臺灣經濟高度仰賴中小企業，然而，這些企業在建立品牌和提升市場競爭力方面面臨著重大挑戰。本研究以自主品牌模式為焦點，探討中小企業如何強化品牌策略和建立強勢的商業模式。通過對M品牌包袋公司的個案研究，深入分析自主品牌的營運優勢和挑戰，並提出整合生產力、商品與市場行銷的戰略框架，以提升品牌競爭力和市場敏感度。

研究結果顯示，通過有效的整合「創新發展、專業生產及有效市場行銷」三大方向，中小企業能夠優化自有品牌，應對市場挑戰。此外，以商業模式理論與價值主張畫布理論為基礎，對個案與消費者所進行的質性研究訪談，深入剖析並揭示出消費者需求，同時也為個案企業提供了定制化的發展策略。綜合而言，本研究為臺灣中小企業提供了戰略洞見和具體建議，旨在推動其在全球市場上的競爭地位和可持續發展的目標和方向。

Taiwan's economy relies heavily on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which faces challenges in branding and market competitiveness. This study focuses on the Original Brand Manufacturer (OBM) model, examining how SMEs can enhance brand strategies and establish strong business models. Through a case study of the M brand bag company, the research analyzes OBM's operational advantages and challenges, proposing a strategic framework that integrates productivity, products, and marketing to boost brand competitive and market responsiveness.

The findings indicate that by effectively integrating "innovative development, professional production, and effective marketing," SMEs can enhance their brands and tackle market challenges. Additionally, based on the Business Model Theory and the Value Proposition Canvas, qualitative research interviews were conducted with the case study and consumers to uncover consumer needs, providing customized development strategies for the case enterprise. In summary, this study offers strategic insights and specific recommendations for Taiwanese SMEs to enhance their competitiveness position and pursue sustainable development in the global market.

王振寰 (2010)。追趕的極限：臺灣的經濟轉型與創新(第一版)。巨流圖書股份有限公司。
李小娟 (1989)。產品的第二生命，臺灣經濟研究月刊，12(2)，41-43。
林榮泰 (2005)。文化創意，設計加值，藝術欣賞，1(7)，26-32。
林銘松 (1995)。臺灣自創品牌廠商國際行銷道路選擇之研究-以資訊電子業為例，台大管理論叢，139-170。
林芯玫 (2003)。我國筆記型電腦代工廠商競爭優勢之探討，東吳大學研究所碩士論文。
吳豐祥和林子正 (2008)。我國OEM/ODM 轉自有品牌廠商建構行銷通路之個案研究−動態能力與組織學習的觀點，行銷評論，5(3)，347-369。
吳曉慧 (2019)。從品牌企業調查探討臺灣品牌企業發展，臺灣經濟研究月刊，42(7)，28-36。
邱震忠 (1998)。我國行動電話製造商代工策略及行為之初探，元智大學管理研究所碩士論文。
洪慧娟 (2011)。影響我國廠商海外直接投資事業採行OEM/ODM經營方式的決定因素，國立政治大學研究所碩士論文。
施振榮 (2003)。自創品牌 須不斷創新，經濟日報。
施振榮 (1989)。對民間高科技工業之展望一心懷科技，放眼天下，總統府月會報告。
施振榮 (1994)。再造宏碁，台北：天下遠見出版。
陳向明 (2002)。社会科學質的硏究. 五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
部落客Impochun (2017)。科技廠術語：OEM、ODM、JDM、OBM是什麼？https://blog.impochun.com/oem-odm-jdm-obm/(引用日期2017/11/1)。
陶蓉蓉 (2012)。從OEM到OBM：論企業設計創新的核心價值，藝術探索，1，120-122。
黑洞工作室 (2012)。何謂 OEM、ODM 與 OBM？其差異為何？
湯明哲和李吉仁 (1999)。外包與專業製造廠商−雙贏的策略，遠見雜誌， 62，172-175。
楊玫香 (2021)。從ODM轉型OBM的關鍵因素，輔仁大學研究所碩士論文。
謝中興 (2020)。代工廠商的創新升級與產業動態，經濟論文叢刊，48(2)，269-299。
瞿宛文 (2003)。全球化下的台灣經濟。台北市：台灣社會研究叢刊。
瞿宛文和安士敦 (2003)。超越後進發展：台灣的產業升級策略，朱道凱翻譯，台北：聯經出版社。
瞿宛文 (2004)。代工，品牌與產業升級，台灣：中研院社科所。
瞿宛文 (2006)。台灣後起者能藉自創品牌升級嗎？台灣社會研究季刊，63，1-52。
經濟部工業局 (2022)。臺灣品牌耀飛計畫−臺灣品牌企業調查，經濟部工業局計畫期末執行成果報告。
Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-120.
Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
Cayla, J., & Eckhardt, G. M. (2007). Asian brands without borders: regional opportunities and challenges. International Marketing Review, 24(4), 444-456.
Chandler, A. D. (1978). The United States: Evolution of Enterprise, in P. Mathias and M.M. Postan (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. VII, The Industrial Economies: Capital, Labor and Enterprise, Cambridge UP, 70-133.
Chandler, A. D. (1990). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Belknap Press.
Christensen, C. M. (2013). The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.
Chu, W. W. (2009). Can Taiwan's second movers upgrade via branding. Research Policy, 38(6), 1054-1065.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage.
Doyle, P. (1990). Milding successful brands: The strategic options. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7(2), 5-20.
Geertz, C. (2008). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The cultural geography reader (pp. 41-51). Routledge.
Hoch, S. J., & Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed? MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 57.
Jin, J. & Yanming, S. (2012). OEMs’external social capital. RD involvement, and enterprise upgrading. Science Research Management, 5, 47-55.
Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Saunders, J., & Wong, V. (2005). Principles of marketing: 4th European edition. Pearson Education Limited.
Morville, P. (2005). Experience design unplugged. In ACM Siggraph 2005 web program (pp. 10-es).
Nielsen, J., & Norman, D. (2014). The Definition of User Experience. Nielsen Norman Group.
Ng, S. C., Zhao, X., Fan, X., & Rungtusanatham, J. M. (2014). TQM and brand-Milding by Chinese original brand manufacturingrs: Impact on Msiness performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(3), 825-846.
Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Oliveira, M. A. Y., & Ferreira, J. J. P. (2011). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengers. African Journal of Business Management, 5(7), 22-30.
Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, NY: Oxford University Press.
Platt, J. (1985). Weber's verstehen and the history of qualitative research: The missing link. British journal of sociology, 448-466.
Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
Rappa, M. A. (2004). The utility business model and the future of computing services. IBM Systems Journal, 43(1), 32-42.
Tucker, W. T. (1965). Max Weber's Verstehen. The Sociological Quarterly, 6(2), 157-165.
Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80-94.
Yang, T. Y., Yang, Y. T., Chen, J. R., & Lu, C. C. (2019). Correlation between owner brand and firm value-Case study on a private brand in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(3), 232-237.
Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141–155). American Psychological Association.