Author: |
詹嘉琦 Chia-Chi Chan |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
以自我決定理論探討雙北市智能障礙者的工作動機 Work Motivation of People with Intellectual Disabilities in Taipei: Based on Self-Determination Theory |
Advisor: | 張千惠 |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
復健諮商研究所 Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Counseling |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2014 |
Academic Year: | 102 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 112 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 自我決定理論 、智能障礙者 、工作動機 |
Keywords (in English): | self-determination theory, intellectual disabilities, work motivation |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 267 Downloads: 29 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究以Deci與Ryan(1985)提出的自我決定理論為基礎,目的在於瞭解智能障礙者的工作動機之現況,以及在不同的個人變項、就業變項和心理需求之智能障礙者於研究變項中的差異或相關情形,進而探索可預測工作動機的心理需求向度;本研究採用問卷調查法,以臺北市、新北市的智能障礙者為研究對象,共計回收有效問卷共計137份。所蒐集之資料運用描述性統計、t檢定、單因子變異數分析及多元迴歸分析進行資料處理。研究主要發現如下:
一、聯繫感是智能障礙者滿足程度最高的心理需求。
二、認同整合調節是智能障礙者最同意的工作動機類型。
三、性別、障礙程度、學歷程度、父母職業水準和家庭經濟狀況等個人變項在工作動機的各向度皆未存在明顯差異。
四、是否有實習經驗、職業訓練經驗、職業輔導評量、工作經驗、工作穩定度和不同的勞動條件等就業變項對於工作動機未有明顯差異。然在工作意願、是否在職及喜歡目前工作的程度對於工作動機部分向度有顯著差異。
五、心理需求中,勝任感與聯繫感可正向預測工作動機,且以勝任感的預測力較大。
六、在各種變項對於外在調節皆未達顯著。
This study aimed to (1)investigate the work motivation of people with intellectual disabilities, and to (2)understand the impact of their individual backgrounds, employment backgrounds, and basic psychological needs on their work motivation. The data, 137 valid questionnaires filled out by people with intellectual disabilities in Taipei, were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA and multiple regression.
The results showed that: 1. The need of relatedness was the most
influential factor of work motivation; 2. People with intellectual disabilities agreed the most that the work motivation was from (identified and integrated regulation); 3. There were no significant differences among work motivation and the five variables, gender, disability degree, education degree, parent's occupation, and home economic status; 4. There were no significant differences among work motivation and the variables of practical training, career training , career counseling evaluation, work experience, job stability, and different labor conditions; while there were significant differences among work motivation of and the variables of the willingness of work, employment status, and preference degree of current job; 5. The needs for competence and relatedness could positive predict work motivation. The need for competence was more significant than the need for relatedness; and 6. There were no significant differences of the variable of external regulation.
一、 中文部分
刁惠美(1992)。影響民間企業僱用殘障者雇用表現因素之研究─以臺北市、臺北縣、桃園縣為例。國立臺灣大學社會研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
王敏行(2008)。性別、年齡、障礙、職位層級與僱用決定:雇主與職業重建人員觀點比較。特殊教育研究學刊,33(3),1-24。
王華沛、王敏行、邱滿艷、賴陳秀慧、鳳華、吳明宜、黃宜君、吳亭芳、陳靜江(譯)(2013)。工作與身心障礙者。臺北:心理。(Edna Mora Szymanski, & Randall M. Parker, 2010)
行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局(2009)。中華民國98年身心障礙者勞動狀況調查報告。臺北市:作者。
李宜玫、孫頌賢(2010)。大學生選課動機與學習投入之關係。教育科學研究期刊,55(1),155-182。
李崇信(1983)。中、重度智能不足者之職業教育。特殊教育季刊,9,16-20。
李新鄉(2008)。組織心理學。臺北:五南。
何華國(2004)。特殊兒童心理與教育(第四版)。臺北:五南。
江亮演、余漢儀、葉肅科、黃慶鑽(2007)。身心障礙者福利。臺北:松慧有限公司。
身心障礙者權益保障法沿革(2007)。全國法規資料庫。2013年5月10日,取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchResult.aspx?p=A&k1=%e8%ba%ab%e5%bf%83%e9%9a%9c%e7%a4%99%e8%80%85%e6%ac%8a%e7%9b%8a%e4%bf%9d%e9%9a%9c%e6%b3%95&t=E1F1A1&TPage=1
巫博瀚、王淑玲(2004)。自我調整學習的理論與實踐。中等教育,55(6),94-109。
吳武典(1994)。殘障朋友潛在人力資源開發與配合措施。特殊教育季刊,52,1-8。
吳統雄(1985)。態度與行為研究的信度與效度:理論、應用、反省。民意學術專刊,29-53。
吳劍雄、陳靜江(2007)。高職特教班智能障礙畢業生所從事職務要求之調查初探。復健諮商。1,17-46。
余禮娟 (2001)。身心障礙社會福利機構智能障礙就業青年自我決策之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所。未出版,碩士論文。
林千惠、徐享良(1996)。臺灣地區身心障礙者就業能力與意願之調查研究。臺灣省政府勞工處。
林幸台(2007)。身心障礙者生涯輔導與轉銜服務,臺北:心理。
林宏熾(2003)。身心障礙者生活發展理論與生涯轉銜服務(三版),臺北:五南。
林坤燦(2001)。智能障礙者職業教育與訓練(二版),臺北:五南。
林啟超(2011)。「高職學生學業動機調節量表」構念效度驗證之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,7(4),75-102。
林欽榮(2000)。企業心理學。臺北:揚智。
林欽榮(2002)。工業心理學。臺北:揚智。
林傳生(2005)。教育社會學。臺北:巨流。
紐文英(2003)。美國智能障礙協會2002年定義的內容和意涵。特殊教育季刊,86,10-15
個人資料保護法(2010)。全國法規資料庫。2013年5月10日,取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/Law/LawSearchResult.aspx?p=A&k1=%e5%80%8b%e4%ba%ba%e8%b3%87%e6%96%99%e4%bf%9d%e8%ad%b7%e6%b3%95&t=E1F1A1&TPage=1。
高三福、陳瑞易(2010)。教練內、外在工作動機之探討。休閒運動期刊。9,7-11。
徐瑋伶(2003)。工作動機研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,19,89-113。
教育部(2012)。身心障礙及資賦優異學生鑑定標準。臺北。
許天威(1985)。智能不足者之教育與復健。高雄市:復文書局。
許天威、徐享良(1994),殘障者職業訓練適性職類之研究。臺北市:
行政院勞委會職業訓練局。
許碧雲(2006)。特殊教育學校高職部智能障礙畢業生職業適應及相關因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系特殊教育行政碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
張春興 (1994)。教育心理學:三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北:東華。
邱皓政(2013)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例(第五版)。臺北市:五南。
臺北縣政府勞工局(2005)。臺北縣政府九十三年度智能障礙者就業狀況與需求調查研究報告。臺北縣:臺北縣政府勞工局。
萬育維(1997)。如何突破殘障者就業困境-從結構與個人的觀點出發。殘障者勞動力開發研討會資料。行政院勞委會主辦。
陸莉、黃玉枝、林秀錦、朱慧娟(1990)。智能障礙學生輔導手冊。教育部特殊教育小組主編,國立臺南師範學院。
陳家聲(1993)。商業心理學。臺北:東大。
陳彰儀(1999)。組織心理學。臺北市:心理。
陳靜江、李崇信、邱滿艷(2003)。智能障礙者就業服務工作手冊。臺北市:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
陳秀惠(2010)。國中生自我決定動機之發展模式及其相關因素探討。國立成功大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南。
陳靜江(2002)。支持性就業成果分析與自然支持之應用修正版。國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心。
陳韻婷、趙本強(2011)。國中智能障礙學生自我決策能力現況暨影響因素及支持情形之調查研究。特殊教育與復健學報。24,81-106。
陳榮華(1983)。臺灣地區國中益智班畢業生就業狀況研究。教育心理學報,16,125-141。
蔡承志譯(1991)。組織行為(初版)。臺北:桂冠。
二、英文部分
American Association of Mental Retardation (2007). Definition of Intellectual Disability. Retrieved March 18, 2013, from the World Wide Web: http://www.aaidd.org/content_100.cfm?navID=21.
Brolin, D.E. (1982). Vocational preparation of person with handicaped children and youth. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Brooke, V., Wehman, P., Inge, K. & Parent, W. (1995). Towards a customer approach to supported employment. Education and Training for Persons with Mental Retardation.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Donnell, C., Lustig, D., & Strauser, D.(2004). The work alliance: Rehabilitation outcomes for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(2), 12-18.
Falvo, D. (2009). Medical and psychosocial aspects of chronic illness and disability. (4th ed)Boston: Jones and Bartlett
Farris, B. & Stancliffe, R. J. (2001). The co-worker training model: Outcomes of an open employment pilot project. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 26, 145-161.
Forrester-Jones, R., Jones, S., Heason, S., & Terlizzim, M. D. (2004). Supported Employment: a Route to Social Netwoks. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(3), 199-208.
Gagne, M. & Deci, E. L. (2005) Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organization Behavior. 26, 331-362.
Gagne, M., Forest, J. Gilbert, M. H., Bube, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A., (2010). The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation Evidence in Two Languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4). 628-646.
Guay, F., & Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Social context, students’ motivation, and academic achievement: Toward a process model. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 35-38.
Halpern, A., & Furher, M. J. (1984). Function assessment in rehabilitation. Baltimore: Brookes.
Hernandez, B. Keys, C., & Balcazar, F. (2000). Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: A literature review. Journal of Rehabilitation ,66(4), 4-16.
Hill, M. L., Wehman, P. H., Kregal, J., Banks P. D., & Metzler, H. M. D. (1987). Employment outcome for people with moderate and severe disabilities: A eight year longitudinal analysis of supported employment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12, 182-189.
Jahoda, A., Banks, P., Dagnan, D., Kemp, J., Kerr, W. & Williams, V. (2009), Starting a New Job: The Social and Emotional Experience of People with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 22(5). 421-425.
Kober, R., & Eggleton, I. R. C. (2005). The Effect of Different Types of Employment on Quality of Life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 756-760.
Lehmann, I. S. (2006). Minimum wage rates and employment of individuals with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation , 72(2), 50-57.
Lombana, J.H., Florida, S.V., & Tallahassee. (1983). Success for mentally retarded student: Sources to upgrade career counseling and employment of special students.
Maslow. A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row.
McCormick, Ernest J., & Ilgen D., (1994). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Westminster, MD:Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Powell, D. H. (1983). Understanding human adjustment: Normal adaptation in the life cycle. Boston: Little-Brown Company.
Robbins, S. P. (2011). Organizational Behavior. (13th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International.
Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P. (1989). Preceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 3-33.
Steer, R. M., & Porter, L. M. (1974). Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians. Journal of Appliced Psychology, 59(5), 603-609.
Strauser, D. R., Lustig, D. C., &Donnell, C. (2004). The relationship between self-efficacy, locus of control, and work personality. Journal of Rehabilitation 68(1), 20-26
Strauser, D. R., Lustig, D. C., & Donnell, C. (2004). The relationship between working alliance and therapeutic outcomes for individuals with mild retardation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,47, 215-223.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statwastics. (5th Ed.).Needham Heights, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
Toswill, J., Tuck, B., & Wilton, K. (1991). Employment status, age and the quality of life and well being of adults with mild intellectual disability. Crossing boundaries: Present realities-future possibilities. Proceedings of 15th National Conference of the Australian Association of Special Education Inc., Brisbane, 477-482.
Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G., & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation Scale: Its Value for Organizational Psychology Research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4). 213-226.
Wehmeyer, M. L. (2014), Self-Determination: A Family Affair. Family Relations, 63, 178–184.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. (1995), Individual and environmental factors related to the self-determination of adults with mental retardation, Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 291-305.
Wehmeyer, M. L., & Metzler, C. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111-119.
Wehman, P., & Revell, W. G.(1996). Supported employment from 1986 to1993: A national program that works. Focus on Autism & Other Developmental Disabilities, Winter 96, Vol.11 Issue 4, p235,9 p,6 charts.
Whitman, T. L. (1990). Self-regulation and mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 347-362.
Wright, G. (1980). Total rehabilitation. Boston: Little, Brown.
Zivolich, S., Shueman, S. A. & Weiner, J. S. (1997). An Exploratory cost-benefit analysis of natural support: Strategies in the employment of people with severe disabilities. Hournal of vocational rehabilitation, 8, 211-221.