Author: |
許慧瑜 Hui-Yu Hsu |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
國民中學導師班級經營人際與自我層面之研究 Research on Interpersonal Aspects of Classroom Management of Junior High School Homeroom Teacher |
Advisor: |
林世華
Lin, Sieh-Hwa |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
教育心理與輔導學系 Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2010 |
Academic Year: | 98 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 197 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 導師 、班級經營 、人際層面 、角色定位 、因應策略 |
Keywords (in English): | homeroom teacher, classroom management, interpersonal aspect, role-setting, coping strategies |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 110 Downloads: 0 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究旨在了解國民中學導師班級經營人際層面之現況。研究目的為:
一、了解國中導師從事班級經營時,對學生的想法與互動策略。
二、了解國中導師從事班級經營時,對家長、班級科任教師、學校行政的想法與互動策略。
三、了解國中導師從事班級經營時,導師角色定位與自我因應策略。
本研究選取十位不同科別的國中教師,透過訪談的方式,進行資料蒐集。根據文獻探討、研究分析與討論,結論如下:
一、學生層面:受訪教師表示學生兼具正面及負面特質,教師應多關注其正面特質,並採用適當的方法與之互動。互動策略包括:「建立關係」、「了解學生」、「有效溝通」、「建立常規」、「適當管教」。
二、家長層面:受訪教師肯定家長的重要,並認為現在家長形形色色,因此應注意與家長的互動技巧。互動策略方面,教師強調:「親師聯絡」與「親師溝通」兩個概念。
三、班級科任教師層面:受訪教師認為導師與班級科任教師是夥伴關係;互動時,採取「配合協助」及「溝通協調」等策略。
四、學校行政人員層面:受訪教師認為行政是班級經營的支援,導師與行政各司其職照顧學生;互動時強調「不會輕易將學生送行政處理」與「直接溝通、說明需求」。
五、導師自我層面:受訪教師表示導師「工作繁複」、「角色多重」及「導師角色定位因自身的親職經驗而有所改變」。在自我因應策略上,包括「彈性與改變」、「正向詮釋」、「累積經驗」、「身心準備」、「專業成長」、「壓力調適」與「宗教信仰」。
最後依據本研究之結論,提出建議,作為國中導師、學校行政單位、教育主管機關及未來研究者的參考。
This study aimed to realize the current state of interpersonal aspects of classroom management of junior high school homeroom teachers. There were three purposes in this study:
1. to find out what the homeroom teachers thought about students and how they interacted with students;
2. to find out what the homeroom teachers thought about parents, subject teachers and the administration and how they interacted with parents, subject teachers and the administration;
3. to find out what the homeroom teachers thought about themselves and the coping strategies they used when they were in classroom management.
Ten teachers of different subjects were selected and interviewed to collect data. According to literature review, data analysis and discussion, results were as follows:
1.Students:Teacher surveyed indicated that students had both positive and negative characteristics, they suggested that teachers should pay more attention to the positive characteristics of students and use appropriate methods to interact with students. The strategies they used were: build relationships, understand students, communicate effectively, set up rules and discipline appropriately.
2.Parents:Teacher surveyed approved of the importance of parents and they mentioned that there were all kinds of parents nowadays so teachers should note the skills of interacting with parents. As for interactiive strategies, they emphasized the concept of connecting and communicating with parents. Teacher contacted with parents in different ways and they mentioned that when communicating with parents teachers should talk skilfully and clearly.
3.Subject teachers:Teacher surveyed viewed subject teachers as partners; when interacting with subject teachers, the strateies they used were assistance, communication and coordination.
4.Administration:Teacher surveyed viewed the adminstration as supports; when interacting with the adminstration, they mentioned that they seldom sent students to the administration and if in need they would communicate directly with an indication of needs.
5.Homeroom teacher self:Teacher surveyed expressed that the job they did were complicated, the roles they played were multiple, and that their role-setting of homeroom teacher has changed due to their own parenting experience. As for coping startegies, they empahsized flexibility and change, positive interpretation, experience accumulating, physical and mental preparation, professional growth, pressure adjustment and religious belief.
Finally, based on the conclusion of this research above, the researcher offers some suggestions for homeroom teachers, school and educational administrative authorities and future study.
中文部分
王以仁、陳芳玲、林本喬 (2005)。教師心理衛生。台北:心理出版社。
吳宗立 (2002)。班級經營:班級社會學。高雄:復文。
吳明隆 (2006)。班級經營:理論與實務。台北:五南。
吳耀明 (2005)。國小班級經營問題及其解決策略之研究。台東大學教育學報, 16(1),113-150。
林素卿 (2000)。國民中學班級經營問題及解決策略之研究。教育學刊, 16, 211-254。
孫旻儀、王鍾和 (2007)。國中教師管教方式與學生在校學習動機關係之探討。 國民教育研究學報, 18,165-193。
高博銓 (2008)。班級經營的問題與策略。研習資訊, 25(4),85-90。
張文賢 (2007)。國中電腦教師工作壓力與因應策略。中等教育,58(2),52-79。
張民杰 (2007)。班級經營:學說與案例應用 (二版)。台北:高等教育。
張德銳、簡賢昌、丁一顧 (2006)。中小學優良教師專業發展歷程之研究。教育資料與研究雙月刊,68,23-42。
張鐸嚴、林月琴、劉緬懷 (2002)。班級經營。台北:空中大學。
郭丁熒 (2001)。臺灣小學教師角色知覺差距因應方式之探討-調查、內容分析、及潛在類別分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,11(1), 93-112。
陳木金 (2006)。從班級經營策略對教學效能影響看師資培育的實務取向。 教育研究與發展期刊,2(1),33-62。
陳素惠 (2005)。教師工作壓力探討。諮商與輔導,229,28-34。
陳鳳禧 (2005)。現代教師壓力及其因應策略。發表於:國民中小學教師專業發展學術研討會。
曾守誌 (2003)。九年一貫課程實施國民中學導師工作壓力與調適策略之研究。 國立彰化師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
楊百世 (2008)。初任教師班級經營之協同行動研究:以餐旅國中為例。高雄:復文。
甄曉蘭 (2004).。中小學教師的專業成長. 載於中國教育學會、中華民國師範教育學會(合編)。教師專業成長問題研究:理念、問題與革新 (54-72頁). 台北:學富。
劉素倫、林清文 (2007)。國中教師班級經營與學生學習動機之研究。諮商與輔導學報,29(1),1-24。
韓玉芬 (2004)。初任教師工作壓力因應歷程之質的研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
簡紅珠 (2006)。以學習成就為主的教師效能研究與教師評鑑。教育資料與研究雙月刊,73,75-90。
魏麗敏、黃德祥 (2002)。國中與國小班級導師之特質、班級經營風格與教師寵物現象之相關研究。台中師院學報,16,253-270。
西文部分
Adams, K. S., & Christenson, S. L. (2000). Trust and the family–school relationship examination of parent–teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38(5), 477-497
Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 3-15.
Barnas, M. (2000). "Parenting" students: applying developmental psychology to the college classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 27, 275-276.
Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 17-43). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Burden, P. R. (2003). Classroom management: Creating a successful learning community (2 ed.). New York: Wiley.
Chang, L., Liu, H., Wen, Z., Fung, K. Y., Wang, Y., & Xu, Y. (2004). Mediating teacher liking and moderating authoritative teachering on Chinese adolescents' perceptions of antisocial and prosocial behaviors. Journal of educational psychology 96(2), 369-380.
Christenson, S. L. (2003). The family-school partnership: an opportunity to promote the learning competence of all students. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(4), 454-482.
Cox, D. D. (2005). Evidence-based interventions using home-school collaboration. School psychology quarterly, 20(4), 473-497.
Elias, M. J., & Schwab, Y. (2006). From compliance to responsibility: Social and emotional learning and classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 309-341). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmer, E. T., & Gerwels, M. C. (2006). Classroom management in middle and high school classrooms. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 407-437). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: a critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 103-112.
Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as a field of inquiry. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 3-15). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Friedman, I. A. (2006). Classroom management and teacher stress and burnout. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 925-944). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10 ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Gregory, A., & Ripski, M. B. (2008). Adolescent trust in teachers: Implications for behavior in the high school classroom. School Psychology Review, 37, 337-353.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: a necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(8), 1302-1316.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children's school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625-638.
Ho, I. T. (2001). Are Chinese teachers authoritarian? In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner : Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 99-114). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong.
Holliday, C. O. (2005). The human connection. The Clearing House, 79(1), 21-23.
Houghton, P. (2001). Finding allies: sustaining teachers' health and well-being. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(9), 706.
Hoy, A. W., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Student and teacher perspectives on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 181-219). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hughes, J., & Kwok, O.-m. (2007). Influence of student–teacher and parent–teacher relationships on lower achieving readers' engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 39-51.
Hughes, J. N. (2002). Authoritative teaching: tipping the balance in favor of school versus peer effects. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 485-492.
Hughes, J. N., Cavel, T. A., & Willson, V. (2001). Further support for the developmental significance of the quality of the teacher-student relationship. Journal of School Psychology, 39(4), 289-301.
Humphreys, T. (2000). 教師與班級經營(曾端真、曾玲珉譯)。台北:揚智文化(原著於1996出版)。
Jones, V. (2006). How do teachers learn to be effective classroom managers? In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Jones, V. (2006). How do teachers learn to be effective classroom managers? In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 887-907). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jones, V. F., & Jones, L. S. (2007). Comprehensive classroom management : Creating communities of support and solving problems (8 ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
Kauchak, D. P., & Eggen, P. D. (2007). Learning and teaching : Research-based methods (5 ed.). Boston: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology: Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.
Kuntsche, E., Gmel, G., & Rehm, J. (2006). The Swiss teaching style questionnaire (STSO) and adolescent problem behaviour. Swiss journal of psychology 65(3), 147-155.
Landau, B. M. (2001). Teaching classroom management: a stand-alone necessity for preparing new teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Manning, M. L., & Bucher, K. T. (2007). Classroom management: Models, applications, and cases (2 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson /Merrill Prentice Hall.
Marzano, R., Marzano, J., & Pickering, D. J. (2006). 有效的班級經營—以研究為根據的策略(賴麗珍譯)。台北市:心理(原著於2003出版)。
Marzano, R. J., & Marzano, J. S. (2003). The key to classroom management. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 6-18.
McCANN, T. M., & Johannessen, L. R. (2004). Why do new teachers cry. The Clearing House, 77(4), 138-145.
Milner, H. R. (2006). Classroom management in urban classrooms. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 491-522). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mitchell, M. G. (2005). The essentials of teaching in secondary classrooms: A basic guide for new teachers. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
O’Connor, E., & McCarthney, K. (2007). Examining teacher-child relationships and achievement as part of an ecological model of development. American Educational Research Journal, 44(2), 340-369.
Pellerin, L. A. (2005). Applying Baumrind's parenting typology to high schools: toward a middle-range theory of authoritative socialization. Social Science Research, 34(2), 283-303.
Savage, T. V., Savage, M. K., & Armstrong, D. G. (2006). Teaching in the secondary school (6 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518-524.
Smith, H. A. (2007). Teaching adolescents: Educational psychology as a science of signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Stough, L. M. (2006). The place of classroom management and standards in teacher education. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 909-923). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Walker, J. M. T. (2008). Looking at teacher practices through the lens of parenting style. The Journal of Experimental Education 76(2), 218 - 240
Walker, J. M. T. (2009). Authoritative classroom management: how control and nurturance work together. Theory Into Practice, 48(2), 122-129.
Walker, J. M. T., & Hoover-Dempsey, K. V. (2006). Why research on parental involvement is important to classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 665-684). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Weinstein, C. S. (2003). Secondary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice (2 ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287 - 301.
Witmer, M. M. (2005). The fourth R in education—relationships. The Clearing House 78(5), 224-228.