Author: |
王馨梅 Hsin-Mei Wang |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
九年一貫數學教科書之順序性、繼續性及銜接性分析:以統計與機率主題為例 The Analysis of Sequence, Continuity and Articulation in Grade 1-9 Mathematics Textbooks: The Case of Statistics and Probability |
Advisor: |
吳心楷
Wu, Hsin-Kai |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
科學教育研究所 Graduate Institute of Science Education |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2011 |
Academic Year: | 99 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 174 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 銜接性 、繼續性 、順序性 、九年一貫課程 、統計與機率 |
Keywords (in English): | articulation, continuity, sequence, Grade 1-9 Curriculum, statistics and probability |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 221 Downloads: 53 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
臺灣九二課綱將數學學習領域分為五大主題,過去研究多針對數與量、幾何等主題進行分析,較少涵蓋統計與機率的內容,且國中小數學課程內容的銜接性一直是課程發展的重要議題。因此,本研究目的為透過分析架構評估不同版本教科書,在統計與機率主題內容的順序性、繼續性及銜接性。
根據文獻本研究將課程銜接性定義為:教科書需依課程綱要完整呈現分年細目建議次序的學習內容,並符合相同概念再次出現的原則。本研究採內容分析法,對象為教育部審核通過的數學教科書,依市佔率挑選出三個版本(南一、翰林與康軒)。分析架構是以九年一貫課程的數學學習領域之課程綱要和分年細目為基礎,研究過程中藉由專家效度、同意值、追溯檢核等策略以驗證本研究信實度。
研究結果顯示,在順序性效標方面,三版本於一、四、五及六年級的概念呈現上,表現情形相同,年級內的概念存有順序性的關係,例如統計圖概念的安排順序依次為長條圖、複雜長條圖、折線圖及圓形圖。在繼續性效標方面,三版本教科書其各個概念重複出現時,概念深度、文字陳述難度會隨年級增高,且呈現的圖示數量會依年級遞減。概念內容重複次數最多為表格概念,出現次數較少的為有關製圖型的概念內容。在銜接性效標方面,三版本在年級內並無重複出現有關直接或交叉對應表格以及製成統計圖的概念內容,此外,各版本皆透過統計圖表的呈現用以輔助說明題意,省略冗長的文字描述,並連結其他有關統計與機率的概念內容。整體而言,教科書在順序性及繼續性的表現上,與銜接性的表現沒有直接的相關。
本研究結果希冀可做為教科書編排及教師教學之參考,以期進行有關統計與機率的教學活動時,能完整呈現該主題概念的意涵。
In 2003, five themes were identified in the curriculum guidelines of Grade 1-9 Mathematics. Among them, the theme of statistics and probability were relatively unstudied in mathematical education research. Additionally, the articulation of the grade 1-9 mathematics curriculum has always been an important issue in curriculum development. For the reason, the purpose of this study was to examine the sequence, continuity, and articulation of the contents of three mathematics textbooks in the theme of statistics and probability.
Based on the literature, the curriculum articulation is defined as the way in which the contents of textbooks are organized with regard to the sequence and continuity suggested by curriculum guidelines and competence indicators. This study employed methods of content analysis and the subjects of this study were Han-Lin, Kang-Xuan, and Nan-Yi mathematical textbooks which were chosen in the condition of being examined by Ministry of Education and the market share. The analysis scheme was developed based on Competence Indicators by Grade in the Mathematics Learning Area. In the processes of analysis, some strategies such as triangulation and audit trails were adopted to ensure the trustworthiness of this study.
The analysis showed that the three textbooks presented appropriate sequences of concepts in the first, fourth and fifth grades. A sequence was also found within a grade; for instance, the concept of statistics graphs would start from bar graphs, complex bar graphs, and then broken-line graphs and circle graphs were introduced. In terms of continuity, when the same concept was repeated in the textbooks of different grades, the difficulty of concepts would increase by grade, and the number of the pictures would decrease by grade. The concepts of data tables were repeated often, while the graphs constructed concepts were seldom repeated. The three textbooks did not show curriculum articulation in the concepts of one or two dimension tables and constructing graphs. In addition, rather than using verbal descriptions, the three textbooks included statistical graphs and tables to explain the meanings of mathematical problems and to connect the other concepts about statistics and probability. In summary, the analysis suggested that the sequence and continuity had no direct relation with articulation in the mathematical textbooks.
一、中文部分
王文科(1995)。教育研究法(4版)。臺北市:五南。
江姮姬(2001)。從哈伯瑪斯的「溝通行動理論」探討我國教科書審查制度。國教學報,13,135-163。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(1996)。教育改革總諮議報告書。臺北市:行政院。
李而雅(2006)。從生活課程到社會學習領域課程銜接之研究。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李金葉(2006)。國小數學領域教科書角概念教材之內容分析。台中教育大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
李隆盛(2007)。教科書制度與影響--序言。臺北市:五南。
李豪文(2007)。從課程組織探討一到三年級數學教科書之幾何內容。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
吳明穎(2001)。國小數學教科書內容分析之研究。屏東師範學院數理教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
吳婌菱(2007)。國中社會學習領域公民課程與高中公民與社會課程銜接之研究-以法律部分為例。國立臺灣師範大學政治學研究所在職進修碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
邱忻恬(2006)。台灣與西班牙七至九年級數學教科書內容之比較研究。國立暨南國際大學比較教育學系碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
周珮儀(2002)。國小教師解讀教科書的方式。國立台北師範學院學報,15,115-138。
周珮儀(2003)。教科書研究的現況分析與趨勢展望。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編),教科書之選擇與評鑑(175-207頁)。高雄市:高雄復文。
周珮儀、鄭明長(2006)。一個我國教科書研究資料庫的建置與分析。國立高雄師範大學教育學系教育學刊,26,109-132。
周淑卿(2003)。論中小學教科書評鑑機制建立的必要性。載於中華民國課程與教學學會(主編),教科書之選擇與評鑑(55-78頁)。高雄市:高雄復文。
徐于婷(2009)。台灣、香港、中國國小數學教科書代數教材之內容分析。國立屏東教育大學應用數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
孫菁璣(2008)。九年一貫課程數學學習領域一到三年級教科書之比較研究。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
國民教育(無日期)。臺北市:國立教育資料館—教育資源服務中心。2009年10月11日,取自:http://3d.nioerar.edu.tw/2d/citizan/default.asp
國立編譯館(2009)。國民中小學98學年度上學期教科圖書一覽表。2010年1月10日,取自:http://dic.nict.gov.tw/~textbook/dic/98(1).html
國立編譯館(2010)。國民中小學98學年度下學期教科圖書一覽表。2010年1月10日,取自:http://dic.nict.gov.tw/~textbook/dic/98(2).html
教育改革(無日期)。臺北市:國立教育資料館—教育資源服務中心。2009年10月11日,取自:http://3d.nioerar.edu.tw/2d/revolute/default.asp
教育部(1998)。教育改革行動方案。臺北市:教育部。
教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要--數學學習領域。臺北市:教育部。
張香莉(2003)。國小三、四年級社會學習領域課程銜接之行動研究。國立臺北師範學院社會科教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
張琇涵(2006)。台灣與新加坡三角函數課程之教科書比較。國立中央大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園縣。
陳秋紅(2007)。Study on the continuity of English curricula between elementary and junior high schools in Taipei City。國立政治大學英語教學碩士在職專班碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳昭吟(2005)。國民中小學數學課程銜接之研究--以桃園縣為例。國立新竹教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
陳晚蓁(2003)。國一新生數學銜接方案之研究-以分數單元為例。國立嘉義大學數學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
黃婉琪(2007)。國小教師參與教科書設計與編輯之專業發展研究—以優質教科書編輯工作坊為例。臺北市立教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊文達(2004)。國小教師在數學學習領域課程銜接的合作行動研究。國立臺北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
楊龍立、潘麗珠(2005)。課程組織:理論與實務。臺北市:高等教育。
蔡文煥(1998)。國小統計教材機率初步概念之設計理念與實際。載於臺灣省國民學校教師研習會(主編),國民小學數學科新課程概說(高年級)協助兒童認知發展的數學課程(頁257-266)。臺北縣:臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。
蔡阜鋼(2004)。國小學童統計圖概念分析之研究。臺中師範學院數學教育學系在職進修教學碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
蔡曉文(2006)。A study of the English connective curriculum teaching situation and encountering problems in junior high school in Ping-Tung County。國立高雄師範大學英語學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
歐用生(2001)。國民中小學課程的銜接與統整。載於歐用生、莊梅枝(主編),邁向課程新紀元(七)九年一貫課程學習領域研討會論文集(頁29-41)。臺北市:中華民國教材研究發展學會。
賴季伶(2003)。數學課程銜接之研究-以九十二學年度小學四年級康軒版教材為例。國立臺北師範學院課程與教學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
龍盈江(2005)。國高中數學課程銜接問題及因應策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
藍順德(2004)。二十年來國內博碩士論文教科書研究之分析。國立編譯館館刊,32(4),2-25。
藍順德(2006)。教科書政策與制度。臺北市:五南。
二、西文部分
Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bailey, K. D. (1987). Methods of social research (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Beane, J. A., Toepfer, C. F., & Alessi, S. J. (1986). Curriculum planning and development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Berelson, B. (1971). Content analysis in communication research. New York: Hafner.
Bognár, K., & Nemetz, T. (1977). On the teaching of probability at secondary level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 399-404.
Bracey, G. W. (2006). Don't let yourself get snookered by education statistics! Education Digest, 72(1), 44-47.
Cain, R. B. (1972). Elementary statistical concepts. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company.
Fischbein, E., Pampu, I., & Mânzat, I. (1970). Comparison of ratios and the chance concept in children. Child Development, 41(2), 377-389.
Fischbein, E., & Schnarch, D. (1997). The evolution with age of probabilistic, intuitively based misconceptions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 96-105.
Garfield, J., & Chance, B. (2000). Assessment in statistics education: Issues and challenges. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1), 99-125.
Haber, A., & Runyon, R. P. (1969). General statistics. London: Addison-Wesley.
Hawkins, A. S., & Kapadia, R. (1984). Children's conceptions of probability - a psychological and pedagogical review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 349-377.
Henson, K. T. (2001). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform (2nd ed.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill.
Hoel, P. G. (1963). Introduction to mathematical statistics (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. London: Addison-Wesley.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, A. T. (1999). Students' probabilistic thinking in instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 487-519.
Jones, G. A., Thornton, C. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., Perry, B., & Putt, I. J. (2000). A framework for characterizing children's statistical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 269-307.
Konold, C. (1991). Understanding students' beliefs about probability. In E. v. Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 139-156). Canada: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lecoutre, M.-P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in "purely random" situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 557-568.
Longstreet, W. S., & Shane, H. G. (1993). Curriculum for a new millennium. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
McNeil, J. D. (1965). Curriculum administration : Principles and techniques of curriculum development. NY: Macmilllan.
Mills, J. D. (2004). Students' attitudes toward statistics: Implications for the future. College Student Journal, 38(3), 349-361.
Moschkovich, J. N., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 457-486). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
New Standards. (1995). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning (Vol. 1: elementary school). Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
New Standards. (1995). Performance standards: English language arts, mathematics, science, applied learning (Vol. 2: middle school). Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
Oliva, P. F. (2001). Developing the curriculum (5th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Oliver, A. I. (1965). Curriculum improvement: A guide to problems, principles, & procedures. NY: Dodd, Mead & Company.
Olofsson, P. (2007). Probabilities: The little numbers that rule our lives. Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (1998). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1975). The origin of the idea of chance in children (L. Leake, P. Burrell & H. D. Fishbein, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (original work published 1951)
Ross, S. M. (2000). Introduction to probability models (7th ed.). New York: A Harcourt Science and Technology Company.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465-494). New York: Macmillan.
Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238-241.
Smith, P. C. (1995). Assessing writing and statistical competence in probability and statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 22(1), 49-50.
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum developmwnt: Theory and practice. NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Tam, H. P. (2010). A brief introduction of the mathematics curricular of Taiwan.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Zais, R. S. (1976). Curriculum : Principles and foundations. NY: Crowell.