Author: |
楊培翎 Yang Pei-ling |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
國中教師健康與教學效能之相關研究 A Study of the Relationship Between Teacher Health and Teaching efficacy in Junior High Schools. |
Advisor: |
曾永清
Tseng, Yung-Ching |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
公民教育與活動領導學系 Department of Civic Education and Leadership |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2011 |
Academic Year: | 99 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 154 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 教師健康 、教師教學效能 |
Keywords (in English): | teacher health, teaching efficacy |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 167 Downloads: 17 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
西方教育家福祿貝爾(Friedrich Froebel)曾將學校比喻成一座花園,學生是花園一株株的植物,教師則是其中的園丁。因此,教育如同耕種,惟有不斷的努力翻土施肥、除草殺蟲,種子才會萌芽茁壯。身為栽種植物的園丁,培育孩子的教師,一言一行都將在無形之中影響著孩子,但倘若教育過程中舉足輕重的園丁因為自身的健康狀況而無法給予植物正面的栽種與培育時,植物或是下一代的孩子,又將學習到什麼?
本研究旨在瞭解目前國民中學教師健康與教學效能之現況,並探討教師健康與教學效能之關係。本研究主要以量化的研究方法,用問卷調查法進行研究資料收集,研究對象為新北市公立國民中學2010年現任教師(含代理教師),不包括實習老師,根據文獻探討及相關實證之研究結果設計問卷,並進行問卷調查,最後將調查結果加以統計分析與討論。
本研究結果發現如下幾點:
一、新北市國民中學教師健康中上,在「心理健康」情形最佳。
二、新北市國民中學教師教學效能現況中上,在「良好學習氣氛」層面效能表現最佳。
三、國民中學教師健康依其背景變項不同之差異性分析上,不同「性別」、「年齡」、「服務年資」、「學校規模」等變項在教師健康整體或向度有顯著差異存在。
四、國民中學教師教學效能依其背景變項不同之差異性分析上,不同「專業背景」、「服務年資」、「擔任職務」、「學校規模」變項上有顯著差異存在。
五、國中教師健康與教師教學效能之間呈正相關,教師愈健康,教師教學效能也愈佳。
根據迴歸分析得知國中教師健康對教師教學效能具有解釋力,檢定結果均達顯著水準,國中教師健康整體可解釋教師教學效能總變異量的7.5%,其中以「心理健康」較具解釋力
Good fortune and an official position Bell (Friedrich Froebel) once became the school analogy a garden, the student was a garden plant, the teacher is gardener. Therefore, the education is similar to the cultivation, will only have unceasingly turns the soil diligently applies fertilizer, the weeding insect disinfestation, the seed will only then germinate healthy. The body to plant the plant the gardener, will cultivate the child the teacher, every word and deeds will be affecting the child in invisible.But if in education process pivotal gardener is unable because of own state of health when gives the plant positive planting with the cultivation, plant perhaps next generation child, also what will study?
Of this research is for the purpose of understanding that present situation of the present Junior high school teacher health and the teaching efficacy ,and discusses relations of the teacher health and the teaching efficacy.
This research mainly take the quantification research technique, carries on the research acquisition of information with the questionnaire survey procedure, the object of study in 2010 the incumbent teacher (including acts teacher) as the new north market public Junior high school, not including practice teacher, according to the literature discussion and the related real diagnosis of findings design questionnaire, and carries on the questionnaire survey, finally the survey result will perform the statistical analysis and the discussion.
This findings discovery following several points:
1.In New Taipei City Middle school teacher health on the situation is best in “the psychologically healthy”
2.In New Taipei City Middle school teaching efficacy present situation on, the stratification plane potency performance is best in “the good study atmosphere”.
3.Junior high school teacher health according to its background variable different difference analyze, different “the sex”, “the age”, “the serve period of service”, “the school scale” and so on variable in the teacher healthy whole or to have the remarkable difference have.
4.The Junior high school teaching efficacy according to its background variable different difference analysis, different “the specialized background”, “the service period of service”, “holds the post of the duty”, “the school scale” on variable to have the remarkable difference existence.
5.In the country between the teacher health and the teaching efficacy presents related, the teacher is healthier, the teacher teaching potency is also better.
The teacher health has the explanation strength according to the regression analysis knowing country to the teaching efficiency. The examination result reaches the remarkable standard, in the country the teacher healthy whole may explain that teaching efficiency total amount of variation 7.5%, has the explanation strength by “the psychologically healthy”.
一、中文部份
丁淑萍(2005)。台北市國中教師自覺疲勞感與職業壓力、健康生活型態之相關研究。國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
王受榮(1992)。我國國民小學教師效能感及其影響因素之研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
王淑怡(2002)。國民小學教師教學效能指標之建構。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
王榮徳、游正芬、鍾智文、姚開屏(2000)。廿一世紀之健康照護效性評量:生活品質與生活品質調整後之存活分析,台灣醫學,4(1),65-74。
王麗春(1996)。SF-36量表在台北市老人健康狀態調查之效度研究。國立陽明大學公共衛生研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
石明家(2001)。SPSS10.X統計資料分析。台北市:碁峰資訊股份有限公司。
江易穎(2002)。國中音樂教師專業成長與教學效能之研究。國立臺灣師範大學音樂研究所,未出版,臺北市。
行政院衛生署編(2007),中華民國公共衛生年報,行政院衛生署,未出版。
汪成琳(2002)。特殊教育學校校長教學領導與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化市。
李佳霙(1996)。探討中部五縣市民眾健康狀況及醫療利用之研究。中國醫藥學院環境醫學研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
李卓倫(1985)。健康的定義與假說。公共衛生,12(2),146-159。
李珀(1999)。有效能的教學。臺北市:臺北市政府教育局。
李彥君(2002)。國民小學教師工作壓力與情緒管理關係之研究。國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
李莉莉 (2003)。臺北市國民小學激勵策略與教師效能之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
吳清山 (1992)。學校效能研究。臺北市:五南。
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS統計應用學習實務。臺北市:知城。
林玉体 (1969)。我國高級中學課程之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
林青慧(2003)。臺灣簡短36(SF-36)健康量表工具信效度及常模之建立。中國醫藥學院醫務管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
林海清(1994)。高中教師激勵模式與其工作滿意、服務士氣、教學效能之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北。
林進財(1998)。教學理論與方法 。台北:五南。
周子敬、彭睦清 (2005)。國內大專院校教師工作壓力及工作滿足感差異比較。智慧科技與應用統計學報,3(1), 85-107。
周新富(1991)。國民小學教師專業承諾、教學效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
姚開屏(2000)。簡介與評論常用的一般性健康相關生活品質量表兼談對未來研究的建議。測驗年刊,47(2),111-138。
姚開屏(2002)。台灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展與應用。台灣醫學,6(2),193-200。
高夢滔(2002)。美國健康經濟學研究的發展。經濟學動態,8,63-66。
孫志麟 (1991)。國民小學教師自我效能及其相關因素之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
孫志麟(1995)。教師效能的研究途徑與評量理念。教育資料與研究,5,67-75。
國立編譯館(民87)。課程教材教法通論。臺北:正中。
許文耀(1999)。身心健康量表編製計畫。聯安健康事業有現股份公司委託之研究計畫,未出版。。
許芳懿(1997),國民小學教師溝通型態、自我角色知覺與教師自我效能關係之研究,國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所論文,未出版,臺南。
陳木金 (1997)。國民小學教師領導技巧、班級經營策略與教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
郭明德 (1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
張春興 (1994)。教育心理學—三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市:東華。
張郁芬(2001)。國小教師工作壓力、社會支持與身心健康之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
張健群(2009)。國中教師工作壓力、休閒運動參與與身心健康之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義市。
張碧娟 (1999)。國民中學校長領導、學校教學氣氛與教師教學效能關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
張德銳(1994)。促進教師專業成長的新途徑-國小教師 教學評鑑系統。編輯於中國教育學會主編,教育改革,195-238頁。台北:師大書苑。
黃秋柑 (2004)。彰化縣高職教師專業成長與教學效能關係之研究。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
黃朝楠(2007)。過量教育對教學生產力之研究-以臺北地區國民中學教師為例。國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士班碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
黃義良(1999)。國小兼任行政工作的工作壓力與調適方式之研究。國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
教育部(1995)。教師法。臺北市:教育部。
健康幸福調查,台灣人煩到墊底(2010年12月14日)。中央社。2010年12月20日,取自:http://www.cna.com.tw/SearchNews/doDetail.aspx?id=201012140256&q=%E5%81%A5%E5%BA%B7%E5%B9%B8%E7%A6%8F%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5+%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E4%BA%BA%E7%85%A9%E5%88%B0%E5%A2%8A%E5%BA%95
馮绣雯 (2003)。國民小學教師教學信念與教學效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
曾榮祥(2000)。有效推動學校行政革新---「轉化領導」在學校行政中應用之歷程與策略。學校行政雙月刊,6(3)。59-70。
葉重新(2004)。心理學。心理,臺北。
楊淑麗(2003)。國民中學學校氣氛、教師工作壓力與教師身心健康之研究。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展及使用手冊。2001;第一修訂版。
臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組。臺灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華衛誌2000,19(4)。315-24。
蔡麗華 (2001)。臺北縣國民小學教師工作投入與教學效能關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
鄭泰安(1996)。華人常見的心理症與社會心理問題,曾文星主編,華人的心理與治療,台北:桂冠。271-294。
廖居治 (2000)。國中生活科技科教師教學信念與教學效能之研究。國立高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
劉月娥(2000)。國民小學教師專業決定與教師效能感之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
劉威德(1994):國中教師教學成敗歸因、教學自我效能與社會支持相關之研究。高雄師大教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
劉淑雯 (2003)。私立課後托育教師專業能力、工作滿意與教師效能研究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南。
盧瑞芬、謝啟瑞(2005)。醫療經濟學,臺北學富。
簡玉琴(2002)。桃園縣國民小學教師自我效能與教學效能關係之研究。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市 。
顏淑惠(2000)。國民小學教師情緒管理與教師效能關係之研究。台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
蘇國興(2003)。臺北市國小教師工作壓力、運動行為與身心健康之相關研究。臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
二、外文部份
Aaronson, N.K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Bucquet, D., Bullinger, M.. (1992).International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. Quality of Life Research, 1, 349-351.
Arkes , J . (2003). Does Schooling Improve Adult Health?. RAND Working Paper. DRU-3051.
Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
Ashton , P.T. , Webb , R.B. , & Doda , N. (1983). A study of teachers’sence of efficacy Final report , execuitive summary . Florida Univ. , Gainesville . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No . ED 231833)
Bjorner, J.B., Damsgaard, T.M., Watt, T., Groenvold, M. (1998). Tests of data quality,scales assumptions, and reliability of Danish SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1001-1011.
Borich, G.D. (1988):Effective teaching methods. Columbus,O.H.Charles,E.Merrill.
Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales. (2nd ed. ).Open University Press.
Brooks, RG. (1995). Health Status Measurement: A perspective on change. London: Macmillan press.
Brophy, J.&Poters, A.C. (1988).Synthesis of research on good eaching:Insights from the work of the institute for research on teching.Educational Leadership.45(8),74-82.
Cavers, L. (1989)﹒Teacher efficacy:its relationship to school level organizational condition and teacher demographic characteristics﹒﹝CD-ROM﹞﹒Abstract Form:ProQuest File:Dissertation Abstracts Item:49:3563A.﹒
Cheng, T.A., & Williams, P. (1986) The design and development of a screening questionnaire for use in community studies of mental disorders in Taiwan, Psycological Medicine,16, 415-422
Cropper, M .L., (1977).Health, investment in health, and occupational choice. Journal of Political Economy.85(6), 1273-1294.
Dupont, C.M. (1990)﹒Effects of a staff development program in science onparticipants, self-efficacy and commitment to teaching﹒Dissertation Abstracts International,51,356A﹒
Edward, C. H. (1993). Classroom discipline and management. New York: Macmillan.
Franklin, V.L. (1989)﹒Teacher efficacy and selected organization climate variables in urban and suburban school setting﹒Dissertation Abstracts International,50,06A﹒
Gibson, S. & Dembo, M.H. (1984) Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
Gilleskie, D.B & Harrison, A.L. (1998).The effect of endogenous health inputs on the relationship between health and education. Economics of Education Review, 17, 279-295.
Good, T.L. (1979)﹒Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school﹒Journal of Teacher Education,30(2),52-64﹒
Greenberg, J. S.(2000)。壓力管理(潘正德譯)。臺北:心理(原著出版於1995)。
Greenwood, G.F.,Olejnik, S.F.,& Parkay, F.W. (1990)﹒Relationships between four teacher efficacy belief patterns and selected teacher characteristics﹒Journal of Research and Development in Educational,23,102-106﹒
Griffith, J. (2002). Is quality/effectiveness an empirically demonstrable school attribute? Statistical aids for determining appropriate levels of analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13(1), 91-122.
Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255.
Guskey, T. R. (1981), ‘Measurement of responsibility teachers assume for academic successes and failures in the classroom, Journal of Teacher Education 32, 44–51.
Guskey, T.R. (1988)﹒Teacher efficacy,self-concept and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation﹒Teaching and Teacher Education,4,63-69﹒
Guthrie, J.T. (1983).Research views:Classroom management.Reading Teacher,36,606-608.
Hanslukwa, H.E. (1985 ). Measuring the health of populations. Indicators and interpretations. Social Science and Medicine, 20, 1207-1224.
Harris, B.M.& Hill, J. (1981)﹒The Detek handbook﹒National Educational Laboratory publishers Inc﹒
Hill, F.H. (1991 )﹒Assessing the relationship between reflective practice,content knowledge and teaching effectiveness of student Teachers﹒(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.338565)﹒
Hoover-Dempsey﹐K.V. ﹐Bassler﹐O.C. & Brissie﹐J.S. (1987). Parent involvement:Contributions of teacher efficacy﹐school socioeconomic status and other school characteristic. American Education Research Journal,24(3)﹐417-435.
Leigh,P. (1983). Direct and indirect effect of education on health. Social science Medicine, 17(4) , 227-234.
Lu, J.R., Tseng ,H.M., Tsai ,Y.J. (2003). Assessment of health-related quality of life in Taiwan (I): Development and psychometric testing of SF-36 Taiwan version. Taiwan J Public Health., 22(6), 501-511.
Marsh,H.W., & Bailey,M.(1991). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A profile analysis. Australia, New South Wales:Geographic srce./country of publication.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 310).
McDowell, I., Newell, C. (1996). Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mchaney, J.H. , & Impey, W.D. (1992). Strategies for analyzing and evaluating teaching effectiveness using a clinical supervision mode l . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 354268).
McHorney, C.A. (1996). Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 Health Survey.
McHorney, C.A., Kosinski M., Ware J.E. (1994). Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results form a nation survey. Medical Care, 32(6), 551-567.
McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E., Lu, J.F.R., Sherbourne, C.D.(1994). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Test of data quality, scaling assumptions,and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32(4), 40-66.
McHorney, C.A., Ware, J.E., Raczek, A.E. (1993). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31(3), 247-263.
Modaff, W.M.(1992)﹒The Development of the Student Audit Teacher Behaviors﹒University of Missouri﹒
Moneys, S.M. (1992 )﹒What is teaching effectiveness?A survey of student and teacher perceptions of teacher effectiveness﹒(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No﹒ED 351 056)﹒
Mushkin, S. (1962). Health as an investment. Journal of Political Economy, 70(2),129-157.
Roy, S.C.(1976). Introduction to nursing: An adaptation model. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
Ryan, K.,& Phillips, D.H. (1982)﹒Teacher characteristics﹒In H.E. Mitzel (Ed. ),Encyclopedia of Educational Research, (1869-1875)﹒NY:Free Press﹒
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Steven, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 667-680.
Sullivan, M., Karlsson, J., Ware, J.E. (1995). The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey: I.Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10),1349-1358.
United States Department of Health and Human Services.(1996). Physical activity and health:A report of the Surgeon General Executive Summary.Washington,DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Ware, J.E., Gandek, B. (1998). Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions,and reliability: The IQOLA Project approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,51(11), 945-952.
Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Gandek, B., Aaronson, N.K., Apolone, G., Bech, P. (1998).The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in ten countries: Results from the IQOLA Project. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(11), 1159-1165.
Ware, J.E., Keller, S.D.,Gandek, B.,Brazier, J.E. Sullivan, M., IQOLA Project Group. (1995). Evaluating translations of health status questionnaires: Methods from the IQOLA Project. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 11(3), 525-551.
Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M., Keller, S.D. (1994). SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. Boston,MA: The Health Institute.
Ware, JE,& Sherbourne, CD. (1992)The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-483.
Ware, J.E., Snow, K.K., Kosinski, M. (1993). SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Hospital.