簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 趙英婷
論文名稱: 高中生之自尊、個人目標導向、自我設限與學業表現之相關研究(以臺北市某一高中為例)
指導教授: 程景琳
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 教育心理與輔導學系
Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling
論文出版年: 2005
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
中文關鍵詞: 自尊個人目標導向自我設限學業表現
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:344下載:118
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討高中生自尊、個人目標導向、自我設限及學業表現之間的關係,也探討不同性別、年級之高中生的自尊、個人目標導向、自我設限差異情形,並進一步訪談不同自我設限程度(高/低)的高中生,比較其學習狀況、目標設定的差異情形。本研究以臺北市立某完全中學高中部高一、高三學生為研究對象,共計517人(女性270名,男性247名)。使用的研究工具包括「自我設限量表」、「個人目標導向量表」與「自尊量表」。調查所得資料以獨立樣本t考驗、單因子多變量變異數分析、Pearson積差相關、典型相關及多元迴歸等統計方法處理。此外,研究者另外選出八位高自我設限與八位低自我設限的學生進行訪談,並對訪談逐字稿進行內容分析。研究結果發現;(一) 高中生會採用自我設限策略,最常採用的自我設限策略為取得性內在自我設限及宣稱性內在自我設限,其次為取得性外在自我設限,最少採取的為宣稱性外在自我設限;(二)不同性別的高中生在採用之自我設限策略並無顯著差異;(三) 不同年級的高中生在採用之自我設限策略上有顯著差異,且高一學生在使用取得性內在自我設限、宣稱性內在自我設限較高三學生為高;(四)不同之個人目標導向與自我設限策略間有兩組典型相關存在;(五)高中生所持之個人目標及採用之自我設限策略可以預測其學業表現;(六)不同程度(高/低)自我設限的高中生在「學習生活」、「學業的價值觀」及「目標設定」三個向度上有差異。最後,研究者依據研究結果對教育及未來研究提出具體建議。

    中文摘要……………………………………………………………Ⅰ 英文摘要……………………………………………………………Ⅱ 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題與假設………………………………………5 第三節 名詞釋義………………………………………………7 第二章 理論基礎與文獻探討 第一節 自我設限的動機與定義………………………………11 第二節 自我設限之分類………………………………………19 第三節 個人目標導向的相關理論與研究……………………24 第四節 自我設限相關因素之探討……………………………32 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構………………………………………………38 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………41 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………42 第四節 訪談設計與實施………………………………………50 第五節 研究資料分析…………………………………………52 第四章 研究結果 第一節 基本統計分析…………………………………………55 第二節 自尊與自我設限的關係………………………………60 第三節 個人目標導向與自我設限的關係……………………62 第四節 自我設限、個人目標導向與學業表現的關係………68 第五節 訪談內容分析…………………………………………71 第五章 討論 第一節 基本統計資料討論……………………………………88 第二節 自尊與自我設限的關係………………………………93 第三節 個人目標導向與自我設限的關係……………………95 第四節 自我設限、個人目標導向與學業表現的關係 ……103 第五節 訪談內容討論 ………………………………………105 第六章 結論與建議 第一節 結論 …………………………………………………111 第二節 研究限制與貢獻 ……………………………………113 第三節 研究啟示及未來建議 ………………………………114 參考文獻 一、中文資料…………………………………………………118 二、西文資料…………………………………………………120 附錄 一、自我設限量表……………………………………………127 二、個人目標導向量表………………………………………130 三、自尊量表…………………………………………………132 四、正式訪談大綱……………………………………………134 五、訪談同意書………………………………………………135 表目次 表3-2 正式施測班級與人數分配…………………………41 表3-3-1 自我設限量表因素分析結果表……………………43 表3-3-2 自我設限量表信度表………………………………44 表3-3-3 目標導向量表因素分析結果表……………………46 表3-3-4 目標導向量表信度表………………………………47 表3-3-5 自尊量表因素分析結果表…………………………48 表3-3-6 自尊量表信度表……………………………………49 表3-4 訪談樣本人數分配表………………………………51 表3-5 訪談研究資料編碼架構表…………………………54 表4-1-1 自我設限策略描述分析結果………………………55 表4-1-2 自我設限之單因子重複變量變異數分析摘要表…56 表4-1-3 自我設限之平均數差異事後比較摘要表…………57 表4-1-4 不同性別在使用的自我設限策略上的t考驗結果摘要 表………………………………………………………………57 表4-1-5 不同年級在使用的自我設限策略上的t考驗結果摘要表………………………………………………………………59 表4-1-6 各變項之相關表……………………………………59 表4-2-1 不同性別的高中生在自尊狀況上之t考驗結果摘要表………………………………………………………………60 表4-2-2 不同年級的高中生在自尊狀況上之t考驗結果摘要表………………………………………………………………61 表4-3-1 個人目標導向之描述性分析結果………………………………………………………………62 表4-3-2 個人目標導向之單因子重複變量變異數分析摘要表………………………………………………………………63 表4-3-3 個人目標導向之平均數差異摘要表………………63 表4-3-4 不同性別的高中生的個人目標導向之t考驗結果摘要表………………………………………………………………64 表4-3-5 不同年級的高中生的個人目標導向之t考驗結果摘要表………………………………………………………………65 表4-3-6 高中生個人目標導向與自我設限之典型相關分析摘要表………………………………………………………………67 表4-4-1 自我設限與學業表現之多元迴歸分析結果摘要表………………………………………………………………68 表4-4-2 個人目標導向及自我設限與學業表現之多元迴歸分析 結果摘要表……………………………………………………70 圖目次 圖2-1 四種向度的自我設限分類 …………………………………………………23 圖3-1 本研究之研究架構 …………………………………………………………40 圖5-1 高中學生個人目標導向與自我設限之第一個典型相關結構分析路徑圖 ………………………………………………………………………………………99 圖5-2 高中學生個人目標導向與自我設限之第二個典型相關結構分析路徑圖 ……………………………………………………………………………………102

    參考文獻
    一、中文部分
    王崇信(民83)。自我肯定對自我設限的影響。私立中原大學心理學研究所碩士論文。
    毛國楠&程炳林(民82)目標層次與目標導向對大學生自我調整學習歷程之影響。教育心理學報,26,85-106。
    向天屏(民89)。國中小學生成就目標導向、學習策略、自我跛足策略與學業成就關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    朱瑞玲 (民77)。中國人的心理。台北:桂冠出版社。
    吳欣怡(民88)。青少年自我尊重模式之驗證。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    侯玫如(民91)。多重目標導向與測量時間對國中生認知、動機、情感、行為和學習表現之影響。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    陳向明,民91。社會科學質的研究。台北市:五南出版社。
    陳根旺(民92)。阿德勒取向探索活動對國小低自尊學生輔導效果之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    陳惠邦(民79)。自我跛足與行為歸因之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    梁維中(民93)。國高中生學業自我設限行為之相關研究。國立臺南屏東師範學院社會科教育學系研究所碩士論文。
    程炳林(民91)。多重目標導向、動機問題與調整策略之交互作用。師大學報:教育類,47(1),39-58。
    程炳林(民92)。四向度目標導向模式之研究。師大學報:教育類,48(1),15-40。
    楊山由穎(民92)。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    黃堅厚(民88)。人格心理學。台北:心理。
    潘如珮(民92)。高中生成就目標、成敗歸因、內隱理論、學生知覺教師態度、學業成就與自我跛足之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    鄭芬蘭(民84)。目標導向因果模式之驗證暨目標導向之教學實驗方案之效果研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所博士論文。
    葉明衡(民90)。國小學童自我設限行為之研究。國立屏東師範學院教育心理學與輔導研究所碩士論文。
    謝岱陵(民92)。國中生四向度目標導向之前因及後果變項之研究。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Education Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
    Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
    Arkin, R. M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985). Self-handicapping. In J. H. Harvey, & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and application (pp.196-202). New York: Academy Press.
    Baumeister, R.F.,(1986).Public Self and Private Self. New York: Springer- Verlag.
    Baumgardner, A. H., Lake, E. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1985). Claiming mood as a
    self-handicap: the influence of spoiled and unspoiled public identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 349-367.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1988). Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individual: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 3-22.
    Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M. & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self presentational motivations and personality differences in self esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547-579.
    Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(4), 405-417.
    Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Dweck, C. S. (1975). The role of expectations and attributions in alleviation of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 674-685.
    Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational process affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
    Dweck, C. S. & Leggeet, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
    Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
    Duda, J. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in
    schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299.
    Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol.10,pp. 143- 179 ). Greenwich, CT JAI Press.
    Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 968-980.
    Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
    Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2×2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
    Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for teaching and Learning. 63, Fall, 29-42.
    Harris, R. N., & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 451-458.
    Higgins, R. L., & Harris, R. N. (1988). Strategic alcohol use: Drinking to self- handicap. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6(2), 191-202
    Hirt, E.R., Deppe, R.K., & Gordon, L.J.(1991).Self-reported versus Behavioral Self-handicapping. Empirical Evidence for a Theoretical Distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 981-991.
    Joanne,K. (2002) The relationship of self-handicapping and self-esteem, to the symptom reporting behavior of primary care patients. Hofstra University Press.
    Jones, E. E. & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self- handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200-206.
    Kelly, H.H.(1971).Attribution in Social Interaction. Morristown, NJ: General
    Learning Press.
    Kimble, C.E. ,& Croy, N.A.(1998).Document Development of Self-Handicapping
    Tendencies. Journal of Social Psychology,138(4), 524-534.
    Kimble, C. E., & Kimble, E. A., & Croy, N. A. (1998). Development of self- handicapping tendencies. Journal of Social Psychology, 138(4), 524-534.
    Kolditz, T., & Arkin, R.M.(1982).An Impression Management Interpretation of the Self-handicapping Phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,43, 492-502.
    Lay, C. H., Knish, S., & Zanatta, R. (1992), Self-handicappers and procrastinators: A comparison of their practice behavior prior to an evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality. 26(3), 242-257.
    Leary, M. R. & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self- reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1265-1268.
    Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., & Debus, R. L. (2001). Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism: Exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 87-102.
    McCrea S. M., & Hirt, E. R. (2001). The role of ability judgments in self- handicapping. Personality and social Psychology Bulletin, 27(10), 1378-1389
    Meece, J.L. (1991). The classroom context and students’ motivational goals. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Advances in achievement and motivation research (Vol. 7, pp.261-286). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Meece, J. L., Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Education Psychology, 85(4), 582-590.
    Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Education Psychology, 89(4), 710-718.
    Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 423-434.
    Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (1995). Predictors of middle school students’ use of self- handicapping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(4), 389-411.
    Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Education Psychology, 26, 61-75.
    Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
    Nurmi, J., Onatsu, T., & Haavisto, T. (1995). Underachievers’ cognitive and behavioral strategies: Self-handicapping at school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 188-200.
    Nolen,S. B.(1987). The hows and whys of studying: The relationship of goals to strategies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC, April 20-24, 1987.
    Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments (Vol.6, pp.117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.452-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college. In M. L. Maehr, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds), Advanced in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol.7, pp.371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
    Pope, A. W., McHale, S. M., & Craighead, W.E. (1988). Self-esteem Enhancement  with Children and Adolescents. New York: Pergamon Press.
    Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (1983). Determinants of reduction in intended effort as a strategy for coping with anticipated failure. Journal of Research in Personality , 17(4), 412-422.
    Rhodewalt, F.(1994).Conceptions of Ability, Achievement Goals, and Individual Differences in Self-handicapping Behavior: On the Application of Implicit Theories. Journal of Personality, 62, 67-85.
    Rhodswalt, F., & Fairfield, M. (1991). Claimed self-handicaps and the self- handicapper: The relation of reduction intended effort to performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 402-417.
    Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Rotter, J. B.(1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, whole No. 609).
    Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and Self-defeating ego orientations: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Education Psychology, 89, 71-81.
    Smith, T.W., Snyder, C.R., & Perkins, S.C.(1983).The Self-serving Function of Hypochondriacal Complaints: Physical Symptoms as Self-Handicapping Strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 787-797.
    Smith, T.W., Snyder, C.R., & Handelsman, M.M.(1982).On the Self-serving Function of an Academic Wooden Leg: Test Anxiety as a Self-handicapping Strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 314-321.
    Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social Psychology (pp.104-127). New York: Oxford
    University Press.
    Skaalvik, E.M. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientations: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
    Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1985). Self--handicapping as a self -presentational response to success and failure: The role of self-esteem. Paper presented at the meeting of Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
    Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping and self-presentation: The Strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality,58(2), 443-464.
    Tice, D. M. (1991). Esteem protection or enhancement?Self-handicapping motives and attributions differ by trait self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(5), 711-725.
    Urdan, T. ;Midgely, C. & Anderman, E.M.(1998).The Role of Classroom Goal structure in Students’ Use of Self-Handicapping Strategies. American Educational Research Joural, 35(1),101-122.
    Warden, M. R. (1991). Withdrawal of academic effort: implications for self-
    handicapping and self-worth theories(Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(03), B1782, No. AAC9123696.

    QR CODE