簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張玉佩
Yu-Pei Chang
論文名稱: 台灣北區高中數理資優班學生情緒發展層次與情緒適應之研究
The Emotional Developmental Levels and Adjustment of Math-Science Talented Students in Senior High Schools
指導教授: 郭靜姿
Kuo, Ching-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 374
中文關鍵詞: 數理資優生過度激動情緒發展層次情緒適應
英文關鍵詞: math-science talented, overexcitability, emotional developmental levels, emotional adjustment
論文種類: 學術論文
相關次數: 點閱:276下載:54
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在編製情緒特質量表,並探討台灣北區高中數理資優生的情緒發展層次及情緒適應的情形。研究者以自編的「情緒特質量表」及「我的特質量表」、「基本人格量表」為研究工具;以123位高中數理資優生及132位普通學生為研究對象,比較數理資優生與普通學生在「情緒特質量表」、「我的特質量表」及「基本人格量表」的差異,以及三個量表之相關性;另外,亦比較在不同情緒發展層次時,「我的特質量表」及「基本人格量表」之表現是否有差異;並就以上之結果討論資優生整體情緒適應之情形。量表施測所得的結果以F考驗及Person積差相關來進行統計考驗。茲就本研究之主要研究結果說明如下:
    一、 情緒特質量表由研究者自編,包含情緒功能與情緒認知兩個因素,共計26題,採用五等量表。其內部一致性介於.538~.712;重測信度介於.657~.769之間;專家效度介於.714~1.000。
    二、 資優組在情緒特質量表之得分顯著高於普通組(p<.05)。
    三、 資優組僅只有「智能」過度激動(intellectuall overexcitability)特質較普通組明顯(F=45.35, p<.001)。
    四、 資優組在基本人格量表的「抑鬱」、「慮病」、「異常」、「迫害感」、「虛幻感」、「情緒困擾」及「社會適應」之得分均顯著低於普通組(p<.05)。
    五、 基本人格量表分量表間、過度激動分量表間及情緒特質量表間之得分大部分達顯著正相關(p<.05)。
    六、 過度激動特質與基本人格量表間,大部分皆達顯著之相關(p<.05);不過心理動作及智能過度激動與部分基本人格分量表達顯著之負相關。
    七、 情緒特質量表與基本人格量表及情緒過度激動間皆達顯著負相關(p<.05),但與智能過度激動達顯著正相關(p<.05)。
    八、 在不同情緒發展層次時,僅智能過度激動之得分差異達到顯著水準(F=8.71, p<.001)。
    九、 在不同情緒發展層次時,與基本人格量表之得分差異均達到顯著水準(p<.05)。
    十、 由上述之統整得知資優組之情緒發展層次及情緒適應的表現皆優於普通組,然而從一些個案的表現,可看到一些適應不佳的資優生個案。

    The main purposes of this research were to construct an emotional developmental levels scale (Emotional Traits Scale) and to explore emotional developmental levels and emotional adjustment of talented high school students with math-science ability in Northern Taiwan.
    123 talented high school students with math-science ability and 132 regular students are selected as samples. The major instruments for this research are ‘Emotional Traits Scales’, ‘The Me Scale’, as well as ‘CBPI(Basic Personality Inventory in Chinese Version)’. The data gathered are processed by F test and Pearson correlation.
    The main findings of this research are stated as follows:
    1. The coefficient of internal consistency of ‘Emotional Traits Scale’ (Cronbach α) is .549~.769; the coefficient of stability is .657~.769; and the expert validity is .714~1.000.
    2. Talented and regular students have the most people in level II~III.
    3. The emotional developmental levels of talented students are more significant than regular students (p<.05).
    4. Talented students are only more significant in ‘Intellectual OE’ than regular students (p<.001).
    5. Talented students are more significantly lower in CBPI’s subscales, such as ‘Depression’, ‘Hypochondriasis’, ‘Deviation’, ‘Persecutory Ideas’, ‘Thinking Disorder’, ‘Social Adjustment’ and ‘Emotional Disturbance’ than regular students (p<.05).
    6. There are significant positive correlation (p<.05) between most of CBPI’s subscales and types.
    7. There are significant positive correlation (p<.01) between five OEs subscales , except in ‘Emotional OE vs. Psychomotor OE’ and ‘Emotional OE vs. Intellectual OE.’
    8. Among five OEs and CBPI, most of them are significant correlation (p<.05). Intellectual OE is significant negative correlation with most of CBPI’s subscales.
    9. There are significant negative correlation (p<.05) between Emotional Traits Scale, and CBPI. Specially Emotional Traits Scale have significant positive correlation (p<.05) with The Me Scale, but significant negative correlation (p<.05) with Emotional OE.
    10. Among the different emotional developmental levels, only Intellectual OE has significant level (p<.001).
    11. In different emotional levels, there is significant level (p<.001) in CBPI.
    12. In conclusion, talented students’ emotional levels and emotional adjustment are better than regular students. But we can still find some not well-adapted talented cases in the samples.

    第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 6 第三節 研究問題與研究假設 7 第四節 名詞釋義 12 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 Dabrowski的正向非統整理論與相關之研究 16 第二節 評量情緒發展的相關工具 71 第三節 資優青少年的情緒適應 80 第四節 資優生的特質與情緒發展 88 第五節 資優者情緒發展層次與過度激動之研究 117 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構 132 第二節 研究對象 132 第三節 研究工具 136 第四節 研究程序 152 第五節 資料處理與分析 154 第四章 結果與討論 第一節 高中數理資優生與一般學生在情緒特質量表之表現 158 第二節 數理資優生與一般學生在過度激動量表之表現 169 第三節 高中數理資優生與一般學生在基本人格量表之表現 188 第四節 情緒特質、過度激動特質表現與基本人格量表得分之相 關 201 第五節 高中數理資優生與一般學生在不同情緒發展層次時其過度激動特質表現差異之比較 221 第六節 高中數理資優生與一般學生在不同情緒發展層次時其基本人格量表表現差異之比較 224 第七節 高中數理資優生在整體情緒適應之情況 232 第五章 結論與建議 第一節 研究結果 252 第二節 研究限制 273 第三節 研究建議 275 參考文獻 280 附 錄 次 附錄一 「情緒特質」量表(專家評定量表-中文版) 297 附錄二 「情緒特質」量表國內、外專家評鑑名單 312 附錄三 「情緒特質」量表(專家評定量表-英文版) 314 附錄四 「情緒特質」量表專家意見表 336 附錄五 「情緒特質」量表(預試量表) 348 附錄六 「情緒特質」量表(正式量表) 364 表 次 表2-1-1正向非統整的動力 31 表2-1-2心理功能-從較低到較高的層次形式轉化摘要 36 表2-4-1較高形式的心理功能與資優特質的比較 102 表5-1-1Dabrowski & Piechowski在情緒發展層次論之相關研究 120 表2-1-4 Miller的五個發展層次類別編碼系統 125 表3-2-1預試樣本 134 表3-2-2重測樣本 134 表3-2-3正式施測學校 136 表3-3-1「情緒特質量表」預試項目分析摘要表 141 表3-3-2「情緒特質量表」預試量表之內容架構 142 表3-3-3「情緒特質量表」正式量表之內容架構 143 表3-3-4「情緒特質量表」正式量表內部一致性係數摘要表 145 表3-3-5「情緒特質量表」各分量表間之相關 146 表3-3-6「情緒特質量表」之重測信度 146 表4-1-1資優組在情緒特質量表之得分分配情形 161 表4-1-2普通組在情緒特質量表之得分分配情形 166 表4-1-3數理資優生與一般生在「情緒特質量表」各分量表與全量表之平均數與標準差 168 表4-1-4資優組與普通組在「情緒特質量表」各分量表與全量表之變異數分析摘要表 168 表4-2-1資優組在過度激動特質量表上之得分分配情形 173 表4-2-2資優組在過度激動特質量表上各題作答之情形 173 表4-2-3資優組在過度激動特質量表上之表現與張馨仁研究結果比較 176 表4-2-4普通組在過度激動特質量表上之人數分配情形 183 表4-2-5普通組在過度激動特質量表上各題作答之情形 183 表4-2-6資優組與普通組在「過度激動特質量表」各分量表之平均數與標準差 186 表4-2-7資優組與普通組在「過度激動特質量表」各分量表之變異數分析摘要表 187 表4-3-1資優組在基本人格量表上之人數分配情形 191 表4-3-2資優組在基本人格量表各組型之表現情形 192 表4-3-3普通組在基本人格量表上之人數分配情形 195 表4-3-4普通組在基本人格量表各組型之表現情形 196 表4-3-5資優組與普通組在「基本人格量表」各分量表與全量表之平均數與標準差 198 表4-3-6資優組與普通組在「基本人格量表」各分量表與全量表之變異數分析摘要表 199 表4-4-1情緒特質、過度激動特質及基本人格量表間得分之相關 219 表4-5-1不同情緒發展層次時過度激動特質之平均數與標準差 222 表4-5-2不同情緒發展層次時過度激動特質得分差異之變異數分析與單純主要效果摘要表 223 表4-6-1不同情緒發展層次時基本人格量表之平均數與標準差 226 表4-6-2不同情緒發展層次時基本人格量表得分差異之變異數分析與單純主要效果摘要表 230 表4-7-1負向特質極顯著之個案資料 250 圖 次 圖3-1-1研究架構 133 圖4-2-1資優組在過度激動特質量表之得分人數分配情形 178 圖4-2-1資優組在過度激動特質量表之得分人數分配情形 185

    參考文獻:
    一、 中文部分
    自由時報(民91):IQ高資優生EQ常是大問題。自由時報,3月4日,第六版。
    李乙明(民88):高中數理資優班學生情緒智力之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。
    吳武典、林幸台、王振德、郭靜姿(民88):基本人格量表指導手冊。台北:心理。
    教育部(民88):身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定原則鑑定基準。台北市。
    郭靜姿(民76):從影響資優發展的因素談資優學生的教學與輔導。資優教育季刊,23,1-6。
    郭靜姿(民89):談資優學生的特殊適應問題與輔導。資優教育季刊,75,1-6。
    郭靜晃、吳幸玲(譯),(民82),Newman, P. B. 原著:發展心理學。台北:揚智。
    陳正文等(譯)(民86),Schultz, D & Schultz, S. E. 原著:人格理論。台北:揚智。
    陳美芳(民83):資優生的心理輔導。載於開創資優教育的新世紀,國立台灣師大特教系所、中華民國特殊教育學會編印,255-271。
    張馨仁(民89):從Dabrowski的理論看資優生的情緒發展。資優教育季刊,74,6-18。
    張馨仁(民90):資優生過度激動特質之研究。國立台灣師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    黃勝雄(n.d.):正向面對不安,簡樸安渡困境  http://www.commonhealth.com.tw/New-heart/self/huang.htm(2002/6/8檢索)
    黃慧真(譯)(民83),Papalia, D. E. 原著:發展心理學。台北:桂冠。
    楊馥綸(民74):南區國民中學資賦優異學生與一般學生行為困擾影響因素之比較研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    劉慧慧(民91):國中資優生情緒智力與道德判斷關係之研究。國立台東師範學院教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    潘裕豐(民89):談資優學生的情意教育。資優教育季刊,77,1-7。
    歐陽萌君(民81):資優者成年入社會後之人格適應、自我實現及其生涯歷程之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    簡茂發、蔡崇建、陳玉珍(民86):資優概念探析。載於中華民國特殊教育學會主編:資優教育的革新與展望—開發潛能培育人才。北市:心理,3-19。

    二、 英文部分
    Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowski’s overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19(4), 229-236.
    Altman, R. (1983). Social-emotional development of gifted children and adolescents: A research model. Roeper Review, 6(2), 65-68.
    Ammirato, S. P. (1987). Comparison study of instruments used to measure developmental potential according to Dabrowski’s theory of emotional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, Co.
    Anonymous. (1999). Symptoms of depression. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 22(3), 7.
    Bandolato, L. A. (1998). Recognizing & meeting the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Today Magazine, 21(6), 32-37.
    Beach, B. J. (1981). Lesbian and nonlesbian women: Profiles of development and self-actualization. In N. Duda(Ed.). Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference(pp.85-111). Miami,FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Borofsky, G. L. (1981). Traditional and developmental concept of mental health in psychology and psychiatry with particular reference to the concept of psychic overexcitability and the concept of positive disintegration. In N. Duda(Ed.). Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference(pp.195-213). Miami,FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Brennan, T. (1987). Case study of multilevel development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northwestern, Northwestern, Co.
    Caprara, G. V. & Cervone, D. (2000). Personality:Determinants, dynamics, and potentials. Cambridge:Cambridge university press.
    Clark, B. (1988). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school(3th ed.). New York: Merrill.
    Clark, B. (1997). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school(5th ed.). New York: Merrill.
    Colangelo, N. & Pfleger, L. R. (1978). Academic self-concept of gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 1(1), 10-11.
    Coleman, L. J. & Cross, T. L. (2000). Social-emotional development and the personal experience of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mőnks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds). International handbook of giftedness and talent(2nd ed.)(pp.203-212). New York: Elsevier.
    Cropley, A. J. (1999). Creativity and cognition: producing effective novelty. Roeper Review, 21(4), 253-259.
    Dabrowski, K. & Aronson, J. (1964). Positive disintegration. Boston: Little, Brown.
    Dabrowski, K., Kawczak, A. & Piechowski, M. M. (1970). Mental growth: Through positive disintegration. London: Gryf Publications Ltd.
    Dabrowski, K. & Piechowski, M. M. (1977a). Theory of levels of emotional development(vol.1). New York: Dabor science publications.
    Dabrowski, K. & Piechowski, M. M. (1977b). Theory of levels of emotional development(vol.2). New York: Dabor science publications.
    Dana, N. F. & Lynch-Brown, C. (1991). Moral development of the gifted: Making a case for children’s literature. Roeper Review, 14(1), 13-16.
    Davis, G. A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis(Eds.). Handbook of gifted education(2nd ed.)(pp.269-281). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Dowd, E. T. (1989). The self and creativity. In A. Glover, R. R. Ronning & C. R. Reynolds(Eds), Handbook of creativity(pp.233-242). NY; Plenum Press.
    Eysenck, H. J. (1983). The roots of creativity: cognitive ability or personality trait? Roeper Review, 5(4), 10-12.
    Fern, T. L. (1991). Identifying the gifted child humorist. Roeper Review, 14(1), 30-34.
    Folsom, C. (1998). From a distance: joining the mind and moral character. Roeper Review, 20(4), 265-270.
    Freeman, J. (1995). Review of current thinking on the development of talent. In J. Freeman, P. Span, & H. Wagner(Eds.). Actualizing talent: A lifelong challenge(pp.3-19). Wiltshire: Redwood Books.
    Gage, D. F., Morese, P. A., & Piechowski, P. P.(1981). Measuring levels of emotional development. Genetic Psychology Monograph, 103, 129-152.
    Gallagher, S. A. (1985). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of overexcitabilities with measures of creativity and school achievement in sixth grade students. Unpublished master’s thesis, The University of Arizona, Tucson Arizona.
    Gallucci, N. T., Middleton, G. & Kline, A. (1999). Intellectually superior children and behavioral problems and competence. Roeper Review, 22(1), 18-21.
    Garland, A. F. & Zigler, E. (1999). Emotional and behavioral problems among intellectually gifted youth. Roeper Review, 22(1), 41-44.
    Gonz&aacute;lez, B. A. (1997). Gifted children and social maladjustment. In J. A. Leroux(Ed.), Connecting the Gifted community worldwide: Proceedings of the 12th world conference of the world council for gifted and talented children(pp.277-286). Seattle, Washington: The World Council For Gifted And Talented Children.
    Greenspon, T. S. (1998). The gifted self: Its role in development and emotional health. Roeper Review, 20(3), 162-167.
    Griffin, G. L. (2001). Parenting gifted adolescents. Gifted Child Today, 24(2), 54-58.
    Gross, M. U. M. (2002). Social and emotional issues for exceptionally intellectually gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.19-29). Washington: Prufrock.
    Grossberg, I. N. & Cornell, D. G. (1988). Relationship personality adjustment and high intelligence: Terman versus Hollingworth. Exceptional Children, 55(3), 266-272.
    Gust-Brey, K. & Cross, T. (1999). An examination of the literature base on the suicidal behaviors of gifted students. Roeper Review, 22(1), 28-35.
    Hague, W. (1981). Higher levels of emotional functioning and objectivity of value judgments. In N. Duda(Ed.). Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference(pp.249-258). Miami,FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Halsted, J. W. (1990). Guiding the gifted reader. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 321486)
    Hazell, C. G. (1982). An empirical study of the experience of emptiness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northwestern, Northwestern, Co.
    H&eacute;bert, T. P. & Neumeister, K. L. S. (2002). Fostering the social and emotional development of gifted children through guided viewing of film. Roeper Review, 25(1), 17-21.
    Howard-Hamilton, M. & Franks, B. A. (1995). Gifted adolescents: psychological behaviors, values, and development implications. Roeper Review, 17(3), 186-191.
    Kawczak, A. (1970). Introduction: The methodological structure of the theory of positive disintegration. In K. Dabrowski, A. Kawczak, & M. M.Piechowski (Eds). Mental growth: Through positive disintegration.(pp.1-16). London: Gryf Publications Ltd.
    Keynes, M. (1995). Creativity and psychopathology. Lancet, 345(8943), 138-139.
    Lewis, R. B., Kitano, M. K. & Lynch, E. W. (1992). Psychologocal intensities in gifted adults. Roeper Review, 15(1), 25-31.
    LoCicero, K. A. & Ashby, J. S. (2000). Multidimensional perfectionism in middle school age gifted students: a comparison to peers from the general cohort. Roeper Review, 22(3), 182-185.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15(1), 18-24.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1993). The quest for meaning: Counseling issue with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman(Ed.). Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.29-50). Denver: Love Co.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1994). Exceptionally gifted children: different minds. Roeper Review, 17(2), 116-122.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1997). Identity development in gifted children: moral sensitivity. Roeper Review, 20(2), 90-94.
    Lovecky, D. V. (1998). Spiritual sensitivity in gifted children. Roeper Review, 20(3), 178-183.
    Lysy, K. Z. (1981). Personal growth in counselors and noncounselors : A Jungian and Dabrowskian approach. In N. Duda(Ed.). Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference (pp.117-157). Miami,FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Lysy, K. Z. & Piechowski, M. M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108, 267-320.
    Matthews, D. J. (1999). Enhancing learning outcomes for diversely gifted adolescents: education in the social/emotional domain. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10(2), 57-68.
    Manaster, G. J. & Powell, P. M. (1983). A framework for understanding gifted adolescents’ psychological maladjustment. Roeper Review, 6(2), 70-73.
    Maxwell, E. (1985). The changing developmental needs of the gifted: Birth to maturity. In J. L. Genshaft, M. Bireley, C. L. Hollinger(Eds.). Severing gifted and talented students: A resource for school persommel(pp.17-30). Texas: PRO-ED, Inc.
    McWhorter, B. A. (1993). Chaos and positive disintegration: Transformation as a non-linear process in counseling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University, Colorado, Co.
    Miller, N. B. (1985). A content analysis coding system for assessing adult emotional development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, Co.
    Miller, N. B. (1991). Miller assessment coding system manual for rating levels of emotional development. Unpublished manuscript.
    Miller, N. B. & Silverman, L. K. (1987). Levels of personality Development. Roeper Review, 9(4), 221-225.
    Miller, N. B.; Silverman, L. K. & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development, intellectual ability, and gender. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 18(1), 20-38.
    Mudore, C. F. (2002). Are you introvert? Current Health, 2, 17-19.
    Nail, J. M. & Evans, J. G. (1997). The emotional adjustment of gifted adolescents: a view of global functioning. Roeper Review, 20(1), 18-21.
    Neihart, M. (1998). Creativity, the arts, and madness. Roeper Review, 21(1), 47-50.
    Neihart, M. (1999). The impact of giftedness on psychological well-being: What does the empirical literature say? Roeper Review, 22(1), 10-17.
    Neihart, M. (2002). Gifted children and depression. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.93-101). Washington: Prufrock.
    Nixon, L. (1994). Mystical stages and personality development. Paper presented at the Dabrowski Symposium, Keystone, Colorado, June 10.
    Norman, A. D., Ramsay, S. G., Martray, C. R. & Roberts, J. L. (1999). Relationship between levels of giftedness and psychosocial adjustment. Roeper Review, 22(1), 5-9.
    Nugent, S. A. (2000). Perfectionism: Is manifestations and classroom-based interventions. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 215-212.
    O’Connor, K. J. (2002). The application of Dabrowski’s theory to the gifted. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.51-60). Washington: Prufrock.
    Orange, C. (1997). Gifted students and perfectionism. Roeper Review, 20(1), 39-41.
    Paker, W. D. (1996). Psychological adjustment in mathematically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(3), 154-157.
    Parker, W. D. (2000). Healthy perfectionism in the gifted. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11(4), 173-182.
    Peterson, J. S. (2001). Gifted and at risk: Four longitudinal case studies of post-school development. Roeper Review, 24(1), 31-39.
    Platt, P. J. (1981). Analysis of an eminent person using Dabrowski’s theory of positive disintegration. In N. Duda(Ed.). Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the third international conference(pp.463-484). Miami, FL: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Plucker, J. A. (1997). Psychometric characteristics of the adolescent coping scale with academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 9(1), 5-14.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1975). A theoretical and empirical approach to the study of development. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 92, 231-297.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1978). Self-actualization as a developmental structure: A profile of Antoine de Saint-Exup&eacute;ry. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 97, 181-242.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1979). Levels of emotional development. Illinois Teacher, January/February, 134-139.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1989). Developmental potential and the growth of the self. In J. L. Vantassel-Baska & P. Olszewski-Kubilius(Eds.). Patterns of influence on gifted learns(pp.87-101). N.Y.: Teachers College.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1997a). Emotional giftedness: The measure of intrapersonal intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis(Eds.). Handbook of gifted education(2nd ed.)(pp.366-381). MA: Allyn and Bacon.
    Piechowski, M. M. (1997b). Emotional giftedness: An expanded view. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413695)
    Piechowski, M. M. (2002). Experiencing in a higher key: Dabrowski’s theory of and for the gifted. Gifted Education Communicator, Spring, 28-31, 35-36.
    Piechowski, M. M. & Colangole, N. (1984). Development potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2), 80-88.
    Rankel, M. D. (1981). The dis-ease of troubled children: how can we help them grow? In N. Duda(Ed.), Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the Third International Conference(pp.369-385). Miami, Fl: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Reynolds, C. R. & Bradley, M. (1983). Emotional stability of intellectually superior children versus nongifted peers as estimated by chronic anxiety levels. School Psychology Review, 12(2), 190-194.
    Rimm, S. (2002). Peer pressures and social acceptance of gifted students. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.13-18). Washington: Prufrock.
    Robinson, N. M. & Noble, K. D. (1991). Social-emotional development and adjustment of gifted children. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg(Eds.). Handbook of special education research and practice(vol.4). (pp.57-76). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
    Sandal-Miller, K. A. (1988). A comparison of Dabrowski’s concept of overexcitabilities with measures of verbal and mathematical attitude among academically precocious adolescents. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Denver, Denver, CO.
    Sayler, M. F. & Brookshire, W. K. (1993). Social, emotional, and behavioral adjustment of accelerated students, students in gifted classes, and regular students in eighth grade. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37(4), 150-154.
    Schmitz, C. C. & Galbraith, J. (1985). Managing the social and emotional needs of the gifted. Minneapolis: Free Spirit.
    Schuler, P. (2002). Perfectionism in gifted children and adolescents. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.71-79). Washington: Prufrock.
    Seeley, K. (1993). Gifted students at risk. In L. K. Silverman(Ed.). Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.263-275). Denver: Love Co.
    Siegle, D. & Schuler, P. A. (2000). Perfectionism differences in gifted middle school students. Roeper Review, 23(1), 39-44.
    Silverman, L. K. (1990). Social and emotional education of the gifted: the discoveries of Leta Hollingworth. Roeper Review, 7(3), 171-178.
    Silverman, L. K. (1993a). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman(Ed.). Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.3-28). Denver, CO: Love.
    Silverman, L. K. (1993b). A developmental model for counseling the gifted. In L. K. Silverman(Ed.). Counseling the gifted and talented (pp.51-78). Denver: Love Co.
    Silverman, L. K. (1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Reoper Review, 17(2), 110-116.
    Silverman, L. K. (2002). Asynchronous development. In M. Neihart, S. M. Reis, N. M. Robinson, & S. M. Moon(Eds.). The school and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?(pp.31-37). Washington: Prufrock.
    Silverman, L. K. & Ellsworth, E. (1981). The theory of positive disintegration and its implications for giftedness. In N. Duda(Ed.), Theory of positive disintegration: Proceedings of the Third International Conference (pp.179-194). Miami, Fl: University of Miami School of Medicine.
    Smutny, J. F. (2001). Spiritual intelligence(Book). Roeper Review, 24(1), 40-41.
    Stahl, N. N. & Stahl, R. J. (1991). We can agree after achieving consensus for a critical thinking component of a gifted program using the Delphi technique. Roeper Review, 14(2), 79-88.
    Tice, T. N. (1998). Overexcitability? The Education Digest, 63(8), 44.
    Tolan, S. S. (1998). The lemming condition: moral asynchrony and the isolated self. Roeper Review, 20(3), 211-214.
    Treffinger, D. J., Sortore, M. R. & Cross, J. A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K. A. Heller et. al.(Ed.), International handbook of research and development of gifted and talented(pp.555-565). N.Y.:Pergamon.
    Tucker, B. & Hafenstein, N. L. (1997). Psychology intensities in young gifted children. Gifted Children Quarterly, 41(3), 66-75.
    Webb, J. T. (1994). Nurturing social emotional development of gifted children. (ERIC Digest E527).
    Woodward, J. C. & Kalyan-Masih, V. K. (1990). Loneliness, coping strategies and cognitive styles of the gifted rural adolescent. Adolescence, 25(100), 977-988.

    QR CODE