Author: |
劉怡婷 |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
高中師生對公民與社會科經濟課程觀點之研究--以單元四「經濟與永續發展」為例 A Study of the Perspectives on Economic Curriculum of Civics and Society from Senior High School Teachers and Students --Take Unit Four ‘Economy and Sustainable Development’ as an Example |
Advisor: | 黃美筠 |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2012 |
Academic Year: | 100 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 234 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 95課綱 、課程觀點 、經濟教育 、經濟課程 |
Keywords (in English): | curriculum guidelines (95 guidelines), curriculum perspectives, economic education, Economic Curriculum |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 66 Downloads: 17 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究旨在探討高中師生對公民與社會科經濟課程之觀點,探討教學時數、教學方法、教學評量是否為影響師生經濟課程觀點的相關因素,在經濟課程觀點上,是否分別具有顯著差異;並分析教師的背景變項(教學年資、95課綱經濟課程教授次數、學歷背景、在職進修)以及學生的背景變項(性別、組別、家庭)是否影響其對於經濟課程之觀點。為達研究之目的,本研究主要以自編之「高中教師公民與社會科經濟課程觀點問卷」、「高中學生公民與社會科經濟課程觀點問卷」進行問卷調查,輔以訪談法以臻研究設計之完備。本研究之結果發現如下:
一、不同教學時數、教學方法多元性、教學評量多元性之教師,在經濟課程各向度觀點皆無顯著差異。
二、不同上課時數、教學方法多元性、教學評量多元性之學生,在經濟課程部分向度觀點具有顯著差異。
三、不同個人背景變項之教師,在經濟課程部分向度觀點具有顯著差異。
四、不同個人背景變項之學生,在經濟課程部分向度觀點具有顯著差異。
五、各變項對於教師的經濟課程觀點僅在部分向度觀點具有解釋力,且具有統計上之顯著性。
六、各變項對於學生的經濟課程觀點具有解釋力,且具有統計上之顯著性。
據本研究之結果,歸納研究發現作為結論,亦提出對教育相關單位、公民與社會科教師以及對未來研究者的建議,以作為經濟課程修正以及後續研究之參考。
The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives on Economic Curriculum of Civics and Society from senior high school teachers and students. This study inquired whether the teaching hours, methods, and assessment is to influence the view of teachers and students of economic courses relevant factors, and if there is any significant differences on the economic curriculum point of view respectively. Moreover, the analysis of teachers’ demographic variables (i.e. years of experience in teaching, the number of times in 95 guidelines economics curriculum teaching, academic background and refresher training course) as well as students’ demographic variables (i.e. gender, majors group, family) would be possible to influence the perception of the curriculum.
In order to achieve the purpose of this study, the researcher undertook two questionnaire surveys, which are “The questionnaire of the perspectives on Economic Curriculum of Civics and Society from senior high school teachers” and ”The questionnaire of the perspectives on Economic Curriculum of Civics and Society from senior high school students”.Moreover, this study also conducted interviews of selected teachers to reinforce a comprehensive survey.
Results are generalized as follows:
1. There was no statistically significant difference on perspectives of every spheres of economic curriculum among teachers with different teaching hours, method diversity and assessment variety.
2. There was statistically significant difference existed on perspectives of every spheres of economic curriculum among students with different teaching hours, method diversity and assessment variety
3. There was statistically significant difference on perspectives of some spheres of economic curriculum among teachers with different demographic variables was shown.
4. There was statistically significant difference on perspectives of some spheres of economic curriculum among students with different demographic variables was shown.
5. Each variable can support the explanation of the perspectives of some spheres of economic curriculum by teachers, and there is patency in statistics.
6. Each variable can support the explanation of the perspectives on economic curriculum by students, and there is patency in statistics.
In conclusion, according to the findings in the present study, the study hopefully would provide suggestions as for the education authorities, Civic and Society teachers, the revision of economic curriculum and future research.
中文部分
方詠菁(2001)。高中公民科教師對經濟學教材內涵需求之研究--以台灣中部地區為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
方詠菁、黃美筠(2001)。高中公民科教師對經濟學教材內涵需求之研究--以
台灣中部地區為例。公民訓育學報,12,143-185。
白瑩潔(2008)。學生的課程詮釋--以建中人文社會科學資優班學生為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
李文瑞(譯)(2002),Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E.(著):媒體、科技與學習。在張霄亭主譯:教學媒體及學習科技(頁4-23)。臺北:雙葉。
李咏吟、單文經(2001)。教學原理。臺北:遠流。
李坤崇(2010)。高中課程99課綱與95暫綱之分析。教育資料與研究雙月刊,92,1-24。
金管會(2005)。金融知識普及三年(95-97)推動計畫。板橋:行政院金融監督管理委員會。
邱皓政(2006)。量化硏究與統計分析 : SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北:五南。
邱皓政(2008)。量化硏究法(一)研究設計與資料處理。臺北:雙葉書廊。
周淑卿(2002)。教師與學生在課程發展歷程中的處境—系統論與概念重建論的觀點。教育研究集刊,48(1),133-151。
林沁雄(2009年9月)。「公民與社會」之課綱-經濟篇。論文發表於臺北市立教育大學社會暨公共事務學系舉辦之「公民與社會」國際學術研討會,臺北市立教育大學。
林麗婷、黃美筠(2002)。國中公民與道德科教師對經濟教育專業能力之研究—以高雄地區為例。公民訓育學報,12,187-221。
范禎娠(2010)。活動本位教學策略應用於國中理財教學成效之研究。國立臺
灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
吳明清(1991)。教育硏究:基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北:五南。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用—問卷統計分析實務。臺北:五南。
吳麗君(2002)。九年一貫課程的首演:改革理念與實務面向的落差。在中華民
國課程與教學學會編著,創世紀教育工程:九年一貫課程再造。台北:揚
智。
高子珮(2009)。台灣大學英文系教師與學生對英語寫作教學與學習的看法之
研究,銘傳大學應用英語學系碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
徐淑敏(1999)。臺灣中小學經濟學教育之研究。國教新知,45(5),49-59。
許瑞雯(譯)(1999),Decker. Walker和J . Soltis(著):課程與目的(Curriculum and aims)。臺北:桂冠。(原著出版於1997年)
許民陽、吳惠雯,王郁軒(2010)。以學生為學習主體的國小高年級土石流防災課程教學研究,課程與教學季刊,13(1),233-259。
陸民仁(1985)。公民教育的經濟學基礎。在史振鼎編著,公民教育之問題與對策(上冊)(頁133-141)。臺灣省教育會。
教育部(1983)。高級中學公民課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(1995)。高級中學公民課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(2004)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要總綱。2010年10月24日,取自http://www.tnfsh.tn.edu.tw/course/main.htm
教育部(2009a)。普通高級中學課程暫行綱要總綱。2011年2月
28日,取自http://www.edu.tw/high-school/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8403
教育部(2009b)。99課綱修訂理念與特色。2011年2月
28日,取自http://www.edu.tw/high-school/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8403
教育部統計處(2010)。各級學校名錄(高級中學)。2011年11月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=25656
教育部統計處(2011)。高中職概況。2011年11月1日,取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=8956
張 華(2000)課程與教學論。上海:上海教育出版社。
張茂桂(2008)。高中「公民與社會」新課綱的訂定。教育研究月刊,166,44-53。
張茂桂(2009)。再探公民:反思高中《公民與社會》新課綱之訂定。公民訓育學報,20,1-31。
張明偉(2011)。現職高中公民與社會科教師經濟教育專業知能之研究─以台
北地區為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
張秀雄(1996)。公民教育的理論與實施。臺北:師大書苑。
陳玉芬(2002)。經濟推理思考教學運用在國中公民與道德科之行動研究。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
陳秀玲(1994)。臺灣國民中學經濟學教科書之研究—與美、日之比較分析。
國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
陳舒怡(2004)。九年一貫課程國中社會學習領域教科書經濟概念內容分析。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版),高雄市。
陳麗華、王鳳敏(譯)(1996),National Council for the Social Studies(著):美國社會科課程標準(Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies)。臺北:教育部。(原著出版於1994年)
郭禎祥、陳碧珠(譯)(2008),E.W. Eisner(著):教育想像力 : 學校課程、教學的設計與評鑑(The educational imagination : on the design and evaluation of school programs)。臺北:洪葉文化。(原著第三版出於2002年)
鈕文英(2011)。教育研究方法與論文寫作。臺北:雙葉書廊。
單文經(2002)。課程與教學。臺北:師大書苑。
黃丹鈺(2002)。國中公民與道德科經濟學教科書之內容分析。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
黃光雄(1987)。高級職業學校社會科學概論:學科教育目標研究。在教育部人指會編著,中小學社會科學教育目標研究報告(頁128-132)。臺北:三民書局。
黃光雄(1990)。教學的概念、模式及策略。在黃光雄編著,教育概論(頁365-386)。臺北:師大書苑。
黃光雄、蔡清田(1999)。課程設計:理論與實際。臺北:五南。
黃政傑(1985)。課程改革。臺北:漢文出版社。
黃政傑(1990)。課程。在黃光雄編著,教育概論(頁365-386)。臺北:師大書苑。
黃政傑(1997)。課程改革的理念與實踐。臺北:漢文出版社。
黃政傑(2005)。課程思想。臺北:冠學。
黃美筠(2000)。臺灣地區公立高中三年級學生經濟認知之評量。公民訓育學報,9,129-160。
黃美筠(2002)。國三學生對公民與道德科經濟教材經濟認知成效之評估—以附加價值法探討。公民訓育學報,12,59-109。
黃美筠(2004)。社會學習領域中之經濟學教學。在黃炳煌編著,社會學習領域之教學內涵及其示例。臺北:師大書苑。
黃美筠(2005)。中小學經濟教育理論與教材教法之研究。台北:水牛。
黃美筠(2009)。理財教育融入中小學課程的教學策略。臺灣教育,659,14-23。
黃嘉雄(2010)。課程評鑑。臺北:心理。
黃毅志(2008)。如何精確測量職業地位?「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」之建構。台東大學教育學報,19(1),151-160。
黃繼仁(2005)。許瓦布的課程思想。在黃政傑編著,課程思想(頁59-102)。臺北:冠學。
黃鴻文(2003)。國民中學學生文化之民族誌研究。臺北:學富。
黃鴻文、湯仁燕(2005)。學生如何詮釋學校課程。教育研究集刊,51(2),
99-131。
溫明忠(1999)。國中經濟教育的理論與實施。臺北:水牛。
溫騰光(1992)。國民中小學經濟教育課程內涵之研究。文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文(未出版),臺北市。
甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務 : 解構與重建。臺北:高等教育。
劉玉玲(2005)。課程發展與設計。臺北:新文京開發。
熊秉元(2007)。熊秉元漫步經濟。臺北:時報。
蔡幸芳(2004)。由經濟推理的教學進行環境教育之硏究-以國中公民與道德第三册經濟教材為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民訓育研究所碩士論文(未出
版),臺北市。
蔡清田(2001)。課程改革實驗。台北:五南。
蔡清田(2002)學校整體課程經營。臺北:五南
蔡清田(2008)。課程學。臺北:五南。
蔡碧夆(2008)。升學氛圍下國中學生的課程觀:一個班級的民族誌研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
趙寧(譯)(2002),Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J. D., & Smaldino, S. E.(著):媒體、科技與學習。在張霄亭主譯:教學媒體及學習科技(頁54-83)。臺北:雙葉。
鄭又嘉(2004)。學校本位課程發展的教室層次課程實施之經驗課程研究。國立中正大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版),嘉義縣。
潘文福(2010)。建構互為主體性的教室觀察指標—詮釋的觀點。教育資料與研究雙月刊,96,95-116。
潘慧玲(2005)。台灣新一波之高中課程改革。文教新潮,10(3),6-20。
歐用生(2004)。課程領導:議題與展望。臺北:高等教育。
賴穎莉(2008)。國民中小學社會學習領域教科書中經濟課程內容之分析。國立臺北教育大學課程與教學研究所碩士論文(未出版),臺北市。
蕭行易(1983)。經濟學與公民教育。在國立臺灣師範大學學術委員會編著,明日的公民教育(頁97-112)。臺北:幼獅。
韓國棟(2008年5月4日):95課綱經濟學超難,師生都叫苦。中國時報,C4版。
簡良平(2003)。學校課程決定—理論與實證。臺北:師大書苑。
簡良平(2005)。赫斯特的課程思想。在黃政傑編著,課程思想(頁103-136)。臺北:冠學。
簡楚瑛(2009)。課程發展理論與實務。臺北:心理。
蘇紹雯(2008)。英語教材教法與評量研究:專科生與教師觀點之比較。英語教
學,32(1),127-172。
英文部分
Arends, R. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. New York, NY: McGrawhill.
Barrow, R., & Milburn, G. (1990). A critical dictionary of educational concepts: An
appraisal of selected ideas and issues in educational theory and practice. New
York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Baumol, W. J. (1994). Economics Education For a half-century of radical chance, In W, Walstad (Eds) An international perspective on economic education (pp. 19-36). New York: LLC.
Becker, W., & Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and Talk:A National Survey on Teaching
Undergraduate Economics. American Economic Review, 86(2), 448-453.
Beron,K. (1990). Joint Determination of Current Classroom Performance and Additional Economics Classes: A Binary / Continuous Model. Journal of Economic Education, 21(3),255-264.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The cognitive domain. New York: Longman.
Brophy, J. E. (1982). How teacher influence what is taught and learned in classroom. The elementary School Journal, 83(1), 1-13.
Bruner,J.S. (1967).The Process of Education. Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press.
Buckles, S. (1991). Guidelines for economic content in school programs. In W, Walstad & J .Soper (Eds.), Effective economic education in the schools (pp.24-34). Washing, D. C.: National Education Association and Joint Council on Economic Education.
Cadenas, H. G. (1999). Revitalize your teaching-four key elements for success. Contemporary Education, 70(2), 5-7.
Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 181-188.
Clark C.M., Peterson, P. L.(1986) Teachers’ thought processes , In M. C. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp 255–296), New York: Macmillan.
Council for Economic Education. (2010). Voluntary National Content Standards in Economics(2nd Edition). New York,Council for Economic Education.
Davis, A. B., Sumara, D. J. & Kieren, T. E. (1996), Cognition, co-emergence, curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), 151-169.
Feber, M.,Birnbaum, B., & Green, C. (1983). Gender Differences in Economic Knowledge: A Revalution of the Evidence. Journal of Economic Education, 14,4-10.
Gay, L. R, & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational research competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gilliard, J. V., Caldwell, J., Dalgaard, B. R., Highsmith,R. J., Reinke, R., & Watts,
M. (1988). Economics, what and when: Scope and sequence guidelines,
K-12.New York: Joint Council on Economic Education.
Glattorn, A, A. (1987). Curriculum leadership. Glenview, I11.: Scott, Foresman & Co.
Glattorn, A, A. (2000). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Goodlad, J. I. (1979). Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum pratice, New York: McGraw- Hill..
Goodlad, J. I. (1985). Curriculum as a field of study. In T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds) The International Encyclopedia of Education, 1141-1144. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tathem, R., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hansen, W. L.(1998). Principles-based Standards: on the voluntary national content standards in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 29(2), 150-156.
Heath, J. (1989). An Economic Model of the Role of Gender in Economic Education. American Economic Review Proceedings, 79,226-230.
Helburn, S. W. (1985). Economics and economic education:the selective use of
discipline structures in economics curricula, In S, Hodkinson and D. Whitehead
(Eds)Economics Education: Research and Development Issues(pp. 6-32).
Harlow:Longman.
Hills, P. J. (Ed.) (1982). A dictionary of education. London, Boston:Routledge &
Kegan Paul.
Horton,R.V.,& Weidenaar,D.J. (1975). Wherefore economic education? Journal of
Economic Education, 7(1),40-44.
Hurst, P.(1974). Knowledge and the curriculum. Oxford: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Jackstadt, S. &Gootaert, C.(1980). Gender, Gender Stereotyping, and Socioeconomic Background as Determinants of Economic Knowledge and Learning. Journal of Economic Education, 12, 34-40.
Jane, L., & Jody, H. (2009). Is There a Disconnect Between Teaching Styles and
Learning Styles in High School Economics Class. The Journal of Private
Enterprise, 24(2), 157-164.
Kelly, A.C. (1983). Innovation in Economic Education : The Newspaper Can Be an Effective Teaching Tool. Economic56.
Lawson, R. A. (2006). Teaching Economic Principles With Comic Strips. Journal of Private Enterprise, 22(1), 168-176.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2010). Currriculum standards for social studies: Expectation of excellence. Washington.DC: NCSS.
National Council on Economic Education. (1997). Economics America: Content statements for state standards in economics, K-12. New York: NCEE.
National Task Force on Economic Education. (1961). Economic education in the Schools:Report of the National Task Force on Economic Education. New York:Committee for Economic Development.
Nourse, E. (1966). Current Aspects of Our Persistent Economic Problems. Social
Education, 30(4), 235.
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Pamela, F. A. (1987). An Analysis of Teacher, Student and Parent Evaluation of an Elementary Process-Approach Curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Washington, DC. (EDRS Document Reproduction Service No.ED 281 769)
Passe, J. (1996). When students choose content:a guide to increasing motivation,
autonomy, and achievement. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press.
Phenix,P.H.(1962).The disciplines as curriculum content. In A.H.Passow(ed.), curriculum Crossroad.New York:Teachers College Press.
Quigley, C. N., & Bahmueller, C. F. (1991). Civitas: a framework for civic education. Calabasas, CA:Center for Civic Education.
Saunders, P. & Gilliard, J. V. (1995). A Framwork for teaching basic economic concepts with scope and sequence guidelines, K-12. New York: National Council on Economic Education.
Schug, M. C.,Todd, R. J., & Berry, R. (1984). Why Kids Don’t Like Social Studies. Social Education, 48, 382-87.
Schubert, W. (1986). Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility. New York: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1–22.
Siegfried, J. J. and Meszaros, B. T. (1997), National voluntary content standards for
pre-college economics education, American Economic Review, 87 (2), 247-253.
Siegfried J. J., & Walstad, W. B. (1990). Research on Teaching Economics. In P. Saunders and W. B. Walstad (Eds.), The Principles of Economics Course, A Handbook for Instructors (pp. 270-288). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Skilbeck,M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London:Harper & Row.
Snyder, J. , Boiling, F. & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum implementation. In Jackson, P. W. (eds.) Handbook of reach on curriculum. New York: Macmillan.
Soper, J., & Walstad, W. (1988). The reality of high school economics: The teachers''
perspective. Journal of Private Enterprise. 4(3), 85-96.
Stigler, G. J. (1970). The case, if any, for economic education. Journal of Economic
Education, 1(2), 77-84.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
Trujillo, G. (1977). Consumer and Economic Education, K-12: A Comparative Analysis, U. S. Office of Education. Washing, D.C.: Office of Consumer Education.
Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Walstad, W. B. (1992). Economics Instruction in High Schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 2019-2051.
Walstad, W. B. (1994). An International Perspective on Economic Education. New York, LLC.
Walstad, W. B. (1998). Why it’s important to understand economics. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 12(4), 22-26.
Walstad, W. B. (2001). Economic Education in U.S. High Schools. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 195-210.
Weaver, A. M., Deaton, W. L., & Reach, S. A. (1987). The effect of economic summer institutes for teachers on the achievement of their students. Educational Research, 80(5), 296-300.
Wentland, D. (2004). A Guide for Determining Which Teaching Methodology to Utilize in Economic Education:Trying to Improve How Economic Information Is Communicated to Students .Education, 124(4), 640-648.
Wentworth, D., & Schug, M. C. (1994). How to use an economic mysterg in your history course. Social Education, 58(1), 10-12.
Willis, G., Schubert, W. H., Bullough, R. V., Kridel, C., & Holton, J.(1994). The American Curriculum: A Documentary History. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.