Author: |
黃獻淳 |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
曝光量與版材硬度對於柔版印刷品質之影響 The Impact of the Exposure and Hardness of the Photopolymer Plates on Flexographic Printing Quality |
Advisor: |
謝顒丞
Hsieh, Yung-Cheng |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
圖文傳播學系 Department of Graphic Arts and Communications |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2005 |
Academic Year: | 93 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 173 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 柔版印刷 、感光樹脂 、正曝光 、背曝光 、硬度 、印紋深度 、肩部角度 |
Keywords (in English): | Flexography, Photopolymer Plates, Main Exposure, Back Exposure, Hardness, Relief Depth, Shoulder Angle |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 329 Downloads: 11 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究主要針對柔版製版的過程做探討,選定的研究因子為:版材硬度、背曝光時間以及正曝光時間。探討的反應變量為:2%網點擴大、10%網點擴大、50%網點擴大、90%網點擴大、滿版濃度以及印刷反差。經由23全因子實驗設計,得到了8種配方。經由實際的印刷機測試後,得到了待分析的印刷樣張。藉由分光濃度計的量測,得到了原始的印樣數據。最後經由統計軟體實施各種的統計分析後,得到以下的結論:對2%及10%網點而言,版材硬度及正曝光時間是顯著的因子。較硬的版材及較短的正曝光時間有助於降低網點擴大的程度。對於50%及90%網點而言,情況竟然相反,這時較軟的版材反而使得網點擴大的程度降低。相較於版材硬度,背曝光時間與正曝光時間這2個因子在50%及90%網點處,則沒有太顯著的效用。相同的情形亦出現在滿版濃度與印刷反差這2個反應變量上。因此,在本研究中,就影響程度而言,版材硬度對於瓦楞紙板印刷是有最顯著影響程度的。而背曝光時間,則對於各個反應變量的影響程度最小,甚至是不顯著。
The main purpose of this research was intended as an investigation of the impact of different exposures and hardness of the photopolymer plates on flexographic printing quality. The hardness of the photopolymer plates, back exposures and main exposures were independent variables in this research. The concerns were to examine the variations and differences of dot gain, solid ink density and print contrast, which were resulted from the three independent variables. A 23 full factorial experiment was used for the study. Through the design of experiments, eight treatments for the practical printing experiment were constructed. The resulting printed dot areas were measured and analyzed statistically. The following conclusions were found: (1) the hardness of the photopolymer plates and main exposures were the significant factors at 2% and 10% dot areas, and (2) the harder photopolymer plates and the shorter main exposures could reduce the dot gain significantly. In contrast, (3) the softer photopolymer plates reduced more dot gain than the harder one did at 50% and 90% dot areas. To sum up, the hardness of photopolymer plates has the highest degree of impact on corrugated printing among the three independent variables. In comparison, the back exposures had less, even not significant, impact on flexographic printing quality.
一、 中文文獻:
〈超薄版0.76mm的神奇奧妙〉(1999)。台灣Flexo彩集。2003/03/25,取自:http://www.taiwanflexo.com.tw/taiwan.htm。
〈熱敏柔性版直接製版技術〉(2002)。大中華印藝網。2003/03/30,取自:http://www.cgan.com/science/special/softprint/dtsoftprint.htm。
林資碩(2002)。〈台灣柔版應用:概況與前膽〉。《印刷人》,第150期,頁53。
涂秋山(1995)。〈FLEXO到底是什麼?〉。龍臣印刷科技網。2002/10/14,取自:http://www.flexotech.com.tw/chinese_t/info/info_02.htm。
梁木村(2002)。〈感光樹脂版:特性與應用〉。《印刷人》,第150期,頁49。
陳政雄(2002)。〈柔版為何在21世紀成為有潛力的版式〉。《印刷人》,第149期,頁63。
黃秀臣(無日期)。〈柔性版在印刷藝術的表現〉。龍臣印刷科技網。2002/10/14,取自:http://www.flexotech.com.tw/chinese_t/info/info_07.htm。
楊志鋼(2003)。〈世界柔印市場與發展(上)〉。必勝網。2002/11/12,取自:http://www.bisenet.com/new/NewsDetail/?id=549。
簡正宗(2001)。《彈性凸版不同背曝光時間對色彩變異的影響》。中國文化大學印刷傳播研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
譚俊嶠(2001)。〈柔性版印刷被廣泛應用的主要理由〉。2002/11/18,中國包裝器材網。取自:http://www.cpma.com.cn/bao/20011130-904.htm。
二、 英文文獻:
Agfa Educational Publishing. (1997). An introduction to digital prepress for flexography & packaging. Randolph, MA: Author.
Cisternino, M. (2003). Flexo printers ready for the challenge. 2003 GATF Technology Forecast, 56-57.
Dahl, A., & Emmerling, R. (1996). The FQC plate construction project. Flexo, 21(11), 32-40.
DeJidas, L. P. & Destree, T. M. (1989). Quality and productivity in the Graphic Arts. Livonia, NY: Graphic Arts Publishing Co.
DeJidas, L. P. & Destree, T. M. (1995). Sheetfed Offset Press Operating (2nd ed.). Pennsylvania: Graphic Arts Technical Foundation.
DuPont (n.d.). All about Flexo: Market segments. Retrieved October 1, 2002 from DuPont Cyrel Pakaging Graphics, Web site: http://www.cyrel.dupont.com/asia/english/flexo/marketsegments.asp?regid=1&langid=2
Foundation of Flexographic Technical Association (1999). FIRST: Flexographic Image Reproduction Specifications & Tolerances (2nd ed.). Ronkonkoma, NY: Foundation of Flexographic Technical Association.
Foundation of Flexographic Technical Association (1999). Flexography: Principles and practices (fifth ed.). Ronkonkoma, NY: Foundation of Flexographic Technical Association [FTA].
Hsieh, Yung-Cheng (1998). Measuring dot gain from film to plate: Murray-Davies or Yule-Nielsen equation?. Visual Communications Journal, 24-30.
Jansen, V. (1998). A brief on lastest developments in Photopolymer plate technology. Retrieved October 12, 2000 from Taiwan Flexography Collection, Web site: http://www.taiwanflexo.com.tw/taiwan.htm
Kannurpatti, A. R. & Taylor, B. K. (2001). Taming Photopolymerization. Flexo, 26(11), 12-16.
McConnell, T. (2001). Perception is reality. Flexo, 26(2), 34-37.
Packages: A Limitless Market Potential (2000). Retrieved May 7, 2002 from Printcomasia.com, Web site: http://www.printcomasia.com
Romano, R. M., Romano, F. J., Oresick, P., Destree, T. M., Kendra, E. L., & Romano, R. J. (Eds.). (1998). The GATF Encyclopedia of Graphic Communications, Pittsburgh, PA: GATFPress.
Simpson, P. (2003). Labels and packaging paper in 2003: Custom, color, digital and security. 2003 GATF Technology Forecast, 18-19.
Southworth, M., & Southworth, D. (1989). Quality and productivity in the Graphic Arts. Livonia, NY: Graphic Arts Publishing Co.
Specifications Web Offset Publications [SWOP] (1998). Specifications for Web Offset Publications. NY: Author.
Tritton, K. (1996). Stochastic screening. UK: Pira International.
Warfford, M. J. (1997). Shoulder Angle Determination with Flexographic Photopolymer Plate Material (pp. 906-929). Rochester, NY: TAGA.
White, A. (1998). High quality Flexography (2nd ed.). Surrey, UK: Pira International.
Wyatt, R. (1994). Happy birthday, Photopolymer. Flexo, 19(1), 34-37.