本研究之目的為探討不同三字經遊戲方式中，不同自我效能的學生在神馳效應及學習保留的表現情形。研究採實驗相關研究法，正式研究樣本為高年級學童共209人，其中108人進行三字經一條龍遊戲，另101人進行三字經心臟病遊戲，以瞭解不同自我效能的學童，透過遊戲後所產生的神馳經驗及學習保留是否有顯著差異。
在經歷遊戲前，由導師協助第一次前測，以瞭解學童對三字經內容的先備經驗；在遊戲進行中研究者設計不同遊戲方式，並分別施以「三字經遊戲玩家自我效能量表」、「神馳過程問卷」、「三字經記憶測驗」，以測量出學童遊戲的自我效能、神馳過程狀態和學習後記憶的表現。在遊戲後，研究者施以「國小學童神馳效應量表」，以測量出學童經歷遊戲後的神馳效應狀態，並在一個月後進行三字經追蹤測，以瞭解學習保留的程度。
根據實驗結果分析發現：1.進行三字經一條龍紙牌遊戲的「效能期望」構面顯著高於心臟病遊戲。 2.進行三字經心臟病紙牌遊戲的「控制」構面顯著高於一條龍遊戲。3. 三字經心臟病紙牌遊戲在「第一次遊戲前回憶率」顯著高於一條龍遊戲。4. 三字經一條龍紙牌遊戲中，高低分組自我效能的學童在神馳過程中有顯著差異；高自我效能者易偏向無趣組，低自我效能者易偏向焦慮組。5. 兩種遊戲均顯示，高自我效能的學童在神馳效應上高於低自我效能者。6. 三字經心臟病紙牌遊戲中，高自我效能的學童在學習記憶保留率上高於低自我效能者。7. 兩種遊戲均可顯示，學童神馳過程與其神馳效應有正相關。8. 三字經一條龍紙牌遊戲中，不同神馳過程的學童在長期記憶學習保留率有顯著差異。

The purpose of this piece of research is to discuss the effects on the Flow and the learning retention of students with individual self efficiency. The experiment-correlated method is applied on 209 students in the higher grades in primary schools, in order to understand and analyze the differences of flow experiences and learning retention through playing card games. Among all the 209 participants, 108 students play the three-character one continuous line game while the remaining 101 ones play the three-character heart attack game.
Before any experiment started, the class supervisors were requested to assist with the pre-test to comprehend students’ experiences of three-character scriptures and the card game contents. During the game, different playing rules were introduced to the participant. Questionnaires containing the topics of “three-character scripture card game self efficiency scale”, “flow experience questionnaire”, and the “three-character scripture memory test” were to assess the performance of self efficiency, flow experiences, and memory for each. Afertwards, the “element student flow effect scale” was used for evaluating the flow effect status of the participants. Finally, students were requested to complete the three-character scripture test after one month, so that the effects of learning would be examined.
The results were concluded as follows after the experiment:
1. Playing the one continuous line game is significantly with higher efficiency expectation of than it is with playing the heart attack one.
2. It is also significantly with high control aspect while playing the heart attack game in comparison with playing the one continuous line game.
3. However, the “First game recall rate” appears to be significantly higher in the heart attack game than in the one continuous line one.
4. There are obvious differences in the Flow experiences of the participants; the group with higher self-efficiency tends to feel bored while the other group with lower self-efficiency shows more tendency in anxiety.
5. Both games show that the higher self efficiency it is with the students, the better flow effects the participants would get.
6. In the heart attack game, students with higher self efficiency show more significant effects on learning retention.
7. Both games show that the flow experiences and the flow effects are positively related.
8. In one continuous line game, students with different flow experiences show significant differences in their long-term memory.

壹、中文部分
王克先（1968）。學習心理學。臺北：正中。
王克先（1996）。學習心理學。臺北：桂冠。
王保進（1999）。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。臺北：心理出版社。
兒童遊戲與遊戲環境（江麗莉譯）（2001）。臺北：五南圖書公司。（原著出版年：1998年）
吳明隆（2007）。SPSS統計應用學習實務-問卷分析與應用統計（深究經典版）。臺北：知城圖書。
李東霖（2001）。國小三年級學生工作記憶與數學學習關係之探討。臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺南。
快樂，從心開始（Flow-the psychology of optimal experience）（張定綺譯）（1996）。臺北：天下文化出版社。（原著出版年：1990年）
林展立（2005）。演進式遊戲的內容設計與遊戲行為之研究：以Strike Up遊戲為例。臺灣師範大學工業教育學系博士論文，未出版，臺北。
林淑芬、吳淑女（2006）。女性保健志工人格特質、組織承諾與神馳經驗關係之探討—以彰化縣市為例。人文暨社會科學期刊，2(1)，79-88。
林碧芳、邱皓政（2008）。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。
林麗娟（2007）。資訊融入-教與學之投入。教學科技與媒體，79，17-29。
邱皓政（2000a）。量化研究與統計分析。臺北：五南圖書公司。
兒童遊戲：遊戲發展的理論與實務（郭靜晃譯）（2003）。臺北：揚智文化。（原著出版年：1994年）
洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷（2007）。影響教師創意教學因素之研究－以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報，教育類，52（2），49-71。
洪家祐（2008）。遊戲情境中之自我效能與自我調節對心流經驗的影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
洪淑美（主編）（1991）。現代休閒育樂百科（第十冊）。臺北：華一書局。
洪榮昭、劉明洲（1999）。電腦輔助教學之設計原理與應用。臺北：師大書苑。
洪榮昭、林展立（2006.3.24）。教育性遊戲的內容設計原則探討。發表於國立新竹教育大學主辦的電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會。
洪榮昭（2006.3.22-23）。遊戲的教育意義。發表於國立中央大學主辦的遊戲式數位學習研討會。
重塑大腦（張美惠譯）（2003）。台北：時報文化。（原著出版年：2003年）。
高月梅、張泓（1995）。幼兒心理學。臺北：五南圖書公司。
孫邦正、鄒季婉（1978）。教育心理學。臺北：商務印書館。
曹文力（2006）。在遊戲情境中以沉浸經驗探討玩興對創造力的影響。國立交通大學理學院網路學習學程碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學。臺北：東華書局。
張春興（1997）。教育心理學。臺北：東華書局。
張春興（1998）。教育心理學－三化取向的理論與實踐（修訂版）。臺北：東華。
張春興、林清山（1998）。教育心理學(十二版)。臺北：東華。
張春興（2000）。現代心理學。臺北：東華。
張霄亭（1998）。教學媒體與教學新科技。臺北：心理出版社。
許書務（1984）。電腦輔助教學與傳統式教學其學後保留之比較-以6502微處理機課程為例。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。
梁茂森（1990）。國中生學習自我效能量表之編製。教育學刊，14，155-192。
梁培勇（2006）。遊戲治療─理論與實務。臺北：心理。
郭生玉（1989）。心理與教育測驗。臺北：精華書局。
陳桂芳（2002）。網路上合作學習的分組方式及任務類型對於電腦學習成效之影響。靜宜大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，未出版，臺中。
陳淑敏（2000）。幼兒遊戲。臺北：心理出版社。
曾家輝（2007）。啟蒙古典《三字經》難為今用。文匯報。2008年10月16日，取自http://paper.wenweipo.com/2007/02/05/SY0702050003.htm
黃瓊慧（2000）。從沉浸（flow）理論探討台灣大專學生之網路使用行為。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
楊純青（2004）。成人線上學習之人際互動及神馳經驗對其學習成效之影響。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所博士論文，未出版，高雄。
楊淑萍（1995）。自我效能在認知技巧學習善生涯發展上的應用（下）。諮商與輔導，111，14-18。
劉如蓉（1988）。增進自我效能對國小兒童政治人格輔導效果之研究。國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
劉世雄（2006）。資訊科技融入教學的模式之初探。中等教育，57（5），114-135。
駱亭妘（2008）。《三字經》研究。臺北教育大學語文碩士論文，未出版，臺北。

貳、英文部分
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review, 89(4), pp. 369–406.
Andresen, G., & Ahdell, R. (2002). Games simulation in corporate e-learning. Master thesis of University of Illinois.
Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J.T. Spence(Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory(pp. 742-775). New York: Academic Press.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In: G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (vol. 8 pp. 47-89.), New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Review, 89, 708-729.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral chang. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. (1982). Microanalysis of action and fear arousal as a function of differential levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1. 982, 43(1), 5-21.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall, Inc.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Casas, A. K., & Rogers,C.S. (2003). Childhood playfulness as a predictor of adult playfulness and creativity: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the Association for the Study of Play, Atlanta, GA.
Chen, S. Y., & Macredie, R. D. (2002). Cognitive styles and hypermedia navigation: Development of a learning model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 3-15.
Chen, S. Y., Magoulas, G. D., & Dimakopoulos, D. (2005). A flexible interface design for web directories to accommodate different cognitive styles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 70-83.
Clarke, S.G., & Haworth, J. T. (1994). Flow experience in daily lives of sixth-form college students. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 511–523.
Costikyan, G. (2002). I have no words & i must design.In Mäyrä, F. Conference Proceedings of Computer Games and Digital Cultures, 9-33,Tampere University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1985). Emergent motivation and the evolution of the self. In D. A. Kleibeer & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation & achievement ,4, 93-119. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Perennial.
de Graaff, E., Post, G. J., & Drop, M. J. (1987). Validation of a new measure of clinical problem-solving. Medical Education, 21(3), 213-218.
Dempsey, J. V., Rasmussen, K., & Lucassen. B. (1994). Instructional gaming: implication for technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ368345)
DeVries, D. L., & Edwards, K. J. (1972). Learning games and student teams: Their effects on classroom processes. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED070019)
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: the theory of inquiry. Repr. in J. A. Boydston(Ed. ), The later
works of John Dewey,12, 1925-1953. Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1946). John Dewey Society. New York : Harper.
Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 746-761.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1985). Uber das gedachtnis. Leipzig: duncker. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2007). Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Computers & Education, 49(3), 873-890.
Ellington, H., Adinall, E., & Percival, F. (1982). A handbook of game design. London, UK: Kogan.
Ellis, G.D., Voelkl, J. E. & Morris, C. (1994). Measurement and analysis issues with explanation of variance in daily experience using the flow model. Journal of Leisure Research, 26(4), 337-356.
Finneran, C. M., & Zhang, P. (2003). A Person-Artifact-Task (PAT) model of flow: Antecedents in computer-mediated environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (Special issue on HCI and MIS), 59(4), 397-402.
Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4), 441-467.
Gee, J. P. (2005). Game-like learning: An example of situated learning and implications for opportunity to learn. Retrieved November 25, 2008, from http://www.academiccolab.org/resources/documents/Game-Like Learning.rev.pdf
Goddard, L., Dritschel, B., & Burton, A. (2001). The effects of specific retrieval instruction on social problem-solving in depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 297-308.
Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In: F. Plum & V. Mountcastle (Eds.), Handbook of physiology: The nervous system (pp. 373-417), Bethesda: V. Waverly Press.
Harrison, A. W., & Rainer, R. K. (1992). The influence of individual differences on skill in enduser computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 9(2), 91-111.
Hoffman, D., & Novak, P. T. (1997). A new marketing parading for electronic commerce. The Information Society: SpecialIssue on Electronic Eommerce, 13, 43-54.

Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Lu, C. H., Cheng, C. L., Lee, Y. C., & Lin, C. L. (2009). Playfulness-based design in educational games: a perspective on an evolutionary contest game. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 15-35.

Järvinen, Aki. (2002). Gran stylissimo: The audiovisual elements and styles in computer and video games. In F. Mäyrä (Ed.), Computer games and digital cultures conference proceedings, 113–128. Studies in Information Sciences 1. Tampere University Press, Tampere, Finland.

Jones, Q. (1997). Virtual-communities. Virtual settlements & cyber-archaeology: A
theoretical outline. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 3(1).
Karni, A. (1996). The acquisition of perceptual and motor skills: a memory system in the adult human cortex, Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, pp. 39–48.
Kiili, K. (2005). Educational game design:Experiential gaming model revised . Tampere University of Technology. Pori. Research report 4.
Kiili, K. (2005a). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13-24.
Kiili, K. (2005b). Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games:The IT-Emperor case. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 183-198.
Kiili, K. (2006). Towards a participatory multimedia learning model. Education and Information Technologies, 11(1).
Kim, K. S. (2001). Information seeking on the web: Effects of user and task variables. Library & Information Science Research, 23, 233-255.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Landreth, G. L. (1991). Play therapy: The art of relationship. Muncie: Accelerated Development Inc.
Lindgren, H. C., & Byrne, D.(1975). Psychology: An introduction to a behavioral science (4th ed). New York: John Wiley and Sons,11.
Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95 (4), pp. 492–527.
Lombard, M., Reich, R., Grabe, M. E., Bracken, C., & Ditton, T. (2000). Presence and television: The role of screen size. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75-98.
Lucas, K., & Sherry, J. L. (2004). Sex differences in video game play: A communication-based explanation. Communication Research, 31, 499-523.
Martocchio, J. J., & Webster, J. (1992a). Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psychology, 45, 553-578.
Martzoukou, K. (2005). A review of web information seeking research: Considerations of method and foci of interest. Information Research, 10(2). Retrieved November 26, 2008, from http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper215.html
Merrill, M. D. (1991). Constructivism and instructional design. Educational Technology, 31(5), 45-53.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven. Plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64 (2), 275-310.
Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 14–24.
Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–56), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity in web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31-39.
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (1997). Measuring the flow experience among web users. Paper presented at the Interval Research Corporation.
Paivio, A. (1991). Images in mind: The evolution of a theory. NewYork: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in achievement settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
Peabody, D.S. (1997). Engineering tolerance to peptide insertions in a viral coat protein. Arch. Bioch. Biophys, 347, 85-92.
Pearce, J. M., Ainley, M., & Howard, S. (2005). The ebb and flow of online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(5), 745-771.
Pintrich, P. R., & DeGrot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, andapplications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Privette, G., & Bundrick, C. M. (1987). Measurement of experience: Construct and content validity of the experience questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 65, 315-332.
Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology, Research and Development , 44(2), 43-58.
Robertson, J., & Howells, C. (2008). Computer game design: Opportunities for successful learning. Computers and Education, 50, 559-578.
Rogers, S. C., & Sluss, J. D. (1999). Play and inventiveness: Revisiting Erikson’s views on einstein’s playfulness. Play & Culture Studies, 2, 3-24.

Sánchez Franco, M., Martínez López, F., & Martín Valencia, F. (2009). Exploring the impact of individualism and uncertainty avoidance in web-based electronic learning: An empirical analysis in european higher education.Computers and Education, 52, pp. 588-598.

Schwartz, Jeffrey, M., Begley, & Sharon. (2003). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. Harper Perennial, p 337.
Smith, P. K., & Vollstedt, R. (1985). On defining play: An empirical study of therelationship between play and various play criteria. Child Development, 56(4), 1042-1050.
Squire, K. (2003). Design principles of next-generation gaming for education. Educational Technology, 43(5), 17-23.
Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. NY: Simon & Schuster. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://www.vancouver.wsu.edu/fac/peabody/game-book/chapter3.html
Turney, C., Hatton, N., Laws, K., Sinclair, K., & Smith, D. (1992). The classroom manager educational management roles and tasks. North Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Vickii, J. B., & Heidi, J. L. (2002). Criteria used to categorize children's play:Preliminary findings. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8), 733-740.
Vinacke, E. A. (1974). The psychology of thinking .New York: McGraw-Hill.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, P., Hawk, W. B., & Tenopir, C. (2000). Users’ interaction with world wide web resources: An explanatory study using a holistic approach. Information Processing & Management, 36, 229-251.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426.
Woolfolk, J. (1998). Educational psychology. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Zangwill, W.I. (1969). A backlogging model and a multi-echelon model of a dynamic economic lot size production system – a network approach. Management Science, 15, 506-527.