研究生: |
吳姵儒 Wu, Pei-Ju |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
工程師人格特質對工作敬業之研究-以組織變革態度為中介變項 The Study on Engineers’ Personality Traits and Job Engagement: The Mediation Effect of Organizational Change Attitudes |
指導教授: |
林弘昌
Lin, Hung-Chang |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
科技應用與人力資源發展學系 Department of Technology Application and Human Resource Development |
論文出版年: | 2018 |
畢業學年度: | 106 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 69 |
中文關鍵詞: | 人格特質 、工作敬業 、組織變革態度 |
英文關鍵詞: | Personality traits, Job engagement, Organizational change attitudes |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/THE.NTNU.DTAHRD.012.2018.F06 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:160 下載:6 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在組織變革的情況下,難免造成員工心理上的抗拒或工作的不安全感,進而影響員工的工作敬業,導致內部優秀人才的流失。工程師為科技公司之核心角色,亦為組織的重要資產,變革推動成效也必須仰賴員工的支持。本研究主要目的想探究科技業工程師的人格特質、組織變革態度與工作敬業之關係,期望透過本研究能夠有進一步的瞭解,以提供企業推動組織變革時參考。本研究共計發放155份問卷,有效回收問卷為148份,有效回收率95%。回收的資料經彙整後分別以信效度分析、描述統計分析、迴歸分析及拔靴法等統計方法進行分析,研究結果發現:(1)人格特質對組織變革態度具有顯著影響,部分成立;(2)人格特質對工作敬業具有顯著影響,部分成立;(3)組織變革態度對工作敬業具有顯著影響,成立;(4)組織變革態度對人格特質與工作敬業具有部分中介效果。本研究根據研究結果提出管理實務上的建議,供日後企業進行組織變革時參考,以凝聚共識,提升企業及全體員工之生產力,達成永續經營的目標。
Under the organizational change process, employees’ psychological resistance and unsafely on jobs become more inevitable. This phenomenon further influences employees’ job engagement and leads to brain drain in organizations. Engineers are the core role of technology companies, and they are also important assets of the organization, the effectiveness of organizational change should depend on their support. The purpose of this study aims to investigate the relationships on personality traits, attitudes toward organizational change and job engagement for high-tech engineers in Taiwan. The significance of this study provides valuable results to organizations which had been undergoing organizational change as reference.
A total of 155 questionnaires distributed, and 148 were valid, yielding a response rate of 95%. The collected data were analyzed by statistical methods such as reliability and validity analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, multiple regression analysis and bootstrapping method. The results of the study indicate that:(1)Personality traits have significantly positive effect on Organizational change attitudes, partially established.(2)Personality traits have significantly positive effect on Job engagement, partially established.(3)Organizational change attitudes have significantly positive effect on Job engagement, established.(4)Organizational change attitudes have partial mediating effect between Personality traits and Job engagement.
Based on the research results, this study proposes management practices for reference in future organizational changes in order to build consensus, enhance the productivity of the company and its employees, and achieve the goal of sustainable management.
一、中文部份
余坤東、諸承明(2003)。組識變革推動者之情境知覺與變革策略之關聯。臺大管理論叢,13(2),199-232。
李中興、方至民(1994)。以關鍵作業流程為核心。戰力生產力雜誌,458,20-29。
沈哲生(2004)。組織變革工作再設計下員工工作特性、工作生活品質與工作投入關係之研究─以台電公司電力調度自動化為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學勞工研究所,嘉義縣。
林坤霖、楊麗安、蔡新永(2013)。五大人格特質與工作績效:工作態度的中介效果。全球商業經營管理學報,5,87-100。
林麗美、張和然(2015)。員工人格特質、工作價值觀、組織文化與組織承諾之關聯性研究-以A飯店為例。觀光與休閒管理期刊,3,143-157。
洪麗美(2005)。組織變革認知、工作壓力與組織承諾關係之研究-以改制後私立科技大學行政人員為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,高雄市。
張家瑞(2016)。人格特質、理財素養、理財態度與理財行為路徑關係之研究-以花東地區高中職教師為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系,台北市。
許士軍(2001)。管理學。台北:東華。
陳良榕(2017)。鳳梨酥模式:後蘋果時代,台灣科技業最後一搏。天下雜誌,626,68-71。
陳靜宜(2015)。主動性人格特質、工作生活平衡、工作敬業心與退卻行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學勞工關係學系暨研究所,嘉義縣。
曾雅苹(2013)。非營利組織薪資制度、員工組織承諾及工作敬業心關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班,高雄市。
黃于真(2013)。領導風格、知覺組織支持與工作敬業心關係之研究─傳統製造業為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班,高雄市。
黃如苹(2005)。員工人格特質對組織變革態度影響之研究-以財團法人金屬工業研究發展中心為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班,台南市。
黃慧雯(2016)。104:軟體人才荒人力缺口已超越硬體。台北:中時電子報。
溫金豐、錢書華、蘇建全(2007)。高科技組織工程專業人員工作不安全感之研究。東海科學,9(1),147-192。
劉玉玲(2001)。組織行為。台北:新文京開發。
蔡佩君(2007)。人格特質與框架效果對組織變革反應的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中正大學企業管理所,嘉義縣。
賴保禎、周文欽、林世華(1996)。心理與教育測驗。台北:空中大學。
簡珮玲(2018)。員工完美主義特質與工作敬業心關係之研究 -以工作家庭衝突為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學人力資源發展系碩士班,高雄市。
蘇鳳珠(2017)。人力資源管理與組織變革之關?性分析-以高雄市某地區醫院為例(未出版之碩士論文)。高苑科技大學經營管理研究所,高雄市。
二、外文部份
Alharbi, A., & Mamman, A. (2015). Why human resource management innovations have many versions not in theory but in practice. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 5(11), 214-229.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-884). Worchester, MA: Clark University Press.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Bakker, A. B., & Leiter, M. P. (Ed.) (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press.
Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P., & Taris, T. W. (2008). Work engagement: An emerging concept on occupational health psychology. Work & Stress, 22, 187-200.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Blumenthal, B., & Haspeslagh, P. (1994). Toward a definition of corporate transformation. Sloan Management Review, Spring, 101-106.
Buckingham, M., & Coffman, C. (1999). First, break all the rules. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Carnall, C. A. (1990). Managing change in organizations. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic trait into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Psychology, 38(4), 476-506.
Cattell, R. B. (1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore: Penguin Books.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89-136.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1989). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(1), 509-516.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6(1), 343-359.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organizational development and change. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
David, V. D., & Stanley, B. S. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42(1), 25-36.
Dawson, P. (1994). Organizational change: A process approach. London: Paul Chapman.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Elizur, D., & Guttman, L. (1976). The structure of attitudes toward work and technological change within an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 611-623.
Eysenck, H. J. (1982). A model for personality. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Friedman, M., & Roseman, R. H. (1974). Type a behavior and your heart. New York: Knopt.
Fujimoto, Y., Ferdous, A., Sekiguchi, T., & Sugianto, L.-F. (2016). The effect of mobile technology usage on work engagement and emotional exhaustion in Japan. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3315-3323.
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2001). Towards a process model of individual change in organization. Human Relations, 54(4), 419-444.
Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance management and employee engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2), 123-136.
Guilford, J. (1959). Personality. New York: McGraw Hill.
Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
Lu, C. Q., Siu, O. L., Q., C. W., & Wang, H. J. (2011). Family mastery enhances work engagement in chinese nurses: A cross-lagged analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78(1), 100-109.
Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422.
May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety, and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(12), 11-37.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Robbins, S. P. (1993). Organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice -Hall.
Robbins, S. P. (2000). Organization behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes and values. San Francisco: Jossey-Buss.
Rosenberg, D. (1993). Eliminating resistance to change. Security Management, 37(1), 20-21.
Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(7), 655-684.
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Salami, S. O. (2011). Job stress and burnout among lecturers: Personality and social support as moderators. Asian Social Science, 7(5), 110-121.
Salanova, M., Agut, S., & Peiro, J. (2005). Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: The mediation of service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1217-1227.
Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 111-131.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement a multi-sample study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(293-315).
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Schutte, N., Kalimo, R., & Schaufeli, W. (2000). The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-General Survey (MBI-GS) across occupational groups and nations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 53-66.
Vakola, M., Tsaousis, I., & Nikolaou, I. (2004). The role of emotional intelligence and personality variables on attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(1), 88-110.
Yousef, D. A. (2000). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of attitudes toward organizational change in a non-western setting. Personnel View, 29(5), 567-592.
Zabid, A. R., Murali, S., & Azmawani, A. R. (2004). The influence of organizational culture on attitudes toward organizational change. Leadership and Organization Development, 25(2), 161-179.