研究生: |
林昱瑄 Lin, Yu-Hsuan |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
青少女哪吒的生活世界:一群「在玩」青少女的認同形構及其教育意涵 The identity formation of “playgirls” and its implication on education |
指導教授: |
潘慧玲
Pan, Hui-Ling |
學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
系所名稱: |
教育學系 Department of Education |
論文出版年: | 2007 |
畢業學年度: | 95 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 237 |
中文關鍵詞: | 青少女文化 、勞工階級文化 、認同形構 、抗拒論 、勞動階級教育觀 |
英文關鍵詞: | girls’ culture, working-class culture, identity formation, resistance theory, critical pedagogy |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:255 下載:386 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究從三位「在玩」青少女的主體觀點出發,呈現其生活世界各個面向的文化經驗,目的在於挖掘這群都市勞工階級青少女的獨特文化和生活方式,以及她們成為一個「在玩」女孩的認同形構過程。並且希望透過她們在學校裡被邊緣化的經驗,反思主流教育體制的問題,以作為未來發展勞動階級教育觀的基礎。
研究方法採取質性研究的取向,邀請三位被師長們視為「問題學生」的國二青少女,作為本研究的參與者。在資料收集方式上,我主要是採深度訪談的方法,同時佐以校外生活的參與觀察和文件資料的分析。訪談內容包括她們日常生活的各個層面,如愛情、友誼、學校、幫派、工作、家庭、休閒娛樂,以及對於未來的規劃和想像。研究期間從她們國二下學期橫跨到國三畢業。
在研究發現的部分,首先,分別呈現「在玩」青少女在家庭、街角社會、學校、愛情這四個場域,所生產的文化形式,結果歸納出她們有以下幾個主要的文化概念:崇尚霸權式陽剛氣概、以愛情作為生活重心、順服刻板的性別文化、集體追求刺激的玩樂文化、高舉反學校文化、步入早熟的人生進程、重視實務取向的知識、展現漢人中心的意識型態。接著,分析討論「在玩」青少女的認同形構過程,結果發現女孩們因為在學校得不到成就感,她們所崇尚的文化價值也一再受到抱持中產階級信念的師長所貶抑,因此她們會轉而取用她們所熟悉的階級和性別文化,建立另一種可以與主流文化相抗衡的認同形式,以肯定自己的價值。這樣的認同形式促使她們在國中畢業後,大部分選擇離開學校,進入職場,成為「新勞工階級」的一員。另一方面,她們也都清楚未來生活將面臨嚴苛的現實挑戰,為了避免落入孤身奮戰的處境,她們都打算盡快和男性形成同盟關係(同居或結婚),以共同面對經濟上的艱難處境。在這個過程中,抗拒與再製的作用同時都在發生。最後,研究者再根據她們的文化、認同和在學校所遭受的對待,提出學校教育所應省思的部分,以及未來從事反再製教育的方向。
This research, adopting the perspectives of three teenage “playgirls”, tries to represent the cultural experiences of their world. The purpose is to explore the culture and lifestyle of these urban working-class girls, and their identity formation of becoming “playgirls”. Through their marginal experiences in the school, the issue of mainstream education system is reflected and suggestions about developing critical pedagogy are proposed.
The research participants are three junior high school girls, who are labeled as “bad girls” by the school faculty. Qualitative methods such as in-depth interview, observation and document analysis are employed. The interview data covers almost every aspect of their life, including dating, friendship, popular culture, school, family, work and their expectations about future. The research period spans from their eighth grade to ninth grade in junior high school.
The research findings are as follows:
First of all, there are some themes in “playgirls”’ culture. For example, they tend to be highly valueing hegemonic masculinity, centering their life around romance, having accelerated life course, emphasizing practical knowledge, enjoying fooling around in flocks, and having anti-school culture, biased gender culture and Han-centered ideology. Secondly, in terms of the identity formation process of the “playgirls”, it is found that when they fail in school, they may appropriate the class and gender culture inherited from home and their working-class community as raw materials to establish an alternative identity to resist their subordinate position in school. This identity pushes them to the job market right after graduation from junior high school and to get married at an early age. In the process, resistance and reproduction work together. Finally, based on these three girls’ culture, identity and experiences in school, suggestions for school education are proposed.
中華民國基層教師協會(2004,5月)。發展勞動階級的教育觀。勞動家庭與基進教育改革系列論壇Part-1,台北市。
王彥蘋(2002)。狂喜舞舞舞─台灣瑞舞文化的追尋。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文,未出版:台北市。
王淑女、侯崇文、林桂碧、夏春祥、周愫嫻(譯)(2002)。社會學的概念與特色。Judson R. Landis著。台北市:洪葉文化。
王雅莉(2002)。越軌?轉位:青少年參與八家將團體之分析。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文。
王慧婉(2006,11月)。看見。本文發表於中華民國基層教師協會所主辦之《勞動教育觀—紀錄片論壇系列》,台北市。
王慧蘭(2006)。批判教育學:反壓迫的民主教育論述和多元實踐。載於李錦旭、王慧蘭(主編),批判教育學:台灣的探索(頁59-94)。台北市:心理。
吳芝儀、李奉儒(譯)(1995)。質的評鑑與研究。M. Q. Patton著。台北:桂冠。
吳瑾嫣(2000)。女性遊民研究:家的另類意涵。應用心理研究,8,83-120。
吳瓊洳(2000)。國中學生反學校文化之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,台北市。
呂木蘭(2004,11月)。性別議題融入鄉土教育之行動研究—以大甲媽祖信仰為例。本文發表在台灣性別平等教育協會所主辦之性別教育與行動研究研討會,台北市。
宋文里(1993)。誰是垃圾的主人翁?—談「青少年問題論述」的問題。張老師月刊,192,48-56。
宋文里(2000,4月)。再現青少年。本文發表於台灣師範大學所主辦之青少年人格建構研討會,台北市。
李文英(2004,5月)。玫瑰花後的真實~走進媽媽的勞動世界。本文發表於中華民國基層教師協會所主辦之《發展勞動階級的教育觀》,台北市。
李奉儒(2006)。Paulo Freire批判教學論的探索與反思。載於李錦旭、王慧蘭(主編),批判教育學:台灣的探索(頁97-136)。台北市:心理。
李根芳、周素鳳(譯)(2003)。John Storey著。文化理論與通俗文化導論。台北市:巨流。
李莉菁(2001)。國小教師對學生的分類方式及其成因之探討。國立新竹師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文。
林兆衛(2002)。台北都會區青少年偶像崇拜文化之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。
林昱貞(2002)。批判教育學在台灣:發展與困境。教育研究集刊,48 (4),1-25。
林昱瑄(2007,3月)。一群「愛玩」青少女的生活方式及其抗拒意涵。發表於國立屏東教育大學幼兒教育學系所主辦的「教育與文化論壇:教育的文化/文化的教育」,屏東市。
俞智敏、陳光達、陳素煤、張君玫(譯)(1995)。Pamela Abbott & Claire Wallace著。女性主義觀點的社會學。台北市:巨流。
胡慕情(2007,4月30日)。勞動人權,教科書裡看不到。台灣立報。
范麗娟(2004)。深度訪談。載於謝臥龍(主編),質性研究(頁81-126)。台北:心理。
夏林清(1999,3月31日)。穿針引線看家庭。台灣立報。
夏林清(2007,3月)。另謀出路(Alternative)~拮抗空間的協作關係。本文發表於國立屏東教育大學所主辦之教育與文化論壇,屏東市。
翁士勛(2002)。國中學生抗拒型態之質性研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
高玉潔(1998)。學生文化之研究—以桃園縣一所國中學生為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
高強華(1993)。青少年次級文化的瞭解和運用。臺灣教育,511,11-15。
高毓婷(2001)。台北都會區青少年消費文化初探--以兩所不同社會階級學區的國中為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
張如慧(2002)。民族與性別之潛在課程—以原住民女學生為例。台北:師大書苑。
張建成(2002)。批判的教育社會學研究。台北市:學富。
張春興(1996)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華書局。
張慧英(譯)(1997)。Mary Pipher著。拯救奧菲莉亞。台北市:平安。
張馨尹(2005)。1987-2004年臺灣職業教育政策發展與回顧。國立台灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。
張馨濤(譯)(2002)。Peggy Orenstein著。校園中的女學生:探究年輕女孩自尊與自信的缺口。台北市:女書。
畢恆達(1996)。詮釋學與質性研究。載於胡幼慧(主編),質性研究(頁27-45)。台北市:巨流。
許誌庭(2002)。教師作為轉化型知識份子的可能性、限制與實踐方向。教育研究集刊,48(4),27-52。
陳光中、秦文力、周愫嫻(譯)(1991)。Neil J. Smelser著。社會學。台北市:桂冠。
陳伯璋、張盈堃(2007)。行行重行行:我們走在批判教育學的路上。學校教師的生活世界:批判教育學的在地實踐(頁xiii-xix)。台北:師大書苑。
陳奎喜(1990)。學生次級文化。本文出自教育社會學研究(頁225-262)。台北市:師大書苑
陳珊華(2004)。小學生文化資本之累積與作用。國立台灣師範大學教育學系博士論文。
陳偉鳳(2005)。好攝之徒?!青少年自拍次文化之認同建構初探。元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文。
陳惠雯(2006,11月)。另類體驗課程:走出校園內外真實生活。本文發表於中華民國基層教師協會所主辦之《勞動教育觀—紀錄片論壇系列》,台北市。
章勝傑(2003)。中輟現象的真實與建構:一些討論與反省。台北市:心理。
彭秉權(譯)(2005)。批判教育學的議題與趨勢。B. Kanpol著。高雄市:麗文文化。
彭寶瑩(1992)。一群社會新貴的掘起:談青少年次文化。學生輔導通訊,21,88-90。
曾如瑩(譯)(2003)。Rachel Simmons著。怪女孩出列:揭開女孩間的隱性攻擊文化。台北市:商周。
游美惠(2001)。多元文化教育的理論基礎。載於譚光鼎、劉美惠、游美惠(主編),多元文化教育(頁13-55)。台北:國立空中大學。
童琬芬(2002)。青少年漫畫閱讀文化之研究—以台北都會區兩所國中為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃武雄(1999)。札加克太太和她的影子。Tracy Kidder著學童紀事(頁1-6)。吳真美譯。台北:先覺。
黃淑君(2000)。社會階級與青少年性別世界之建構--以台北都會區兩所國中為例。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黃儒傑(2000)。教育機會均等與社會正義。教師之友,41(3),13-19。
黃鴻文(1994)。學生次文化:研究、理論與方法論之檢討。國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系社會教育學刊,23,149-193。
黃鴻文(2000)。中學生次文化—反智主義乎?國立臺灣師範大學社會教育學系社會教育學刊,29,171-195。
黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。台北市:學富。
楊洲松(2004)。當代文化與教育—文化研究學派與批判教學論的取向。台北市:洪葉。
楊恩慈、柯伯儒(2007)。我在風頭水尾的教育實踐與省思—一位偏遠地區的女性教育工作者與傅雷葉的對話。學校教師的生活世界:批判教育學的在地實踐(頁181-206)。台北:師大書苑。
楊瑩(1994)。台灣地區不同家庭背景子女受教機會差異之研究。教育研究資訊,2(3),1-22。
達努巴克(2007,3月)。「上課了!」:部落教室的教學紀事。本文發表於國立屏東教育大學所主辦之教育與文化論壇,屏東市。
寧應斌、何春蕤(2000)。邁向多元文化教育視野下的性教育。本文出自何春蕤主編,從酷兒空間到教育空間,頁373-398。台北市:麥田。
廖年淼(2003)。台灣高職教育發展的隱憂。中等教育,54(4),136-147。
廖年淼、劉孟珊(2004)。高中職教育資源投入之比較分析。教育政策論壇,7(1),41-58。
齊力、董旭英主編(2003)。台灣青少年偏差行為之剖析。嘉義縣:南華大學教社所。
劉泗翰(譯)(2004)。性/別:多元時代的性別角力。R. W. Conell著。台北市:書林。
劉惠琴(2003)。導讀:青少女的性別之牆。出自Rachel Simmons所著怪女孩出列:揭開女孩間的隱性攻擊文化(頁3-6)。台北市:商周。
潘慧玲(1999,6月)。教育學發展的女性主義觀點:女性主義教育學初探。論文發表於臺灣師範大學教育學系舉辦之「教育科學:國際化或本土化」國際學術研討會,台北市。
潘慧玲(2003)。教育研究的取徑:概念與應用。台北市:高等教育。
蔡聿文、張盈堃(2007)。從《山豬、飛鼠、撒可努》談起—一個教育現場解放經驗的實踐與反思。學校教師的生活世界:批判教育學的在地實踐(頁265-281)。台北:師大書苑。
蔡幸秀(2006)。青少年刺青次文化認同初探。元智大學資訊社會研究所碩士論文。
蔡慧敏(2001)。青少年參與家將團的背景及影響—以官將首少年為主。東吳大學社會工作研究所碩士論文。
蕭昭君、陳巨擘(譯)(2003)。Peter McLaren著。校園生活:批判教育學導論。台北市:巨流。
鍾佳沁(2001)。全球化下搖頭次文化再現之研究--台北的搖頭空間。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
鍾佩怡(2002)。我把羅曼史變教材了。台北:女書。
藍采風(2000)。社會學。台北市:五南。
羅燦煐(1998)。事出有因,情有可原?:台灣青少年對約會強暴之寬容性研究,載於中央大學性/別研究室主編第三屆性教育、性學、性別研究暨同性戀研究國際學術研討會論文集。
蘇芊玲(2007)。一個關於人與內涵的故事—台灣性別平等教育協會的行動經驗。本文發表於世新大學性別研究室所主辦之性別平等教育專業發展研討會。五月二十五至二十六日。台北:世新大學。
龔玉玲(2003)。怪胎哪吒「現身」「說法」—現代新編文本中的哪吒圖像。中外文學,32(3),125-140。
American Association of University Women (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America: A national poll to assess self esteem, educational experiences, interest in math and science, and career aspiration of girls and boys aged 9-15. (ERIC No. ED 340 657)
American Association of University Women (1995). How schools shortchange girls: A study of major findings on girls and education. New York: Marlowe & Company.
Anyon, J. (1981a). Social class and school knowledge. Curriculum inquiry, 11, 3-42.
Anyon, J. (1981b). Elementary schooling and distinctions of social class. Innterchange, 12, 118-132.
Anyon, J. (1984). Intersections of gender and class: Accommodation and resistance by working-class and affluent females to contradictory sex role ideologies. Journal of education, 166(1), 25-48.
Apple, M. (1980). The other side of the hidden curriculum: Correspondence theories and the labor process. Journal of education, 162(1), 47-66.
Apple, M. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. London: Routledge.
Apple, M. W., & Weis, L. (Eds.). (1983). Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Archer, L. & Leathwood, C. (2003). New times- old inequalities: Diverse working- class femininities in education. Gender and Education, 15(3), 227-236.
Arnot, M. (2004). Male working class identities and social justice: A reconsideration of Paul Willis’s Learning to Labour in light of contemporary research. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 17-40). New York: Routledge.
Aronowitz, S. (2004). Foreword. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. ix-xiii). New York: Routledge.
Barker, C. (2000). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Bradley, H. (1996). Fractured identities: Changing patterns of inequality. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Burton, L., Obeidallah, D., & Allison, K. (1995). Social context and adolescence: Perspectives on development among inner-city African–American teens. In L. Crockett & A. Crouter (Eds.), Pathways through adolescence: Individual development in relation to social contexts (pp. 119-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Burton, L., Obeidallah, D., & Allison, K. (1996). Ethnographic insights on social context and adolescent development among inner-city African-American teens. In R. Jessor, A. Colby, & R. Shweder (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 395-418). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Carlson, D. & Dimitriadis, G. (2003). Introduction. In G. Dimitriadis & D. Carlson (Eds.), Promises to keep (pp. 1-35). New York: Routledge Falmer.
Cho, M. K. (2000). Bodily regulation and vocational schooling. Gender and Education, 12 (2), 149-164.
Choi, J. A. (2005). New generation’s career aspirations and new ways of marginalization in a postindustrial economy. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26 (2), 269-283.
Cloward, R., & L. Ohlin (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. New York: Free Press.
Cohen, A. K. (1955). Delinquent boys: The culture of the gang. New York: The Free Press.
Cohen, P. (1972). Subcultural conflict and working-class community. In Gelder & S. Thornton (1997)(Eds.), The subcultures reader. London: Routledge.
Collins, J. L. (1995). Discourse and resistance in urban elementary classrooms: A poststructuralist perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Franciaco. (ERIC No. ED 386 506)
Connell, R. W., Ashenden, D. J., Kessler, S. & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: School, families and social division. Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Cowie, C. & Lees, S. (1981). Slags or drags. Feminist Rreview, 9, 17-31.
Eckert, P. (1993). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fine, M. & Rosenberg, P. (1983). Dropping out of high school: The ideology of school and work. Journal of Education, 165 (3), 257-272.
Fine, M. (1989). Silencing and nurturing voice in an improbable context: Urban adolescents in public school. In H. A. Giroux & P. McLaren (Eds.), Critical pedagogy, the state, and cultural struggle (pp. 152-173). New York: State University of New York Press.
Frankenberg, R. (1993). White women, race matters: The social construction of whiteness. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Freie, C. (2005). Class construction: White working-class student identity in the new millennium. New York: State University of New York Press.
Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. Oxford: Westview.
Fuller, M. (1980). Black girls in a London comprehensive school. In R. Deem (Ed.), Schooling for women’s work (pp. 52-65). London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.
Gelder, K. (1997). Introduction to part two, part three. In K. Gelder, & S. Thornton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 83-89, 145-148). New York: Routelege.
Gelder, K., & Thornton, S. (Eds.). (1997). The subcultures reader. New York: Routelege.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Giroux, H. (1980). Beyond the correspondence theory: Notes on the dynamics of educational reproduction and transformation. Curriculum inquiry, 10 (3), 225-247.
Giroux, H. (1983). Theories of reproduction and resistance in the new sociology of education: A critical analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 257-293.
Griffin, C. (1985). Typical girls? Young women from schools to the job market. London: Routlede.
Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London: Sage.
Hall, S., & Jefferson, T. (Eds.). (1975). Resistance Through Rituals: Youth subcultures in post-war Britain. London: Hutchinson.
Hargreaves, (1982). Resistance and relative autonomy theories: Problems of distortion and incoherence in recent Marxist analyses of education. British journal of sociology of education, 3(2), 107-126.
Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The meaning of style. New York: Routledge.
Holland, D., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement and college. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Howell, J. (1973). Hard living on Clay Street: Portraits of blue-collar families. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
Jackson, C. (2002). ‘Laddishness’ as a self-worth protection strategy. Gender and Eeducation, 14(1), 37-51.
Jenkins, R. (1996). Social identity. New York: Routledge.
Kenway, J. & Kraack, A. (2004). Reordering work and destabilizing masculinity. In N. Dolby & G. Dimitriadis (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 95-109). New York: Routledge.
Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lees, S. (1986). Losing out: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Hutchinson.
Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. London: Penquin Books.
Macdonald, N. (2001). The graffiti subculture: Youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York. New York: Palgrave.
McCarthy, C. (1988). Rethinking liberal and radical perspectives on racial inequality in schooling: Making the case for nonsynchrony. Harvard educational review, 58(3). 265-279.
McCarthy, C. (1990). Nonsynchrony and social difference: An alternative to current radical accounts of race and schooling. In Race and curriculum: Social inequality and the theories and politics of difference in contemporary research on schooling (pp. 71-96). Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.
McCarthy, C., & Apple, M. (1988). Race, class and gender in American educational research: Toward a nonsynchronous parallelist position. In L. Weis (Ed.), Class, race and gender in American education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
McIntosh, P. (1990). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent school, 49 (2), pp. 31-35.
McLaren, P. (1988). Foreword: Critical theory and the meaning of hope. In H. A. Giroux, Teachers as intellectuals (pp. ix-xxi). Granby, MA: Bergin & Garvey.
McRobbie, A. (1977). The culture of working-class girls. In Feminism and youth culture (pp. 44-66). London: Macmillan Press.
McRobbie, A. (1978). Working class girls and the culture of femininity. In Women take issue.
McRobbie, A. (1991). Feminism and youth culture. London: Macmillan Press.
McRobbie, A. (1994). Stand up and dance: Youth culture and changing modes of femininity. In Postmodernism and popular culture (pp. 155-176). New York: Routledge.
Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
Miller, W. (1958). Lower-class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of social issues, 15, 5-19.
Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Musgrave, P. W. (1988). Socialising contexts. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
Ortner, S. (1991). Reading America: Preliminary notes on class and culture. In Richard, G. F., (Ed.), Recapturing anthropology: Working in the present (pp. 42-73). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Ortner, S. B. (1993). Ethnography among the Newark: The class of 58 of Weequahic high school. Michigan Quarterly Review, 32(3), 410-429.
Ortner, S. B. (1998). Identities: The hidden life of class. Journal of anthropological research, 54(1), 1-17.
Perry, P. (2002). Shades of white: White kids and racial identities in high school. Durham: Duke University Press.
Proweller, A. (1998). Constructing female identities: Meaning making in an upper middle class youth culture. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Quinney, R. (1977). Class, state and crime. New York: David Mckay.
Rallis, S. F. & Rossman, G. B. (1998). Learning in the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sennett, R. & Cobb, J. (1972). The hidden injuries of class. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage Publications.
Smith, L. (1978). Sexist assumptions and female delinquency: An empirical investigation. In B. Smart & C. Smart (Eds.), Women, sexuality and social control (pp. 74-86). London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.
Smith, P. (2001). Cultural theory: An introduction. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Stacey, J. (2005). Up against whiteness: Race, school, and immigrant youth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sylvester, P. S. (1994). Elementary school curricula and urban transformation. Harvard Educational Review, 64 (3), pp. 309-331.
Thomas, C. (1980). Girls and counter-school culture. Melbourne working papers.
Thornton, (1997). General introduction. In K. Gelder, & S. Thornton (Eds.), The subcultures reader (pp. 1-7). New York: Routelege.
University of Birmingham, Center for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Women’s Studies Group (1978). Women take issues: Aspects of women's subordination. London : Hutchinson.
Valli, L. (1983). Becoming clerical workers: Bussiness education and the culture of femininity. In M. Apple & L. Weis (Eds.), Ideology and practice in schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Wallace, C. (1987). For richer for poorer: Growing up in and out of work. London: Tavistock.
Weiler, J. D. (2000). Codes and contradictions: Race, gender identity and schooling. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Weis, L. & Fine, M. (2004). Working method: Research and social justice. New York: Routledge.
Weis, L. & Fine, M. (2004). Working method: Research and social justice. New York: Routledge.
Weis, L. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrializing economy. New York: Routledge.
Weis, L. (2004). Class reunion: The remaking of the American white working class. New York: Routledge.
Wexler, P. (1988). Symbolic economy of identity and denial of labor: Studies in high school number1. In L. Weis (Ed.), Class, race and gender in American education (pp. 302-315). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Wexler, P. (1992). Becoming somebody: Toward a social psychology of school. London: Falmer Press.
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society: The social structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Willis, P (1977). Learning to labour: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: John Wiley &Sons.
Wilson, D. (1978). Sexual codes and conduct: A study of teenage girls. In B. Smart & C. Smart (Eds.), Women, Sexuality and Social Control (pp. 65-73). London: Routledge & Kegal Paul.
Wolpe, A. M. (1978). Education and the sexual division of labour. In A. Kuhn & A. M. Wolpe (Eds.), Feminism and materialism: Women and modes of production. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Woods, P. (1983). Sociology and the school—An interactionist viewpoint. London: