研究生: |
陳寅真 Chen, Yin-Zhen |
---|---|
論文名稱: |
已婚成年子女與父母之代間矛盾類型及其影響因素 The Types of Intergenerational Ambivalence between Married Adult Children and Parents |
指導教授: | 林如萍 |
學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
系所名稱: |
人類發展與家庭學系 Department of Human Development and Family Studies |
論文出版年: | 2020 |
畢業學年度: | 108 |
語文別: | 中文 |
論文頁數: | 73 |
中文關鍵詞: | 代間矛盾 、代間關係 、孝道 、成年子女 、臺灣青少年成長歷程 |
英文關鍵詞: | intergenerational ambivalence, intergenerational relationship, filial piety, adult children, Taiwan Youth Project |
DOI URL: | http://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202000015 |
論文種類: | 學術論文 |
相關次數: | 點閱:275 下載:0 |
分享至: |
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
中文文獻
內政部統計處(2017)。地區平均餘命。2017年6月12日,取自
http://statis.moi.gov.tw/micst/stmain.jsp?sys=100
行政院性別平等會(2019a)。重要性別統計資料庫。初婚者之年齡平均數。2019年6月3日。取自https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw
行政院性別平等會(2019b)。重要性別統計資料庫。首次生產婦女之平均年齡(生第一胎平均年齡)。2019年6月3日。取自https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw
伊慶春(2009)。回應〈華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻〉。本土心理學研究,32,187-197。doi10.62542009.32.187
伊慶春(2014)。臺灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變:資源與規範的交互作用。社會學研究,3,189-215。
伊慶春(2017)。台灣青少年成長歷程研究:TYP2011調查(成人合併樣本第三波)【原始具數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。
伊慶春、章英華(2018)。父系家庭的持續與變遷:臺灣的家庭社會學研究,1960-2000。謝國雄(主編):群學爭鳴:臺灣社會學發展史,頁23-73。台北市:群學。
利翠珊(2007)。華人已婚女性代間矛盾情感之特色與測量。中華心理衛生學刊,20(4),357-386。doi10.30074CJMH.200712.0003
邱皓政(2008)。潛在類別模式-原理與技術。臺北:五南。
林如萍(2011)。東亞家庭的代間互動類型研究。當代中國研究,18(1),212-239。
林如萍(2012)。台灣家庭的代間關係與互動類型之變遷趨勢。見伊慶春、章英華(主編):台灣的社會變遷1985~2005:家庭與婚姻,台灣社會變遷基本調查系列三之一,頁75-124。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所。
林如萍、黃秋華(2017)。三代之間:代間關係與中年生活福祉。人文及社會科學集刊,29(3),381-414。
林如萍、余佳玟(2018)。嫁出去的「女兒」,潑出去的水?!成年子女給予父母及配偶父母的代間支持。「當代家庭之議題與樣貌」學術研討會,中央研究院。
周玉慧(2015)。青少年至成年初期親子關係的變化及其影響。中華心理學刊,57(1),67-89。doi10.6129CJP.20140831
吳嘉瑜(2003)。代間關係研究的新思維:代間矛盾研究趨勢的興起與相關文獻。輔導季刊,39(4),1-9。
吳嘉瑜(2004)。子代夫妻對偶代間關係經驗:「他」的矛盾?「她」的矛盾?。中華輔導學報,15,123-149。doi10.7082CARGC.200403.0123
吳嘉瑜(2005)。配對研究的行與思-以一個受訪家庭為例。輔導與諮商學報,27(2),71-91。doi10.7040JGC.200512.0071
吳嘉瑜、趙淑珠(2004)。以多重觀點建構代間矛盾經驗之新嘗試。中華心理衛生學刊,17(1),75-111。doi10.30074CJMH.200403.0004
程景琳(譯)(2008)。發展心理學:從過去到現在(原作者:Miller, P, H)。臺北市:學富文化。
楊國樞、葉光輝、黃囇莉(1989)。孝道的社會態度與行為:理論與測量。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,65,171-227。
葉光輝(1997)。台灣民眾之孝道觀念的變遷情形。見張苙雲、呂玉瑕、王甫昌(主編):九○年代的台灣社會:社會變遷基本調查研究系列二(下)。頁171-214。台北:中央研究院社會學研究所籌備處。
葉光輝(2009a)。台灣民眾的代間交換行為:孝道觀點的探討。本土心理學研究,31,97-141。doi10.62542009.31.97
葉光輝(2009b)。華人孝道雙元模型研究的回顧與前瞻。本土心理學研究,32,101-148。doi10.62542009.32.101
葉光輝(2009c)。再論華人孝道雙元模型的幾個關鍵性議題。本土心理學研究,32,207-248。doi10.62542009.32.207
葉光輝、曹惟純(2014)。成人親子衝突之建設性轉化路徑:功能性衝突評估、共享式解決策略與個人生活適應的關聯。中華心理衛生學刊,27(2),173-199。
英文文獻
Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(1), 1-16.
Bengtson, V. L., & Kuypers, J. A. (1971). Generational difference and the developmental stake. Aging and Human Development, 2, 249-260.
Bengtson, V. L., & Schrader S. S. (1982). Parent-Child Relations. In D. J. Mangen & W. A. Peterson (Eds.), Research Instruments in Social Gerontology (pp. 115-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Bengtson, V., Giarrusso, R., Mabry, J. B., & Silverstein, M. (2002). Solidarity, Conflict, and Ambivalence: Complementary or Competing Perspectives on Intergenerational Relationships? Journal of Marriage & Family, 64(3), 568–576.
Bedford, O., & Yeh, K. (2019). The history and the future of the psychology of filial piety: Chinese norms to contextualized personality construct. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 100.
Cohler, B., Grunebaum, H., & Robbins, D. (1981). Mothers, grandmothers, and daughters : personality and child care in three-generation families. New York: Wiley.
Connidis, I., & McMullin, J. (2002). Ambivalence, Family Ties, and Doing Sociology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 594-601.
De Jong-Gierveld, J. (1998). Intergenerational relationships and solidarity within the family. In K. Matthijs (Ed.), The family Contemporary perspectives and challenges Festschrift in honor of Wilfried Dumon (pp. 31-49). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Dewit, D. J., Wister, A. V., & Burch, T. K. (1988). Physical Distance and Social Contact between Elders and their Adult Children. Research on Aging, 10(1), 56–80.
Fischer, L. R. (1981). Transitions in the Mother-Daughter Relationship. Journal of Marriage and Family, 43(3), 613-622. doi:10.2307/351762
Fingerman, K.L., Chen, P., Hay, E.L., Cichy, K.E., & Lefkowitz, E.S. (2006). Ambivalent reactions in the parent and offspring relationship. The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 61(3), 152-160.
Fingerman, K. L., Hay, E. L., & Birditt, K. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 792-808.
George, L. K. (1986). Caregiver burden: Conflict between norms of reciprocity and solidarity. In K. A. Pillemer & R. S. Wolf (Eds.), Elder abuse: Conflict in the family (pp. 67-92). New York, NY, England: Auburn House Publishing Co.
Gaalen, R. I., & Dykstra, P. A. (2006). Solidarity and Conflict Between Adult Children and Parents: A Latent Class Analysis. Journal of Marriage & Family, 68(4), 947–960.
Gaalen, R. I., Dykstra, P. A., & Komter, A. E. (2010). Where is the exit? Intergenerational ambivalence and relationship quality in high contact ties. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(2), 105–114.
Giarrusso, R., Silverstein, M., Gans, D., & Bengtson, V. L. (2005). Ageing Parents and Adult Children: New Perspectives on Intergenerational Relationships. In M. L. Johnson, V. L. Bengtson, P. G Coleman and T. B. L. Kirkwood, (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing (pp. 413-421). London: Cambridge University Press.
Katz, R., Lowenstein, A., Phillips, J., & Daatland, S. O. (2005). Theorizing intergenerational family relations: solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence in cross-national contexts. In Bengtson, V. L., Acock, A. C., Allen, K. R., Dilworth-Anderson, P., & Klein, D. M. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 393-421). doi: 10.4135/9781412990172
Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (1998). Effects of life course transitions on the quality of relationships between adult children and their parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60(4), 924-938.
Lüscher, K. (2002). Intergenerational Ambivalence: Further Steps in Theory and Research. Journal of Marriage & Family, 64(3), 585–593.
Lowenstein, A. (2007). Solidarity-Conflict and Ambivalence: Testing Two Conceptual Frameworks and Their Impact on Quality of Life for Older Family Members. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 62(2), 100–107.
Lendon, J. P. (2017). A Decade of Love and Hate: Trajectories of Intergenerational Ambivalence Experienced by Two Cohorts of Older Parents and Adult Children. Journal of Family Issues, 38(3), 336–357.
Lin, J., Chang, T., & Huang, C. (2011). Intergenerational relations and life satisfaction among older women in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20, 47-58.
Lin, J., & Yi, C. (2011). Filial norms and intergenerational support to aging parents in China and Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 20(S1), 109–120.
Lüscher, K., & Hoff, A. (2013). Intergenerational ambivalence: Beyond solidarity and conflict. In I. Albert & D. Ferring (Eds.), Intergenerational relations: European perspectives on society and family (pp. 39-63). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Lettke, F., & Klein, D. M. (2004). Methodological issues in assessing ambivalences in intergenerational relations. In K. Pillemer & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Intergenerational ambivalence: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 85–113). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational Ambivalence: A New Approach to the Study of Parent-Child Relations in Later Life. Journal of Marriage & Family, 60(2), 413–425.
Pillemer, K., & Suitor, J. J. (2002). Explaining Mothers’ Ambivalence Toward Their Adult Children. Journal of Marriage & Family, 64(3), 602–613.
Steinbach, A. (2008). Intergenerational Solidarity and Ambivalence: Types of Relationships in German Families. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 39(1), 115–127.
Suitor, J. J., Gilligan, M., & Pillemer, K. (2011). Conceptualizing and Measuring Intergenerational Ambivalence in Later Life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66B(6), 769–781.
Tsui, E. Y. (1987). Are Married Daughters " Spilled Water﹖A Study of Working Women in Urban Taiwan. Taipei: Women’s Research Program.
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences, 4, 361-386.
Willson, A. E., Shuey, K. M., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2003). Ambivalence in the Relationship of Adult Children to Aging Parents and In-Laws. Journal of Marriage & Family, 65(4), 1055–1072.
Yi, C., & Lin, J. (2009). Types of Relations between Adult Children and Elderly Parents in Taiwan: Mechanisms Accounting for Various Relational Types. Journal of Comparative Family Studies,40(2), 305-324.
Yeh, K. H. (2003). The beneficial and harmful effects of filial piety: An integrative analysis. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, P. B. Pederson, & I. Daibo (Eds.), Asian social psychology: Conceptual and empirical contributions (pp.67-82). CT: Praeger.
Yeh, K. & Bedford, O. (2004). Filial belief and parent-child conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 39(2), 132-144.
Yeh, K., Yi, C., Tsao, W., & Wan, P. (2013). Filial piety in contemporary chinese societies: A comparative study of taiwan, hong kong, and china. International Sociology, 28(3), 277-296.