社群媒體的普及改變了人們彼此溝通與瞭解世界的方式，匿名社群媒體透過匿名特性的優勢，減輕使用者貼文時的阻力，成了部分群眾對主題發表意見的重要管道，Facebook匿名版是現今社會中受到歡迎同時也具有爭議性的匿名社群媒體之一。
本研究以圖書館匿名社群—Facebook匿名版「靠北圖書館」上的1080則貼文作為研究對象進行內容分析，以「貼文迴響」、「發文者身分揭露」、「貼文包含目的」、「抱怨對象身分揭露」、「圖書館員抱怨圖書館員對象身分揭露」、「場所揭露方式」五大觀察項目之框架進行編碼，對匿名版中的活動情形與匿名版中不同發文者的貼文目的與特性提出見解，藉此了解圖書館場域之內外部人士發文呈現在匿名版中的樣貌，進一步清晰圖書館匿名版社群中的特性並瞭解圖書館場域中正面臨到的挑戰。
根據研究結果，提出了未來對於匿名版與圖書館人力資源研究可能性的建議，期望匿名社群媒體能夠被視為組織了解各組織關係者的管道，並提醒組織的管理者應更加注意匿名社群媒體中可能顯示出的潛在危機。

The popularity of social media has changed how people communicate with each other and know about the world. Some social media provide the anonymous feature to increase the willingness of users to express their opinions, and confessions pages on Facebook are one kind of them. Confessions pages on Facebook are both popular and controversial.
This study analyzes 1080 posts on the Facebook confessions page "Kao-Bei Library" to explore user activities and post features. This study developed a coding scheme which includes the identities of posters, the purposes of posts, objects of complaints, the identifies of librarians who were complained by other librarians, and the ways of representing places.
The result can apply to organizational management, expecting anonymous social media to be considered as a tool to understand the relationships within an organization, thus pay more attention to the potential crisis. Also, this study provides suggestions for anonymous social media studies and librarian's human resource studies.

American Library Association, & Reference and User Services Association. (2004). Benefits and drawbacks of anonymous online communication: Legal challenges and communicative recommendations. Retrieved form http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/rusa/resources/guidelines/guidelinesbehavioral.cfm
Anonymous. (1998). To reveal or not to reveal: A theoretical model of anonymous communication. Communication Theory, 8, 381–407.
Azechi, S. (2005). Informational humidity model: explanation of dual modes of community for social intelligence design. AI & SOCIETY, 19(1), 110-122.
Barari, S. (2016). Analyzing latent topics in student confessions communities on Facebook. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05193
Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., Van Wagoner, P., & Keplinger, K. (2018). Emotional labor within teams: outcomes of individual and peer emotional labor on perceived team support, extra-role behaviors, and turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 43(1), 38-71.
Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. NY. Free Presss.
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research , 1, 99–112.
Bounds, A. (2013).‘Confessions’:Anonymous Facebook pages gain popularity among Boulder High School, collegestudents.Huffington Post,. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/confessions-facebook-page-cu-boulder-students n2962252.html.
Bowman, L. M. (2001). Online anonymity wins again. Retrieved from http://news.cnet.com
Chen, G. M. (2015). Why do women bloggers use social media? Recreation and information motivations outweigh engagement motivations. New Media & Society, 17(1), 24-40.
Christopherson, K. M. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions:“On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3038-3056.
Cirucci, A. M. (2015). Facebook's affordances, visible culture, and anti-anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on social media & society (p. 11). ACM.
Cohen, J. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, J. S. (2012). The paracrisis: The challenges created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public relations review, 38(3), 408-415.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in human behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
Fan, W., & Gordon, M. D. (2014). The power of social media analytics. Commun. Acm, 57(6), 74-81.
Grandey, A. A., & Gabriel, A. S. (2015). Emotional labor at a crossroads: Where do we go from here?. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 323-349.
Grandey, C. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 95-110.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hootsuite(2019). The Global State of Digital in 2019 Report. Retrieved from: https://hootsuite.com/pages/digital-in-2019
Hu, X., & Shi, J. (2015). Employees' surface acting in interactions with leaders and peers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(8), 1132-1152.
Hülsheger, U. R., & Schewe, A. F. (2011). On the costs and benefits of emotional labor: a meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 16(3), 361.
Ingraham, C. (2014). The Google misery index: The times of year we're most depressed, anxious and stressed. The Washington Post. Retrieved from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/12/03/the-google-misery-index-the-times-of-year-were-most-depressed-anxious-and-stressed /
Kottner, J., Audigé, L., Brorson, S., Donner, A., Gajewski, B. J., Hróbjartsson, A., ... & Streiner, D. L. (2011). Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. International journal of nursing studies, 48(6), 661-671.
Krishna, A. & Kim, S.(2015). Confessions of an angry employee : The dark side of de-identified “confessions” on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 41(3), 404-410.
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 159-174.
Martínez-Iñigo, D., Totterdell, P., Alcover, C. M., & Holman, D. (2007). Emotional labour and emotional exhaustion: Interpersonal and intrapersonal mechanisms. Work & Stress, 21(1), 30-47.
Marx, G. (2004). Internet anonymity as a reflection of broader issues involving technology and society. Asia-Pacific Review, 11(1), 142-166.
Marx, G. T. (1999). What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity. The Information Society, 15(2), 99-112.
Matteson, M. L., & Miller, S. S. (2012). Emotional labor in librarianship: a research agenda. Library & Information Science Research, 34(3), 176-183.
Mello, J. A. (2006). Strategic human resource managemant (2nd ed), Ohio, USA: Thomson.
Morio, H., & Buchholz, C. (2009). How anonymous are you online? Examining online social behaviors from a cross-cultural perspective. Ai & Society, 23(2), 297-307.
Mostyn, M. M. (2000). The need for regulating anonymous remailers. International Review of Law, Computers, & Technology, 14, 79-88.
New York Times (2013), Owning Up. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/campus-confessions-pages-are-on-the-rise.html?_r=0
O'Connor (2005). I’m the guy they called Deep Throat. Retrieved from https://www.vanityfair.com/news/politics/2005/07/deepthroat200507
Ozcelik, H. (2013). An empirical analysis of surface acting in intra-organizational relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 291-309.
Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 331-369). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341-371.
Qiu, L., Lin, H., Leung, A. K., & Tov, W. (2012). Putting their best foot forward: Emotional disclosure on Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 569-572.
Rains, S. A. & Scott, C. R.(2007).To identify or not to identify: A theoretical model of receiver responses to anonymous communication, Communication Theory, 17, 61-91.
Richardson, K. M. (2017). Managing employee stress and wellness in the new millennium. Journal of occupational health psychology, 22(3), 423.
Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing Media Messages. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203551691
Sai, H., & Orito, Y. (2011, July). Information offering by anonymous in Japanese Human Flesh Search: Analysis of motivation in social media platform. In 2011 IEEE/IPSJ International Symposium on Applications and the Internet (pp. 592-595).
Santana, A. D. (2014). Virtuous or vitriolic: The effect of anonymity on civility in online newspaper reader comment boards. Journalism practice, 8(1), 18-33.
Scott, C. R., Rains, S. A., & Haseki, M. (2011). Anonymous communication unmasking findings across fields. Annals of the International Communication Association, 35(1), 299-340.
Stephanie, S. (2014). Students tell all on anonymous Facebook ‘confession’ pages. Retrieved from https://www.mercurynews.com/2013/03/18/students-tell-all-on-anonymous-facebook-confession-pages/
Stevens, M.(2018). Starbucks C.E.O. Apologizes After Arrests of 2 Black Men. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/us/starbucks-philadelphia-black-men-arrest.html
Stewart, S. M., & McBride-Chang, C. (2000). Influences on children’s sharing in a multi-cultural setting. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 333-348.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1997) Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 7(3), 321-326.
Taddicken, M. (2014). The ‘privacy paradox’in the social web: The impact of privacy concerns, individual characteristics, and the perceived social relevance on different forms of self-disclosure. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 248-273.
Wabgchuk, T. (2018). Confessions Pages: Does It Deserve A Closer Look?. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 8(5), 8-13.
Wang, W., Hernandez, I., Newman, D. A., He, J., & Bian, J. (2016). Twitter Analysis: Studying US Weekly Trends in Work Stress and Emotion. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 65(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12065
ET Today生活中心（2015）。網友靠北60秒害慘員工　麥當勞不玩了：活動20日結束。檢自：https://www.ettoday.net/news/20150719/537446.htm
王梅玲、謝寶煖 （2014）。圖書資訊學導論。台北市：五南出版。
佐藤昌司（2019）。くら寿司、客離れが深刻…「捨てた魚を調理」動画投稿、騒動連発の裏に従業員教育の欠如。檢自：https://biz-journal.jp/2019/06/post_28307.html
吳宜家（2018）。社群媒體對警察科層文化之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，台北市。
林良昇、鍾智凱（2015）。縱容謾罵楊又穎 「靠北部落客」挨轟。檢自：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/paper/874137
林南宏、 胡珈瑄（2017）。線上使用者匿名傾向的前因及結果。商略學報 ，9(1)，17-36。
金穎清、 郭家崴（2015）。麥當勞得來速60秒服務今晚喊卡。檢自：https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20150720000327-260106?chdtv
長橋亮文（2019）。大戸屋、１２日に一斉休業　不適切動画の投稿受け勉強会。檢自：https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASM344JHRM34ULFA01F.html
胡怡萍（2015）。情緒勞務與組織支持對離職意圖影響之研究-以工作倦怠為中介效果（未出版之碩士論文）。健行科技大學，桃園市。
張乃文（2009）。教師情緒素養建立之研究：情緒勞務負荷的觀點。臺中教育大學學報，23(1) ，75-98。
教育部（2011）。臺灣閩南語常用詞辭典。檢自：https://twblg.dict.edu.tw/holodict_new/result_detail.jsp?n_no=5848&curpage=1&sample=%EF%BC%9F%EF%BC%9F%EF%BC%9F%EF%BC%9F&radiobutton=1&querytarget=1&limit=100000&pagenum=1&rowcount=513
陳書梅（2003）。我國公立大學暨學院圖書館館員工作壓力源之調查研究，大學圖書館，7(1)， 25-55。
陳書梅（2004）。館員工作壓力因應行為研究－以我國公立大學暨學院圖書館為例，圖書資訊學刊，1(4)， 37-57.。
陳書梅（2010）。讀者服務館員負面工作情緒之實證研究 －以公共圖書館為例，圖書資訊學刊，8 (1)，59-96。
陳書梅（2011）。流通館員背景因素的個別差異對其情緒勞務影響之研究－以臺灣地區之大學圖書館為例，圖書資訊學研究，6(1)， 31-67。
陳書梅（2012）。流通館員情緒勞務與情緒耗竭之調查研究：以大學圖書館之刁難讀者服務為例，教育資料與圖書館學，50(1)，5-39。
陳書梅（2013）。大學圖書館流通館員因應攻擊性讀者之服務策略研究：從情緒勞務的層面探討，教育資料與圖書館學，50(4)， 461-489。
陳書梅（2016）。公共圖書館讀者服務館員遭遇問題讀者之情緒勞務研究，圖書資訊學研究，11(1)，1-46。
彭于萍（2015）。大學圖書館館員之情緒勞務與工作滿意之構面關係模式探析，國家圖書館館刊，10(1)，89-118。
黃國彥（2000）。內容分析法：Content Analysis。檢自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1302710/
廖國鋒、張瑞文與王湧水（2006）。領導型態、情緒智力與員工關係品質及工作投入關係之探討，輔仁管理評論，13(3)，111-136。
蔣佳樺、李城忠（2017）。職場友誼對關係品質、工作滿意度影響之研究－以企業附屬運動社團為例，管理資訊計算，6(2)，58-66。
戴國良（2017）。人力資源管理：企業實務導向與本土個案實例（5版）。台中市，鼎茂出版。