研究生: |
林人龍 Ranlong Lin |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
國中學生「生活科技」課程學習體驗之現象學研究 A Phenomenological Inquiry of the Experiences of Junior High School Studnets’ Learning Living Technology |
指導教授: |
余鑑
Yu, Chien |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2010 |
畢業學年度: | 98 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 318 |
中文關鍵詞: | 生活科技 、現象學 、學習體驗 |
英文關鍵詞: | living technology, phenomenology, learning experience |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:169 下載:53 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究試圖藉由現象學方法的深度審視,詳細揭露國中學生親歷生活科技課程學習體驗的本質與意義。研究的目的主要回歸到學生學習生活科技的直接經驗,以便於探索學生經驗生活科技學習的不同方式,進而描寫並理解學生在他們生活科技學習活動中的現象與認知。
有五項的提問引導了本研究的進行:1) 國中學生學習生活科技的經驗是什麼? 2) 學習生活科技的意義為何? 3) 對一個國中學生而言,生活科技的學習會是像什麼樣子?4) 當學生學習生活科技時發生了什麼事?5)學生體驗生活科技的學習有哪些不同方式?
依循現象學取向的質化研究方法,讓學生為自己的體驗發聲,有將近30位來自同一所國中的男女學生參與了這項研究,採取深度訪談與學習體驗反思文本撰寫兩項現象學研究中常用的資料蒐集方法,透過這種資料蒐集的技術與研究者在研究歷程中的教學觀察,讓研究者得以從學生的觀點深入理解他們學習生活科技的真實經驗。
資料分析的方法主要使用源自Giorgi將現象學哲學觀點轉化為具體的研究方法,一種逐步分析文本資料的現象學心理學的方法。經由現象學方法的描寫與解釋分析之後,得到學生在生活科技學習體驗5項推斷,12項核心類別以及14項總體反思。研究所得的結果提供了一些必要的訊息,可以協助生活科技的教育人員進一步發展適當的課程與活動,以便支撐並促進台灣生活科技教育的推展。
本研究從現象學研究觀點的理解出發,建立一個整體的學生學習生活科技的圖像,冀求能幫助從事生活科技教學的教師們察知並了解他們對於學生學習生活科技的影響力,生活科技教師們必須知道如何運用這樣的影響力形成有效的方法,以便於促進學生科技素養的發展。研究的最終發現則提陳一些生活科技教學的意涵,並建議有關生活科技學習的教學和研究,以及學習環境和個人在學習獲得或發展觀點間的關係。
This study attempted to expose the essence and meaning of experiences of students who experienced the living technology activities by phenomenological approach. The purpose of this inquiry was aiming toward the experience of students’ learning living technology, revealing the phenomena and perceptions of students’ learning, describing and understanding the nature and course of their living technology learning, and exploring the ways how they experienced it differently.
The guiding questions for this study were:
1. What is the experience of living technology learning of junior high school students?
2. What is the meaning of living technology learning?
3. What are the images of students’ learning living technology ?
4. What occurred during students learning living technology?
5. What different ways did students experience living technology learning?
According to the phenomenological approach in qualitative research, allowing students’ experiences to speak for themselves. Thirty students of one junior high school including girls and boys participated in the study. Of two common methods of collecting data in phenomenological studies – interviews and journal writing were chosen. The data collecting technique combined with the participation observation in the course of the inquiry enabled the researcher to learn about students’ experiences of learning Living Technology from their perspectives.
Drawing on the work of Giorgi, who translated aspects of phenomenological philosophy into a concrete method of research, a phenomenological psychological approach was used to analyze the data in a step-by-step process. Through describing and interpreting of phenomenological analysis, the findings were five assertions, twelve categories and fourteen reflections of learning experience of students. The results of this study could provide the necessary information needed to further assist educationalists of living technology in developing appropriate programs and activities to support and facilitate the living technology education in Taiwan.
Embarked from the phenomenological research aspects, the study attempted to erect a holistic image of learning living technology of junior high school students. The researcher hoped that it can facilitate living technology teachers to reflect and realize their influence on the students’ living technology learning. Living technology teachers need to know how to apply their influence to effective teaching and promote the development of their students’ technological literacy. The results of this study presented some implications of living technology teaching, recommendations for instruction and research of living technology learning, as well as relationship between learning environment and student individual development.
一、中文部分
王攀峰,張天寶(2004)。讓教育研究走向生活體驗。教師教育研究,16(3)。2009年4月2日,取自http://www.ilib2.com/A-ISSN ~1672-5905(2004)03-0041-05.html
朱曉宏(2005)。學生眼中的教:現象學視野中的課堂生活世界。中國教育學會中青年教育理論工作者分會第十四屆學術年會。
余德慧(2001)。詮釋現象心理學。台北:心靈工坊。
宋廣文譯(2003)。生活體驗研究:人文科學視野中的教育學。北京:教育科學出版社。
李素卿譯(1999)。當代教育心理學。台北:五南。
李隆盛(2004a)。科技教育的課題與展望。生活科技教育月刊,37(7),26-29。
李隆盛(主編)(2004b)。中小學科技教育簡介。2006年9月20日,取自http: / / lee.ite.ntnu.edu.tw/
李維倫譯(2004)。現象學十四講。台北:心靈工坊。
沈清松(1990)。科技、人文價值與後現代。台北:社會大學文教基金會。
林人龍(2006)。「動手做科技」-創作與設計的尋思與釋例。生活科技教育月刊,39(2),15-37。
金觀濤、劉青峯(1994)。興盛與危機:論中國社會超穩定結構。台北:風雲時代。
孫志文(主編)(1982)。人與科技。臺北:聯經。
徐輝富(2008)。現象學研究方法與步驟。上海:學林出版社。
祝振華譯(1974)。科技時代與科技人。香港:今日世界。
教育部國民教育司(2005)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-自然與生活科技領域。2005年10月15日,取自http:// www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326
張偉菁(2002)。從專題研習實例中探討推行全人教育的可行性。香港教師中心學報,1,209-211。
張超、楊改學(2005)。現象學視野中的遠端教育研究。中國遠端教育,12。2009年5月18日,取自http://scholar.ilib.cn/A-ISSN ~1009-458x(2005)12-0011-04.html
許良(2004)。技術哲學。上海:復旦大學出版社。
郭本禹、崔光輝(2004)。現象學心理學的兩種研究取向初探。南京師大學報(社會科學版),6。2009年7月26日,取自http://scholar.ilib.cn/A-ISSN~1001-4608(2004)06-0086-05.html
游光昭(1993)。工藝/科技教育教學的基本精神-問題解決法。中學工藝教育月刊,26(1),8-12。
羅大涵(1988)。科技的意義及其概念架構分析。中學工藝教育月刊,21(3),2-9。
二、外文部分
Adams, J. L. (1991). Flying buttresses, entropy and o-rings, the world of an engineer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and implication. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Aoki, T. T. (2004). Toward curriculum inquiry in a new key (1978/1980). In W. Pinar, & R. L. Irwin (Eds.), Curriculum in a new key: The collected works of Ted T. Aoki(pp. 89–110). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Barlex, D., & Carré, C. (1985). Visual communication in science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barlex, D. (1995). Nuffield D & T teacher’s guide. Lodon : Longman.
Barritt(1979). Analyzing phenomenological description. Retrieved November 20, 2008, from http://www.phenomenologyonline. com/articles/barritt.html/
Basalla, G.(1988).The evolution of technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brewer, W. F., & Nakamura, G. V. (1984). The nature and functions of schemas. In R. S. Wyer, & T.K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition(pp. 110-160). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brimfield, R., Roderick, J., & Yamamoto, K. (1983). Persons as researchers: Observation of the participation. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(4), 5-12.
Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology(pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruyn, S. R. (1966). The human perspective in society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Burton, P. (1986). Analyse, evaluate and realize. In A. Cross, & B. McCormick (Eds.), Teaching technology in schools: Exploring the curriculum. London: Open University.
Carré, C. (1981). Language teaching and learning: Science. London: Ward Lock.
Carter, C., Bishop, J., & Kravits, S. L. (2004). Keys to effective learning: Developing powerful habits of mind. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chamberlin, J. G. (1974). Phenomenological methodology and understanding education. In D. Denton (Ed.), Existentialism and phenomenology in education. Columbia: Teachers College Press.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1984). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-152.
Cho, J. (2000). Curriculum implementation as lived teacher experience: Two cases of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptua1change in science education. Science Education, 80(5), 579-610.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1973). Reflection and research in psychology: A phenomenological study of learning. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall-Hunt.
Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle, & M. King (Eds.), Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Cross, K. P. (1976). Accent on learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Damarin, S. K. (1993). School and situated knowledge: Travel or tourism? Educational Technology, 33(3), 27-32.
Dansereau, D. F. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O'Neil Jr. (Ed.), Learning strategies. New York: Academic Press.
de Bono, E. (1976). Teaching thinking. Penguin Books.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials(pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
DeVore, P. W. (1987). Technology and science. Conducting technical research : The 36th yearbook of Council on Technology Teacher Education. Mission Hill, CA: Glencoe.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. Lodon: Routlrdge.
Dohmen, G. (1989). The linkage between research and practice in adult education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Association of the America Adult and Continuing Education, Atlantic City, NJ.
Dugger, Jr. W. E. (1994). The relationship Between technology, science, engineering, and mathematics. The Technology Teacher, 53(7), 5-23.
Ehrich, L. C. (1997). Principals and professional development: a phenomenological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
Ehrich, L. C. (1999). Untangling the threads and coils of the web of phenomenology. Education Research and Perspective, 26, 19-44.
Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock(Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching(3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Escher, M. C. (1955). Liberation, art work. Retrieved March 13, 2005, from http://www.worldofescher.com/gallery/A25L.html.
Evans, G. (1988). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Farber, M. (1928). Phenomenology as a method and as a philosophical discipline. University of Buffalo.
Fetterman, D. M. (1988). Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent revolution. New York: Praeger.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. Resnick(Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hi1lsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Flavel1, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and metacognitive monitoring: A new era of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911.
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1998). Interviewing: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials(pp. 47-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Frey, R. E. (1989). A philosophical framework for understanding technology. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 27(1), 23-35.
Fritz, A. (1996). Reflective practice: Enhancing the outcomes of technology learning experiences. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 212-217.
Fryer, M. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Gadamer, H. G. (1988). Truth and method(2nd Rev. Translation). New York: Crossroad.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science- A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe, & J. Gale(Eds.), Constructivism in education(pp. 17-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gibson, S. K., & Hanes, L. A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2(2), 181-205.
Gies, J. C. (1982). Technology: A new liberal art? AGB Reports, 24 (1), 17-20. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ259945)
Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a Human Science. New York: Harper and Row.
Giorgi, A. (1985a). Phenomenological psychology of learning and the verbal tradition. In A. Giorgi (Ed.), Phenomenology and Psychological Research(pp. 23-85). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Giorgi, A. (1985b). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. In A. Giorgi(Ed.), Phenomenology and Psychological Research(pp. 1-21). Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Giorgi, A. (1994). A phenomenological perspective on certain qualitative research methods. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 190-220
Giorgi, A., Fischer, W. F., & von Eckartsberg, R. (Eds.) (1971). Duquesne Studies in Phenomenological Psychology: Volume I. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press and Humanities Press.
Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction(2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Gomory, R. E. (1983). Technology development. Science, 220(4579), 576-580.
Hacker, M., & Barden, R. A. (1987). Technology in your World. Albany, NY: Delmar.
Hammond, M., Howarth, J., & Keat, R. (1991). Understanding phenomenology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). The phenomenology of mind. New York: Humanities Press.
Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic writing. New York: Harper and Row.
Hein, S. F., & Austin, W. J. (2001). Empirical and hermeneutic approaches to phenomenological research in psychology: a Comparison. Psychological Methods, 6(1), 3-17.
Henak, R. M. (1992). Addressing learning styles. The Technology Teacher, November, 23-28.
Hodson, D. (1986). The nature of scientific observation. School Science Review, 68(242), 17-29.
Hultgren, F. H., & Coomer, D. L. (Eds.)(1989). Alternative modes of inquiry in home economics research. Peoria, IL: Glencoe Publishing Company.
Hunsberger, M. (1983). The encounter between reader and text. Dissertation Abstracts International, 62(13), 2002A. (UMI No. NK63942)
Husserl, E. (1931). General introduction to pure phenomenology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Husserl, E. (1971). Phenomenology. In Encyclopaedia Britannica (1927: 77-90). New complete translation by R. E. Palmer, The British Society for Phenomenology, 2.
Hutchinson, P. (1987). Report of the commission on technology education of the State of New Jersey, technology: learning how to learn in a technological world. Trenton, NJ: New Jersey State Department of Education.
Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of interview data. Human Studies, 8, 279-303.
Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology. Albany: SUNY Press.
Järvinen, E. M., & Hiltunen, J. (1999). Home security-children’s innovations in action. In I. Mottier, & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), Impacts of technology education. Proceedings of PATT-9 Conference in Indianapolis, March(pp. 27-29). Eindhoven: PATT-Foundation.
Johnson, S. D., & Thomas, R. G. (1994). Imp1ications of cognitive science for instructional design in technology education. The Journal of Technology Studies, 20(1), 33-45.
Jonassen, D. H. (1982). Getting started: Pattern notes and perspectives, the technology of text. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational technology Publications.
Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview In student learning styles. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED182859)
Kerka, S. (1986). On second thought: Using new cognitive research in vocational education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED272699)
Kermode, F. (1979). The genesis of secrecy on the interpretation of narrative. London: Harvard University Press.
Kersten, F. (1989). Phenomenological method: Theory and practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A., & Kelly, V. (1991). The Assessment of performance in design and technology. London: School Examinations and Assessment Council.
Kline, S. J. (1985). What is technology? Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 5, 215-218.
Kockelmans, J. (1967). First introduction to Husserl’s phenomenology. Michigan: Duquesne University Press.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Koulaidis, V., & Tsatsaroni, A. (1996). Technology and Science: An Epistemological Approach to their Teaching. In D. Mioduser, & I. Zilberstein (Eds.), The Second Jerusalem International Science & Technology Education Conference on Technology Education for a Changing Future: Theory, Policy and Practice(pp. S2-73-74). Te1Aviv: Center for Educational Technology.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A socio-cultural approach to education. Cambridge University Press.
Kruger, D. (1988). An introduction to phenomenological psychology. Cape Town: Juta and Company.
Kurenkova, R. A., Plekhanov, Y. A., Rogacheva, E. Y., & Latysheva, J. (2000). The methodologies of life, self-individualization and creativity in the educational process. In Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka (Ed.), Analecta usserliana LXVII(pp. 195–206). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Laster, J. F. (1985). Toward excellence in vocational education: Using cognitive psychology in curriculum planning. ERIC NO. ED254656.
Lavoie, D. R. (1991). The construction and application of a cognitive-network of prediction problem solving. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.
Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.
Legge, J. G. (1914). The thinking hand or practical education in the elementary school. London: Macmillan.
Lehto, S. (1998). New solution for world engineering education in the 21st Century: From outside-driven mass teaching to internally-driven individual learning by means of an optimized process of real-world learning projects. Paper presented to Global Congress on Engineering Education, Cracow, Poland.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
Lewis, T., & Gagel, C. (1992). Technological literacy-A critical analysis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 117-138.
Liao, T. T. (1998). Technological Literacy: Beyond Mathematics, Science, and Technology (MST) Integration. Journal of Technology Studies, 24(2), 52-54.
Lincoln, E. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
Louchakova, O. (2005). On advantages of the clear mind: Spiritual practices in training of a phenomenological researcher. Humanistic Psychologist, 33(2), 87–112.
Luckmann, T. (1989). Philosophy, science and everyday life. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and the social sciences(pp. 148–185). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Makiya, H., & Rogers, M. (1992). Design and technology in the primary school. London: Routledge.
Maslow, A. (1968). Toward a psychology of being(2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design : An interactive approach. London : SAGE.
McCabe, D. (1995). The concept mapping workshop. Educational Development Unit, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
McDonald, J. P. (1992). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mesthene, E. G. (1979). The role of technology in society. In A. H. Teich(Ed.), Technology and the future. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Meyer-Drawe, K. (1997). Education. In L. Embree, et al. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Phenomenology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Montgomery-Whicher, R. (1997). Drawing from observation: A phenomenological inquiry. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58(10), 3808A. (UMI No. NQ23038).
Mooney, R. L. (1975). The researcher himself. In W. Pinar(Ed.), Curriculum theorizing. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Press.
Morse, J. M. (1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research(pp. 220-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mostert, W. (2002). Phenomenology: Discovering new meanings of pedagogy within the lived experience. Retrieved September 25, 2006, from http://www.aare.edu.au/02pap/mos02453.htm
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. London: SAGE.
Natanson, M. (1989). Introduction. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Phenomenology and the social sciences(pp. 3–44). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Osborne, J. W. (1994). Some similarities and differences among phenomenological and other methods of psychological qualitative research. Canadian psychology, 35(2), 167-189.
Osborne, R., & Wittrock, M. (1985). The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59-87.
Osburn, B. N. (1960). Basis for a program of industrial arts. Unpublished paper, Millersville, Pa.
Pacey, A. (1983). The Culture of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Patton, M. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. London: SAGE.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods(2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (2002). Technologically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C..
Perkins, H. V. (1974). Human Development and Learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation. New York: Norton.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1989). Phenomeno1ogical research methods. In R. S. Valle, & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological research methods in psychology. New York: Plenum.
Pullias, D. (1989). Where do we go from here? ATTE Journal, Winter, 3-4.
Richardson, L. (1998). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln(Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials(pp. 345-371). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ritchie, S. M., & Hampson, B. (1996). Learning in the making: A case study of science and technology projects in a year six classroom. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 391-407.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1992). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher level cognitive strategies. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 26-33.
Sardello, R. J. (1971). A reciprocal participation model of experimentation. In A. Giorgi, W. F. Fischer, & R. von Eckartsberg(Eds.) Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology. Pittsburg: Duquesne University.
Savickas, M. L. (2000). From career development to developing self through work and relationships. Prepared for presentation in P. J. Hartung (Chair), Innovating career development using advances in lifecourse and lifespan theory. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.
Schutz, A. (1972). The phenomenology of the social world. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
Schwab, J. J. (1964). The teaching of science as enquiry. In J. J. Schwab, & P. F. Brandwein(Eds.), The Teaching of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 3-103.
Schwartz, A. (1996). Principles of logic- A learning module for the understanding and implementation of logic at the junior high school level. In D. Mioduser, & I. Zilberstein (Eds.), The Second Jerusalem International Science &Technology Education Conference on Technology Education for a Changing Future: Theory, Policy and Practice. Tel Aviv: Center for Educational Technology.
Selvi, K. (2008). Phenomenological approach in education. Analecta Husserliana, 95, 39-51.
Sharma, N. (2008). The origin of the data information knowledge wisdom hierarchy. Retrieved September 10, 2008, from http://nsharma.people.si.umich.edu//dikw_origin.htm
Silvers, R. J. (1984). Teaching phenomenology. Phenomenology & Pedagogy, 2(1), 18-28.
Simon, H. A. (1980). Cognitive science: The newest science of artificial. Cognitive Science, 4(1), 33-46.
Skolimowski, H. (1972). The structure of thinking in technology. In C. Mitcham, & R. Mackey(Eds.). Philosophy and technology: Readings in the philosophical problems of technology(pp. 42-49). New York: Free Press.
Skolimoski, H. (1974). The structure of thinking in technology. In F. Rapp(Ed.), Contributions to a philosophy of technology. Boston: D. Reidel.
Smyth, B. (1994). Qualitative approaches in educational research. Paper presented at the Mini-Conference, Flinders University, South Australia.
Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge University Press.
Solas, J. (1992). Investigating teacher and students thinking about the process of teaching and learning using autobiography and repertory grid. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 205-225.
Sparkes, J. (1987). Technological education, in living with technology: A course for teachers. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Sparkes, J. (1993). Some differences between science and technology. In R. McCormick, C. Newey, & J. Sparkes (Eds.), Technology for Technology Education. London: Addison-Wesley, 25-36.
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The phenomenological movement. Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Stevenson, J. (ed.)(1994). Cognition at work: The development of vocational expertise. Learbrook, Australia: National Centre for Vocational Education Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED380542)
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and teaching. London: SAGE.
Sutton, C. (1996). Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 1-18.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development theory and practice. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Tasker, R., & Osborne, R. (1985). Science Teaching and Science Learning. In R. Osborne, & P. Freyberg(Eds.), Learning in science: The implications of children's science(pp. 15-27). Auckland: Heinemann press.
Taylor, G. (2000). Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in research. University Press of America.
Taylor, P. V. (1993). Education and liberation: The means and ends of dialogue and conscientization. In The Texts of Paulo Freire. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Tennyson, R. D. (1992). An educational learning theory for instructional design. Educational Technology, 32(l), 36-41.
Todd, R. D. (1990). The teaching and learning environment. The Technology Teacher, 50(3), 3-7.
Twyford, J. (2000). Nodding toy project. Retrieved December 20, 2003, from http://www.ex.ac.uk/telemattsfI3/technology/noding/ design.htm
Valle, R. S., & King, M. (1978). Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valle, R. S., King, M., & Halling, S. (1989). An introduction to existential phenomenological thought in psychology. In R. Valle, & S. Halling (Eds), Existential phenomenologicla perspectives in psychology: Exploring breadth of human experience. New York and London: Plenum Press.
van den Berg, J. H. (1972). A different existence. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
van Kaam, A. (1966). Existential foundations for psychology. New York: Appelton Century Crofts.
van Manen, M. (1982). Phenomenological pedagogy. Curriculum Inquiry, 12 (3), 283-299.
van Manen, M. (1984). Praticing phenomenological writing. Phenomenology+Pedagogy, 2(1), 36-69.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy(2nd ed.). Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
van Manen, M. (2002). Phenomenology online. Retrieved October 24, 2007, from http://www.phenomenologyonline.com/
Vandenberg, D. (1971). Being and education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
von Eckartsberg, R. (1988). Existential phenomenological research. In R. Valle (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology: Existential and transpersonal dimensions. New York: Plenum Press.
von Eckartsberg, R. (1998). Introducing existential phenomenological psychology. In R. S. Valle (Ed.), Phenomenological inquiry in psychology. New York: Plenum.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). A constructivist approach to teaching. In P. L. Steffe, & J. Gale(Eds), Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3-15.
von Wright, G. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Revised edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Waetjen, W. B. (1989). Technical problem solving: A proposal. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED334464)
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A socio-cultural approach to mediated action. Hertfordshire, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
White, R. T., & Mitchell, I. J. (1994). Metacognition and the Quality of Learning. Studies in Science Education, 23(1), 21-37.
Wilber, G. O., & Pendered, N. C. (1967). Industrial arts in general education. Scranton, PA: International Textbook.
Winek, G., & Borchers, R. (1993). Technological problem solving demonstrated. The Technology Teacher, 52(5), 23-25.
Wittrock, M. (1986). Students’ thought processes. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching(3rd ed., pp. 297-314). New York: Macmillan.
Wittrock, M. (1987). Teaching and student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(6), 30-33.
Witz, K. G., Goodwin, D. R., Hart, R. S., & Thomas, H. S. (2001). An essentialist methodology in education-related research using in-depth interview. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(2), 195-227.
Zuga, K. F. (2004). Improving technology education on cognition. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 79-84.