1970）. Roles and responsity in general supervision of instruction-A snthesis of research findings 1905-1969.（ph. D. dissertation, Florida State University）
Cooper, J.M. （1984）. Supervision Models.In J.W. Keefe（ed.）.
Instruction leadership handbook. NASSAP Yearbook.
Clegg, D. & Billington, S. （1994）. Making the most of your
inspection：Secondary. London： The Falmer Press.
Davis, Vin （1996）. The earley experience of OFSTED.In Outson J., Earley, P. ＆ Fidler B.（Eds.）. OFSTED inspections-the
earley experience（pp.4-9）. London： David Fulton.
Dean, J. （1992）. Inspecting and advising - a handbook for inspectors, advisers and advisory teachers. London： Routledge.
Dean J.（1993）. A survey of the organization of LEA inspection and advisory services. Windsor： NFER.
Dean, J.（1994）. Second survey of the organization of LEA inspection and advisory services. Windsor： NFER.
Department for Education.（1992）. Choice and diversity-a framework for school. London： DFE.
Department for Education.（1993）. Inspection schools：A guide to the inspection provisions of the Education（Schools） Act 1992 in England（Circular 7/93）. London： DFE.
Department for Education and Employment.（1997）. Excellence in schools. London： DFEE.
Department for Education and Employment.（1999）. Code of practice LEA-school relations. London： DFEE.
Department for Education and Employment ＆ Office for Standard in Education .（2000）. Department report - the government’s
expenditure plans 2000-01 to 2001-02. London：DfEE ＆ OFSTED.
Dunford, D., & Sharp, P. （1990）. The education system in England and Wales. London： Longman.
Dunford,John E. （1998）. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Schools since 1944. London： Woburn.
Dull, L.W. （1981）. Supervision - school leadership handbook.
Columbus： Ohio-Bell ＆ Howell Co..
Donoughue, Carol （1996）. “A fit and proper person…”- the training of inspectors.In Outson J., Earley, P. ＆ Fidler B.（Eds.）. OFSTED inspections-the earley experience （pp. 33-41）. London： David Fulton.
Earley, Peter（1996）.School improvement and OFSTED inspection：The research evidence.In Earley, P., Outson J. ＆ Fidler B. （Eds.）. Improvement through inspection？- complementary approaches to school development （pp. 11-22）. London： David Fulton.
Earley, P., Fidler B. ＆ Ouston J.（1996）. Introduction： OFSTED inspections and school development.In Earley, P., Fidler B. ＆ Ouston J.（Eds.）. Improvement through inspection？- complementary approaches to school development （pp. 1-10）. London： David Fulton.
Farrell, M., Kerry, T. ＆ Kerry, C. （1995）. The blackwell handbook of education. Oxford： Blackwell.
Fidler, B., Earley P. ＆ Outson, J. （1996）. School development, school inspection and managing change. In Earley, P., Fidler B. ＆ Ouston J.（Eds.）. Improvement through inspection？- complementary approaches to school development （pp. 186-190）. London： David Fulton.
Glickman, Card D., Gordon, Stephen P. ＆ Ross-Gordon, Jovita M. （1995）. Supervision of Instruction. Boston： Allyn and Bacon.
Good, C.V.（1973）. Dictionary of education（3rd ed.）.New York：
McGrow-Hill.
Harris, Neville S. （1995）. Quality control and accountability to the consumer： An evaluation of the Education（Schools）Act 1992.In T. Brighouse ＆ B. Moon（Eds.）. School Inspection （pp. 46-65）.： London： Pitman.
Hendy, Jim（1998）. Fourth survey of LEA advisory and inspection
services. Windsor： NFER.
House of Commons. （1999a）. The work of OFSTED. London： The
Stationery Office.
House of Commons.（1999b）. Government’s and OFSTED’S response to the fourth report from the Committee, session 1998-99：The work of OFSTED . London： The Stationery Office.
Lawton, D. ＆ Gordon, P.（1987）. HMI.London： Routledge ＆ Kegan Paul.
Lawton, D.（1992）. Education and politics in the 1990s – conflict or consensus. London： Falmer Press.
Lawton,D.（1994）. The Tory mind on education 1979-94. London： Falmer Press.
Learmonth, James （1996）. OFSTED：a Registered Inspector’s View.In Outson J., Earley, P. ＆ Fidler B.（Eds.）. OFSTED
inspections-the earley experience. London： David Fulton.
Lee, John ＆ Fitz, John （1997）. HMI and OFSTED：Evolution or Revolution in School Inspection. British Journal of Educational Studies,45（1）, 39-52.
Mackinnon , D., Statham, J. & Hales, M.（1999）. Education in the UK- facts & figures（3rd ed.）. Milton Keynes： Open University.
Maclure, J. S.（1979）. Education documents：England and Wales, 1816 to the present day（4th eds.）. London： Metheun.
Mann Peter（1995）. Third survey of LEA advisory and inspection
services. Windsor： NFER.
Matthews, P.（1995）. Aspects of Inspection , Improvement and OFSTED. In T. Brighouse ＆ B. Moon（Eds.）.School inspection.：London： Pitman.
Matthews, P. & Smith, G.（1995）. OFSTED：Inspecting schools and improvement through Inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25（1），23-34.
Office for Standard in Education. （1996）. Planning improvement – schools’ post-inspection action plans. London： HMSO.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997a）. Corporate plan 1997-98 to 1999-2000. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997b）. LEA support for school
improvement-a framework for the inspection of local education authorities. London： OFSETD.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997c）. Inspection and re-inspection of schools from September 1997. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997d）. School inspection- removal from special measures. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997e）. Inspecting independent schools-a framework. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997f）. Inspecting youth work-a revised inspection schedule. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1997g）. Inspecting adult education-a revised inspection schedule. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1998a）. School evaluation matters. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1998b）. Proposals for a
differentiated system of school inspections – a consult paper. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1999a）. Inspecting schools-the
framework. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1999b）. Corporate plan 1999. London：OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1999c）. Handbook for inspecting primary and nursery schools with guidance on self-evaluation. London：OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （1999d）. LEA support for school
improvement-a framework for the inspection of local eduaction authorities. London： OFSETD.
Office for Standard in Education. （1999e）.OFSTED inspection forms.
London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Education. （2000）. Helping schools to carry out self-evaluation. London： OFSTED.
Office for Standard in Inspection. （1996）. Improving school
inspection-an account of the OFSTIN conference. Oxford： New College.
Ouston, J. ＆ Davis, J.（1998）. OFSTED and afterwards？ Schools’ responses to inspection. In Peter Earley （Ed.）, School improvement after inspection？ School and LEA responses （pp. 13-24）. London： Paul Chapman.
Pike, Calvin（1999）. Using inspection for school development.
Oxford： Heinemann.
Rhodes, Gerald （1981）. Inspectorates in British government-law enforcement and standards of efficiency. London： Allen ＆ Unwin.
Rowles, D.（1996）. Inspection and advice. In Docking, J.（Ed.），
National school policy- major issues in education policy for schools in England and Wales, 1979 onwards（pp.175-186）. London： David Fulton Publishers.
Sandbrook, Ian（1996）. Making sense of primary inspection. London：Philadeiphia.
Scanlon, Margaret（1999）. The impact of OFSTED inspections. Windsor：NFER.
Sergiovanni, T.J.（ed）（1982）. Supervision of teaching. Boston： Allyn and Bacon.
Sergiovanni, Thomas J. ＆ Robert J. Starratt.（1983）. Supervision–human perspective（2nd ed.）. New York： McGraw-Hill Book Co..
Thomas, Gerran （1998）.A brief history of the genesis of the new schools’ inspection system. British Journal of Educational Studies, 46（4）, 415-427.
Thompson, Meryl （1997）. The oral evidence. In Duffy, Michael （Eds.）, A better system of inspection？ （pp.1-6）. Northumberland： OFSTIN。
West Sussex County Council.（1998）. Advisory and inspection services. 〔WWW page〕http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/ed/aisweb/ais
（visited on 10 Dec. 1998）
Wilcox, B. & Gray, J.（1995）. The OFSTED inspection model：The views of LEA chief inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education,25（1）,63-73.
Wilcox, B. & Gray, J.（1996）. Inspecting schools.：London：
Open University Press.
Wiles, Kimball ＆ Lovell, John T.（1975）. Supervision for better schools（4th ed.）. N. J.： Prentice Hall.
Wilson（1996）. Reaching for a better standard：English school
inspection and the dilemma of accountability for American
achools. New York： Teacher College.
Wiles, Jon ＆ Bondi, Joseph（1996）. Supervision - a guide to practice（4th ed.）. N. J.： Prentice-Hall.
Woods, D., & Orlik, S.（1994）. School review and inspection. London： Philadelphia.
Woods, Margaret （1998）. Partners in pursuit of quality： LEA support for school improvement after inspection. In Peter Earley （Ed.）, School improvement after inspection？ School and LEA responses （pp. 37-50）. London： Paul Chapman.
Wragg（1997）. Inspection and school self-evaluation. In Duffy, Michael（Ed.）, A better system of inspection？（pp. 21-25）. Nothumberland： OFSTIN.
York City Council（1997）. City of York Council educational
services - annual report 1997-98.