Author: |
張玉如 |
---|---|
Thesis Title: |
運用視覺創意教學於國中環境藝術教育之研究— 以綠色生活地圖製作為例 A Study on the Influences of Students’ Creativity Enhanced by Creative Visual Thinking Instruction on Environmental Art Education in Junior High School— Using the Making of Green Map as an Example |
Advisor: | 林仁傑 |
Degree: |
碩士 Master |
Department: |
美術學系 Department of Fine Arts |
Thesis Publication Year: | 2015 |
Academic Year: | 103 |
Language: | 中文 |
Number of pages: | 142 |
Keywords (in Chinese): | 視覺創意教學 、創造力 、環境藝術教育 、綠色生活地圖 |
Keywords (in English): | creative visual thinking instruction, creativity, environmental art education, Green Map |
DOI URL: | https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202205266 |
Thesis Type: | Academic thesis/ dissertation |
Reference times: | Clicks: 120 Downloads: 23 |
Share: |
School Collection Retrieve National Library Collection Retrieve Error Report |
本研究旨在探討運用視覺創意教學於綠色生活地圖繪製,對提升國中學生創造力之影響。本研究採不相等控制組前後測設計的準實驗研究方法。樣本取自台北市某國中七年級四個班級:實驗組62名學生以視覺創意教學方案進行綠活圖繪製;控制組62名學生以一般美術教學方案進行教學,實施每週一節、為期八週的實驗教學。研究工具有「新編創造思考測驗」和「威廉斯創造性傾向量表」分別作為測量學童創造力認知領域和情意領域之工具,在教學實驗前、後分別實施測驗,進行統計分析,並輔以質性資料(包含教學省思、訪談、課程回饋單等)。量化資料以獨立樣本單因子共變數進行分析,質化資料則以內容分析為主。
本研究結果為:
一、運用視覺創意教學於國中環境藝術教育具可行性,透過課堂活動鼓勵學生思考與觸發想法,在綠色生活地圖繪製時運用圖像表現策略,有助於提供學生創意具體呈現的方法,不僅增進學習興趣和深化關懷社區環境的意識,更讓創造力豐富綠活圖的視覺設計。
二、本研究所發展的視覺創意教學,未能整體提升學生的創造性認知能力,但在
語文能力的獨創力、圖形能力的流暢力、變通力與精進力有顯著差異;在創造性情意特質部分,實驗組優於控制組,創造性傾向的總分和挑戰性達到顯著差異。
This study is aimed to discuss the influences of students’ creativity enhanced by the application of creative visual thinking in the making of green maps. Research method used in this study is the quasi-experiment of the nonequivalent pretest-posttest design. Four classes from the 7th grade of a junior high school in Taipei City were selected as the sample for study. The experimental group consists of 62 students applying creative visual thinking instruction in the making of green maps; the control group consists of another 62 students applying general teaching strategies in the learning of visual arts. The whole experimental teaching lasted two months, one session per week. Research instruments include the “New Creative Thinking Test” developed by Dr. Wu Ching-chi and “Test of Divergent Feeling” in Williams Creative Assessment Packet. The quantitative data were analyzed by one-way ANCOVA using the pretest-posttest results and analyzed according to control-experimental groups. The qualitative data were from students’ Green Map artwork assignment, students’ feedback of the instruction. The results of this study were as follows:
Firstly, it is feasible to apply creative visual thinking instruction in environmental art education in junior high school. Teachers encouraged students to care more about their community through the application of Green Map concept in teaching, and improve students’ thinking ability with the implementation of creative visual thinking instruction. These strategies not only stimulate students’ motivation to learn, but give students an opportunity to show their creativity in the visual image design of Green Map.
Secondly, in this study, the application of creative visual thinking instruction could not entirely enhance students’ creative cognition, but showed significant differences in certain aspects: the scores of the “New Creative Thinking Test” on “originality” of figural creative thinking abilities; the “fluency”, “flexibility” and “elaboration” of verbal creative thinking abilities in the experimental group were superior to the control group. In terms of creative thinking and sensitivity, students from the experimental group made significantly greater gains in “Test of Divergent Feeling” on total score and “quality of challenge” than those from the control group.
中文文獻
王 鑫(1987)。環境保護教育理念架構之規劃報告。行政院國家科學委員會專
題研究計畫成果報告。
王木榮、林幸台 (1994)。威廉斯創造力測驗指導手冊。台北:心理。
王其敏(1997)。視覺創意-思考與方法。台北﹕正中。
王其敏(2005)。運用『圖像表現策略』創作廣告作品之教學研究。ICSCC2005永續與文化創意設計國際研討會論文集。
王其敏(2005)。視覺思維與創意教學研究。富邦傳播叢書, 台北:揚智。
王佳玲(2005)。創造思考教學策略運用於社區取向藝術教學之研究—以嘉義縣竹崎國小五年級美術才能班為例。南華大學美學與藝術管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台(2000)。創造力研究。台北:心理。
毛連塭 (2003)。對創造力研究的發展。載於毛連塭、郭有遹、陳龍安、林幸台,創造力研究。台北:心理。
林秀珊 (2007)。視覺藝術創造思考教學活動對國中美術班學生創造力表現之影響。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育學系所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
洪榮昭 (2003)。提升創意教學成效之研究。國科會研究報告(未出版)。
洪惠瑕 (2008)。創造思考教學運用於美術課程以提升國中生創造力之研究。高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
周 儒(1999)。環境教育的神話與迷思。環境教育科學技術專刊,16,1-6。
周如琪 (2012)。國中藝術與人文課程結合綠色生活地圖之課程研究-以苗栗縣立建國國中為例。國立臺灣藝術大學美術教學碩士論文。未出版,新北市。
吳靜吉 (1998)。新編創造思考測驗研究。教育部輔導工作六年計畫研究報告。臺北:教育部。
高燦榮(2006)。環境藝術。台北:南天。
郭禎祥、趙惠玲(2002)。視覺文化與藝術教育。載於黃壬來主編。藝術與人文教育(325-359頁)。台北市:桂冠。
黃心怡(2007)。視覺創意教學提升國中學生創造力之行動研究。淡江大學教育科技學系在職專班碩士論文,未出版,新北市。
徐慶宏、林惠文(2007)。創新地圖教學─社區綠活圖課程的實踐。新竹教育大學「中華民國課程與教學學會第十六屆課程與教學論壇研討會」,新竹市。
陳英豪、吳鐵雄、簡真真(1980)。創造性思考與情意的教學。高雄:復文。
陳奐宇(2000)。創造思考教學對圖形創造力影響之研究-以國小四年級與六年級普通班比較。國立台灣師範大學美術研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳昭儀(1991)。創造歷程階段論。創造思考教育,3,46-49。
陳維治(2013)。使用綠色生活地圖作為環境教育課程發展與教學策略之研究。國立東華大學碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
陳龍安(2000)。創造思考教學。台北市:師苑。
陳龍安(2006)。創造思考教學的理論與實際。台北:心理。
彭震球(1991)。創造性教學之實踐。台北市 :五南。
張子超(2001)。環境教育課程設計。台北:師大。
張玉成(1983)。教師發問技巧及其對學生創造思考能力的影響。台北:教育部。
張美智(2003)。環境藝術教育之理論建構與教學實驗研究。新竹師範學院美勞教學碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
張春興(1989)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:東華。
雍士賢 ( 2007 )。應用綠色生活地圖輔助指認地區特色之研究。都市計劃學系碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
楊冠政(1998)。環境教育。臺北:明文。
荒野保護協會(2005)。地圖有氧運動Green Map。臺北市:野人文化。
廖敦如(2005)。建構環境藝術教育課程設計與實施之行動研究。師大學報教育類,50,45-68。
蔡秉恆、溫嘉榮、黃天佑( 2008)。以Big Six Skills 資訊問題解決歷程培養創造力成效之研究。數位學習科技期刊,1,13-24。
鄭淑如(2006)。環境教育融入國中藝術與人文領域教學之研究。國立彰化師範大學藝術教育研究所碩士論文。未出版,彰化市。
盧安來(1995)。國小美勞教育與環境教育結合的構想與實施。藝術家,237,246-256。
羅玲妃譯,Buzan, T.& Buzan, B.著(1998)。心智繪圖-思想整合利器。台北:一智。
外文文獻
Efland, A. D., Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (1996). Postmodern art education: An approach to curriculum. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
Graves, G. W. (1999). Curriculum evaluation: One approach for assessing built environment education in the classroom. In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.),
Built environment education in art education (pp.194-209). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Green Map Japan (2005). Green Map Activity Guide. Green Map Japan, Inc .
Gruber, H. E. (1989). The evolving systems apporoach to creative work. In D. B. Wallance & H. E. Gruber (Eds.), Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp.3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Tulloch, D. (2004). The Green Map System as a Means for PPGIS Education and
Exploration .3rd Annual Public Participation GIS Conference, Madison, WI.
Hicks, L. E., & King, R. J. H. (1999). Mapping a sense of place: A contextualzed approach to designed environments. In J. K. Guilfoil & A. R. Sandler(Eds.), Built environment education in art education, pp.10-17. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurement used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds(Eds.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Plenum Press.
Merriam-Webster. (2005). Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.
Pettifer, S. C., Marsh, J. and West, A. (2000) Deva 3: Architecture for a large-scale distributed virtual reality system. Proceedings of ACM Symposium in Virtual Reality Software and Technology (pp.33-39). Seoul, Korea: ACM Press.
Rober H. M. (1972). Expriences in Visual Thinking. Monterey, CA:Brooks J.Cole Publishing Company.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. L. (1996). Investing in creativity.American Psychologist, 51(7), 77-688.
Taylor, C. W. ( 1959 ). Identifying the creative individual. In E.P. Torrance (Ed.), Creativity : Proceedings of the second Minnesota conference on gifted children.
Tulloch, D., & Graff, E. (2007). Green Map Exercises as an Avenue for Problem-Based Learning in a Data-Rich Environment. Journal of Geography, 106, 267-276.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt-Brace.
Williams, F. E.(1972). Encouragging creative potential. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Williams, F. E. ( 1980 ) . Creativity assessment packet ( CAP ) : manual. Buffalo, NY: D. O. K. Publishers. Inc.
Wiles, J. (1985). The mind of invention: Activities to stimulate creative thinking. New York: Freeman Press.