Basic Search / Detailed Display

Author: 程翊婷
Thesis Title: 高職特教班教師對職業輔導評量的看法與實施現況
Teachers’ Perceptions and Application of Vocational Assessment: An Investigation of Special Education Class in Vocational High Schools
Advisor: 林幸台
Degree: 碩士
Master
Department: 特殊教育學系
Department of Special Education
Thesis Publication Year: 2006
Academic Year: 94
Language: 中文
Number of pages: 226
Keywords (in Chinese): 職業輔導評量高職特教班
Keywords (in English): vocational assessment, special education class of vocational high school
Thesis Type: Academic thesis/ dissertation
Reference times: Clicks: 636Downloads: 52
Share:
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report
  • 本研究主要目的在瞭解高職特教班教師對於職業輔導評量的看法以及實際參與運用的情況,運用問卷調查方式,以台灣地區高職特教班的任教教師為研究對象,進行資料收集,回收有效問卷331份,並以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、重複量數分析及多元迴歸強迫進入法等統計方式進行資料處理與分析。茲就本研究主要發現分別說明如下:
    一、高職特教班教師對於職業輔導評量的概念仍感陌生,且有一成的教師仍未聽過職業輔導評量。
    二、高職特教班教師對職業輔導評量的瞭解程度影響實際參與運用情形。
    三、高職特教班教師對於職業輔導評量的實行持正面肯定的態度。
    四、教師認為職業輔導評量結果的助益著重在職場轉銜。
    五、教師運用職業輔導評量結果於職業教育中的頻率較少。
    六、教師對於職業輔導評量的認知與實際參與程度不相符合。
    七、教師參與職業輔導評量專業團隊的程度偏低。
    八、教師的「任教地區」、「目前職務」、「特教背景」與「特教年資」會影響教師對職業輔導評量的看法;而教師的「任教地區」和「目前職務」則會影響教師在職業輔導評量的實施現況。
    本研究依據上述研究結果,對於相關政府單位、教師以及未來研究等方面提出建議,以供參考。

    The purpose of this study was to investigate teachers’ attitudes and current practices on vocational assessment in special education classes of vocational high schools. With 331 valid questionnaires returned, descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, repeated measures, and multiple stepwise regression were used to analyze the data. Major findings of this study were as follows:
    1.Most teachers in special education classes of vocational high schools were not well acquainted with the concept of vocational assessment. About 10% of the respondents have not heard of the term.
    2.The better teachers knew about vocational assessment, the more they were involved in the implementation and application of vocational assessment.
    3.The teachers showed positive attitude toward the implementation of vocational assessment for their students.
    4.Most teachers confirmed the usefulness of vocational assessment on students’ employment transition.
    5.Fewer teachers applied results of vocational assessment report on vocational education program.
    6.Teachers’ perception of vocational assessment was not correspondent with their application of the assessment results.
    7.Few teachers were engaged in professional vocational assessment team.
    8.Teachers’ attitudes toward vocational assessment had strong relationships with factors of their school location, assigned position, professional background, and years in teaching. Moreover, school location and assigned positions had impacts on teachers’ application of vocational assessment results.
    Implications and suggestions for teachers, educational administrative, and future studies were provided accordingly.

    致謝......................................................I 中文摘要..................................................II 英文摘要..................................................IV 目次......................................................VI 圖表目錄..................................................IX 第一章 緒論................................................1 第一節 研究動機.............................................1 第二節 研究目的與待答問題....................................7 第三節 名詞釋義............................................10 第二章 文獻探討............................................12 第一節 職業輔導評量在高職特教班的實施現況.....................12 第二節 職業輔導評量的目的與流程..............................22 第三節 職業輔導評量結果的運用................................40 第四節 學校人員在職業輔導評量中所扮演角色.....................56 第五節 影響教師對職業輔導評量看法的相關因素....................67 第三章 研究方法............................................71 第一節 研究設計............................................71 第二節 研究對象............................................73 第三節 研究工具............................................76 第四節 研究步驟............................................83 第五節 資料分析............................................85 第四章 研究結果與討論.......................................88 第一節 高職特教班教師對職業輔導評量看法與實施現況..............88 第二節 不同背景變項的高職特教班教師對職業輔導評量看法和實施現況的差異情形...................................................101 第三節 高職特教班教師對職業輔導評量看法與實施現況之比較........112 第四節 教師背景變項和在職業輔導評量的看法對於實際參與運用職業輔導評量的預測情形..............................................128 第五節 綜合討論...........................................136 第五章 結論與建議.........................................156 第一節 研究發現與結論......................................156 第二節 建議...............................................168 參考文獻.................................................176 附錄一 預試和正式施測參與學校名單..........................189 附錄二 預試問卷..........................................190 附錄三 提供問卷意見的專家和教師名單........................194 附錄四 專家和特教教師所提供修改建議........................195 附錄五 預試問卷項目分析...................................199 附錄六 預試問卷因素分析...................................203 附錄七 正式問卷因素分析...................................207 附錄八 正式問卷..........................................209

    一、中文部分
    內政部(民91):身心障礙者生涯轉銜服務整合實施方案。中華民國九十一年一月三十一日內政部台內社字第○九一○○六○二一八號函頒。
    王明泉(民93):高中職以上特殊教育現況與未來展望—以東部地區為例。發表於台灣特殊教育的現在與未來分區研討會。取自http://www.enable.org.tw/iss/pdf/3-4.pdf
    王保進(民91):視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究。台北:心理。
    王敏行(民92a):身心障礙者職業輔導評量與職業重建的關係。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(2-6頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    王敏行(民92b):轉介身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務應有的認識。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(29-33頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    王敏行(民92c):職業轉介判斷指標。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(47-48頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    王敏行(民92d):轉介職評服務流程圖與說明。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(54頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    王筱婷(民94):智能障礙者職業輔導評量結果之運用及其就業適應之相關研究-以中部地區六名智能障礙者為例。國立彰化師範大學復健諮商研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    台中市勞工局(民95):身心障礙者輔導評量簡介。http://www.tccg.gov.tw/sys/SM_theme?page=4191b790
    台中縣勞工局(民95):身心障礙者職業輔導評量簡介。http://www.taichung.gov.tw/enable/04topic/01topic_01b.
    asp?bull_id=14705
    台北市勞工局(民91):社區化支持性就業與職業輔導評量執行成果與發展。發表於九十年度身心障礙者就業促進工作執行成果研討會(91.4.26)。
    台北縣勞工局(民93):台北縣身心障礙勞工職業輔導評量中心服務成果報告。發表於台北縣身心障礙勞工職業輔導評量服務成果報告(93.10.20)。
    台南市勞工局(民95):身心障礙者職業輔導評量簡介。http://labor.tncg.gov.tw/main.htm
    台南縣勞工局(民95):身心障礙者職業輔導評量簡介。http://lab.tainan.gov.tw/index_news.php
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民87):身心障礙職業輔導評量辦法。中華民國八十七年六月三十日發布台八十七勞職業字第○二七四三四號。
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民92a):九十二年度促進身心障礙者就業業務訪視計畫報告書。台北市:職訓局。
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民92b):促進身心障礙者中程計畫。中華民國九十二年五月十四日勞職特字第○九二○二○○八三○號。
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民92c):補助辦理身心障礙者職業輔導評量實施計畫。中華民國九十二年二月七日職特字第○九二○○○二三七五號。
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民93):九十三年度各縣市政府及辦理職業輔導評量單位一覽表。http://www.evta.
    gov.tw/balk/balk930903.doc
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民94a):九十二年度身心障礙者就業促進業務訪視建議事項後續辦理情形。http://www.evta.gov.tw/balk/940906.doc
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民94b):行政院勞工委員會94年上半年身心障礙者就業促進業務執行情形報告。http://www.evta.gov.tw/balk/940824.htm
    行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(民95):94年度辦理身心障礙者職業輔導評量成果統計表。(未出版)
    吳明宜(民92):身心障礙者職業輔導評量方法。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(13-22頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    林宏旻、施毓豪(民92):高職特教班就業轉銜探討—以國立台中高工特教班為例。特教園丁,19(1),62-70。
    林宏熾(民87):身心障礙者之生涯訓練與發展—就業轉銜面面觀。就業與訓練,16(3),25-33。
    林宏熾(民92):身心障礙學生教育轉銜及十二年就學安置。特教園丁,18(3),4-19。
    林宏熾(民93):高職階段智能障礙學生轉銜服務之分析研究—以台灣中部地區為例。東台灣特殊教育學報,6,117-132。
    林宏熾、林巾凱(民89):身心障礙者生涯與職業輔導評量常用工具簡介。就業與訓練,18(5),34-40。
    林幸台(民90):身心障礙者生涯發展與轉銜服務。中等教育,52(5),26-37。
    林幸台(民91a):高職特教班智能障礙學生轉銜模式之研究—組織與運作模式之探討。特殊教育研究學刊,22,189-215。
    林幸台(民91b):職業評量與課程設計。載於國立暨台灣區公私立特殊教育學校(班)九十一年度職業輔導評量與課程規劃研習手冊(19-29頁)。教育部中部辦公室主辦(91.11.21-22)。
    林幸台(民93a):台灣地區身心障礙勞工職業輔導評量服務模式之探討。發表於台北縣身心障礙勞工職業輔導評量服務成果報告(93.10.20)。
    林幸台(民93b):高職特教班教師參與轉銜服務工作及其對專業合作態度之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,26,1-17。
    邱皓政(民91):量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。台北:五南。
    邱滿豔(民82):美國職業評量簡介。勞工行政,60,47-48。
    邱滿豔(民85):我國殘障者職業輔導評量工具發展方向之探討。就業與訓練,14(5),17-21。
    徐享良(民91):學校如何執行職業輔導評量—生態評量及社區化就業觀點。載於國立暨台灣區公私立特殊教育學校(班)九十一年度職業輔導評量與課程規劃研習手冊(50-62頁)。教育部中部辦公室主辦(91.11.21-22)。
    徐享良(民93):對身心障礙者職業輔導評量上的考量。發表於國立彰化師範大學特殊教育中心九十三年度職業輔導評量研習(93.9.18)。
    桃園縣勞工局(民95):身心障礙者職業輔導評量簡介。http://www.tycg.gov.tw/cgi-bin/SM_theme?page=4429ff83
    教育部(民94):特教通報網。http://www.set.edu.tw。
    張英鵬(民82):動力取向觀運用在殘障者職業評量上之探討。特殊教育季刊,46,26-28。
    張彧(民91):職業輔導評量工具之介紹及評量資料之分析與運用。載於國立暨台灣區公私立特殊教育學校(班)九十一年度職業輔導評量與課程規劃研習手冊(30-49頁)。教育部中部辦公室主辦(91.11.21-22)。
    張萬峰(民90):智能障礙一般就業技能評量表之發展。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    許德良、黃璽璇(民92):身心障礙學生十二年就學安置相關職業輔導評量程序和方法。特教園丁,18(3),67-72。
    陳明顯(民93):身心障礙者職業輔導評量之執行與應用結果分析-以高雄市勞工局博愛職業技能訓練中心為例。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文(未出版)。
    陳飛燕(民89):智能障礙者的職業訓練與就業輔導之探討。就業與訓練,18(2),14-17。
    陳靜江(民94):職業輔導評量簡介與其在促進就業之應用。發表於國立台東大學特殊教育中心辦理之鑑定及評量工具研習(94.5.14)。
    黃國庭(民91):教師在身心障礙者的轉銜教育中應扮演的角色。國教輔導,41(3),56-61。
    新竹市勞工局(民94):身心障礙者職業輔導評量服務暨宣導座談會。訊息載於http://labor.hccg.gov.tw/ News/
    news_94_160.htm
    楊雅惠、林幸台(民91):高職聽障教育教師轉銜服務知能調查研究。東台灣特殊教育學報,4,203-218。
    蔡德穗(民93):學校單位轉介職評之經驗分享。發表於台北縣身心障礙勞工職業輔導評量服務成果報告(93.10.20)。
    劉民專(民90):國中智能障礙學生升學與就業轉銜服務需求之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    劉彩虹(民94):探討身心障礙者職業輔導評量執行概況。台東特教,21,24-36。
    賴淑華(民92):身心障礙者職業輔導評量的基本內容。載於職訓局編:身心障礙者職業輔導評量工作手冊(7-12頁)。台北市:職訓局。
    蘇盈宇(民91):高職特教班智能障礙學生就業轉銜服務現況與需求之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。
    蘇純瑩(民91):智障成人社區自主能力、認知功能與就業表現之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所博士論文(未出版)。

    二、英文部分
    Bang, M. Y., Lamb, P. (1997). Impacts of an inclusive school-to-work program. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the Council for Exceptional Children, Salt Lake City, UT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED408752)
    Bingham, R. P., & Krantz, J. (2001). Career and vocational assessment 1997-1998: A biennial review. Journal of Career Assessment, 9, 1-24.
    Bock, M. A., & Hurlbutt, K. (2001-2002). Preacademic and vocational assessment: The key to effective educational programming for students with autism. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 27(1-2), 81-88.
    Burlew, L. D., & Morisson, J. (1996). Enhancing the effectiveness of vocational assessment in promoting lifestyle change via specific change strategies. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 29, 163-175.
    Case, K. L. (2000). How learning-disabled students use assessment information [Abstract]. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Caston, H. L., & Watson, A. L. (1990). Vocational assessment and rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 34, 61-67.
    Clarke, S., & Tuck, R. (1996). Problems of implementing assessment and certification. In O. Bertrand (Ed.), Assessing and certifying occupational skills and competences in vocational education and training (pp.59-65). Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Center.
    Conderman, G., & Katsiyannis, A. (2002). Instructional issues and practices in secondary special education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 169-179.
    Elrod, G. F., Tesolowski, D. G., & Devlin, S. D. (1998). Vocational assessment of special needs learners. In H. B. Vance (Ed.), Psychological assessment of children: Best practices for school and clinical settings (pp. 456-480). New York: Wiley.
    Fouad, N. A., & Zao, K. E. (2000). Meeting the revolution: Future trends in vocational assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 403-409.
    Fultz, L., & Kinsey, C. (2004). Assessment for transition from school to work. In E. M. Levinson (Ed.), Transition from school to post-school life for individuals with disabilities: Assessment from an educational and school psychological perspective (pp. 250-274). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
    Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § et seq (2004).
    The Interdisciplinary Council on Vocational Evaluation/Assessment. (1995). The position statement of the interdisciplinary council on vocational evaluation and assessment. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 18, 109-12.
    Izzo, M. V., Johnson, J. R., Levitz, M., & Aaron, J. H. (1998). Transition from school to adult life: New roles for educators. In P. Wehman & J. Kregel (Eds.), More than a job: Securing satisfying careers for people with disabilities (pp. 260-283). Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
    Knott, L., & Asselin, S. B. (1999). Transition competencies: Perception of secondary special education teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 55-65.
    Leconte, P. J., & Neubert, D. A. (1997). Vocational assessment: The kick-off point for successful transitions. Washington, DC: National Transition Alliance for Youth with Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED413465)
    Lehmann, J. P., Hyatt, J., & Sample, P. (1997). Partners in transition: Empowering teachers to provide transition services. Paper presented in a conference, CO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406101)
    Levinson, E. M. (1993). Transdisciplinary vocational assessment: Issues in school-based programs. Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
    Levinson, E. M. (1994). Current vocational assessment models for students with disabilities. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 94-101.
    Levinson, E. M. (1998). Levinson, E. M. (2004). Introduction to transition assessment. In E. M. Levinson (Ed.), Transition from school to post-school life for individuals with disabilities: Assessment from an educational and school psychological perspective (pp. 3-35). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.Transition: Facilitating the postschool adjustment of students with disabilities. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Levinson, E. M. (2004). Introduction to transition assessment. In E. M. Levinson (Ed.), Transition from school to post-school life for individuals with disabilities: Assessment from an educational and school psychological perspective (pp. 3-35). Springfield, IL: C.C. Thomas.
    Lombard, R. C. (1994). Vocational assessment practices: What works. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED378385)
    Lombard, R. C., Larsen, K. A., & Westphal, S. E. (1993). Validation of vocational assessment services for special populations in Tech-Prep: A model for translating the Perkins assurances into practice. Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 16(1), 14-22.
    Nagle, K. M. (2001). Transition to employment and community life for youths with visual impairments: Current status and future directions. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 95, 725-738.
    Neubert, D. A. (1985). Vocational evaluation recommendations used in the educational planning and placement process for handicapped students: A case study of three school sites [Abstract]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland College Park. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Nolte, D. (1992). Vocational assessment of students with disadvantages: Their peculiar needs. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Vocational Association, St. Louis, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED355427)
    Olson, L. (1997). The school-to-work revolution: How employers and educators are joining forces to prepare tomorrow’s skilled workforce. Reading, MA: Perseus Books.
    Omizo, S. A., & Omizo, M. M. (1992). Career and vocational assessment information for program planning and counseling for students with disabilities. School Counselor, 40(1), 32-39.
    Paepsaet, G. E. (1984). Relationship between teachers’ ratings and vocational assessment system scores [Abstract]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertation.
    Peterson, M. (1986). Vocational assessment of special student : A procedural guide. Starkville, MS: VOC-AIM.
    Peterson, M. (1988). Vocational assessment of special students for vocational education: A state-of-the-art review. Columbus, OH: National Center for Research in Vocational Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED296158)
    Power, P. W. (2000). A Guide to Vocational Assessment (3rd ed.). Austin, AX: Pro-Ed.
    Power, P. W. (2006). A Guide to Vocational Assessment (4th ed.). Austin, AX: Pro-Ed.
    Reisse, W. (1996). Germany: The institutional framework and certification in the dual system. In O. Bertrand (Ed.), Assessing and certifying occupational skills and competences in vocational education and training (pp.153-162). Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Center.
    Rouyx, B. (1996). France: Examinations in a centralized, school-based training system. In O. Bertrand (Ed.), Assessing and certifying occupational skills and competences in vocational education and training (pp.163-172). Washington, DC: OECD Publications and Information Center.
    Rubin, S. E., & Roessler, R. T. (2001). Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process (5th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
    Sexton-Radek, K., & Paul, P. (2002). Vocational assessment of at-risk Hispanic high school students. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED474525)
    Sitlington, P. L. (1996). Transition assessment—Where have we been and where should we be going? Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 19, 159-68.
    Sitlington, P. L., & Clark, G. M. (2001). Career/vocational assessment: A critical component of transition planning. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 26(4), 5-22.
    Sitlington, P. L., Neubert, D. A., Begun, W., Lombard, R. C., & Leconte, P. J. (1996). Assess for success: Handbook on transition assessment. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
    Stodden, R. A., James, R., Chang, C., & Harding, T. (2000). National survey of educational support provision to students with disabilities in postsecondary education settings. Honolulu, HI: National Center for the Study of Postsecondary Educational Supports. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED454679)
    Taylor, R. L. (1997). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational and psychological procedures (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2000). Some final thoughts about using tests and assessment procedures in counseling. In C. E. Watkins Jr. & V. L. Campbell (Eds.), Testing and assessment in counseling practice (pp. 547-556). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
    Wehman. P. (2001). Life beyond the classroom: Transition strategies for young people with disabilities (3rd ed.). Baltimore: P.H. Brookes.
    White, M. (2000). The impact of careers guidance for employed adults in continuing education: Assessing the importance of attitudinal information. London: Policy Studies Institute.
    Zunker, V. G., & Norris, D. S. (1998). Using assessment results for career development (5th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    QR CODE